By Dick Hall-Sizemore

There has been considerable discussion on this blog as to which agency has been the biggest failure in the face of the pandemic. Many have placed the heaviest blame on the Department of Health. I would award the prize for the being the biggest failure to the Virginia Employment Commission (VEC).

The Department of Health certainly has had its problems and failures, but it has had to face a complex environment. For examples, it was dealing with a disease about which little was known at first, including its major method of transmission; the most vulnerable citizens were those in nursing homes, which are controlled by private owners; and it is dependent on other actors, such as hospitals and local health departments, for its data.

On the other hand, VEC has one primary mission—get out checks promptly to people who have lost their jobs. It largely failed at that job.

One year after the pandemic began, there are still people who are waiting for their benefits. One claimant got two letters from VEC on the same day. One letter said that he was ineligible for the benefits he had received and was liable to repay $19,650. The other letter notified him that he had been found eligible for benefits.

There are two main reasons for these failures. First, the agency has been neglected in the past and there have been administrative failures. Second, the pandemic was unprecedented and presented unprecedented problems for the agency, as it did for most agencies.

The agency is an easy one for administrations and legislatures to neglect. It is funded entirely by nongeneral funds: federal funds and revenue from employer taxes. Such agencies generally operate in their own little world, unbothered by the administration or the legislature.  They do not ask for general fund appropriations. As long as they do their job, no one pays much attention to them. And, in the past, VEC has generally executed its functions with little complaint from the public.

That is not to say there have not been administrative failures. At the beginning of the problems brought on by the pandemic, VEC officials used the excuse that the agency’s computer system was obsolete, operating on 1980’s technology. However, as I pointed out in a post last year, the legislature long ago provided the authorization and appropriation to upgrade VEC’s system. Prior directors and  administrations dragged their feet in carrying out the upgrades, with the result that, after 15 years, its completion was finally projected for December 2020. After all, in the past, there really was no urgency to make this work a priority. The current VEC administration bore the brunt of the criticism resulting from the failure of prior administrators.

COVID-19 brought unprecedented problems. First and foremost, there was the deluge of claims. According to VEC, since March 2020, it has received more than 1.5 million claims. That is more than three times the average received during recent economic recessions. Another point of comparison would be 2019, the most recent year prior to the pandemic, when the agency received a total of 134,957 claims. The agency simply was not staffed to process the volume that descended upon it. For example, there were not enough operators to handle the volume of calls, frustrating many desperate people.

Another problem was created by the supplementary payments provided by the federal government. While welcomed by the unemployed, it took considerable time to program that obsolete VEC information system to handle this different category of funding and to handle the categories newly created by the federal COVID legislation, primarily self-employed individuals.

In December, the Northam administration made the decision to begin making payments to people whose applications had been on hold, some for months, pending staff review. Many of those applications were of people who had been originally approved and then had payments stopped because something in their file had been flagged. The most common issue for stoppage of payments related to the way the claimant left his job. In short, the administration decided to let the paperwork catch up with the payments. If someone was subsequently found to be ineligible, he would be required to pay the money back.

The Governor recently signed legislation (HB 2040) that would codify this authorization until the end of FY 2022. Furthermore, the legislation requires VEC to waive the obligation to repay any overpayment “if (i) the overpayment was made without fault on the part of the individual and (ii) requiring repayment would be contrary to equity and good conscience.” (In order that any loss from this provision not be reflected in the tax paid by employers, the legislature provided almost $19 million in general fund appropriation to cover it.)

My Soapbox

Through no fault of its own, the current VEC administration was woefully unprepared for the flood of claims resulting from the closing of businesses due to COVID-19. However, despite the very public problems and public outcry, the Northam administration was slow to react. It was not until December that it made the decision to continue payments for claimants whose files had been flagged and were being reviewed by senior staff.

I realize that it takes time to train new employees to provide information to potential claimants and to review claims. However, it seems that some steps could have been taken to improve service. For example, the administration could have contracted with private companies to provide more people to answer telephones. Those operators may have been in New Mexico and not have been able to provide more than basic information, but at least desperate unemployed persons could have been able to talk to someone rather than being but on indefinite hold. Another possibility would have been the establishment of large registration sites in armories, school gymnasiums, etc., where claimants could have gone to get help submitting their claims via computer. These sites could have been staffed by retired VEC personnel.

Finally, it is apparent that these delays in getting payments to claimants constitute some justification for the moratorium on evictions and shutoffs related to back rent and utility payments.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

12 responses to “VEC Gets the Booby Prize”

  1. I’ve got to say, it’s a crowded field for the “biggest failure in responding to COVID” award. There’s VDH. And who can forget the lack of leadership of the Virginia Department of Health. But you make a good case for the VEC.

    As you rightly point out, the VEC was understaffed for a black swan event like the pandemic. No reasonable person would fault them for falling behind initially. The failure came in the slow reaction. After a month or two, it should have been manifestly evident that the VEC was undermanned, that the layoffs were not letting up, and that people were hurting from not getting their UI checks.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Or, all of that would have manifested itself in the exercises of a pandemic flu emergency that several administrations failed to run. The scenario in the Annex predicted a huge surge in unemployment

  2. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Amazingly, they did have the foresight not to shutter the VEC for the pandemic.

  3. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    State agencies were not designed to be nimble and flexible and whether it’s VDH or VEC or the schools, there’s lots of “fail”. And it’s not just Virginia.

    It’s very hard to modernize state agencies or even some types of businesses that were never really tasked to change quickly. It often means changing the way they do businesses and risks breaking things.

    In the private sector, the more nimble competitors force change, in Govt , there is no such force and the guy/gals in charge – know it.

    There is no penalty for not changing fast.. just lots of grumbling… from the disaffected who are mostly impotent.

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Bravo! All the more reason to cut the size of government and lower taxes. Why keep expanding a systemically broken organization?

  4. James C. Sherlock Avatar
    James C. Sherlock

    VEC has perhaps the most concise mission in the state government and has screwed it up entirely. If it can’t process unemployment claims, what use is it.

    Then take VDH, please. I have worn out a keyboard writing about the utterly failed organization that is VDH.

    The Department of Education is in the running for screwing up the guidance to schools and standing by while:
    1. only 4% of Virginia public school kids had in person classes;
    2. the Catholic schools down the street from the public schools were open all year with no issues;
    3. teachers successfully threatened a strike in Fairfax County;
    4. the Secretary of Education pursued personal grievances against Asian kids and their parents by ruining TJ and threatening the same for the rest of Virginia’s high achievement programs; and
    5. having no strategy at all for remediating the learning losses.

    VDEM was supposed to coordinate the efforts of VDH, VEC and VDOE, so we need to award that agency a black star as well.

    When we can’t decide which agency of the Northam administration is the most incompetent from a ruch stable of contenders, we have to look to the Governor.

    But not Virginia’s print media. They see, hear and speak of none of this.

  5. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    I’m not buying the “Black Swan” event argument. COVID-19 may have been a “Black Swan” event from a health perspective but sudden downturns in the economy are not all that unusual. Surely unemployment check processing spiked in 2008 / 2009. In April 2007 unemployment in Virginia was 3.1% by Feb 2010 it was 7.6%. Were no lessons learned?

    The fact that 15 years after money was appropriated for a systems rewrite the new system wasn’t ready or didn’t work is epic incompetence. Perhaps of Virginia still had a Secretary of Technology that person could have prodded the VEC to get its act together.

    Finally, I see no reason to refer to a screw up as winning a Booby Prize. In Virginia we award Clownies (named after the Imperial Clown Show in Richmond) not Boobies.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      There was a Secretary of Technology in office for almost all of those 15 years. It was not the function of that office to oversee the development or upgrade of internal agency IT systems.

      1. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        But it should be a function of the Secretary of Technology. Just like a corporate CIO co-owns the development of departmental systems in well run companies, even if the division has its own CIO reporting to the divisional president.

        It’s still 1954 in Richmond I guess.

        I hear the vaccination scheduling software that Virginia purchased turned out to be half-assed. Wouldn’t it have been nice to have somebody who knew what the heck they were doing in the selection process? Buying software from a nonprofit? That sounds brilliant.

        https://www.virginiamercury.com/2021/03/10/virginia-could-abandon-vaccine-scheduling-software-amid-persistent-bugs/

  6. StarboardLift Avatar
    StarboardLift

    Remember that VEC was in the midst of a software upgrade when COVID–19 struck, in order to meet the surge in usage they suspended the upgrade and fully reverted its old software? Remember the calls for help from those COBOL literates? If a bureaucrat in Virginia fails to get approval to update software for a decade, that person should lose the position. Don’t tell me there isn’t any money–figure out the priorities of your agency, cut costs, make it work. Shameful.

  7. ” I would award the prize for the being the biggest failure to the Virginia Employment Commission (VEC).”

    And I would agree with you.

  8. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    If we’re assigning birds, how about State agencies that get albatross (gooney, if you choose), vulture, owl, goose, and chicken?

    I think we can all guess Sherlock’s choice for vulture.

Leave a Reply