VDOT Makes the Case for I-95 HOT Lanes

by James A. Bacon

NORFOLK–The McDonnell administration characterized a public-private partnership agreement for HOT lanes on Interstate 95 as a win-win arrangement that will expand capacity and create new choices for Virginia drivers without dunning taxpayers or motorists who don’t want to pay tolls.

The agreement in principle with Fluor Transurban also protects taxpayers from financial harm if ridership projections fail to meet expectations but shares revenue with the state if revenues exceed a pre-set level.  “People have a choice. Nobody’s forcing them to go onto the HOT lanes,” Transportation Secretary Sean T. Connaughton said during Wednesday morning meeting of the Commonwealth Transportation Board. “As tolls rise, it will encourage people to use transit or carpools. This is all about using market forces.”

Hours later, at the Governor’s Transportation Conference, the McDonnell administration highlighted other design-build and public-private partnership projects (P3s), including a major truck-climbing lane on rugged terrain on Interstate 81, the addition of HOT lanes to the Washington Beltway, the Coalfields Expressway and the Interstate 295 interchange in Chesterfield County. In the absence of significant new revenue sources, the administration is turning to P3s to leverage the $4 billion the state will borrow during Gov. McDonnell’s four-year term.

The unapologetic trumpeting of P3s and megaprojects followed the release yesterday of a report by the Virginia Chapter of the Sierra Club, “21st Century Green Transportation: A Vision for Virginia,” that criticized McDonnell’s “frantic road building program” for spending billions of dollars in borrowed money to build “major, unneeded and destructive roadways.” The Sierra Club said the state should prioritize spending on maintenance, establish performance standards to guide the selection of projects, require stronger links between transportation and land use and devote more spending to alternate forms of transportation such as mass transit, van pools, bicycles and pedestrian-friendly infrastructure.

The governor’s office announced the I-95 HOT lane agreement Tuesday morning. The $940 million deal will add, improve or extend 29 miles of HOV lanes from Fairfax County through Stafford County. The HOV (high occupancy vehicle) lands will be converted to HOT (high occupancy toll) lanes, in which people can pay a toll to bypass congested traffic in the general lanes.  Carpoolers, buses and motorcycles will be allowed to continue using the HOT lanes with no extra charge.

Virginia Department of Transportation officials expect that trips will run around 11 miles for a $4 charge on average, although the toll will change continually, depending upon demand, and could be considerably higher or lower. There will be no toll gates. Drivers will enter the HOT lanes like they enter HOV lanes, but they will pass under a gantry that will record their activity based on EZPass transponders in their cars. Toll rates will be set to maintain free-flow conditions of 55 miles per hour minimum speed.

As tolls rise, the HOT lanes will encourage to carpool, ride buses or even join the ranks of “slugs” who hitch rides with drivers eager to avail themselves of the free HOV lanes, Connaughton said. To create transportation options, the deal contemplates the investment of $200 million in the expansion of transit bus services and park-and-ride lots.

Chief Deputy Commissioner Charlie Kilpatrick gave a detailed explanation of how the commonwealth’s interests are protected in the agreement with Fluor Transurban. Although the state is granting a 73-year concession upon completion of construction, it will maintain legal ownership and all assets will revert to the state at the end. The state has the right to audit the concessionaire’s books, and it can suspend tolling in emergencies. The agreement outlines the concessionaire’s obligations to maintain operating standards and roadway conditions. And Fluor Transurban assumes the full risk of cost overruns or schedule delays.

By investing $97 million, the state will attract roughly$840 million in private investment, some of it equity and some of it financed by bonds. CTB members asked what protection the state has if revenues fall short of projections and the venture loses money. Revenues would go first to pay operating expenses, he said, and only then be used to meet payments to bond holders. If the entity went bankrupt, private investors would lose their equity.

The agreement also builds in options and protections for Fluor Transurban, such as allowing the enterprise to propose enhancements not contemplated in the original deal. The state has no effective veto over tolls, which are set by market rates. And the private partner has the right to be compensated if the state undertakes a project that is proven to impact the revenue flow from the road, such as making significant improvements to U.S. Route 1, which runs parallel to the Interstate.

The Federal Highway Administration is scheduled to review and approve the project in the spring of 2012. The financing will close that summer. Construction is scheduled to be complete in 2015.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

13 responses to “VDOT Makes the Case for I-95 HOT Lanes”

  1. thanks for the time and effort you spend on reporting transportation issues in Va.

    so I have a question for Groveton and others who read here.

    It appears that both METRO and the HOT Lanes are supported by the Clown Show in Richmond.. the Pocahontas half-breeds…

    is this a good or a bad thing?

    Would Groveton be so bold as to thank the Clown Show for it’s support of these projects or would Groveton see this as yet another example of why he believes they are clowns?

    just though I’d try to stir things up a bit this morn.

    😉

  2. Groveton Avatar

    If a mugger took my wallet at gunpoint and stole all my credit cards and the $200 of cash I had in my wallet, that would be bad. If that same mugger then had some pity on me and gave me a $5 back from my own wallet for bus fare, he’d still be a mugger.

    The HOT lanes “supported” by Richmond allow me to pay for something that is taxpayer funded virtually everywhere else in the state. Some years ago, there was a plan to put tolls on Rt 81. Presumably, those tolls would have paid to make the endless death trap known as Rt 81 a bit more modern and a bit more safe. Never happened. The Clown Show caved to trucking interests.

    Bob McDonnell is a rare ray of sunshine in Richmond. Of course, he grew up in Mt Vernon and is not a Descendant of Pocohontas. Gov. McDonnell and, to an extent, Sean Connaughton, have bulldozed the General Assembly and the local anti-growth NIMBYs across the state.

    If, and I do emphasize if, the truck climbing lane on Rt 81, the Coalfields Expressway and the Rt 295 interchange in Chesterfield are “user pays” with driving tolls, I will be very impressed. That will be a great start on “user pays” across the state – rather than just in NoVa and Tidewater. There will still be much to do. For example, adding HOT lanes and per mile tolls around the traffic disaster that is Fredricksburg. You see, LarryG, as long as you’re paying to drive just like the people in NoVa pay to drive – I am happy. Ditto for Bacon. Short Pump in Henrico is another traffic disaster that should be fixed with tolls to fund road improvements. We’ll see how Jim Bacon’s love of “user fees” lasts as he’s being dinged by automatic gantries every time he gets in his car to run out for a loaf of bread.

    And, speaking of Bacon, I love this …

    “Virginia Department of Transportation officials expect that trips will run around 11 miles for a $4 charge on average, although the toll will change continually, depending upon demand, and could be considerably higher or lower.”.

    When MWAA wants to raise the tolls on the Dulles Toll Rd there is a huge cry of indignation from Jim Bacon and his ilk. The cost to drive on the Toll Rd is painted in the worst possible terms – years into the future. But when the Clown Show wants to do the same thing – it’s all lovey dovey. No inflated future toll rates. And the always helpful, “…could be considerably higher or lower”. Like, when the main roadway is crowded and you actually need to use the HOT lanes …. maybe it will cost $8 to drive 11 miles. Which makes a round trip at rush hour $16. And, over time and after inflation, that round trip might cost $20 or more? You know, about the same per mile cost as the evil, labor union loving MWAA wants to charge?

    Jim Bacon is doing a good job of reporting on transportation issues in Virginia. However, he has the “imperial DNA” of Richmond running through his cells. The Clown Show spends 25 years crating a transportation fiasco. Then, one governor in his one (consecutive) four year term backhands the Clown Show and makes progress. He passes a “tax increase” by borrowing money that will have to be repaid by a state treasury which is very unlikely to be able to repay those loans at the current tax rate. He goes around the Clown Show and does the right thing.

    But he’ll soon be gone, either at the end of his term or next summer when he ascends the stage at the Republican Convention as the Vice Presidential nominee.

    All of which leaves us, in 2014 or sooner, with a return to “politics as usual” in Virginia. Bill Bolling? Seriously, Bill Bolling? Or Benito Cuccinelli?

    Maybe we’ll get a chance to vote for a Sean Connaughton – a guy who gets things done. Or Terry McAuliffe – another guy who gets things done. Or, somebody else from Northern Virginia or Tidewater. You know, places that aren’t trying to remain stuck in the 1950s.

    Or, we’ll get Bill Bolling. Or this year’s version of Creigh Deeds. People without the courage of a Bob McDonnell in running around the Clown Show in Richmond.

  3. it’s often difficult to tell how things actually come to be…..

    having said that… I make the following observations:

    1. Connaughton could not have made the progress he has without the strong visible support from McDonnell.

    VDOT has, for years, managed to avoid direct hands-on guidance from prior “reform-minded” leaders.

    2. – VDOT/Connaughton/McDonnell could have EASILY walked away from any/all METRO, HOT Lanes, Rt 29 in Cville, I-95 tolls, Rt 460 tolls, toll tunnels in Hampton, etc.

    3. – there were more than trucking interests opposed to tolls on I-81 – it was many localities who hosted businesses that use I-81 as their primary distribution backbone that threatened to move elsewhere….

    It’s going to be harder for those arguing against I-81 tolls when the rest of Va is handling them.

    4. – Still trying to figure out why it’s okay to have tolls on the DTR but not HOT on I-495/I-95. It seems to be purely subjective and inconsistent to be in favor of tolls on roads in one place but opposed to tolls in other places.

    so I ask Groveton this basic question: ” Are you in favor of tolls on roads”?

    now.. I don’t need a multi-paragraph dissertation on the finer points.. just a basic philosophy about tolling roads in general…

  4. Carpoolers, buses and motorcycles will be allowed to continue using the HOT lanes with no extra charge.

    =================================================

    I doubt it. I’m pretty sure there is a clause in the contract allowing them to boot the carpoolers off if they eat into revenues.

    Practically speaking, it may not make a difference if the carpoolers just elect to pay instead.

    If that happens we can labeleHOT lanes as not green, and therefore there will be a big unaccounted negative on the hot lane balance sheet.

    “It’s going to be harder for those arguing against I-81 tolls when the rest of Va is handling them.”

    Precisely, and if you make tolls universal, therough mileage fees or something, yu will see the support for tolls evaporate entirely. Right now those who favor tolls do so because they figure they won;t be the ones paying them.

    We know all we need to know about privat toll roads from looking at th history. We had them once and got rid of them, we even got rid of a lot of public tolls. This is a mistake, pure and simple.

  5. The HOT lanes “supported” by Richmond allow me to pay for something that is taxpayer funded virtually everywhere else in the state.

    ======================

    Yup. I submit this isin violation of the state constituion which says taxes must be applied equally.

  6. 11 miles for a $4 charge on average, although the toll will change continually, depending upon demand, and could be considerably higher or lower.”.

    36 cents per mile, or equal to a gas tax increase of $9.00 per gallon.

  7. it was many localities who hosted businesses that use I-81 as their primary distribution backbone that threatened to move elsewhere….

    It’s going to be harder for those arguing against I-81 tolls when the rest of Va is handling them.

    4. – Still trying to figure out why it’s okay to have tolls on the DTR but not HOT on I-495/I-95.

    ================================================

    Because the airport authority has THEIR business loated on a non toll road, right next to the DTW?

    I’m sure if you gave those businesses on I-81 their ownd non-toll road, their objection to tolls on I-81 would drop.

  8. I think it’s safe to conclude that the McDonnell administration has embraced tolls – over a gas tax increase.

    anyone disagree?

  9. Groveton Avatar

    Gotta love LarryG. He writes a 4 bullet point preamble to a simple question and then warns me not to be verbose.

    “so I ask Groveton this basic question: ” Are you in favor of tolls on roads”?”

    Only if the plan is to deploy tolls to all major roads relatively quickly.

  10. Only if the plan is to deploy tolls to all major roads relatively quickly.

    ++++++++++++++

    Not even then. It is a dumb, expensive, way to raise taxes.

  11. I think it’s safe to conclude that the McDonnell administration has embraced tolls –over a gas tax increase. anyone disagree?

    ++++++++++++++++++

    I disagree.
    McDonnell has embraced guaranteed profits for a few firms for a very long time. At public risk.

  12. ” It is a dumb, expensive, way to raise taxes.”

    maybe.

    but given the 80% opposition of a gas tax increase from the public – this path is the path of less resistance.

    In fact, if you ask people to choose between increased gas taxes and tolls.. it’s no contest.

    and all of RoVa likes the toll idea…it holds them harmless because most of the toll roads are going to be in more urbanized places.

  13. HOT lanes serve several good purposes. It enables additional traffic lanes to be constructed at a lower cost to the public. It gives drivers a choice. It lets drivers get to where they need to be more quickly than if the added lanes were general purpose lanes. It permits reliable bus service on the Beltway for the first time since the road was built. It encourages van and car pooling, by allowing those vehicles free access to the HOT lanes. This helps with the county’s TDM goals.

Leave a Reply