by James A. Bacon

On March 10 the Federalist Society, a group promoting conservative/libertarian principles in law schools, hosted a panel discussion at Yale Law about freedom of religion and speech. About 120 student protesters descended upon the event, shouted down the speakers, and then, after repeated warnings, continued their noisy demonstration in the hallway. In the aftermath, more than 400 law students, about 60% of the student body, signed an open letter voicing support for the protesters and assailing the presence of armed police. While the protesters were excessively loud and “engaged in rude and insulting behavior,” wrote Law School Dean Heather Gerken, they did not violate the school’s “three-warning protocol.” Heated debate over the contours of free speech continues to this day.

At the University of Virginia, by contrast, the Federalist Society held a symposium on the topic, “The Federalists Vs. the Anti-Federalists: Revisiting the Founding Debates.” The event went off without a hitch. There were no protests, no open letters, and no need for statements by the dean.

The exercise of free speech and free expression leaves very much to be desired at the University of Virginia, but students, parents, faculty and alumni can console themselves: at least UVa is not Yale. (Which is fairly ironic, given the fact that President Jim Ryan, Provost Ian Baucom, and law school Dean Risa Goluboff all hold Yale degrees.)

The Ryan administration continues to pursue an aggressive “equity” agenda that includes rewriting the university’s history, mandating Diversity Equity & Inclusion training, and requiring people to write “diversity statements” for job applications and employee reviews. Moreover, the radical sentiments given free play at Yale do exist at UVa — read the editorials in The Cavalier Daily student newspaper for abundant proof. But Ryan, Baucom and Goluboff have set a different tone in recent months by publicly supporting the principles of free speech and free expression.

Last year the Board of Visitors adopted a free-speech statement written by a Ryan-appointed board. When Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin delivered a speech at the Federalist Society event, Goluboff, a committed leftist, gave him a polite introduction. Ryan and Baucom recently penned a column, published in Inside Higher Education, opining upon the necessity of going beyond simply tolerating free speech to actually listening to others with different views. Putting words into action, Ryan will lead tomorrow a “conversation” with a panel that includes Emma Camp, who published a scathing op-ed in The New York Times about student self-censorship at UVa.

In the latest sign that UVa is not Yale, seventeen faculty members have published an op-ed in The Cavalier Daily chastising the CD editorial board for objecting to a scheduled speech by former Vice President Mike Pence, and the proposition, widely held in woke circles, that unwanted speech threatens the well-being of students to the point where it constitutes violence.

“What saddens us about the mindset of The Cavalier Daily editorial is its assumption that the editors should enjoy the freedom to say what they want but others with whom they disagree should not,” stated the letter, whose signatories includes such academic luminaries and legends as economic professor Kenneth Elzinga, political scientist Larry Sabato, and sociologist Brad Wilcox.

All of this represents a sea change from the atmosphere at UVa a year or two ago, where, to cite but one example, a medical student was issued a “professionalism concern card” for questioning the basis of the thinking behind “microaggressions.” The subsequent inquiry precipitated a series of events that led to his expulsion.

What is different today?

Have Ryan, Baucom and Goluboff spontaneously embraced views that depart from their peers at other elite U.S. universities, including their alma mater at Yale? Are they any less woke than other academics in their views regarding the alleged intersectional oppression of minorities, women, gays, and transgenders?

I cannot speak for what is in their hearts. But I will make this observation: the political environment here in Virginia is very different than it was a year ago. And UVa, as a public institution, is more accountable to outside forces than Yale, a private institution run by a self-perpetuating oligarchy and buffered from outside pressure by one of the world’s largest endowments. Team Ryan does not have the luxury of giving the figurative finger, as the Yale protesters did, to those who think differently.

I suspect that Ryan has been getting a heap of advice from Rector Whitt Clement and former Rector Jim Murray, both of whom are moderates in the culture wars: appointed by Democratic governors, adhering to old-school Democratic Party values, yet ensconced in the political mainstream. Clement, who is distressed by extreme manifestations of wokeism, has warned Ryan that he cannot ignore the import of Youngkin’s election.

The election of Attorney General Jason Miyares has prompted a major personnel change at UVa. Miyares fired Timothy Heaphy, Ryan’s hand-picked university counsel, and intends to replace him with a career lawyer, most likely from the AG’s office. Meanwhile, Ryan has to contemplate the possibility that Youngkin will replace the entire Board of Visitors over the next four years with UVa alumni who are determined to uphold the principles of free speech, expression and inquiry, question his DE&I agenda, protect the Jeffersonian heritage that has been denigrated under his watch, and reverse the march toward leftist intellectual conformity.

The Jefferson Council (TJC), of which I am a founding member, also has worked to change the environment. In highlighting abuses of free speech and condemning leftist intolerance at UVa, TJC has created channels of communication that bypass the UVa and alumni association propaganda organs to inform alumni of what is happening. We have met with faculty and student groups, and we have told them we have their backs. Conservatives, libertarians, moderates and even traditional liberals now know they do not stand alone if targeted by the Twitter Outrage Mob.

UVa is not Yale. And it never will be.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

34 responses to “UVa Has Issues, But At Least It Is Not Yale”

  1. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    While the protesters were excessively loud and “engaged in rude and insulting behavior,” wrote Law School Dean Heather Gerken, they did not violate the school’s “three-warning protocol.”

    Three warnings? Are these law students or sixth graders?

    1. Sounds like a woke version of 3 rounds of “heckler’s veto” are permissible — perhaps more if no official warning is given.

  2. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    Committed leftist? What in heavens is that? And woke leadership at UVa, sensitive to social issues, would seem to emulate some of the most woke of Mr. Jefferson’s principles and outlook. Sure, it may be true that overseeing difficult issues such as speech will result in mistakes and even unhelpful policies. Being unlike Yale in a single instance does not a virtue make nor signal. Does TJC truly support the political patronage of the AG’s office in UVa as a model of Jeffersonian ideals? Once upon a time in America, conservatives were composed critics not name callers for their own virtues.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      re: ” Once upon a time in America, conservatives were composed critics not name callers for their own virtues.”

      clearly the dialogue in BR no longer meets that standard and BR actually really reflects the current state of Conservatism and conservative dialogue which is indeed uber name-calling, pejoratives, what-a-boutism and other fetid “talking points”. Just check the other blogs, Twitter , FOX .

      Demonizing institutions like Yale and UVA is what they do now – not just “speech”:

      ” The Ryan administration continues to pursue an aggressive “equity” agenda that includes rewriting the university’s history, mandating Diversity Equity & Inclusion training, and requiring people to write “diversity statements” for job applications and employee reviews. Moreover, the radical sentiments given free play at Yale do exist at UVa — read the editorials in The Cavalier Daily student newspaper for abundant proof. But Ryan, Baucom and Goluboff have set a different tone in recent months by publicly supporting the principles of free speech and free expression.”

      Plainly stated, Conservatives are at war with Higher Ed , Public Education, Govt and Science these days.

      It’s here in BR almost every day.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      The real question is “who sounds more like the Russian press?”

    3. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Being a white male conservative is the easiest thing to be; you just continue to believe what you’ve always believed.

    4. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Apparently the Conservative concept of consequence-free speech does not allow room for Liberal student protest free speech… alas…

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        right. Using free speech to disagree with the speaker is ‘cancel’ and ‘cancel’ is verboten.

        “free speech” means you get a forum to say what you want and no one else can respond.

        1. DJRippert Avatar
          DJRippert

          Disagreement is fine. Shouting down speakers with whom you disagree is not fine. I suspect that even you understand the difference.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Seen quite a few school board meetings of late where the School board is shouted down and almost zero condemnation from the usual suspects crying about free speech…..

      2. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        No, it doesn’t allow people in law school to “shout down” invited guests. You liberals seem to struggle with the concept of polite discourse. These are law students, not junior high schoolers.

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          I am sure you believe that students protesting the war in Vietnam and for Civil Rights in the exact same manner in the 60s had no 1st amendment rights as well….

          Btw, if JAB had reported accurately, you would know that all ADF (not Federalist Society, btw) speakers were able to say their piece and were not actually “shouted down”.

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Wahhhhawk! UVa! Wahhhhawk! Polly wanna 60’s mostly white UVa!

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      … and all-male don’t forget… the good ole days!!

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Diversity, in his mind, is the inclusion of white women for dates. Driving to Longwood was such a hassle and the only places to go were The Nottingham, Toms, or parking behind the dorms.

      2. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        The University of Virginia started admitting women (beyond the nursing program) in 1970. That was 52 years ago. By 1977, half the entering freshmen (called first year at UVa) were women. That was 45 years ago.

        Why do you liberals live in the past?

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          Aka, “the 60s…”….smh…

          “Why do you liberals live in the past?”

          We do not… we just drop by once in a while to heckle you Conservatives…

  4. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “Are they any less woke than other academics in their views regarding the alleged intersectional oppression of minorities, women, gays, and transgenders?”

    Twice in one piece you (intentionally) conflate the left’s “woke” platform of equity for the marginalized in society with your desire for consequence-free speech. The two are not the same… you know this and your methods are quite transparent, JAB… do better…

  5. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2022/03/17/controversy-continues-over-yls-protest-and-police-presence/

    Google and read a little about the speaker’s organization: Alliance Defending Freedom. The have supported lawsuits requiring the sterilization of trans humans before they can change their names and lobbied against the decriminalization of homosexuals. I would say that the student protestors have a point – heck, just having Michael Farris as their CEO is reason enough in my book. Also, ADF’s 1st amendment rights were in no way violated by the protest. This piece tells the tale… JAB skipped all the details and jumped straight to “victimhood” as is his wont.

  6. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “Since the event, Laurence Silberman, a circuit judge for the US Court of Appeals for the Washington, D.C. Circuit, reportedly sent an email to all Article III judges in the United States recommending that all federal judges “carefully consider” whether the Yale Law students who participated in the protest should be “disqualified for potential clerkships.””

    Can’t wait for the BR anti-cancel culture piece for this doozy… wait… Conservatives canceling students for exercising their 1st amendment rights is a-ok… my bad…

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Little children, masquerading as law students, who can’t control their emotions should be seen as questionable candidates for supposedly impartial law clerkships. If twenty-something graduate students can’t control their emotions then they need to face the consequences.

      These are not law students, these are spoiled little children.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Oh..!! So NOW there is no such thing as consequence-free speech… understood clearly…

        Btw, this protest was organized, controlled, and scheduled… hardly the acts of children…

  7. tmtfairfax Avatar
    tmtfairfax

    I cannot imagine anyone in my law school class shouting down a speaker. And if someone had tried, he/she would have been opposed strongly by everyone irrespective of personal political views. But then, my peers didn’t get trophies for participation. And we understood what the First Amendment means.

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Really…??

      “During the early 1800s, inhabited public buildings at Harvard were blown up and Yale students celebrated Christmas by breaking windows of college buildings (Bledstein, 1976). In 1836 at the University of Virginia, a group of students refused to surrender their guns to University faculty. A riot soon followed with students participating in random shootings and attacks on professors’ homes (Bledstein, 1976). Furthermore, a student stabbed the president of Oakland College in Mississippi to death, and the president and a professor at the University of Georgia were stoned (Rudolph, 1990). Also according to Rudolph:
      Between 1800 and 1875 students were in rebellion on at least one occasion at Miami University, Amherst, Brown, University of South Carolina, Williams, Georgetown, University of North Carolina, Harvard, Yale, Dartmouth, Lafayette, Bowdoin, City College of New York, Dickinson and DePauw. (p. 98)
      These disturbances were usually in rebellion against the inadequate living conditions, terrible food, rigid rules, and the Puritan religious values that characterized colleges of the time (Report, 1970). Discontent during that early period was largely apolitical. This began to change, however, in early 20th century with the emergence of the Intercollegiate Socialist Society (ISS)-the first radical political movement at America’s institutions (Report, 1970). Campus protests in the 1920s and 1930s focused on political issues with strikes against the war, protests against the Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC), attacks on America’s foreign policy (Report, 1970), immigration, and free speech (Lucas,
      1994).”

      By comparison, what happened at Yale was a discussion over afternoon tea…

      1. tmtfairfax Avatar
        tmtfairfax

        Well, none of this happened at the University of Minnesota Law School in the mid-1970s. One spring day, before class we did see a streaker running down Pleasant Street, SE, in Minneapolis. And, we did have lively debates both in and outside class. But no one was shouted down or threatened for having a position on an issue.

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          Looks like you missed all the fun by a few years:

          Tuesday, May 26, 1970

          “Protesters participated in an anti-ROTC rally in front of Morrill Hall. Fifteen strikers blocked entrances into the building during this demonstration. Stated in the article, “Moos, U attorney to testify in Morrill disruption case,” by M. Howard Gelfand in the Minnesota Daily, it was said that “Members of the group were boisterous and making much noise by shouting, blowing whistles and kazoos, banging on a 55-gallon oil drum and throwing water-filled balloons against the building and at persons entering and exiting the building…””

          A pretty interesting read. Looks like the university was pretty supportive of the student protests at that time.

          https://www.continuum.umn.edu/2020/06/1970-student-strike-50-years-later/

          1. tmtfairfax Avatar
            tmtfairfax

            Apples & Oranges. While I did not attend the University of Minnesota in 1970, I was aware of the anti-war protests in Spring of that year. I recall demonstrations at the University and a blockade of I-94 connecting St. Paul & Mpls.

            But none of that changes my experience at the U of M Law School from 73-76. There were many, many vigorous debates about many topics, legal, political, economic and other topics. I remember many people expressing strong emotions but no one trying to shout down a person speaking. We, as a class, believed that the best remedy for free speech was more free speech.

  8. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    Hey, JAB, maybe your TJC can get YAF to invite ADF to come “speak” at your alma mater and when the woke students come protest that truly reprehensible organization, you can be ready with your “victimhood” cloak and correspondent’s pad (heck, you could probably write the anti-Ryan piece right now). Think of the BR clicks you will get and those sweet advertising 🤑🤑…

    1. Yes, ADF has quite a history, according to (among others) the SPLC which classifies ADF as an anti-LGBTQ hate group. Here, the Federalist Society defended its choice of guest speaker (the general counsel of ADF) as simply presenting a legal voice from the other side of the political spectrum; Yale’s gay community was unimpressed by that argument. But the real fuss from the student perspective was about the armed police called to maintain order. If you prefer nuance to name-calling, see this article from the campus newspaper afterwards.

    2. Ah, now I see you already, this morning, posted the same link to the Yale Daily News. As that makes clear, the Yale event sponsoring the lawyer for a “hate group” to discuss its tactics is quite distinguishable from a lecture on the Federalist Papers, or the proposed UVa event sponsoring a speech by Mike Pence.

  9. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    “And UVa, as a public institution, is more accountable to outside forces
    than Yale, a private institution run by a self-perpetuating oligarchy
    and buffered from outside pressure by one of the world’s largest
    endowments.”

    Err. What do you know about Yale, exactly? Ever been there? Where did this come from? I have many friends and colleagues who are Yalies. I have a relative on the faculty.

    1. Virginia’s governor appoints the Board of Visitors, which guarantees new people with different outlooks every time a governor from a different political party is elected. Thus, with Youngkin’s election, we will see a major change in the make-up of UVa’s BoV over the next four years. You may not like the change, but the point is that change is possible. Yale’s board, like that of virtually all private universities, is a self-perpetuating clique accountable to absolutely no one.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        If I recall, Larry Summers was at private Harvard. Pressure.

      2. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        re: ” we will see a major change in the make-up of UVa’s BoV over the next four years.”

        good luck on that… I think your frustration is overwhelming realities…

        Were they “leftists” when they were appointed originally or did they somehow evolve from reasonable people into leftists?

        I’m not supporting ‘leftists” running the BOV because I don’t believe there is such a thing to start with. I mean how did Helen Dragas get there and the folks that voted with her? Mr. Kaine, right? Not exactly a conspiracy of leftists pols appointing leftist BOV.

Leave a Reply