UVa’s Latest Lurch Toward Leftism

Malo Andre Hutson

by James A. Bacon

The University of Virginia has bolstered its reputation as a Leftist intellectual  monoculture with the announcement that Malo Andre Hutson, director of Columbia University’s Urban Community and Health Equity Lab, will become the new dean of the School of Architecture.

At Columbia, Hutson belongs to both the Earth Institute and the Columbia Population Research Center. He has written about gentrification, environmental justice, and urban health, a trifecta of trendy Leftist disciplines. His latest book is entitled, “The Urban Struggle for Economic, Environmental and Social Justice.”

“Malo brings a depth and breadth of experience and scholarly accomplishment that stand out in his field,” said Liz Magill, UVA Provost. “Just as important is his vision for the future of UVA Architecture and its ability to create solutions for real world problems. Malo has continuously demonstrated strategic brilliance in connecting architecture and urban planning to other disciplines for the benefit of his community, his students, and his profession.”

UVa leadership considered one other critical attribute in the selection: “Hutson’s work in support of diversity, equity, and inclusion goes beyond his research and student engagement. At Columbia, he serves as a member of Columbia University’s Provost’s Advisory Council for the Enhancement of Faculty Diversity and the co-leader of the GSAPP’s Anti-Racism Task Force.”

As dean of the UVa architecture school, Hutson will play a key role in the recruitment, retention and advancement of faculty members and departmental heads. He should fit right into UVa and help accelerate its sinistral drift. There was no hint in UVa’s announcement that the promotion of intellectual diversity a criteria for hiring the new dean.

The book-jacket description of his new books reads as follows:

Dr. Hutson’s timely new book shows how residents of once-neglected urban communities are standing up to city economic development agencies, influential real estate developers, universities, and others to remain in their neighbourhoods, protect their interests, and transform their communities into sustainable, healthy communities. Based on seven years of research, this book draws on a wealth of material to conduct a case study analysis of eight low income/mixed-income communities in Boston, New York, San Francisco, and Washington, DC.

“At last, a book that looks at some of the ways in which gentrification has been reined in. The book provides a wide-ranging and largely convincing account of the alliances that have made possible some legal constraints to be placed on unrestrained gentrification”
​–Tim Butler, King’s College London, UK

Bacon’s bottom line:

Color me skeptical. As the old saying goes, if White people move out of an urban neighborhood, that’s White flight, and it’s racist. If White people move in to an urban neighborhood, that gentrification… and it’s racist. If Dr. Hutson is looking for more research material, he need cast his eye no farther than his new hometown of Charlottesville where anti-white gentrification has emerged as a political force. (See the musings of Mayor Nikuyah Walker.) Or, casting a wider net, Hutson could take on the cause of the anti-gentrifiers in Arlington County and figure out how to “rein in” Amazon, which is driving up housing prices as it creates tens of thousands of jobs.

But conservative Wahoos, parents and alumni can console themselves about one thing: Hutson has got to be better than the F*ck Quilt Lady just appointed Dean at Washington & Lee University!


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

41 responses to “UVa’s Latest Lurch Toward Leftism”

  1. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    The thing is – is UVA any further left than most other higher ed?

    Go around the country – is UVA really left of other higher ed?

    White flight is real and so is gentrification. Why try to deny it when it’s
    pretty clear?

    And, yes, even liberals do it!

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      It’s something popular on the Right, denial. “Just another group of well behaved tourists.”

    2. CJBova Avatar

      What’s clear to these people is if you’re white, you’re racist, and Larry, you’re buying into it too.

      It doesn’t matter how many universities have been taken over by leftist ideologies. Numbers don’t make it right. Oops. Dirty word. Should have said appropriate.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        I’m not buying into ANYTHING here EXCEPT the bogus nature of the narrative.

        Universities have been “leftist” since time began for Conservatives. What’s new? This narrative has been going on since when ? 1930?

        And it’s just UVA that has become “leftist”?

        Ya’ll need a new brain.

        1. CJBova Avatar

          Harvard’s been around since 1636; William & Mary since 1693. They were not the leftists of today.

          And y’all need to learn some manners and how to discuss issues without resorting to insults.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Carol – for as long as I have been alive – I realize that’s not since 1636 or such – but for quite a few decades, most of Higher Ed in the US has been considered as “leftists” by many “conservatives” and not just UVA or VaTech , but most of higher ed – coast to coast and then some!

            Not exactly a “new” thing.

            My apologies to you if you don’t feel you need a new brain personally.

        2. WayneS Avatar

          “And it’s just UVA that has become “leftist”?”

          Who said that?

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            ” UVa’s Latest Lurch Toward Leftism”

            Now, you wanna go back and see some of the prior posts in BR and see whether it was about UVA or all higher ed?

            😉

    3. dick dyas Avatar
      dick dyas

      If everyone does it, including libs, why is this professor disclosing it now?

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        what is it they say – publish or perish?

        The difference between libs and conservatives is that Libs know it’s wrong and needs to change but Conservatives deny the whole thing and blame the libs.

    4. WayneS Avatar

      “White flight is real and so is gentrification. Why try to deny it when it’s pretty clear?”

      But is it racist?

  2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    UVA is winning the Woke Bowl. VPI is catching up though. I remember this funny old football joke from a while back:

    George Welsh, after living a full life, died. When he got to heaven, God was showing him around. They came to a modest little house with a faded UVA flag in the window. “This house is yours for eternity, George,” said God. “This is very special – not everyone gets a house up here.”

    George felt special, indeed, and walked up to his house. On his way up the porch, he noticed another house just around the corner. It was a 3-story mansion with a Burgundy and Orange sidewalk, 50 foot tall flagpole with an enormous Virginia Tech logo flag, and in every window, VT curtains.

    George looked at God and said, “God, I’m not trying to be ungrateful, but I have a question. I was a darn good coach, I won several bowl games, and I even went to the College Football Hall of Fame.”

    God said, “So what do you want to know, George?”

    “Well, why does Frank Beamer get a better house than me?”

    God chuckled and said, “George, that’s not Frank Beamer’s house……
    It’s mine.”

  3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “If White people move in to an urban neighborhood, that gentrification…”

    You do know that is not gentrification, don’t you…??

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      well hells bells, you mean all poor neighborhoods are not black either? Jeeeesus….

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      well hells bells, you mean all poor neighborhoods are not black either? Jeeeesus….

  4. Matt Hurt Avatar
    Matt Hurt

    I really don’t understand it. There’s so many subjects of substance and import that are discussed in this blog, but almost as soon as the discussion begins, it devolves into a “your team sucks” smear campaign to show how the other team is either evil, stupid, or a combination of the two. Things in our society are way better than they used to be, but also need to get way better. The issues being discussed in this blog aren’t simple- if they were, they would have been solved long ago. It makes be believe that the folks who sidetrack the discussion are more interested in political theater than in engaging in an honest discussion. There’s certainly different policy prescriptions that are favored by different political factions, but if folks really want to see progress, everyone needs to focus on the problem rather than the shortcomings of the other team. Lord knows that both teams are pretty screwed up- there’s no way they couldn’t be, they’re comprised of humans.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      I totally agree. The premise for some is that most of these things “don’t work” – that the die is cast when kids are born poor or black or without both parents.

      Surely you’ve read this here many times, no?

      I was curious how you feel about this :

      1. Matt Hurt Avatar
        Matt Hurt

        So here’s how I’d like to see this type of thing play out, not just this particular issue, but a discussion about any policy issue. First, come to consensus on the the fact that what we’re talking about is a problem, and it would be ideal for the problem to improve if not be completely solved. Then, start peeling back the onion to reveal the issues that cause the problem to sustain. After that, discuss what would be done to mitigate those issues. Invariably there will be a ton of “yeah buts”, and those need to be fully addressed. At the end of that long and laborious process, I bet policy prescriptions could be attained that most discussion participants would endorse. It is likely that those policies wouldn’t be a person’s first or second choice before the discussion began.

        I think in the point you bring up, a good starting point would be to ask the other person would you rather these kids grow up to be on the dole, or is there something that can be done to give them a better shot of being a contributor to society rather than a drain on society.

        My big problem is that there is a ton of brain power that participates in this blog. I really hate that otherwise intelligent folks get sucked into jockeying for political position and working to get their jabs in at their opponents.

        I do not find it helpful however to make generalizations against one side or the other (such as your statement above) because each side is not a monolith- as it turns out neither Republicans nor Democrats are completely homogenous in thought. I find this to be a good strategy to put others on the defense which tends to thwart true discussion. It seems that folks who are interested in policy issues have become so politically radicalized that any hint of partisanship effectively devolves the conversation into a pissing match.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          I agree with everything you’ve said here. I’ve always felt that discussion should be on the issue itself and not the individuals.

          And I take your criticism also. I try not to initiate a personal attack (or impugning groups) but I will respond in kind , not always but sometimes.

          Matt – you have to notice the initial blog posts here – that start off with impugning people and groups – almost a daily thing – these days,no.

          THAT is what I DO respond to. If the blog post says “Leftists” and worse and it’s coming from a guy who claims to be a Conservative – where is the real issue to debate – to start with?

          Finally, you’re a professional educator and you KNOW – dang well – this crap about CRT and “equal outcomes” is total crap. So say it.

          😉

          1. Matt Hurt Avatar
            Matt Hurt

            It depends on how we define equal outcomes. I think it’s a failure on our parts that educational outcomes correlate so well with race. I appreciate that folks are finally paying attention to this, but I’m afraid that the way that we’re trying to solve the problem is not going to provide the intended results.

            From a K-12 perspective, we want to improve outcomes for students, and those outcomes are measurable. However, the state Board of Education has reduced the role that student outcomes figure into teacher evaluations. That same board also lowered the cut scores on almost all of the reading and math SOL tests which will have an effect of to some degree or another masking the achievement gaps between our subgroups of students. I can’t understand how anyone would think that these actions would reduce achievement gaps in the real world.

            I’m with you on all of the leftist/conservative arguments on this blog, and political discourse in general. If only hyperbole was worth $0.10 a ton, we could mine enough so that we wouldn’t ever have to work again. It seems to me that many conservatives aim their arguments at ideas that are held by the most fringe on the left (probably none of which have ever heard of this blog) and many progressives treat the conservatives as if they’re trying to reinstate Jim Crow (and I’ve seen no evidence of that here either). I think it would really help if everyone in general would assume that the “other” is not trying to destroy the world. We’re all in this together, and we can make it better or worse. Besides that, I have found in my personal life that trying to play the blame game doesn’t ever pay off with anything of value.

        2. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Okay, let’s come to a consensus on the facts. “On January 6, Trump incited an attempt to block a pro forma vote and a violent overthrow of the US government.”

          Your turn.

          1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            Pelosi, Bowser, and the deep state orchestrate a false flag event. Spend more money investigating so called rioters than was spent on investigating 9/11 conspirators.

            your turn. Jan 6th will forever be a flash point that divides.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            So, nothing gets done. Now, I’m pouring. What’s your poison?

          3. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            Just along for the ride. A multi generational schism of the electorate ahead. Ground Clear does wonders. Knocked out all of the poison ivy in my yard last week.

          4. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            So does Ever Clear, or 87 octane.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      “The issues being discussed in this blog aren’t simple- if they were, they would have been solved long ago. ”

      Define “simple”. If one or both sides are dead set against implementing any particular solution, then no matter how simple the problem may be…

      For example, a child has cancer but the parent’s religious beliefs prohibit surgery or blood transfusions, etc.

      Another example, suppose someone develops a method for evaluating the racial effects of a policy or law and one side becomes convinced that the method is rooted in Marxism even if it isn’t.

      1. Matt Hurt Avatar
        Matt Hurt

        Maybe both of those proposed solutions are not the way to go. The “my way or the highway” mentality is not the way to work with others. It may turn out that the true solution falls somewhere in between.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Maybe, maybe not. But if irrational beliefs are held by one side, “it’s racist” or the other “it’s a commie plot” then that’s the end of it. Welcome to the paralysis of religion.

        2. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Matt – here is how this blog post started off:

          ” The University of Virginia has bolstered its reputation as a Leftist intellectual monoculture with the announcement that Malo Andre Hutson, director of Columbia University’s Urban Community and Health Equity Lab, will become the new dean of the School of Architecture.

          At Columbia, Hutson belongs to both the Earth Institute and the Columbia Population Research Center. He has written about gentrification, environmental justice, and urban health, a trifecta of trendy Leftist disciplines.”

          … ” He should fit right into UVa and help accelerate its sinistral drift. ”

          Now how do you respond to this as an “issue”?

          What is THE issue to be discussed? That UVA is an uber leftist entity infested with leftists ?

          BR did not used to be this way.

          But it started to trend that way about the time the Culture War shifted into high gear. BR seems to WANT to be a member of that group now and again , if you go back and read the title and content of many of the blog posts – it’s a consistent theme that “leftists” have infested our institutions and are spreading “anti-racism”, CRT, “equal outcomes” and more.

          Surely you see this and as a professional educator, I would think – aghast.

          I also suspect if you weighed in with your views, sooner or later, they’d be on you too like they are Dick and others.

          1. Matt Hurt Avatar
            Matt Hurt

            My comment was general in nature (not specific to this article), and was basically a response to kind of what you mentioned above. We have been conditioned to think that we have to make great claims in order to be heard. Hyperbole gets clicks. That kind of behavior also causes the conversation to devolve into sheer partisan lunacy. There is so much brain power, obviously bright folks, that frequent this blog, I just wonder what they could accomplish if they could work together. I feel that they squander so much of their gifts with this petty squabbling. Maybe scoring points against the other team is the real objective.

            I come here from the thoughtful commentary, which I find quite often in the articles and the comments. I really enjoy the spirited debates in which the merits of the topics are discussed. I just get frustrated wading through the other stuff to get to it.

  5. Rob Austin Avatar
    Rob Austin

    The Jim and Liz Show at UVa forges on at WokeUVa. Just look at the latest senior hires.

  6. tmtfairfax Avatar
    tmtfairfax

    I enjoyed the free discussion of all topics and points of view in both college and law school. It certainly prepared me for life and the practice of law. I doubt that students who were “shielded” from similar experiences will be prepared as well.

    Aren’t gentrification and white flight polar opposites and, at least, somewhat self-correcting?

    Doesn’t single parenting affect all races, ethnic groups and economic classes? My dad’s father died when my dad was 8. His father committed suicide when my grandfather was 3. My great grandfather’s father died in a fall at the Philadelphia docks when my ggf was about 9. Not much social and economic support for widows and orphans in those days. And they were Irish-Americans to boot.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Well , not really polar opposites. In both cases , there are efforts to live in low-crime, healthy communities with amenities , good schools, etc…

      Not much economic support for WHITE widows and orphans and much less, almost none for Black.

      1. tmtfairfax Avatar
        tmtfairfax

        Larry, there was no public financial support for my 2nd ggm in 1850 and for my ggm in 1898. Same as for a black woman who experienced the same loss of her husband in those same years. And my grandmother only received a WWI veterans widows’ pension, which was the same for a widow of an African-American soldier from the “Great War.” There was no difference in government support (or lack thereof) based on race.

        I’m missing your point in the first paragraph.

  7. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    The crux of the issue is two fold:

    1) Is UVa developing a liberal monoculture with what seems like the endless hiring of far left of center faculty and administrators?

    2) “Color me skeptical. As the old saying goes, if White people move out of an urban neighborhood, that’s White flight, and it’s racist. If White people move in to an urban neighborhood, that gentrification… and it’s racist.”

    I’d like to hear Malo Hutson address the second point.

    Jim is exactly right. When Whites left DC for the suburbs in the 1960s and 1970s it was racism. Black DC and the White suburbs constituted segregation. The vastly different quality of the school systems was “de-facto Jim Crow”. Then the Whites (typically very liberal) began gentrifying parts of DC that had been almost all Black for 50 years. Guess what? That’s racist too.

    Everything is racist to race baiters.

  8. Merchantseamen Avatar
    Merchantseamen

    “Hutson’s work in support of diversity, equity, and inclusion”. An oxymoron. They are so caught up they can’t see it.

  9. WayneS Avatar

    I’d like to see know more about his architectural resume. Does anyone know where I can find a project in which he was involved?

    1. WayneS Avatar

      Never mind. He is not an architect. His degrees are in urban planning.

      Silly me to think UVA would hire an architect to head its school of architecture.

  10. let’s see..keeping people out of a neighborhood because of their skin color….what a great original idea.

Leave a Reply