Update: UVa Freezes Undergraduate Tuition One Year

Jim Ryan

by James A. Bacon

The University of Virginia is freezing undergraduate tuition in the next school year, but increases in student fees, room, and board will total about $392, or about a 1.1% increase in the cost of attendance in the College of Arts & Sciences.

The board had considered boosting tuition as much as 3.1% this year, based on the national cost of providing a college education plus 1%, reports the Daily Progress. While the Board held steady on tuition this year, UVa President Jim Ryan warned, that the respite likely would last only one year.

“If there were ever a year to raise undergraduate tuition, it would be this year, given the large and unexpected costs and the loss of revenues because of COVID,” Ryan said. “At the same time, if there was ever a year to not raise undergraduate tuition, it would also be this year, given the pandemic and the financial hardship facing a lot of our students and their families.”

A tuition freeze represents a tuition cut when inflation is taken into account, Ryan said. “No increase at all is not neutral,” he said. “It is the functional equivalent of cutting tuition, given the impact of inflation.” Over the past six years, UVa has raised tuition 9.7 compared a 9.8% increase in the Consumer Price Index and a 14% increase in the Higher Education Price Index.

Reports the Daily Press:

UVa Rector James B. Murray, Jr. said the past year was rough, noting that 250,000 Virginians lost their jobs, including many students and their families. He also noted UVa’s $44 million in unrecoverable COVID costs.

He said the school also needs to find another $16 million to cover unexpected and unfunded state mandates that raise employee salaries 5% in the next school year. The state provided about 25% of the pay raise for next year but has not earmarked money to sustain the raise, meaning the university will have to fund all of it in the future.

Ryan argued that the tuition freeze puts the University of Virginia at a competitive disadvantage compared to peer institutions. UVa charges about $30,000 less per student than the top 25 private colleges in the country to which UVa compares itself — about $361 million less in tuition each year. “We’re at a competitive disadvantage when you compare our in-state tuition to the tuition of our private peers, not matter how you slice it,” he said.

Bacon’s bottom line: If the goal is to boost UVa’s national ranking as one of the “best colleges” in the United States, Ryan has a point. All elite universities are stuck on an endless treadmill in the race for status, which has driven spending and tuition relentlessly higher. But the added spending, one can argue in economic terms, has diminished marginal utility. In layman’s terms, once you’ve already achieved a certain level of academic excellence, every added dollar of inflation-adjusted spending delivers less bang for the buck.

One also might inquire why UVa, the flagship public university of Virginia, is comparing itself to elite private universities. Shouldn’t UVa be comparing itself to top public universities? One of the top goals of a public university should be to provide an affordable education to the citizens of the state in which it resides.

One more question: Since when did the bench mark for increasing tuition become the Higher Education Price Index — pegging costs to an economic sector notorious for its inability to control costs — plus one percent? Where did that plus-one-percent come from? How is that justified?

If UVa wants to develop a competitive advantage in the national educational marketplace and prestige sweepstakes, perhaps it should try a novel strategy adopted by almost no other institution (possibly excepting the University of Chicago). Position itself as an institution noted for its intellectual diversity, a place where students and faculty from all races, creeds, and walks of life are welcome but where no topics are taboo, all (non-seditious) viewpoints are tolerated, and a vibrant and stimulating exchange of ideas takes place. Create an institution that’s not hostile to the 40% of the country that considers itself conservative… in sum, an institution, gasp, that is true to the ideals of its founder Thomas Jefferson.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

10 responses to “Update: UVa Freezes Undergraduate Tuition One Year”

  1. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Thank god for UVa and VMI. What else is there for A Republican to do but sport their favorite weapon on the House floor?

  2. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    I know it’s not popular in thsi blog to say this but UVA is a brand name with a certain demand for it’s product. That’s the reality bumping up against the “theory” that it’s a Public University that has a duty to provide a universally affordable education to all comers.

    What it does instead, ( my opinion) is get top dollar from the ones that can afford top dollar then use that profit to provide means-tested help to the less wealthy and any extra goes into building a bigger, better, UVA that keeps it an “in-demand” institution.

    If you took away the state help and UVA went it alone, I’m not sure much would change in terms of what it would charge – it would be still rooted in basic supply/demand – which really is a pragmatic approach.

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      “What it does instead, ( my opinion) is get top dollar from the ones that can afford top dollar then use that profit to provide means-tested help to the less wealthy and any extra goes into building a bigger, better, UVA that keeps it an “in-demand” institution.”

      Very true. UVa is a taxing entity with no power under the Virginia Constitution to levy taxes. You got it.

      What would happen if the Secretary of Transportation unilaterally decided to base car registration fees on the net worth of the person registering a vehicle? The surplus taken from the middle class and wealthy would be used to offset fees collect from the less wealthy? No enabling legislation for this, no executive order, no possible accountability for elected officials since they never passed any laws authorizing this transfer tax.

      Would that seem right and democratic to you?

      1. How about all the localities that tax citizens to help pay for mass transit — then make fares free on the grounds of “equity”? That is being done today.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Indeed. Take K-12 and figure out how much each parent contributes in taxes towards their child’s education.

          How many parents actually pay 10K in taxes per kid?

          1. I get it, Larry. If we provide K-12 education for free, why not provide everything else — car registrations, bus fares, Obama phones, you name it — for free?

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            No. Not free at all but not everyone contributes the same/equal amount towards it.

            Right?

            Or – on a different vein. – everyone DOES pay a set hookup fee for stuff like electricity, water/sewer – even though the actual costs vary by location. But then they DO charge you for your use – unless of course, you qualify for a special low rate, right?

            Not “free”. Someone pays.

      2. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Well.. obviously Government is more ACCOUNTABLE than UVA – agree? ๐Ÿ˜‰

        but even Govt collects from the wealthy and then redistributes, right? I mean if the poor had to pay for schools and the rich could pay for their own… the poor would have really crappy schools, right?

        ๐Ÿ˜‰

  3. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    I love Ryan’s “best of times, worst of times” quote. Very original. Wouldn’t you love to see the list and salaries of faculty and administrators who missed even one week’s pay in the past 14 months? Won’t be very long. Might be none (whereas low paid staff may have taken it in the neck.) And I’d like to see a deeper accounting of COVID-related special income to balance against those complaints of losses.

    1. Rob Austin Avatar
      Rob Austin

      The administrative bloat at UVa continues unabated even in times of economic downturns. Witness the recent hiring for the new post that will oversee the Dean of Students, African-American Studies, Student Health, and more. She will immediately add to the bloat by hiring as many administrators and staff as she wants. This signals that Ryan and his provost have absolutely no clue how to run a university. How many assistant deans for equity, or associate deans for Safe Spaces do you need, Ryan? Clearly, as many as he can get away with. The BoV is just a woke rubber stamp..

Leave a Reply