VDOT Financial Forecast Gloomier Than Ever

You know it’s a slow summer news day when Scott Leake’s Virginia State Republican Caucus “News Clips” newsletter contains only five stories — and one of those is an editorial in the Bristol Herald Courier calling for tougher laws against negligent dog owners.

With my usual wells of ignorance and foolishness running dry, I am compelled to address a subject of a serious nature. This story was reported a couple of weeks ago in the Mainstream Media, and I never gave it the attention it deserved. But better late than never.

According to numbers in a June 18 financial report by VDOT’s CFO Rita Busher, the Virginia Department of Transportation budget is in bad shape and getting worse. Here are the highlights:

Revenues. In its Six Year Financial Plan, VDOT expects to see little more revenue in 2014 than it collects in 2009. “Total revenues and other financing sources” are expected to yield $4.74 billion, about 1.4 percent more than in 2009 — considerably less than anyone’s reasonable estimate of inflation. Here’s the really scary part: That forecast actually might be optimistic. It assumes a 1.5 percent annual growth in transportation revenues while rising gasoline prices could conceivably reduce gasoline consumption and gas tax revenues.

Maintenance first. In Virginia, highway maintenance and operations get first claim on state tax dollars. Thanks to inflation, Busher forecasts that maintenance expenditures will increase from $1.69 billion next year to $2.01 billion in 2014 — an 18.9 percent increase.

For the most part, toll revenues are already spoken for: Debt service is projected to increase to $413.6 billion in six years. That leaves less for everything else (although it’s worth noting that “earmarks and special financing,” whatever that refers to, also shows healthy growth over the next six years.)

Construction last: As a result, dollars allocated to highway construction are shrinking — to $984.1 million next year and then to $730.2 million in 2014. I believe that includes Virginia’s share of federal transportation spending. If we factor in inflation, that $730 million could look more like $600 million or less in real dollars.

Yes, Virginia, the transportation funding crisis is real. But it’s only one side of the equation.

Here’s what we don’t know: What’s happening to Vehicle Miles Driven? If people are driving less, they’re not clogging the highways. If that’s the case, then traffic congestion may not be getting worse — it may be getting better. If traffic congestion is getting better, then the $100 billion+ funding shortfall for road and highway projects anticipated over the next 20 years is likewise inflated and out of date.

Not only should the rising cost of gasoline whittle down the projected “need” for highway projects, it will change the priorities of those projects that have been identified. We have already discussed on this blog the outsized decline of property values on the metropolitan fringe, indicating that many households want to move closer to the urban core. If that’s the case, highway construction dollars likewise may need to move from the fringe to the core.

General Assembly Republicans have called for an audit of VDOT. That can’t hurt, but I don’t see VDOT performance as the real problem. The problem is that higher gas prices have rendered obsolete Virginia forecasts of travel demand and road/highway capital spending. What we need to audit is the list of highway projects and see how well they match up with evolving travel patterns in an energy-constrained era.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

  1. “It assumes a 1.5 percent annual growth in transportation revenues while rising gasoline prices could conceivably reduce gasoline consumption and gas tax revenues.”

    Sigh. Why do you keep peddling this line? Assuming 1.5 percent growth is pretty reasonable considering that’s less than what we’ve been getting for more than twenty years. And it’s what we’re getting right now, year-to-date. There is NO EVIDENCE that gas prices will have any effect on future transportation revenue. None.

    You might think it’s common sense or likely to be so, but without data to back it up it’s just baseless speculation. Economics forces sometimes can be counter-intuitive. In this case, the gas tax is just one of dozens of taxes imposed to fill the piggybank at VDOT. It takes a big drop from $900 million to affect $4.75 billion. And it isn’t dropping much at all, despite all-time high prices.

    Tax revenues usually go down when the economy is down. Bureaucrats love this because it is an excuse to cry poverty. Usually, they’re lying (example on pg. 19). When the economy recovers, do the taxes go down? Of course not.

  2. charlie Avatar
    charlie

    Two minor points.

    In terms of Vehicle Miles Driven, that is not a perfect measurement either. I think, based on what I’m seeing, is that people are becoming more efficient drivers. Either through getting rid of a 10 MPG SUV for commuting, avoiding congestion by time-shifting, or combining trips. I agree the metric we need to measure VDOT on is how to increase that efficiency, rather than just “reducing congestion”.

    Second, your fear is we enter a Euro-cycle where higher gas taxes lead to less driving, less transport taxes, higher taxes to make up the revenue, and eventually $10 a gallon gas like in the UK. It’s why the feds should raise the gas tax, not states, because ultimately transportation is about the states.

    What we need is a better understanding of how gas prices really change consumer behavior. Right now is more about projection of future prices rather than reducing driving.

  3. Jim Bacon Avatar
    Jim Bacon

    Bob, go back and read carefully what I wrote. Here’s what I said (with emphasis added):

    “That forecast actually might be optimistic. It assumes a 1.5 percent annual growth in transportation revenues while rising gasoline prices could conceivably reduce gasoline consumption and gas tax revenues.”

    I don’t pretend to know what will happen to gasoline consumption. But I think we’re fools if we don’t acknowledge the *risk* that consumption could decline.

  4. Jim Bacon Avatar
    Jim Bacon

    Charlie, you’re right — the first response of most people will be to increase the gas mileage of cars they drive. But there are limits to how fast they can carry that out. Resale values for the gas guzzlers are plummeting. (CarMax had to write down the value of its truck and SUV inventories by 25 percent in just the past quarter!) Meanwhile, fuel-efficient cars are selling at a premium. (Just try to buy a Prius right now). A lot of people will be stuck with the cars they have.

    But let’s say people do switch en mass to fuel-efficient cars. What will that do to gasoline tax revenues?

    (I’m not predicting anything, Bob. I’m just asking questions and identifying possibilities.)

  5. Scott Avatar

    My apologies for a slow news day 🙂

  6. “I’m not predicting anything, Bob. I’m just asking questions and identifying possibilities.”

    Of course. I’m just pointing out there’s nothing “scary” going on. A bureaucrat says the sky is falling; the data say it’s business as usual.

    I believe the calculation is that it takes 14 years for a change to cycle through the automobile fleet. In fact, I believe it may take longer in VA because the heinous personal property tax is a significant disincentive to buy a nice, brand new efficient and safer car.

    I find it hard to believe the supply & demand problems with gasoline won’t be solved long before this cycle is complete. First, the public is all for drilling now. Second, if you compare gas price increases in Europe with those in the US, you’ll notice that much of the extra cost is caused by our deflated currency. Stop flooding the money supply and $4 gas becomes $3 gas (which is still too high). The US dollar is at parity with the Australian dollar and the Loonie. That’s outrageous.

    And in the unlikely event that electric, flying cars take over — as has been predicted on the cover of Popular Mechanics magazine since the 1950s — there’s no doubt our registration, personal property, speeding ticket, parking ticket and other motorist revenue sources will be sufficiently sky-high by then to make up the difference.

  7. Some more data. For the most part, people just aren’t buying new cars:

    “Honda’s sales rose 1.1 percent [unadjusted] in June, up 4.1% year-to-date.”

    “Toyota Motor Corp. ran aground in June, with U.S. sales down 21.4 percent (unadjusted), the biggest drop of the year for the world’s No. 2 automaker. For the first half, Toyota said it sold 1,240,086 vehicles, down 6.8 percent from the first half of 2007.”

    “Sales of the Prius hybrid were down 25 percent during the month as Toyota struggled with supply problems. Dealers are reporting a two-month wait for the fuel efficient hatchback.”

    “Compared with the first half of 2007, [Ford] sales fell a full 14 percent.”

    The arrows have been red and pointing downward across the board for a while.

    Source: Automotive News via thetruthaboutcars.com

  8. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    Perhaps the poor economy is simply making consumers avoid new debt and hang onto the cars they already have – longer?

    Fear of losing jobs – or perhaps, as is the case in my family, my wife already lost her job, have caused consumers to avoid adding more strain to monthly bills?

    -Reid

  9. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    Jim,

    Forgive me in advance if this email is redundant.

    My republican blog has moved. The new site is http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com

    To comment on the new site does require registration, aka a username and password. I know this is cumbersome, but it helps weed out the trolls.

    Stay well, and happy blogging. Also, please update your blogrolls as well. Thank you.

    eric aka the Tygrrrr Express

  10. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    “What’s happening to Vehicle Miles Driven? If people are driving less, they’re not clogging the highways.”

    Not necessarily.Fewer miles driven in fewer places could mean more miles driver per square mile, and that mans more congestion, not less.

    RH

  11. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    I actually support Bob’s premise that we already spend too much money in ways that are not cost-effective and that giving more money to the transportation cookie monster will not result in better transportation.

    The question is – does VDOT really need more money to start with?

    Bob sez no.

    Larry sez no.

    Wow!

  12. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    “…the first response of most people will be to increase the gas mileage of cars they drive. But there are limits …..”

    Yep. If you switch from a gas guzzler to a moerate car you will save alot more than switching from a moderate car to a subcompact.

    Law of diminishing returns applies here.

    RH

  13. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    “because the heinous personal property tax is a significant disincentive to buy a nice, brand new efficient and safer car.”

    Yep. This is exactly why my farm trucks are all old clunkers – the newest is 20 years old. The upside is that they stay out of the junkyard.

    RH

  14. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    How about this?

    NO Sales Tax on any vehicle that gets over 35 mpg?

    or.. a graduated sales tax reduction that starts at 30mpg and goes up… such that if you get one that is over 40 mpg, you get a $500 rebate?

    See this.. way.. there will be even less money for VDOT and local officials to waste on transportation.

  15. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    If I had more money to spend on the farm, I could do more and produce more, but I’m not sure it would be any more profitable.

    On the other hand, it costs me more every year just to do maintenance and keep up.

    I can’t see any reason we should expect VDOT would be any different.

    RH

  16. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    well.. it turns out that Bob was right after all.

    there is, in fact, a MASSIVE CONSPIRACY:

    http://www.capitolweekly.net/article.php?_adctlid=v%7Cjq2q43wvsl855o%7Cx8ezvs2fmgge0q&xid=x8ef3mb7j5w7cw&done=search.php%3Fsearchparams%3Da%253A5%253A%257Bs%253A9%253A%2522issuedate%2522%253BN%253Bs%253A6%253A%2522author%2522%253BN%253Bs%253A5%253A%2522title%2522%253BN%253Bs%253A4%253A%2522body%2522%253Bs%253A10%253A%2522toll%2Broads%2522%253Bs%253A12%253A%2522article_type%2522%253BN%253B%257D

    I oughta get a medal from Rush Limbaugh or someone for posting this before Bob.

    🙂

    oh.. and here’s an extra special bonus:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/02/AR2008070203200.html?nav=rss_metro

    gawd omighty … we’re giving away our roads to foreigners and sharing the profits so we can build more wasteful transit..

    I am just beside myself folks.

    … eating hats and words is painful business..

  17. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    Here’s an easier link to the first link in my post above…

    I did not realize just how long the original link was.

    http://tinyurl.com/5bhsv6

  18. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    Should You Move Closer to Work to Save Commuting Costs?

    If it cost you only $500 more a month in rent, you drive a 15 mpg gas hog at least 50 miles one-way, then, yes.

    Otherwise, no.

    http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/

    And there are other considerations. You might not want to move closer to Chicago which has the highest sales taxes in the nation.

    the amount of all things made from oil supplied to individual U.S. residents has been fairly level over the past 26 years. That suggests that the increase in the amount of oil supplied to U.S. residents over that time is paced solely by population growth – individual Americans are themselves not consuming ever increasing amounts of oil.

    ——————————–
    There is also a post entitled

    Why Does Everything Cost So Much More Today?

    Which includes this gem:

    “…the amount of all things made from oil supplied to individual U.S. residents has been fairly level over the past 26 years. That suggests that the increase in the amount of oil supplied to U.S. residents over that time is paced solely by population growth – individual Americans are themselves not consuming ever increasing amounts of oil.

    But if you wanted to point your finger in one direction to blame just one party as to why oil prices are so high today, may we suggest you point it at China first…. “

    It appears that Larry’s claim that we are over-using our highways because they are free is not true.

    RH

  19. I agree that “there is no evidence that gas prices will have any effect on future transportation revenues,” but gas prices have already impacted how people are driving and buying cars. Everyday I hear people talk about wanting mass transportation in Richmond. I know talk is cheap but isn’t it time we talked more about implementing mass transportation and less about building highways?

  20. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    Just think how much could be done if Jitney buses were authorized. But what about those union bus driver jobs? Never happen.

    TMT

  21. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    taxing people for mass transit – even if they say they agree… why that would be… errr… ummm.. ahhhh…. wrong… It would be anti-American.. anti-dream-affordable-home, anti-people even.

    Why.. if we did that.. we’d be taking food out of the mouths of babes because their parents would not have enough left to purchase gasoline to drive 50 miles to their jobs.

    In fact, as gasoline gets more and more expensive, we need to cut more and more taxes so that they can afford to continue buying gasoline.

    the best way to accomplish this is that every time gasoline goes up a penny, we should reduce the gas tax a penny.

    That way increasing prices will not harm our economy.

  22. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    “I know talk is cheap but isn’t it time we talked more about implementing mass transportation and less about building highways?”

    Not if mass transportation costs more than highways for equivalent service.

    Right now, people want mass transit because it is heavily subsidized and their out of pocket costs are low. But, in order to actually achieve a haigh ratio of mass transit users, the user will have to wind up paying more of the costs.

    Right now 95%+ of transit occurs in motor vehicles, and 2% on mass transit.

    Suppose those numbers reversed? Who would pay for the trley stpendous amount of mass transit that would be required? Virtualy everyone would.

    It isn’t about more mass transit and fewer highways, it is about having the right mix of each, in order to get the best service and the lowest overall costs.

    RH

  23. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    “Just think how much could be done if Jitney buses were authorized.”

    Jitney buses are a great idea. Paricularly with the new communication modes. With enough of them on the roads, you could text up a jitney, and have one appear at your door before long. The communication system would ensure that you got a ride without too many stops or transfers.

    It is time to overrule the unions and legalize jitneys.

    Notice that profit making jitneys are not too different from my idea of paid car pools. Paid car pools might be viewed as an interim step to jitneys: a jitney subsidy to keep interest high until the market is fully developed.

    RH

  24. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    “Why.. if we did that.. we’d be taking food out of the mouths of babes because their parents would not have enough left to purchase gasoline to drive 50 miles to their jobs.”

    Yes, actually, you might.

    Suppose you drive 50 miles to your job, and you decide to move to a spot 5 miles from your job. And supose your rent/mortgage payment doubles, from 1000 a month to 2000.

    Unless you drive a HUMMER and get less than 8 mpg, you will lose money on the move, and have less to feed your kids with.

    Taxing people for mass transit, unless it is really good, cost effective mass transit will cost more than the alternative, and that is before you even figure the rent difference.

    In all but a very few cases, taxing people ofr mass transit would be anti-American, anti-affordable, and anti-people.

    RH

  25. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    This is why I am starting the “Keep American Strong and Mighty” fund.

    We are going to show those oil boogers who really is in charge.

    For every penny they raise gasoline prices, we are going to take a penny tax away….

    .. and when we get to zero.. we will continue… raise the price – the government will promptly buy it down…

    we will keep this up because affordable American policies that are pro-People.

    I’m already getting prickles just thinking about this .. it’s about time we showed those smelly emirs with their flowing stinking robes who is in charge here.

  26. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    Look at China instead of the Smelly Emirs.

    eg. Purchases from China have bid up the price of pig iron over 98%. No speculators involved.

    Never let facts get in the way of how you coose to think.

    RH

  27. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    we simply cannot afford to let what China does distract us from the direct challenges to our American Way of Life.

    China can take a flying leap along with those smelly Emirs…

    Our policy should be steadfastly patriotic – to preserve the American Way of Life.

    Whatever it takes.

    Cheap, affordable energy is what makes us the greatest Power in the World.

    Our policies should be to do anything and everything that will assure that Americans get affordable energy.

    This is so simple.. why doesn’t everyone “get this”?

  28. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    “Cheap, affordable energy is what makes us the greatest Power in the World.”

    Partly.

    V-22 Raptors and Carriers help some, too.

    What’s your point? That we will be better off and more powerful if we use less energy, live less well, and concede all growth to the Chinese?

    RH

  29. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    Cheap, affordable energy is what makes us the greatest Power in the World.

    If cheap affordable energy mekes great power, how do you explain the position of the Middle East on this graph?

    http://www.des.ucdavis.edu/faculty/handy/TTP_seminar/intro%20to%20travel%20demand.ppt#259,19,Mobility%20as%20a%20Function%20of%20GDP

    RH

  30. Groveton Avatar
    Groveton

    Republicans on Parade

    “I was not aware of it,” Del. Phillip A. Hamilton (R-Newport News) said. Hamilton said that a member of his staff monitors his campaign contributions and that he does not track them himself. But he added that if the company asks for its $1,500 contribution back, he will send it.

    And … who can forget this gem (regarding the abuser fees):

    “I think clearly the overwhelming majority of delegates and senators never meant or expected it would apply to these lesser charges,” said Del. C.L. “Clay” Athey Jr. (R-Warren). “There was obviously a drafting error.”

    We Republicans demand accountability in government. We insist on a performance audit of VDOT.

    Uhhh….my aide looks at campaign contributions, not me. I’ll send the check back but only if they ask.

    Uhhh….I am a practicing lawyer but the legislation I supported had a drafting error (presumably made by those lousy “drafting people”).

    Here’s the right answers:

    P. Hamilton – “I shouldn’t have taken the illegal contribution. I have already sent the money back to Transurban. It won’t happen again.”

    C. Athey – “I should have read the law before I signed the bill. This is particularly poor performance on my part because I am a lawyer. It won’t happen again”.

  31. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    Good one Groveton.

    Here’s a good way to put some more sunshine on money.

    VPAP has linked in to electronic transactions.

    Why not have VPAP to have email sign-ups (or RSS) so that when donations are made – within minutes/hours – everyone who wants to know is told who is giving what money to whom?

    This would INCLUDE ALL PAC disbursements.

    no more sending money to the PAC to then quietly launder it

    If we cannot outlaw this money – let’s shine as much sunshine on it as we can…

Leave a Reply