The Uranium Controversy Throwing Off Gamma Rays

When Clarke Hogan, D-Halifax, threw a party at his family’s retreat in Brunswick, ME, recently, the guest list included legislative pals, Del. Wat Abbitt, I-Appomattox, and House Speaker William J. Howell, R-Stafford. The guest list also included John-Garrett Kemper, a top lobbyist for uranium mining in nearby Pittsylvania County, reported Jeff Schapiro in the Sunday Times-Dispatch.

While Republicans have pushed hard for off-short oil drilling, notes Schapiro, Hogan and Abbitt helped kill a bill in the last session that would have launched a state study on the economic and environmental issues surrounding uranium mining in Pittsylvania, home to what is reputed to be the largest untapped uranium deposit in North America. While Republicans normally favor energy development, Hogan and the GOP-leaning Abbitt are both “downstream” — literally — from Pittsylvania, and have vocal constituencies worried about the impact of uranium mining on their water supplies.

Schapiro contacted Hogan about the Maine shindig but was rebuffed. Said Hogan: “Where I go on vacation with my friends is, frankly, none of your business. . . . Write up your conspiracy theories, but don’t waste my time.”

Hogan stands between the proverbial uranium ore and a hard place. Schapiro suggests that he might be looking for a way out. If the General Assembly refuses to back a special study commission, the report notes, it may be possible to do an end run by assigning the job to the Virginia Coal and Energy Commission.

The politics of the uranium mining controversy are fascinating. Virginia environmentalists are mobilizing to oppose any move to end — or even think about ending — the moratorium on uranium mining. But Democratic Gov. Timothy M. Kaine and Dems in the state Senate have backed the study.

As the United States braces for the construction of dozens of new nuclear power plants over the next couple of decades, uranium prices are rising and the Pittsylvania deposit is said to be potentially worth a billion dollars. The landowners, Virginia Uranium Inc., are lining up lobbyists and P.R. pros to knock down the moratorium. Meanwhile, the mining and processing of uranium could lead to the investment of hundreds of millions of dollars in Southside Virginia and dovetail with the nuclear services industry cluster in Lynchburg.

Addendum: While Schapiro describes Kemper as “a top lobbyist for the prospective mine,” there is no record of his affiliation in the Virginia Public Access Project. It’s possible that he was hired since the last filing deadline.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

4 responses to “The Uranium Controversy Throwing Off Gamma Rays”

  1. Anonymous Avatar

    When the price of energy goes up, so does the cost of conservation.

    Just as we now see changes in the restrictions on offshore drilling in the news, so will we see changes in Virginia mining rstrictions – eventually.

    RH

  2. Anonymous Avatar

    There also is a population of Americans who do not want a nuclear reactor every 300 miles and the eventual odds of spills, breaches, and more investigations about security guards sleeping on the job, etc. It is very easy for industry to sell the idea of uranium mining as "alternative energy," but this by far is the dirtiest part of the nuclear cycle with all the emissions produced over decades from all the heavy equipment used to mine & mill the ore from acres and acres of land. It also is nearly impossible – and is extremely costly – to fully clean up (or remediate) uranium-contaminated soil and/or water. And seriously, who's to say a big giant like Cameco wouldn't come in and buy up this junior exploration company (VUI) and sell the uranium to whomever they please? There's absolutely no guarantee that it would solely be used to power reactors only in the Commonwealth.
    Don't forget about the people who would be affected most — and they aren't the ones who have a financial stake in the outcome of VUI's attempt to overturn a moratorium.

  3. Anonymous Avatar

    The last paragraph of this article incorrectly states that the uranium deposit near Chatham could be “worth a billion dollars.” In fact, it’s projected to be worth TEN billion dollars. That’s a lot of money to leave sitting in the ground in this most economically challenged part of the Commonwealth. It’s also got to be enough money to assure that whatever mining is eventually done here is done in an environmentally sound manner, with proper oversight and reclamation.

  4. Anonymous Avatar

    Did Hogan switch parties?

    You blew your lede.

Leave a Reply