VCU Wins Free Speech “Green Light” Rating

Photo credit: Babs Reh, Flickr

by James A. Bacon

Congratulations to Virginia Commonwealth University for winning a “green light” rating from the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) after making conscientious efforts to improve its formal free-speech policies. VCU is now one of five universities in Virginia and only 64 nationwide with the designation.

Since 2018, VCU revised several policies governing dorm room decorations, computer use, student conduct, sexual harassment, and reservation and use of campus spaces. But VCU’s sex-based misconduct policy remained a problem, according to FIRE.

“VCU’s old policy included a laundry list of behaviors, such as mocking and name-calling, that the school might have classified — and therefore made punishable — as sexual harassment. It was both overbroad and vague,” said FIRE in a statement.

“A single insult or joke does not qualify as sexual harassment,” explained Laura Beltz, FIRE director of policy reform. “It has to actually be a part of a pattern of conduct that meets that definition of harassment before being punishable. But that was not made clear under the old policy. For all students knew, they were always one strike away from getting in deep trouble on account of something they said.”

Following a November higher-ed summit in which Governor Glenn Youngkin urged Virginia’s public universities to draw up plans to support free speech and viewpoint diversity, VCU administrators met with Beltz. The university revised its policy to make it clear that student words had to meet the policy’s definition of harassment to be punishable.

“A university’s role is to create an environment that supports free inquiry and free expression – we learn and grow through being free to examine new and different ideas,” said VCU President Michael Rao. “Even when we disagree, it’s important to treat other people how all human beings should be treated – with civility, professionalism and respect.”

Virginia now has the third-most green light-rated universities in the country, trailing only North Carolina (with 15) and Mississippi (with six). The University of Virginia, George Mason University, the College of William & Mary, and Radford University also have green lights.

Good news, but… VCU should be applauded for reviewing its policies to protect free speech, and Governor Youngkin deserves credit for prodding VCU and other universities to build free-speech protections into its written policies. But there’s a lot more work to do.

Putting formal written policies into place is just the first step. As we have learned from our close observation of UVA, those policies also have to be administered in a fair and impartial manner. Equally essential is creating a free-speech culture where faculty, students and staffs don’t live in fear of Twitter Outrage Mobs, social ostracism, and ideological favoritism by instructors.

At UVA, for instance, the fact remains that a large percentage of students and faculty refrain from speaking on controversial topics, particularly those relating to race, sex, gender, “equity,” or “social justice.” In recent months the problem has been most pronounced among Jewish students, many of whom have taken to hiding any signs of their Jewish identity and suppressing expression of their views about the Israel-Hamas conflict, as we have amply documented on the Jefferson Council blog. While espousing sympathy in public statements for both sides of the conflict, the Ryan administration has sponsored a series of speakers and programs that are overwhelmingly biased in favor of anti-Israel viewpoints.

An even tougher nut to crack is the partisan/ideological imbalance at UVA and other universities. Some professors do encourage all students to speak freely in class but only a handful expose students to the rich tradition of conservative, libertarian and classical liberal thought that would provide them the intellectual armature to contest the dominant leftist discourse.

Tweaking formal policies is an important step toward creating a truly free and vibrant intellectual climate. But until university presidents transform campus culture, truly free speech and expression will remain an aspiration rather than the reality.

James A. Bacon is executive director of the Jefferson Council, an alumni organization at the University of Virginia that supports civil dialogue, intellectual diversity, and the free exchange of competing ideas.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

35 responses to “VCU Wins Free Speech “Green Light” Rating”

  1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “Equally essential is creating a free-speech culture where faculty, students and staffs don’t live in fear of Twitter Outrage Mobs, social ostracism, and ideological favoritism by instructors.”

    Aka, consequence-free speech… the true Conservative goal…

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      well sure… at some point.. there WILL BE severe sanctions for engaging in Twitter Outrage mobs..,
      social ostracism… etc… govt-enforced consequence-free “Free Speech”… We can’t have conservatives running around butt-hurt all the time because others let them know how they feel about their “free speech”.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      And Truth Social outrage, er, uh, truthies,…

    3. Not Today Avatar
      Not Today

      Not sure how one squares a demand for ‘safe space’ protections, not against state actors or agents but peer/social approbation, with conservatism but Bacon’s making a valiant effort.

    4. Not Today Avatar
      Not Today

      Not sure how one squares a demand for ‘safe space’ protections, not against state actors or agents but peer/social approbation, with conservatism but Bacon’s making a valiant effort.

    5. “Aka, consequence-free speech… the true Conservative goal…”

      How does that remark square with the “consequences” of being a communist during the McCarthy era?

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Ummm… one was federal legislative branch-driven censorship (see HUAC) and the other is private citizens exercising their own free speech in response to public comments – you only seem to be concerned with sheltering the Conservative comments, btw, unsurprisingly.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          confusion between the consequences of “free speech” and the consequences of being a called a “communist” by conservatives?

          confusion…………..

      2. Not Today Avatar
        Not Today

        Innocent people being demonized/accused and having their lives/careers destroyed by zealots?? Tracks.

    6. Not Today Avatar
      Not Today

      That wasn’t even based on facts or due process but inference and speculation, much like today’s conservative witch/DEI hunts.

    7. Twitter outrage mobs and social ostracism are the just part of the risks of engaging in free speech.

      At public universities, though, ideological favoritism by instructors is a violation of the right to free speech – instructors, teachers, professors, etc., are state actors/agents.

      1. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        As usual, Wayne provides a simple, sane explanation.

      2. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        As usual, Wayne provides a simple, sane explanation.

      3. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        As usual, Wayne provides a simple, sane explanation.

      4. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        As usual, Wayne provides a simple, sane explanation.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      It wouldn’t be fair to rank schools with a stated goal of suppressing free speech with those that are merely ambivalent.

    2. Randy Huffman Avatar
      Randy Huffman

      Closer to home Georgetown got a 17 or so. Harvard was dead last at 0.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        What does “warning” mean for Hilldale?

        1. Randy Huffman Avatar
          Randy Huffman

          Have no idea, I glanced through the Fire report last evening and didn’t even see their name but did not read through it,, but would like to.

          It is disappointing to me they didn’t score better , but I don’t know why they were given what they got.

  2. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    Asserting that a “pattern” of behavior is essential to identifying a trespass of a right or privilege runs counter to long-held conservative concepts that a pattern of police motorist stops of people of color compared to others is not unconstitutional. How much pattern is necessary to achieve a violation?

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Depends on the pattern. For example, lash scars…

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        Redlining??? No scars!!! Election integrity??? Purge the felons!!! NIMBY??? Only In Your Backyard!!! Massive Resistance may have been the last obvious pattern.

        1. Not Today Avatar
          Not Today

          Busing? The same spitting, angry faces as Moms for Illiberalism at school board meetings, just in dated clothes.

    2. Not Today Avatar
      Not Today

      Are you seriously expecting ideological consistency from conservatives? Once upon a time, they claimed to decry government intrusion in personal decision-making too.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        ouch ouch ouch but dead-on right!

  3. John Harvie Avatar
    John Harvie

    Who are the other four?

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      YooVee, eh?

      Virginia is now home to five green light institutions: Beyond VCU, the list includes the University of Virginia, George Mason University, the College of William and Mary, and Radford University

      1. John Harvie Avatar
        John Harvie

        Thanks. Not surprising Tech not on the list. One of mine made it, one did not.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Same. One in, one out. Interesting that the one not on the list is one of the most conservative in the state.

  4. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    I think everybody needs to calm down a bit. Over the weekend David Trone, a Democratic candidate for Maryland’s soon to be vacant US Senate seat accidentally said “jigaboo” when he meant to say “bugaboo”. The fact that he was being interviewed by a Black woman didn’t help.

    I don’t like David Trone, I don’t support David Trone, I hope Larry Hogan wins the seat.

    However, Trone obviously made a mistake and misspoke. He didn’t call anybody a “jigaboo”, he confused two words.

    Of course, Trone has apologized profusely.

    But … the cancel mob is out in force. He should drop out of the race, he should disappear from the public stage.

    Please ….

  5. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Keep an eye on Murthy v. Missouri. The case concerns alleged suppression of free speech regarding COVID by the federal government on social media platforms. The trial and appeals court records show that Biden functionaries were intimately involved in pointing out information and accounts to social media platforms for suppression, and those platforms complied.

    Does the federal government have the right to pressure social media companies to suppress speech the government believes is inaccurate and/or harmful?

    I say no. The US Government has an almost infinite ability to make itself and its points of view heard. The proper remedy to speech that the government finds incorrect, incomplete, or inaccurate is countervailing expression, not censorship.

Leave a Reply