University of Lynchburg Bites the Bullet

Biting the bullet

by James A. Bacon

In anticipation of shrinking numbers of college-bound students, the University of Lynchburg has taken proactive steps to reduce its cost structure. A small private institution affiliated with the Church of Christ, the university has announced that it is cutting employee headcount by 10%, with further reductions over the next three years.

Staff positions will be eliminated immediately; faculty positions will be phased out through retirements and reassignments, reports WSET News.

“Lynchburg is closing 12 undergraduate programs and 5 graduate programs, impacting a total 4.5% of students,” the University said in a press release. “Currently 70% of undergraduate students are studying in eight majors, and 95% of students are in 21. The university offers 51 majors.”

Everyone in higher education knows that the demographic tsunami is coming. Everyone knows that competition will heat up for a smaller number of students. Everyone knows that pressure will intensify to admit less-academically-qualified students and students with greater financial need. Institutions that freeze with indecision about what to do will find themselves burdened with unsustainable overhead and bleeding financial reserves. University of Lynchburg leadership was wise to make the hard decisions before encountering a fiscal crisis.

It is often said that colleges and universities should be run like a business. Some observers scoff at the notion, arguing that higher-ed has a higher calling that makes comparisons with the profit-maximizing private sector problematic.

But all institutions, for-profit or non-profit, are enterprises that must match revenues and costs over the long run. All institutions make decisions about how to allocate their resources to generate the greatest returns. An institution can defy that logic in a growing market subsidized by massive federal student lending, but it won’t survive in a contracting market.

University of Lynchburg President Alison Morrison-Shetlar gets it. “We can reallocate these resources to where the students want to have experiences and enhance that experience,” she told WSET. “And that is definitely what we have been doing, we’ve been doing those types of things for quite a few years, but now we’re in an opportunity to really look critically and what’s working and what [sic] not working.”

Every university needs to conduct a hard-nosed evaluation of where they excel and where they fall short of the market competition, and then pivot towards its strengths.

In terms of enrollment, the university has held its own over the past decade, a period in which many smaller liberal arts institutions have lost ground. According to State Council of Higher Education for Virginia (SCHEV) data, full-time-equivalent enrollment stood at 2,698 in 2012-13 and lost only a smidgeon over the succeeding decade. Enrollment was 2,685 in 2022-23.

To maintain enrollment, however, the college admitted 95.9% of applying students, up from 92.4% ten years previously, essentially accepting all comers.

SCHEV data indicate that entering students have greater need of financial aid than in the past. The percentage of students entering the university who received gift aid was 34.3%, up from 23.4% in 2012.

The sticker price for tuition, fees and other costs of attendance was $35,540 in 2024, according to College Tuition Compare.com. That’s higher than for almost all of Virginia’s public universities. But adjusted for financial aid, the net cost of attendance is $23,876.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

21 responses to “University of Lynchburg Bites the Bullet”

  1. Lefty665 Avatar
    Lefty665

    A sizeable majority of the majors (30 = 59%) with a total of about 135 students? That's less than 5 students or less than 1/2 percent of total enrollment per major.

    I can understand wanting to maintain diverse studies or some majors just on principle. But, a sizeable majority of majors in the school with so few enrollees is puzzling. What took them so long to decide to pare down, or is that kind of distribution common?

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Ya know what else is close to 59%? Their graduation rate. They accept 95% of applicants.

      I wonder how Trump U stats compared?

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Ya know what else is close to 59%? Their graduation rate. They accept 95% of applicants.

      I wonder how Trump U stats compared?

      1. walter smith Avatar
        walter smith

        I wonder how many of the indoctrinated so-called smart college juveniles can tell you what from the river to the sea means, or intifada, or knows Jack Squat about anything. And that's from the "elite" schools!
        Automatons. With no common sense.
        Go be gay, or a woman in "free Palestine." Heck, just go try to be an "out" Christian in any Muslim country.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          What’s wrong with you?

          1. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            I don’t know. An aversion to Leftism? An ability to spot logical inconsistencies? Being intolerant towards the intolerant? Lotta possibilities…
            And of course I could just be an *******….

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Go with that one.

          3. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            OK, I will. I didn’t want to brag about being a prodigy, but I appreciate you recognizing it.

  2. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Business Studies (Access)
    Community and Nonprofit Leadership (Access)
    Diversity Strategies (Access)
    Management
    Music
    Music Education
    Physics
    Religious Studies
    Spanish
    Spanish Education
    Special Education
    Theatre

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Areas of study 2022 graduates
      Registered nursing/registered nurse 10.3%
      Exercise physiology 9.3%
      Criminology 8.9%
      Psychology 6.8%
      Business administration and management 6.5%
      Public health education and promotion 5.6%
      Biology/biological sciences 5.1%
      Environmental science 4.2%
      Speech communication and rhetoric 4%
      Computer and information sciences 3.7%
      Teacher education and professional development, specific levels and methods 3.5%
      Sport and fitness administration/management3.5%
      Art/art studies3%
      Accounting3%
      Mathematics2.3%
      English language and literature1.9%
      Sociology1.9%
      Biomedical sciences1.6%
      International relations and affairs1.6%
      Health and physical education/fitness1.4%
      Chemistry1.4%
      Economics1.4%
      Drama and dramatics/theatre arts1.4%
      Marketing/marketing management1.4%
      Political science and government1.2%
      History1.2%
      Statistics0.9%
      Music0.9%
      Music teacher education0.7%
      Physics0.7%
      Intelligence0.2%
      Multi-/interdisciplinary studies0.2%
      Philosophy0.2%

      Based on their size of 2800 they graduate about 500, which jives with 1 student being 0.2%. A little over 400 is a better fit with 3 being 0.7%

      1. Lefty665 Avatar
        Lefty665

        The last 3 are below 1/2 percent, what are the other 27, or 25 if we average in the next two? Quite a diverse unpopulous lot, Philosophy, Intelligence, Multi/Interdisciplinary studies, Physics and Music Teachers. About 2 dozen students spread among them.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Well, the major is something like 21 to 24 semester hours in some particular concentration, so basically the difference between any of those last three could be just 7 courses taken over 4 years.

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Well, a Claremont College it ain’t.

  4. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    I see this as somewhat akin to what Walmart/Amazon have done to Mom & Pop stores or even how big developers can develop big amenity-laden developments while small developers just don't have the financial resources to really compete.

    Bigger well-funded Universities just will offer "more" and "better", wider/deep from academics to sports.

    The handwriting is on the wall. The bigger Universities are not only not in trouble, they're going to eat the smaller ones…one by one. Some really good ones that cater to high income demographics will survive. Others that have narrow focus and are really good at that focus will survive.

    But the small ones just are not going to be able to offer soup to nuts and Lynchburg University is an example.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Maybe private equity will step in and help in the same way they have with nursing home, veterinary clinics, and housing.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        and newspapers? ;-). Unlike many, I don’t see private equity as inherently evil and should be outlawed. I’m not even sure HOW they’d be outlawed! And one might ask if smaller universities could compete on price like Community colleges do?

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Capitalism’s grim reaper.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            private equity often just accelerates what is going to happen anyhow – for some things. Still trying to understand how it works with veterinary… not a dying business at all… is it undervalued? We are currently without dog but friends indicate that the costs have gone up tremendously … seems like a place for competition… oh wait.. clinics now at Petsmart, et al.. are private practices now outmoded?

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Pack animals, Larry. One alone can’t do it, but if one can simply take a bite, they rest will glom on.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            herd?

  5. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    Now do UVA. I think 1/3rd to 1/2 of the Course Catalog is BS.
    Also would fix the "affordable housing crisis" just like that!

Leave a Reply