VCU Seeking Prof to Teach Black Queer Antiracist Anticolonial Feminism

VCU Gender, Sexuality and Women’s Studies graduates

by James A. Bacon

Virginia Commonwealth University is hiring an assistant professor to teach “Race in Arts/Media, queer of color critique and Black feminist media studies.”

That’s quite the academic specialty. I can’t imagine there are many such scholars around. Once upon a time, I would have questioned whether there was any demand for graduates of such a program, but the national obsession with sexual/gender identity means someone is actually hiring people like that. According to CareerExplorer.com, the average salary for people with a B.A. degree in gender studies is only $27,300 yearly one year out, but it increases to almost $60,000 annually ten years out.

I shudder to think what employers are getting for their money. Consider the criteria VCU is looking for in a Black/queer/feminist professor, and then ask yourself if he/she/insert-your-preferred-pronoun will be more likely to help students gain independent, critical reasoning skills or turn out preprogrammed social-justice robots.

The job description advertised in The Chronicle of Higher Education notes that the successful candidate must have a PhD in Gender, Sexuality and Women’s studies, have teaching experience in the same field, and have a “demonstrated experience working in and fostering a diverse faculty, staff, and student environment.”

VCU’s Department of Gender, Sexuality and Women’s Studies (GSWS), avers the job description, is “committed to social transformation.” The Department, in its own estimation, excels in “race, racialization, and antiracism studies; LGBTQ studies and queer theory; postcolonial/decolonial/anticolonial studies; health and health policies; and research and activism for social justice change in the academy and the broader community.”

Among the materials applicants must submit is a Statement of Contributions to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion that illuminates his/her career aspirations and contributions toward promoting diversity, equity and inclusion. “Through this statement,” states the website, “you can share how your lived experiences, and academic and professional activities will impact your contribution to VCU’s mission of promoting equity and inclusion.”

The ad thoughtfully provides a link to an Office of the Provost page regarding statements of Contribution to Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. Statements of between 150 to 300 words are a university-wide mandate “required for all faculty searches.” Examples of contributions extend from personal activities to research and scholarship that “promotes equity and parity.”

The Provost’s explanation concludes with this seemingly contradictory caveat: “Equity and Inclusion will be viewpoint-neutral. VCU does not engage in unlawful discrimination in the context of hiring decisions, to include based on the ideological beliefs or viewpoints of the candidates.” In a related document, the Provost’s office reiterates, “VCU’s commitment to diversity, inclusion and equity is not aimed at producing ideological conformity.”

Remarkably, for a department committed to diversity, GSWS does not appear to include a single White male (at least no White males as males are traditionally understood). The 19 faculty and staff pictured here do include one individual who is indisputably a Black male and another dark-skinned person with facial hair, bright blue lips and big hoops hanging from his/her/their ears whose self-identity I would not dare guess at for fear of giving offense. So, there might be as many as two Black males, but I make no suppositions. Regardless, there are no White males. Apparently, diversity and inclusion has its limits.

Regarding the Department’s approach to academics, the GSWS website provides a Collective Statement of Resistance and Accountability. It does not strike the outside observer as open to a diverse range of viewpoints.

Together we are situated in the system of white supremacy. We all stand in solidarity with Black people, whose lives and worth have not been fully made to matter in our country, by white supremacy as a system. We denounce the ways in which we are complicit and implicit in this system….  Because our department is one that believes in praxis, particularly anti-racist intersectional praxis, we see part of our daily work as making sure the institution (VCU) lives up to the values it claims to hold. We recognize that VCU exists within a network of and in relationship to other social institutions (such as the City of Richmond, the criminal justice system, etc.), and as such we endeavor that the work we do at VCU also addresses the failings and violence of other institutions.

It does not escape my notice that the departmental chair is White, as is the associate chair, and the chair of the search committee. Ironically, one is tempted to observe, GSWS embodies the very racial hierarchy and white supremacy it denounces in broader society.

Among GSWS’s other statements of principle…

  • We understand that the very existence of police is an extension of white supremacy and capitalism and therefore we are abolitionist in our praxis.
  • We affirm, center and honor that the necessary radical politics have come from and continue to come from people who identify as Black & trans, Black & queer, and/or Black & femme.
  • We name, call out and push back against white supremacy in its myriad manifestations including in higher education, particularly at VCU.

(But, hey, the words “critical race theory” don’t appear here!)

I find it particularly interesting that the Department denounces as “white supremacist” an institution that indulges the existence of a 19-person department that, to all outward appearances, maintains a parasitical existence. The 19-person department contributed only 34 B.A. degrees and zero advanced degrees in 2020-21, according to State Council of Higher Education for Virginia data. Two majors per faculty member strikes me as exceptionally low productivity for any university department.

Bacon’s bottom line: If I were one of Governor Glenn Youngkin’s new appointees to the VCU Board of Visitors, I would make a point of inquiring whether GSWS faculty pull their weight in terms of teaching load and, more pointedly, whether the department lives up to VCU’s laughable insistence that the university does not discriminate on the basis of political belief.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

77 responses to “VCU Seeking Prof to Teach Black Queer Antiracist Anticolonial Feminism”

  1. James Kiser Avatar
    James Kiser

    The reason Heinlein referred to these times as the crazy years. Question is how did he know?

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      More Vonnegut than Heinlein.

      1. WayneS Avatar

        Or Anthony Burgess (The Wanting Seed).

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        There is a group here whose minds are definitely closed. And, the truth shall set you free.

        Hey, I might get the opportunity to say “neener, neener” to you after all. BTW, when your AC can’t keep up with the load, and it’s 85 degrees inside, you can boost its performance by setting a hose to spray the compressor, keeping it wet.

  2. Bob X from Texas Avatar
    Bob X from Texas

    I always interview recent grads with social justice gibberish on their applications but I don’t hire them!

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Another racist heard from…

  3. We’re doomed…….. the ChiComms will certainly win out

    1. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
      YellowstoneBound1948

      The United States is a silly country. Many powerful and autocratic nations seek our destruction, and our silliness only encourages them.

  4. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Sounds like VCU is trying to market to a yet untapped/not well tapped category of college applicant, eh?

    Should make it easy for Conservatives to know what higher ed they won’t attend, eh?

  5. WayneS Avatar

    So, if I go back to school can I major in that?

    1. Teddy007 Avatar
      Teddy007

      the top major at VCU is business followed by visual and performing arts, psychology, education, and health sciences.
      Classes taught by such a professor is to support minors of African-American students. It is common to find the pre-med, business, or STEM African-American students minority in something like African-American studies.

  6. WayneS Avatar

    We understand that the very existence of police is an extension of white supremacy and capitalism and therefore we are abolitionist in our praxis.

    The best thing for VCU to do pursuant to getting rid of this evil extension of white supremacy and capitalism, is to do away with the VCU campus police department. Then they should file a formal, written, request to the Richmond Police Department that their officers stop responding to calls from VCU students, faculty and employees. Perhaps they should even go so far as to remove 911 service from telephones and computers at VCU-owned properties.

  7. In the 90s I had a friend who was finishing his MA in English at Georgetown who was my best friend for a number of years with whom to go bar hopping etc. I even went with him when he moved to the Boston area to help him look at apartments, when he entered the PhD program at Brandeis. He was gay like me, and also African American, or more specifically a Jamaican immigrant whose family had moved to Silver Spring, Maryland when he was around 3 or 4. (For years I did not realize he was not American born.)

    As he was finishing up at Brandeis he told me that in English and the humanities in general he could see it was becoming difficult for new PhDs to get jobs, especially tenure track jobs or jobs at elite universities, unless they were in at least TWO affirmative action categories, because academia was trying to “rectify” the fact that so many academics were white, and in some fields male. He said getting a job as a straight white male in the humanities, unless you were really spectacular, was impossible.

    This surprised me since my friend’s politics were completely conventional Maryland/DC “liberal” Democratic politics of the time. (Though he did surprise me very slightly during the Obama vs Hillary primaries, telling me he was a Hillary supporter – the same month a white lesbian client told me her “secret” she said she could not let her lesbian friends know, that she was supporting Obama and not Hillary.)

    So this does not surprise me. We know men have stopped going to college or finishing it and women are now over half of college graduates. Therefore the author’s opinion – that finding these specialized queer feminist of color academics to take these jobs will be difficult – may be incorrect. I suspect for the past 25 years universities have been filtering out anyone who is not as many of those categories as possible, and pumping out gaffe prone middlebrows like Justice Sotomayor, Stacy Abrams, Kamala Harris, Justice Jackson, or Muriel Bowser, because they are women and non-white. Just as we seem to be promoting failures or morally compromised people like Rachel Levine or Pete Buttigieg just because they are “trans” or gay, and in some cases – Seattle or Chicago – voters have even elected completely dysfunctional gay women to be mayors.

    I wonder if my friend would now be denounced – as Asians are – for being “white adjacent.” Perhaps Jamaicans, Nigerians, Ethiopians, and other black people who don’t seem to be trapped in the fatal embrace of the welfare state will be redefined as white. Though if African American male voters also keep moving away from the Democratic Party, will they be redefined as “white adjacent” as well?

    1. WayneS Avatar

      …if African American male voters also keep moving away from the Democratic Party, will they be redefined as “white adjacent” as well?

      Well they certainly couldn’t be Black anymore. President Biden said so. And everyone knows president Biden would not lie…

    2. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
      YellowstoneBound1948

      Thank you for this refreshing post. “Gaffe prone middlebrows” — I could not have said it any better.

      1. CrazyJD Avatar

        That was juicy, wasn’t it.

    3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      “We know men have stopped going to college or finishing it and women are now over half of college graduates.”

      Merit-based perhaps…??

    4. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      The observations here echo similar faux libertarian intellectual absurdities offered in a couple of DC campaigns for elected office. Well written but equally unpopular. Conservative extremists will applaud.

  8. WayneS Avatar

    We understand that the very existence of police is an extension of white supremacy and capitalism and therefore we are abolitionist in our praxis.

    The best thing for VCU to do pursuant to getting rid of this evil extension of white supremacy and capitalism, is to do away with the VCU campus police department.

    Then, they need to file a formal, written, request to the Richmond Police Department asking that their officers stop responding to calls from VCU students, faculty and employees. Perhaps they should even go so far as to remove 911 service from telephones and computers at campus buildings and properties.

  9. All this probably goes without saying, but I’ll say it anyway. (I’m watching all this happen from the inside, incidentally.):

    This is one way that the left uses public money and other resources to advance its political agenda. These kinds of disciplines and positions are overtly political and (of course) always leftist.

    It’s a particularly efficient use of their (the left’s) energies, of course, as it will pay off for the next 30-40 years–and there’s little more efficient than an investment in young minds–whether for good or ill.

    Despite the left’s noisy commitment to “diversity, equity and inclusion” (DIE), “diversity” of thought is the very last thing they want. Universities generally and especially the humanities and social sciences are already strongly biased to the left. Nonsense like feminism, postmodernism, CRT etc. is already vastly over-represented in universities. But they are making hires like this hand over fist and calling them diversity hires. And somehow they get away with hiring more and more people doing something they already have way too much of….and calling it “diversity”…

    Finally, these kinds of disciplines outright make people stupider. Even the professors in these disciplines can’t reason their way out of a wet paper bag–partially because few smart students go into them, partially because the methods of pseudoscholarship they teach actually make people dumb. (E.g.: forget about carefully analyzing evidence: just call the author racist.)

    Some people keep saying “oh this nonsense will just die out.” First, I see little reason to believe that. Second, even if it were to die tomorrow, immeasurable damage has already been done. Vast numbers of overtly political pseudoscholars have already been hired, and they’ll still be here, wrecking academia, after most everybody reading this is dead.

    1. We really do need the better politicians to use this degeneracy and devolution of the culture to at least end tax support for NPR, universities, etc. People should study critical theory on their own dime, or they can get Mr. Soros to pay for it. I suspect as long as the government leaves the economy alone there will be a pool of capital available for loan to people studying STEM subjects and they will get jobs that allow them to pay it back.

  10. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    this reminds a lot like Conservatives first reactions to the coming out of gay folks and acceptance of them by many in employment/work/roles/military etc.

    It was a tough pill for Conservatives to swallow and even now for some.

    Now it’s deja-vu all over again with transgender, queer, etc.

    Leftists, commie plots, moral degradation, the whole nine-yards boogeyman all over again.

    Conservatives simply can’t seem to deal with realities of life. Better that we don’t know there are folks that are transgender, and gawd forbid we actually want them recruited and and hired to demonstrate “diversity” to potential students, employees, who are transgender, etc.

    It’s a leftist world of moral depravity , the undoing of a decent and normal society. Sounds just like the Conservative uproar when homosexuals started coming out.

    We just have to persevere… yep, both left and right.

    1. The concerns expressed above have NOTHING to do with gays coming out, Larry. It has EVERYTHING to do with large swaths of academia succumbing to leftist ideological doctrine. Any reader of these comments can see that, no matter how hard you try to distract and deflect.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        no distraction – truth! There are folks who want gays and transgender, women and blacks to be equally treated in society and there are those who disagree.

        You call them “leftists” and commies and other pejoratives… but truth is even some Conservatives agree. Then there are those who do not… right?

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        I suppose you’d be happy to have a Dept. of MAGA Studies? Suppose? Ha!

    2. Hiring to “demonstrate diversity” rather than hiring on the basis of talent and accomplishment is exactly the problem. There’s not even any proof that such hiring accomplishes anything. It’s really just a set of leftist aesthetic preferences + their desire to completely take over and politicize universities by hiring people they agree with politically and culturally.

      You can make up just-so stories all day long about why people are concerned about such things–but you clearly don’t have any idea what you’re talking bout.

      I’ve been in academia in some form or other for 40 years now. One thing I can tell you for sure: anyone hired to fill the job description above will not be a top-notch scholar nor thinker. The areas (feminism, queer theory, anticolonialism, etc.) are among the intellectually weakest in the academy. Each one is nonsense by itself. Together they’re probably worse than no education at all. Don’t believe me? Go read some of the so-called “work” in those areas of “study.” If you haven’t read it, you are in no position to speak about it.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        You don’t think companies hire people of color in their advertising not for their color but their talent?

        real world?

        Most corporations these days purposely hire to a demographic percentage and most colleges are also trying to achieve that.

        They both want to reflect the demographics of society.

        That’s a reality whether one agrees with it or not.

        1. A somewhat peculiar comment.

          Of course it’s a reality. If it were a fiction there’d be no reason to speak against it. Saying something “is a reality” doesn’t mean it’s good. That’s like saying “well, like it or not, the fact that your pants are on fire is a reality.” What’s the point of saying that? “Oh, it’s a reality? I guess it must be ok then…”

          Corporations are part of the real world. So are universities. Neither is a fiction.

          Hiring on the basis of race is against Title VII, isn’t it?

          Not sure what things are like at corporations. But hire someone mediocre into a professorship and you’re dooming the next 40 years of students to be slightly less knowledgeable than they could have been. And you can’t hire the best person, except by sheer luck, if you add any other criterion for hiring. The best candidate over 6′ tall will only occasionally be the best candidate. As will the best candidate who is female. Or Asian. Or white. Or black. Or “trans.” Or whatever.

          Also corporations picked this nonsense up from academia. So corporations having adopted it doesn’t count in its favor. It’s being promoted in academia by morons. And corporations let academia trick and bully it into doing what academia told them to do.

          Some real world….

  11. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “Remarkably, for a department committed to diversity, GSWS does not appear to include a single White male (at least no White males as males are traditionally understood).”

    Still stinging from your discovery that being a white male wasn’t going to be an advantage in African-American Studies at UVa, eh?

    1. WayneS Avatar

      Okay, that was funny.

  12. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    One of my longstanding pet peeves has been the tendency of higher education institutions to set up departments and majors around esoteric, narrowly focused areas. It is amazing that there is actually a Department of Gender, Sexuality, and Women’s Studies. Even more amazing is that there are 19 faculty and staff associated with that department. Is there really that much demand for these courses? Hearkening back to my days as an undergraduate, I would suspect that these courses would be those often referred to as “crip” courses, or not especially academically challenging. Another larger question: Why couldn’t such courses be offered under the well-established are of Sociology? That would avoid the expense of a department head and staff. (Maybe I answered my own question.)

    In the end, it is departments such as these that open higher education up to well-deserved criticism.

    1. Proving once again P. T. Barnum was correct.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        What’s your degree in, again?

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Well, yes. But jokes about “basket-weaving” are about as old as Higher Ed.

      Colleges do that to attract enrollment and to encourage potential students that they ARE welcoming and inclusive.

      They also provide sports programs and sports scholarships for the same reason even though they have nothing what-so-ever to do with academics, neither the folks who get the scholarships nor the general student body – that is attracted to a school often because of it’s participation in College Sports.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        College courses in Law Enforcement… seriously, how much studying is necessary to learn to shoot unarmed Black people?

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          lord……

        2. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
          YellowstoneBound1948

          Nancy, do you have any idea how hard it is to draw down on someone? No, you don’t. So, could we be a little less cavalier about law enforcement?

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            No.

          2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Exactly!!

          3. Ignorance has never stopped the left.

        3. WayneS Avatar

          Ha ha. Very funny.

          And besides, maybe modern law enforcement courses teach the students other options besides shooting perps.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Uh yep, other options…
            https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dj7kz4MfjQ8

            Aw, c’mon. You had to know it was out there! The 13-minute version of Ina Gadatazer
            https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vFH9kmKZX_o

          2. WayneS Avatar

            Wasn’t that 15 years ago?

          3. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Something like that. He walked her like a dog in front of a crowd. Tazered her once or twice when he put her in the squad car. He got a 60-day suspension. She got $300,000.

            Later, he stopped a car and did an illegal search claiming the driver was a murder suspect when he knew the real suspect had already been arrested. He was fired for lying on arrest documents. He sued, got his job back and back pay.

            She’s dead now.

    3. Lefty665 Avatar
      Lefty665

      Long ago when I was in college we all had a major interest in sexuality “studies”. We never dreamed that one day we would be able to major in it, although some seemed to be so inclined. We also spent much time studying women to identify those who shared our interest. Hormones being what they are, there were many. It was was a diverse, inclusive and equitable environment.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        I drew female psychology students like flies… I suspect they saw a thesis in me.

    4. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      I’m certain, Dick, that in 1950 and 1930, respectively, a Dept. of Sociology, or a Dept. of Psychology would have been met with equal skepticism.

      In 1960 a Dept. of African/African-American studies caught the attention of at least one BR author. In the 1970s, UVa started a Dept. of Women’s studies after a man agreed to be the chair for the two women who did all the work.

      Alchemy! Seems to me there was a time….

      As Mama used to say, “Education is like a box of chocolates. Ya never know what you’ll learn until you bite into it.”

      Or, as Papa used to say, “College is a fountain of knowledge, and Son, one thing of which I’m sure, you’ll learn to drink there.”

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        Sorry, but, sociology and psychology as academic subjects go back further than the 1930s and 1950s. In some respects the beginnings of sociological analysis go back to the ancient Greeks. The first sociologist of modern relevance was August Comte (1798-1857). W.E. B. Du Bois got a doctorate in sociology from Harvard in 1895. As for psychology, William James introduced it as a academic subject at Harvard in 1875 and Harvard awarded its first doctorate in the subject in 1878.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          So, sue me for the dates. 1800s for doctorates? Kid’s stuff, kinda young. I certainly hope this new hire won’t have to wait 2000 years for their first postgrad advisee.

          The idea was that subjects of study vary constantly, and the other examples, e.g., Women’s Studies, given today’s particular legal environment are certainly germane to the situation. N’est pas? The addition of the other drill-down areas of homosexuality, or any threatened minority, to their curriculum is for one reason — to fight ignorance and prejudice — something that’s on display around here almost continuously.

          But let’s take something more staid, mathematics. George Boole set forth the axioms of Boolean Algebra in the late 1800s. He considered them “amusing”. Of course, no serious study of Computer Science could be worthwhile without an examination of his algebra, nor could modern computing circuits be designed without it. I suppose that one can still receive a Ph.D. by studying some obscure adaptation of it.

          But it’s not all universities, and of course, will not attract all students. So one Department in one large university adds one small area of study. Is it so much in the grand scheme?

          Harvey Mudd College, 7 departments, and yet produces the highest percentage of graduates who attain a Ph.D. of all US colleges and universities, and not even a Dept. of Psychology. But then, they’re really specialized, i.e., “not a large State university.”

          Lastly, I give caution to all with one word, Proxmire. He gained great fame trashing grants and studies, mostly by making fun of their titles. How’d that end? If I recall , in embarrassment.

          Bacon is channeling Proxmire. He reads an ad for a position and rants. Don’t help him.

          1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
            Dick Hall-Sizemore

            I think Harvey Mudd College proves my point.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            And mine. We cannot have just Havey Mudds. Our university system is the envy of the world because of diversity of subject area.

          3. WayneS Avatar

            Some fair points, but a department at a publicly funded university which has 19 faculty and staff, but graduates only 8 or 9 graduates a year strikes me as being an inefficient expenditure of taxpayer dollars.

            Perhaps we should leaver the [Fill in the Blank] Studies Departments to private colleges and universities?

          4. WayneS Avatar

            Some fair points, but a Department at a publicly funded university which has 19 faculty and staff, but graduates only 8 or 9 people per year strikes me as being an inefficient expenditure of taxpayer dollars.

            Perhaps we should leave the [Fill in the Blank] Studies Departments to private colleges and universities?

          5. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Good lord, Man. STEM** will look stupid as STE. If a Dept. is measured only by graduates, then good-bye Mathematics! A school the size of Longwood, or Mary Washbag will have – just a guess – fewer than 10 getting BA/BS in math. Of the thousands of universities in the US, the number of Ph.D. In math is fewer than 400 per year.

            ** BTW I always thought it should be STEaM. Sounds hotter.

          6. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
            Dick Hall-Sizemore

            A department should not necessarily be measured by its number of graduates. Using your example of mathematics, I would contend that every college and university should have a requirement that every student earn at least six credit hours in math. A well-educated person should have some basic knowledge of math. The same goes for literature, history, and natural science. (Disclosure: When I attended W&M, a student could take either a math course or a philosophy course to meet the distribution requirements. I chose philosophy instead of math and have regretted it ever since. I enjoyed philosophy, but I should have taken math, as well.)

          7. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Wouldn’t surprise me if you could find your freshman catalogue online, but if I recall from my day, Elementary Functions, aka precalc was required of virtually all majors, and most entering students, aged 18, would have had it in HS within two years. But, it was by far the course with the largest number of sections (often wondered why the called it “sections” and not sessions).

            Sometime in the first week, a department test would have been given covering Algebra, and certain students would have been offered the opportunity to retake “bonehead” math instead, and then Elementary Functions in the spring. No harm, both courses counted toward distributions. For easily half the majors, that was it. In the other half of majors most only required Calculus I and that was it. All STE would go further up the chain.

            Of course, those courses were only required because of lab science requirements. Your basic Bio/Chem/Physics 101s used Elementary Functions as the “math” needed to plug formulas.

            The courses I wish I had never taken were Soc/Pysc 101 because the only time I could take them was 8AM. They cost me too, GPA speaking.

            English 101 Grammar & Composition, aka “Vietnam Prep”, just sucked any time of day. Yeah, I know, it shows even all these years later.

          8. WayneS Avatar

            This particular STEM graduate enjoyed English Grammar and Composition.

            It was 5-hour Calculus at 8:00 am every day that really sucked. It did not hurt my GPA, but it still sucked.

          9. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            I’m guessing your draft status had a lot to do with enjoyment. I was 1-A.

          10. WayneS Avatar

            I was YIR.

            Yes, I registered.

          11. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Well, ya know, it wasn’t fun. I’d rather a vaccine mandate than a draft.

          12. WayneS Avatar

            I can’t disagree with that.

          13. WayneS Avatar

            I am a graduate of the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech. At the time I was attending the university I would have disagreed with what I am about to say, but I wish those majoring in what are now called STEM fields were required to take more liberal arts classes.

            I have an idea: I’ll help you with math if you can guide me to a half-way decent understanding of Aristotle and Plato.

          14. WayneS Avatar

            Longwood does not have a separate math department. They have a department they call “Mathematics and Computer Science”.

            I’m fine with combining blending smaller departments with related, more popular areas of study.

            Like Mr. Hall-Sizemore’s suggestion that a “Department of Gender, Sexuality and Women’s Studies” should fall under the umbrella of Sociology.

          15. WayneS Avatar

            Longwood does not have a separate math department. They have a department they call “Mathematics and Computer Science”.

            I’m fine with combining blending smaller departments with related, more popular areas of study.

            Like Mr. Hall-Sizemore’s suggestion that a “Department of Gender, Sexuality and Women’s Studies” should fall under the umbrella of Sociology.

          16. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Probably does in the real scheme. At my undergrad, the chairperson of the dept was indeed by unpopular vote. It was the joke in the department. Everyone schemed and connived to elect someone else. There wasn’t a dime more in salary and the compensation was you got first choice of classes and a title.

          17. WayneS Avatar

            What? Not even a new hat?

          18. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Mortarboard.

          19. WayneS Avatar

            What? Not even a new hat?

      2. WayneS Avatar

        What knowledge of any true value would an Assistant Professor/Race in arts/media, queer of color critique and Black feminist media studies have to impart to you.

        I wean, seriously, the title is all but indecipherable, imagine what a syllabus for a course might look like.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Sillybus. It’s not a course of study that would have interest to me, but we are most assuredly heading into complicated days in the law, and a pre-law student or business student might glean something. For example, they might actually learn what CRT really is.

        2. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Sillybus. It’s not a course of study that would have interest to me, but we are most assuredly heading into complicated days in the law, and a pre-law student or business student might glean something. For example, they might actually learn what CRT really is.

        3. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
          YellowstoneBound1948

          Wayne, unless the dude could impart a better way to weld, paint, wire, or plumb, there is very little he could impart to me.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            QED

  13. Ken Reid Avatar
    Ken Reid

    Where do I go to apply? 🙂

  14. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    A good suggestion there, Ken, sign up for a course. Take Bacon and Sherman with you. That way, youse guys can come up with some fresh material instead of parroting, and copying and pasting from white supremacy websites.

  15. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Bunch of old white guys complaining about the extremes to which future generations are going to find solutions to the problems that a bunch of long dead white guys created.

  16. Ruckweiler Avatar
    Ruckweiler

    Oh, these classes would be a pip listening to the denigration of the system which gives this so-called”professor” a career in academic demagoguery/indoctrination. Why not a professor of Underwater Basket Weaving as this phony discipline?

Leave a Reply