Virginia and US employment fluctuations since 2004, showing the dip in 2009-10 and plummet in the last four months. Source VEC. Click for larger view.

By Steve Haner

By the end of this amazing year, almost 1.5 million Virginians may have filed claims for unemployment insurance payments, leaving the state’s once-record unemployment trust fund balance of $1.5 billion reduced to $750 million in the red, legislators were told this morning.

That $2.25 billion swing is due to $2.6 billion spent out of the state fund, to cover basic unemployment benefits. To date, the federal government has supplemented that with another $6.3 billion paid to Virginian under special COVID-19 related benefits, which do not come out of the state trust account. 

Those were a couple of highlights of a briefing Virginia Employment Commissioner Ellen Marie Hess provided to a panel of legislators in a virtual meeting. The state’s joint Commission on Unemployment Compensation had not met in a year, so the slides she had today show a stark change from previous rosy reports.

Keep that $750 million of red ink in just one state special fund in mind when the politicians come with their happy-talk about how well the state did as Fiscal Year 2020 closed out. To focus only on the state’s general fund when assessing this crisis is to wear blinders. The combined deficits in 2010 and 2011, after the last recession, were less than $200 million.

Hess and her staff have been crushed under a tsunami as an unimagined number of claimants sought a series of just-invented new benefits, using bureaucratic systems that are creaky even in quiet times. She provided a bit of insight to the challenge in a guest column in Saturday’s Richmond Times-Dispatch, and during the meeting legislators seemed reluctant to pile on with criticisms.

At this point, she told legislators, 91% of applicants are seeing benefits within 14 days of filing. The number of people exhausting all their benefits without returning to work is also shooting up.

The slides she shared, and she admitted this, may still be too optimistic, and neither in the slides nor her comments would she predict what comes next. Under normal circumstances, the state trust fund’s plunge into deficit would be addressed by massive new taxes on every Virginia workplace. At the peak after the 2008 recession, the average tax per worker was 330% higher than the current $70.

Nothing from 2008-2009 is applicable to this economic disaster, and that peak tax of $236 per job slot will likely be exceeded in the coming years. Hess said the higher taxes both rebuild the fund and repay any federal loans to keep it afloat. Only if the federal government were to waive repayment of those loans would the coming tax hikes moderate.

That is not something the federal government has done before. But precedent hasn’t mattered in previous legislation passed to respond to COVID-19, so perhaps the loans will be forgiven. It would still be wise for employers to expect “significant” (Hess’s word) tax increases come January.

That $750 million deficit projection as of December 31, a staff economist explained, is based on several steady state assumptions that could be blown out of the water by further economic restrictions. You can see in the slides VEC projects only small decreases in 2020’s ongoing tax revenue or interest compared to last year. It also could be changed by federal actions ordering additional months of payments or other eligibility changes.

As has happened with all the other such legislative bodies, the membership has changed to reflect the new Democratic majority in both legislative Houses. Republican Delegate Lee Ware of Powhatan has handed the gavel to Henrico Democrat Lamont Bagby. The three Senate members are all Democrats, so the partisan split overall is now six Democrats and two Republicans.

Some of the new members showed interest in diving right in to offer their help, calling for another meeting of the panel in a couple of weeks to discuss possible legislation to be considered at the August 18 Special Session. That led to a caution from some senior members over just what issues would be allowed for consideration, so far limited to budget matters and criminal justice reform.

But what can’t be addressed in August will keep until January, by which time a deeper deficit may be evident, the pandemic will or won’t be fading, and the bite on employers will be known, at least for 2021.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

23 responses to “VEC: 1.5 Million Unemployment Claims In 2020”

  1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
    Nancy_Naive

    Oh well, when you devise an economic system in which wealth accumulates almost unhampered in the top 1% and drive the bottom 40% into poverty with half of those in crushing poverty, then there will be consequences when there are unforeseen catastrophic events.

    American capitalism appears to be less robust than advertised.

    1. Matt Hurt Avatar
      Matt Hurt

      We have a crapitalist system, not capitalist. Crony capitalists have purchased their favor from both sides of the aisle. Neither party has cornered the market on special interest money.

      1. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
        Reed Fawell 3rd

        “We have a crapitalist system, not capitalist.”

        Not yet true, but we are getting their fast, but the problem is far larger than traditional rogue and crony capitalists.

        One primary reason is that our politicians have put up ever more of our government functions, decisions, and wealth for sale to highest bidders.

        But look who the bidders are. Now capitalists are only part of problem. Now big bidders include big unions (most importantly public service unions), big non-profits (universities, health care, environmentalists), as well as big private corporations, and an ever growing array of other special interest groups such as lawyers and social justice warriors of all sorts.

        This trend of buying power grows annually as these groups become ever more powerful in the high tech, big data and information field, and in the instant communication of the internet game. Especially so since these huge companies within big tech now can control the US economy (think Amazon if in wrong hands) as well as determine information flow, public opinion and elections (think Google, Facebook, Tweeter if in wrong hands) now along with Main Stream Media and Press, all pushing ideologies, private agendas, and vast amounts of misinformation, into controlling positions within public opinion.

        As a result of these historic fast moving trends we see massive consolidations of power rapidly forming, growing and shifting right now, all pushing for radical change into unknown economic, social, and cultural territory. This appears to be pushing our nation over the falls right now, de-funding of police, for example.

  2. LGABRIEL Avatar
    LGABRIEL

    Our State and Federal unemployment systems are government systems, and their flaws are not shortcomings of a free market system.

    1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
      Nancy_Naive

      One could say that the existence and need of a government safety net for unemployment is itself a failure of the American free market system… if it weren’t for bad luck, I’d have no luck at all…

      1. What a simple-minded remark. The collapse of the unemployment insurance fund has nothing to do with the “free market” system. The surge in unemployment )and stress on the unemployment insurance system) can be attributed entirely to the horrendous consequences of the COVID-related economic shutdowns in Virginia and other states to which our economy is tied.

        If the Russkies dropped nuclear bombs on the 10 largest American cities and the economy tanked as a result, you’d be blaming the failure of the “free market system.”

        1. Eric the Half a Troll Avatar
          Eric the Half a Troll

          American billionaires made $565 billion at the same time that some 42 million filed for unemployment. That is indeed a failure of the “free market”system. A few of those $565 billion would have easily kept the unemployment insurance fund from collapsing.

        2. Nancy_Naive Avatar
          Nancy_Naive

          Wait, wait, me Bucko. For 60 years, youse guys have been claiming that the government isn’t the solution; it’s the problem. Somebody important said something like that, I think.

          But your right, why should we hold the free market responsible for the underfunded unemployment insurance program? We didn’t hold it responsible for underfunded retirement plans, after they flat out stole the excess.

          And you’re also correct, it wasn’t the market that created this mess. You did. Well, you and the Electoral College. Hillary warned us. She said he couldn’t handle a crisis, but you voted for him anyway.

  3. Two observations:

    (1) Steve made an important point: While the General Fund may be in relatively good shape, what about the non-General Fund budget and various off-the-book funds like unemployment insurance? I’ve long been calling for an evaluation of systemic state exposure to risk…. which, of course, has fallen on deaf ears.

    (2) As bad as our situation is in Virginia, it’s worse in a lot of other states, perhaps most other states. Misery loves company. If we have to boost our employer contributions, so will every other state.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      “Employer contributions” are really “employee contributions”, no?

      works just FICA contributions, right?

      1. Steve Haner Avatar
        Steve Haner

        Tax. The word is tax. And it is one I’m fine with. No, this is not deducted from paychecks, and even with FICA only half is deducted from paychecks. The UI system, just like the workers comp system, are important to maintain. Left alone the Left will ruin them fast.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Most employers consider these “contributions” to be part of the wages they pay – and like companies that offer discounts for cash – the same thing works for cash labor…. and companies like Fed Ex and Uber claim that their workers are not “directed” which exempts them from paying FICA – not sure about unemployment.

          The point is that most employers consider FICA to be a labor cost.

      2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        No. Employees do not contribute to the unemployment insurance fund. It is a tax on employers. Of course, employers may pass along that tax on the prices they charge their customers. In that way, the general public may indirectly pay for the fund. But that is different than FICA, for which both the employer and employee are directly taxed.

  4. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead V

    Why work when you can get paid up to 900 bucks a week to sit home and watch Rawhide, Bonanza, Gunsmoke, High Chaperrall, Wagon Train, and Little House on the Prairie in order. I cannot tell you how many small business owners cannot round up labor right now. It pays more not to work. UBI is awesome at the moment.

    1. Steve Haner Avatar
      Steve Haner

      Between the rich benefits and the constant fear porn, agreed, I wouldn’t want to be hiring right now. The rich benefits will run out soon, but I suspect some level of supplementation will continue.

      I don’t feel like engaging with Nasty Nancy and our new friend the Half Wit Troll. I’ve told Jim I’d like to end the practice of anonymous arguments with hidden identities. Other regular contributors fully agree. This is an addiction just like other social media, but I can break it. I want the rules changed, Jim. Name yourselves, allow us to know if there are hidden agendas, and then I’ll be happy to rip your arguments to shreds.

      1. Steve Haner Avatar
        Steve Haner

        https://apnews.com/b67709a7b23c7c89239a51a2494d2ba3

        Oh, and check that out! VEC has hired a Richmond lobbying shop to do its public relations work, a very nice six figure contract for a short period! Color me jealous. What an admission of total failure on the part of the administration. Cue Rippert…..Man, somebody needs to get the string of emails and procurement paperwork on that one. Who pulled what strings? Did a legislator meddle? Was there a bid at all or sole source?

    2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      I have seen those reports as well. From personal experience, in the restaurants I frequent (not many), the regular wait staff is back.

      From a different perspective, if these people can make more from the enhanced unemployment benefits, that is a reflection on how low paid these jobs are. $900 per week works out to $46,800 a year (52 weeks, no vacations), before taxes, FICA, health care, etc. In Richmond these days, a decent apartment will cost at least $800-1,000 per month. Also, remember that $900 is the maximum. The actual amount someone would get would be determined by her wages before being laid off.

      These complaints will soon be outdated. The additional $600 under the CARES act will expire at the end of this month. If Congress extends the supplement, it will be at a lower amount; the reported amounts being considered are $200-400.

      1. Steve Haner Avatar
        Steve Haner

        $978 is the max. That’s almost $51,000 over 52 weeks.

        1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
          Dick Hall-Sizemore

          Obviously, I was wrong. But that is still the maximum. Do you have any idea what the median weekly benefit is under CARES?

  5. Steve Haner Avatar
    Steve Haner

    “The point is that most employers consider FICA to be a labor cost.” That’s from Larry! I appoint him a Conservative for a Day. YES! All those various employee benefits are just another cost of labor, including things like FICA and paid leave and sick leave and health care and UI taxes. When I submitted the budget for a new position in that state agency, all those costs were added into salary for a true cost of compensation.

    Do they ultimately lower what remains for salary? Sometimes, but often not. The market pressures should set the salary, and in my experience workers are focused on that. If you offer them a slightly higher salary and low pension contribution, or a lower salary and generous pension contribution, they foolishly demand the first. Ants and grasshoppers.

    Dick, if the median or mean benefit was not in her slides, I don’t know what is is for Virginia. To get the state max of $378 you need a previous salary of about $38,000, so that’s a big chunk of applicants. The federal add-on of $600 more is flat, no matter what your previous salary or wage. If nothing else, I expect the new bill will cap benefits at somewhere below that previous salary.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Thanks for the data on the salary that is required for the maximum benefit. That helps put it in perspective. I think you are right–that would include a big chunk of applicants. (For a little more perspective, $38,000 is higher than beginning and many corrections officers make, as well as lot of state administrative employees, e.g. fiscal techs, etc.)

      I can confirm your anecdote about putting together a state agency budget. At DPB, we would cost out a position using salary and FICA, plus the following fringe benefits, VRS, health insurance, group life insurance, retiree health insurance, and short-term and long-term disability insurance. UI was not included. Agencies had an appropriation in their base to cover unemployment and workers’ comp benefits; that base was adjusted periodically, based on the agency’s history.

      1. Steve Haner Avatar
        Steve Haner

        The figure 25% comes to mind – adding in bennies added 25% or so. You had to do it on raise calculations, too, because so many are tied to salary (FICA, pension contributions, etc.)

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      re: ” Do they ultimately lower what remains for salary?”

      Of course not – but when they hire they calculate the total cost of the employee – and they should and must.

      The rub comes if some kinds of work can be done cheaper because it does not pay FICA or unemployment or workmans compensation, etc.

      The govt imposes these taxes because they have costs also and these taxes are really ‘pay as you go’ trust funds… there’s not taxes in the sense that they for schools of military but instead for workers who end up unemployed or hurt or retired.

      It’s what every single developed country on earth does and by comparison what most 3rd world countries don’t do and surely do have a much more “real” “free market”.

      where would you like to live? In a “real” free market or here?

Leave a Reply