Unvaccinated Patients Denied Organ Transplants Everywhere

by Kerry Dougherty

It’s right there on the bottom left of my Virginia driver’s license. A little heart and the words “organ donor.”

I ticked that box years ago. I also joined the bone marrow donor list when a friend had leukemia and needed a match.

Donating our organs is the last act of kindness we can do on this earth. After all, you can’t take them with you.

But recent headlines about unvaccinated patients were being denied transplants are alarming to those of us who oppose vaccine mandates and are worried about a movement toward medical apartheid.



Most concerning is the story of D.J. Ferguson, a 31-year-old father of two who was taken off the heart transplant list because he’s unvaccinated. The young Massachusetts man is critically ill, surviving on a heart pump, but was removed from the transplant list because he’s unvaccinated. According to NPR, he refused a COVID-19 vaccine over concerns about his particular heart problem and the side effects of the mRNA vaccines in young men.

D.J.’s mother, Tracey Ferguson, insists that her son isn’t against vaccinations, noting he’s had other immunizations in the past. But the trained nurse said Wednesday that he’s been diagnosed with atrial fibrillation — an irregular and often rapid heart rhythm — and that he has concerns about the side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine.

Give the guy a heart, dammit. This is cruel.

Look, I’m a skeptic. I suspected these headlined cases were outliers. Surely most hospitals wouldn’t deny a life-saving measure to a very sick person simply because they did not take the COVID-19 vaccine.

It couldn’t happen here, I thought.

I was wrong.

Earlier this week I contacted the media department at Sentara Health, one of the largest hospital systems in Virginia and the dominant provider in Hampton Roads. I asked if unvaccinated patients were eligible for transplants and if donors needed to be vaccinated.

This was the reply:

Sentara Transplant Services has joined the American Society for Transplantation and a growing number of transplant centers in requiring waitlist patients to be vaccinated for COVID-19 prior to transplant. This is an emerging standard of care to ensure successful use of precious donated organs. Transplant patients are currently required to take a battery of vaccines to prevent hepatitis, flu, tetanus, whooping cough and other diseases that threaten transplant outcomes. The COVID-19 vaccine was added to that list due to COVID-19’s deadly potential post-transplant, when recipients are on immunosuppressive drugs and highly vulnerable to infections,

Donors need not be vaccinated, they added. They must test negative for COVID-19, however.

I understand the thinking behind this. What a waste, to transplant a heart to a patient, only to have them die of COVID.

But this is a heavy-handed one-size-fits-all policy. Especially now that we know the vaccines neither prevent infection nor transmission. Seems even a mild case of COVID would threaten the health of fragile transplant patients.

This vaccine requirement is just the latest in a long list of ethical problems that surround transplants. I remember arguing with friends once about whether our donated lungs should go to former smokers who blackened their own, or our livers to alcoholics who pickled theirs.

After all, there’s no guarantee that these organ recipients won’t begin smoking and drinking again once they get a fresh set of innards. They’re addicts. Like many transplant patients, I imagine.

Eventually I concluded that I wouldn’t worry about the worthiness of my recipient. I’d donate my organs and hope that the person who got my parts would enjoy them.

I don’t like vaccine coercion. It’s repugnant that every unvaccinated person who needs a transplant has been struck from the waiting list and given a death sentence by imperious hospital administrators.

These policies may backfire. Some might not sign up to be donors once they realize that transplant centers denying organs to the unvaccinated happily provide them to patients whose reckless lifestyle choices have left them gravely ill.

That’s a curious place to draw the line.

Here’s a thought: As a way to save the lives of unvaccinated patients, perhaps donors should be able to specify that their organs go ONLY to the unvaxxed who are currently shut out of the transplant process.

I’d be down with that.

This column has been republished with permission from Kerry: Unemployed & Unedited.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

13 responses to “Unvaccinated Patients Denied Organ Transplants Everywhere”

  1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “But recent headlines about unvaccinated patients were being denied transplants are alarming to those of us who… make our money by writing how alarmed we are about stuff…”

    Fixed it for you…

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      You missed one…

      “I was wrong”

      Rarely aren’t.

  2. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    The “standard of care” now requires violating the Nuremberg Code.
    This is beyond unethical. It is immoral. It is inhumane. Oh, wait…maybe that is why there is a Nuremberg Code!
    I have always thought the anti-vax crowd…maybe a little nutty… I mean Bobby Kennedy Jr. and Jenny McCarthy – stick to being a babe…stay in your lane…
    But the religious zeal of insisting on an EXPERIMENTAL product and censoring anyone who wishes to ask a question? And denying treatment to people who face things any of us would not wish on an enemy (well, except for you tolerant, open-minded Leftists) is just wrong.
    Look in the mirror. You are horrible people. Medicine has been utterly corrupted. Doctors take back your noble profession!

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      I am sick of how you continually compare Pfizer and Moderna, our FDA, President Trump’s Warp Speed team, to Dr. Menegele and the Japanese with their own horrid experiments…Get your own mirror.

      1. walter smith Avatar
        walter smith

        You can be sick of whatever you want. I think Warp Speed was an improvement.
        But I didn’t write the Nuremberg Code. It defines any medical experiment without informed, willing consent as a crime against humanity. It is Article 1.
        Any EUA product is by definition experimental. In a sane world that should be a sufficient bar to mandating. It has been “authorized,” so get it if you want it. But, you cannot mandate it. Is that too hard to understand?

        And I have made no such comparisons. I point out what the law says and what the Nuremberg Code says. I own stock in Pfizer and Merck and Eli Lilly and Astra Zeneca and Glaxo Smith Kline. Every single dose of of the Covid shots has been EUA. Miyares’ opinion that a law must be passed is correct. Historically, this has been sort of outsourced, for the colleges, to some association like the AFHA (?) recommendations, but if they require it, which seems not unlikely, there will be challenges at that level and at the State law level. No one objects to mumps, measles, rubella, polio, etc. The objection is that it is experimental, and it is. We don’t know its true long term effects. The sleight of hand “approval” required lots of post-approval studies. Highly unusual. We have VAERS evidence, military evidence, life insurer evidence, that something is up. So it is wrong for an individual to consider his or her own medical attributes and relative risks and to make an informed decision?

        Finally, even if the Covid “vaccine” (sorry – I like the old definition – the normal, long-accepted one) gets fully-approved and passed into Virginia law, the proper balancing requires at a minimum medical and religious exemptions. (And one day there will need to be reconciliation of my body my choice “medical privacy” and 1905 Jacobson case) That is not character assassination.

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Ya know, Kerry, you have two kidneys and only need one. I’m sure Baylor Medical in Texas will accommodate your wish now.

  4. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
    YellowstoneBound1948

    The lack of available hearts may have some bearing on this. I remember when Mickey Mantle got a second liver in 1994. It created a firestorm. Here was a lifelong alcoholic, stricken by life-threatening cancer, receiving a second liver, when hundreds of others on the waiting lists were left waiting. The federal government enacted legislation, and after that it was going to be very hard for a liver to be flown from Miami to L.A. if it meant flying over patients with identical needs. Mantle, by the way, died a few weeks after receiving the second liver. It’s not a perfect comparison to the current situation, but it does show that state and federal governments and healthcare providers do have some latitude in organ transplantation. They will regulate.

  5. Matt Adams Avatar
    Matt Adams

    There is medical validity to Mr. Ferguson’s case, as it’s been noted the prevalence of myocarditis following the disease and vaccine. So much so that the UK and Nordic Countries modified their rules of vaccination to exclude the sub-group of younger males from the Moderna vaccine.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/08/nordic-countries-are-restricting-the-use-of-modernas-covid-vaccine.html

    I think you have to review this on a case by case basis and not make blanket bans.

    1. walter smith Avatar
      walter smith

      Wait…you mean different people are different and maybe different treatment protocols are…possible?
      Heretic!

      1. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        That’s always been the case, that’s why a Patients Physician is the only person who can make the decisions.

        The issues we are seeing is a direct result of the binary thinking that is prevalent in the current political debate. The practice of demonizing those who you don’t agree with politically is pointless.

        1. walter smith Avatar
          walter smith

          Worse than pointless. Dangerous and un-American.
          Back to free speech…

  6. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Could be worse. You could donate your body to science and your hand with 15 cents glued to your palm wind up in an exact change basket on I-95 in Richmond. RTD achive search should find it.

    I expect respect for my gift, and best medical practices for probability for success,.

  7. VaNavVet Avatar

    Sounds like a plan but why stop there? These folks should be able to get some other recognition too. I am in favor of the old concept of non-smoking areas only where it is an area set aside for non-vaxxed this time around. Hopefully, the vaccinated folks will make up the vast majority of the patrons.

Leave a Reply