UVa Board Ponders 3.1% Hike in Tuition & Fees

by James A. Bacon

The University of Virginia Board of Visitors is considering raising in-state undergraduate tuition up to 3.1% next year and hiking student fees by $114. The increases potentially would add $554 to tuition and fees next year, bringing the total to $17,860, reports the Daily Progress. Including room, board, books and other expenses, the total cost of attendance would reach $34,600 for students not benefiting from financial aid. Out-of-state students would pay $70,200 all told.

Rector James B. Murray cited the impact of the COVID-19 epidemic. “2020 has been a tough year for everybody, for the students, parents and the administration. It’s been a financially troubling year and psychologically troubling year. We have lost a lot of revenue. We don’t have housing revenue, dining revenue, athletics, or student and public services. … The board is committed to keeping tuition increases at a minimum and using every other source of revenue whenever and where ever we can.”

Said Murray: “Tuition is always the last lever that we pull.”

Third-year student Madison Perry, one of two dozen students allowed to speak in the board’s first-ever open comment session, had a devastating come-back.

“Something really stuck out to me in Mr. Murray’s opening address to the board; tuition is the last lever that the board wants to pull,” she said. “Obviously, I’m assuming good faith here, but why do you pull it every year? Why has tuition gone up every year for decades now?”

It turns out that COVID has set back students financially, too. Perry said she lost her job in the restaurant industry. She found new work, but a parent’s illness has made her education a burden on her family, so she has taken out private loans to pay her expenses.

Levi Schult, a fourth-year astrophysics major, said he and most of his friends had lost their jobs due to the pandemic. Because he has a car, he was able to find work doing deliveries, but now he feels at higher risk for contracting COVID-19.

Over the 15 years for which the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia (SCHEV) has data, the cost of attendance at UVa has increased 99% — from $14,764 in the 2005-06 academic year to $$29,379 in the 2019-20 academic year. By comparison, inflation over the same period was 28.4%.

The exact tuition increase for 2021-22 won’t be known until the General Assembly enacts its budget and decides how much state aid it will provide UVa, Murray said.

Here is a useful perspective for understanding UVa (and most other public and private universities): The university  is a mechanism for extracting wealth from students, their families and, to a decreasing extent, taxpayers for the benefit of faculty and, above all else, an oligarchy of highly compensated administrators. Driven by the quest for prestige, the administration has endless ideas for spending money on initiatives of ever-diminishing educational utility. With little appetite for cutting programs or expenses, the UVa board increases expenses as much as the political environment and higher-ed marketplace will bear. Year after year after year.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

18 responses to “UVa Board Ponders 3.1% Hike in Tuition & Fees”

  1. Steve Haner Avatar
    Steve Haner

    Apparently Biden the Savior was pushed on the CNN Townhall/Paean of Praise to use his magic powers to wipe out $50,000 in student loan debt. He wants to limit it to $10,000. But he was taking heat. During the extended coverage no discussion of trying to prevent the debt in the first place by rationalizing college costs.

    Should loan forgiveness appear, and become expected, what will the impact of that be on University Administrative Greed and Board of Visitor compliance? I don’t see it pressuring prices down.

    1. Anonymous_Bosch Avatar
      Anonymous_Bosch

      Indeed. If loan forgiveness becomes a thing then what is to keep “educational” institutions from treating that like an excuse to raise the rates even further? Loan forgiveness without corresponding price controls is absolutely insane. This is the same issue that the government has with healthcare.

  2. Steve Haner Avatar
    Steve Haner

    Apparently Biden the Savior was pushed on the CNN Townhall/Paean of Praise to use his magic powers to wipe out $50,000 in student loan debt. He wants to limit it to $10,000. But he was taking heat. During the extended coverage no discussion of trying to prevent the debt in the first place by rationalizing college costs.

    Should loan forgiveness appear, and become expected, what will the impact of that be on University Administrative Greed and Board of Visitor compliance? I don’t see it pressuring prices down.

  3. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead V

    Rector Murray: “tuition is the last lever we want to pull”. I don’t believe a word that comes out of his mouth.
    https://ramiungarthewriter.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/a19b5-pants2bon2bfire.gif

    1. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
      Reed Fawell 3rd

      “Rector Murray: “tuition is the last lever we want to pull”. I don’t believe a word that comes out of his mouth.”

      Nor do I.

  4. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead V

    Rector Murray: “tuition is the last lever we want to pull”. I don’t believe a word that comes out of his mouth.
    https://ramiungarthewriter.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/a19b5-pants2bon2bfire.gif

    1. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
      Reed Fawell 3rd

      “Rector Murray: “tuition is the last lever we want to pull”. I don’t believe a word that comes out of his mouth.”

      Nor do I.

  5. Any 18-year old can get a loan for any amount to go to any college.
    If the college is given responsibility for the debt you will see a different perspective of just handing out money to anyone and there will be an incentive to keep costs down.

    Currently, there is no reason to keep tuition low because loans to pay those costs for are granted to everyone!

    1. and now with SAT/ACT tests no longer a requirement for applications due to C-19……. and with students losing a year or more of schooling….. the quality of student being admitted to college with large loan debt will be interesting to see….

  6. Any 18-year old can get a loan for any amount to go to any college.
    If the college is given responsibility for the debt you will see a different perspective of just handing out money to anyone and there will be an incentive to keep costs down.

    Currently, there is no reason to keep tuition low because loans to pay those costs for are granted to everyone!

  7. LarrytheG Avatar

    I don’t get it. You have a choice of what to buy and for how much. How can you blame others for the decisions you made and then on top of that , imply the govt should step in and “do something”?

    Where are the Conservatives?

    If UVA wants to charge too much for their product, what wrong with people making choices?

    Faux Conservationism. geeze.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      You miss the point, Larry. UVa is not like a commodity or service, such as a restaurant, which people are free to use or not, depending on the price. It is not even like Harvard, the University of Richmond, or Hampden Sydney College, which are private institutions which parents can choose for their children or not, if the price is too steep. It is a public institution, supported by taxpayer dollars. As such, it is supposed to operate for the public good of the Commonwealth and its residents. A college education is still one of the best means of promoting social mobility. A degree from UVa. carries a certain amount of prestige. To the extent that the cost of a UVa education increases, it becomes less accessible to the middle and lower socioeconomic levels of the Virginia population. A lot of us feel that a good percentage of the expenditures incurred by higher education institutions are of marginal benefit, at best. Higher ed seems to feel that it does not have to carefully manage its costs because it can always increase tuition and fees. In that sense, it is not accountable as other state entities are.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        Well, yeah.. I know the theory…but then there actually is reality which most of us have to actually deal with…

        or was that sarcasm?

        😉

        Seriously, if you are a Conservative, reject the Govt role and do what your hear and mind says…. heck that goes for liberals also.

  8. LarrytheG Avatar

    I don’t get it. You have a choice of what to buy and for how much. How can you blame others for the decisions you made and then on top of that , imply the govt should step in and “do something”?

    Where are the Conservatives?

    If UVA wants to charge too much for their product, what wrong with people making choices?

    Faux Conservationism. geeze.

  9. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
    Baconator with extra cheese

    For Equity’s sake UVA should make tuition free for BIPOCs and raise the tuition about 80% for NONPOCs…. or maybe only admit BIPOCs students with free tuition until they spend that endowment they obtained via self-proclaimed systemic racism.
    But talk is cheap and watching that endowment grow must give the old Wypipo running the show wood.

  10. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
    Baconator with extra cheese

    For Equity’s sake UVA should make tuition free for BIPOCs and raise the tuition about 80% for NONPOCs…. or maybe only admit BIPOCs students with free tuition until they spend that endowment they obtained via self-proclaimed systemic racism.
    But talk is cheap and watching that endowment grow must give the old Wypipo running the show wood.

  11. LarrytheG Avatar

    The idea that someone is not responsible for their loan debt because UVA “charged too much” is as ludicrous as some fools making that claim about a car or home loan/

    We have gone wacko! Something I would expect from liberals but not Conservatives.

  12. LarrytheG Avatar

    The idea that someone is not responsible for their loan debt because UVA “charged too much” is as ludicrous as some fools making that claim about a car or home loan/

    We have gone wacko! Something I would expect from liberals but not Conservatives.

Leave a Reply