VDOT Evolves New Project-Management Focus

A VDOT engineer — the foot solder of Virginia’s transportation program

by James A. Bacon

In 2004, the Virginia Department of Transportation maintained a staff of 10,000 employees.  Today the head count stands around 7,000. That sounds like a dramatic downsizing. But there’s less to those numbers — and more — than meets the eye.

Much of the staff reduction reflects an outsourcing of the design and drafting functions to outside engineering firms, which means that lower payroll costs are offset by higher contract fees. But the shift does advance an  important VDOT management goal: to focus on project management as a core capability.

Chief Deputy Commissioner Charles Kilpatrick provided the numbers in a Wednesday presentation to the Commonwealth Transportation Board. VDOT has seen “lots of change” in staffing, in processes and in how it conducts business, says Kilpatrick, a career VDOT employee who worked briefly in the private sector before taking on the No. 2 position at the department under the McDonnell administration.

There has been a wholesale change of senior personnel at the highway department. Not only did Gov. Bob McDonnell appoint a new highway commissioner, Gregory A. Whirley, and chief deputy commissioner, Kilpatrick, but VDOT has a new chief financial officer, a new director to run public-private partnerships, new people to run research, administration and planning & programming, eight new division administrators and four new district managers.

A very real VDOT accomplishment has been the ability to handle a surge in the number of maintenance and construction projects in the past year without increasing head count. The McDonnell administration has emphasized putting idle funds to work, pushing projects out the door more quickly, and ramping up a series of mega-projects financed through borrowed funds and public-private partnerships.

In one major process change, VDOT is shifting from design-bid-build projects (designing projects in-house and putting them out to bid), to design-build projects (detailing the project specifications and letting contractors undertake the construction and design). In theory, the approach can lead to more creative, cost-saving designs, while the ability to conduct design work and construction simultaneously enables private contractors to complete projects more quickly and at lower cost. Transportation Secretary Sean Connaughton has frequently expressed his frustration with the unnecessarily high cost of many VDOT projects executed under the old design-bid-build model.

Once upon a time, VDOT would have handled all the design and drafting internally. It still maintains a core design-and-drafting capability, said Kilpatrick in an interview. But the main focus has shifted to managing projects and bringing them in on budget and on time. As a consequence, VDOT has to hire more project managers and construction inspectors.

The department is authorized to have 500 more employees than it has on staff but reaching the full complement isn’t easy. VDOT has lost a large number of employees through retirement, and it has to compete with the private sector for qualified employees. “As the economy improves,” Kilpatrick said, “more people will leave.”

What Kilpatrick did not say, but surely was on his mind, is that state employees generally get paid less than their private-sector counterparts. A big advantage of being a state employee is the chance to earn juicy retirement benefits. But the McDonnell administration wants to make state employees contribute more to their retirement benefits than in the past. Moreover, young people aren’t willing to commit themselves to 40-year careers like the old guard did.

Meanwhile, said Kilpatrick in an interview, it’s possible that VDOT has over-shot its restructuring. The department may have gone too far in cutting back the number of resident engineers, whose job is to stay in touch with local government officials and the public. That undermines another key goal, which is to maintain a strong “customer focus.”

A decade ago, VDOT had an abysmal record for completing projects on budget and on time. Despite challenges, says Kilpatrick, the department is delivering the goods. Since the enactment of the governor’s transportation funding package a year ago, he says, VDOT has advanced 363 projects to preliminary engineering, 106 to right-of-way acquisition and 156 to the construction phase, and has completed 111. Another 290 projects are expected to begin construction over the next three years.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

5 responses to “VDOT Evolves New Project-Management Focus”

  1. ” What Kilpatrick did not say, but surely was on his mind, is that state employees generally get paid less than their private-sector counterparts. A big advantage of being a state employee is the chance to earn juicy retirement benefits. But the McDonnell administration wants to make state employees contribute more to their retirement benefits than in the past. Moreover, young people aren’t willing to commit themselves to 40-year careers like the old guard did.”

    I still look at the I-495 HOT lanes and how the effort is being done concurrently on multiple overpasses rather than sequentially.

    In order to do that you have to hire a lot of people in a short time from the programming to design to construction but you won’t need them all once the project is completed

    that’s the inherent weakness of an organization like VDOT with it’s fixed, one size, staffing that may be way to much for some projects but not near enough for mega projects like the HOT lanes.

    I’m all for the current thrust but as Jim points out.. people with project management experience are in demand in the private sector also and with more portable pensions.. not easily kept in house if the money is better somewhere else.

    If health care was portable.. VDOT would have their hands full as would other state agencies including schools. Portable health care would be a boon for employees… empowering them to seek the best economic deal.

    I’ve believed for some time now that health care benefits is the State’s ace in the hole… When you go to the private sector and change jobs.. bad stuff can happen to your health insurance.

  2. Most of my knowledge of VDOT’s operations stems from the Beltway HOT Lanes project. After a rocky start when VDOT and Fluor-Lane forget to tell people what was going on before they did things like cut down swaths of trees and open a equipment site right by three schools without sufficient protection, things have improved dramatically. VDOT does a good job of communications and is even starting to listen to residents. I think Fluor-Lane and Transurban, the operator, are also communicating and listening. The project is a bit ahead of schedule and, from what I know, more or less on budget. VDOT is clearly in charge, as it should be. It’s only one project, but I give design-build a thumbs up.

  3. Anonymous Avatar

    Mr. Bacon,

    You are on a very important, very insight-rich trail. My compliments. I strongly encourage you to continue research and dialogue on this topic.

    As an employee looking from the inside-out, though, there are some details about your article that are just plain inaccurate.

    By far, the statement about leadership turnover needs to be re-assessed. At face value, it’s accurate – but dig deeper. Look at old org charts of VDOT’s executive leadership and REALLY compare names. Not the seats they occupy – but the numbers and names of people.

    The VDOT leadership team is almost ENTIRELY intact from years gone by.

    When Shucet was at VDOT, he took away a lot of the bureaucratic controls from the VDOT “elite” at CO – and the results began to shine through in real, meaningful ways.

    As soon as he left, the power grab within the agency was on. Those same VDOT “elite” seized that control back AND MORE, making SURE that they would make changes so drastic (aka “Blueprint”) that it would be virtually impossible to wrestle it away from them ever again.

    How did that manifest itself? Layoffs targeted toward field workers and front-line managers. Don’t believe me – read the audit, and how CO did NOT follow the Blueprint guidance for layoffs in their own divisions. This is also the reason behind the residencies being decimated, removing the inherently vital connection between local governments, their constituents, and the VDOT service providers. It was done to remove local field “control” while further enriching the “elite” oversight and bureaucratic tyranny from CO. LEgislators from the Valley area where clued into this during the downsizing, and made some noise (I want to recall Obenshain was one of those) – but the carefully orchestrated media spin delivered by the “elite” held them off and carried the day. Go back and find some of Obenshain’s concerns about this happening – he was SPOT ON with much of his views of what was happening.

    It remains that way today – and those that are informed see it clearly. They won’t acknowledge it publicly, but Rome is burning at VDOT from the inside-out. It’s not a agency with new leadership. It’s mostly the same leadership, with a few folks changing seats, titles, or other inconsequential – but publicly satiating – moves. The agency is miserably top-heavy with self-serving bureacracts that are willing to till the agency into the ground while watching the bloodbath from their prized seats upon the hill.

    Think I’m informed? I am. Think I’m passionate about it? I am. The one thing I’m not, though, is optimistic that enough truth can be shined on this matter to bring pressure to those that are purposely interfering with the ability of 7,000 state employees and their ability to provide the important services that taxpayers desperately need and deserve.

    Please prove me wrong. Keep digging. You’re onto something here.

  4. trying to understand how anon’s info relates to the project management focus.

    to a certain extent, most organizations will undergo change with much of the power structure remaining intact.. but VDOT has downsized… AND they appear to be changing…slowly..over time… the switchboard that I think Schucet fostered appears to still be intact and VDOT has gotten involved with some major mega projects that are PPP partnerships with concessionaires like Transurban and Fluor.

    they’re now talking about Corridors of Statewide Significance which indicates to me that they understand the difference between roads with a statewide focus and others.

    They’ve moved the Hampton Roads/Tidewater bridge/tunnel conundrum forward by making it clear that tolls will have to be part of the solution.

    so.. I’m not discounting the dirty laundry nor internal problems but from the outside it does appear that the things that VDOT works on – are undergoing major changes.

    AT our local level – we HAVE had a series of staff chances with the local liaison but they are maintaining corporately the list of local projects that are at issue with the BOS and making progress on those projects.

    The 527 TA for projects that have major impact to state roads is a new thing that seems to be working… Was at issue in Tysons and I note that when Stafford developed their UDAs, VDOT was fully involved where those UDAs connected with Routes 1 and 17 – specifying, requiring heavy duty access management.

    We had the sequential lights linked and computer-coordinated on several Primary/major arteries…

    so.. from the outside .. changes are happening… and most appear to be improvements over previous operations.

    Perhaps anon can tell us what projects, operations are suffering degradation that we on the outside can see and relate to… that would be more compelling that talking about internal dirty laundry but on the outside we can see no direct harm from it, in fact, as I said. we see changes.. and many are better than the prior status quo.

  5. Anonymous, thanks for your observations. I will bear them in mind as I continue my transportation coverage. The main thing holding me back from digging deeper is a lack of time. Any assistance you can provide me off-line would help. You can continue communicating through the blog — or contact me at jabacon[at]dev.baconsrebellion.com.

Leave a Reply