University Boards’ Primary Duty is to the Commonwealth, AG Says

Jason Miyares

by James A. Bacon

The primary duty of board members of Virginia’s public colleges and universities is to the commonwealth, not to the individual institutions, Attorney General Jason Miyares wrote Monday in response to an advisory opinion requested by Governor Glenn Younkin.

According to Miyares’ missive, Youngkin asked whether Virginia law imposes upon boards of visitors “a duty to serve the interests of the university or college only, or the Commonwealth more broadly.”

“Although they extend services to non-residents, Virginia’s institutions of higher education exist to fulfill the commonwealth’s commitment to provide education to the students of Virginia,” the AG answered. “It is clear that the boards of visitors serving them, as public officers of the state, have a duty to the Commonwealth as a whole.”

The letter does not elucidate the particular circumstances that led to the request for clarification, but the issue of board members’ primary duty did arise during the September 2023 meeting of the University of Virginia Board of Visitors meeting. Rector Robert Hardie had invited Clayton Rose, former president of Bowdoin College and currently a Harvard University professor, to lead a discussion of “best practices in board governance.” (See our coverage here.)

University board members should “protect the reputation of the institution,” act as “cheerleaders,” and show solidarity once a decision has been made, Rose said. His PowerPoint presentation stated explicitly that boards of high-functioning boards “serve the university’s interests.”

Two members of the Board, Youngkin appointees Paul Harris and Doug Wetmore, took issue with Rose’s formulation. “We’re a public body,” said Wetmore. “Our responsibilities are laid out in the Virginia code. We take a public oath of office to uphold the state constitution.”

Summarizing the legal case for his advisory opinion, Miyares wrote:

Virginia is home to some of the nation’s finest public institutions of higher education. … These institutions are “state agencies; they are statutory corporations created and empowered by acts of the General Assembly.” Although they extend services to non-residents, Virginia’s institutions of higher education exist to “fulfill[] the Commonwealth’s commitment to provide education to the students of Virginia.” …

The General Assembly has vested the management of Virginia’s colleges and universities in their respective boards of visitors. … Each institution, and its respective governing board, “is part and parcel of the Commonwealth’s higher education system,” as established by law in Title 23.1 of the Code of Virginia. In serving on the governing board of such a public corporation, each visitor “hold[s] under an act of the legislature a public office or employment[.]” …

The law recognizes that although a public corporation generally may benefit and thus “involve some private interest[,]” strictly speaking, public corporations are such only as are founded by the government for public purposes, where the whole interests belong to the government. Accordingly, “private individuals have no interest in or control over” any of Virginia’s public colleges and universities. … It is clear that the boards of visitors serving them, as public officers of the state, have a duty to the Commonwealth as a whole.”

Virginia law provides that “each board shall at all times be under the control of the General Assembly,” Miyares continued. Boards are subject to open-records and public-meeting provisions of the Freedom of Information Act. Board members are appointed by the Governor, and members are subject to removal by the Governor. Public universities also have extensive obligations to publish reports regarding budgets, tuition increases, student fees, state property, intellectual property, and athletic department funds.

“It is evident,” Miyares wrote, “that a board of visitors simply serves as the vehicle by which the General Assembly has chosen to exercise the Commonwealth’s control over its colleges and universities. … Accordingly, it is my opinion that the primary duty of the board of visitors of each Virginia public institution of higher education is to the Commonwealth.”


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

45 responses to “University Boards’ Primary Duty is to the Commonwealth, AG Says”

  1. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    Only a state is sovereign. Local governments and state institutions are not. Absent a legislative directive to the contrary, this makes sense in all 50 states.

  2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Gee whiz, is anybody surprised at Miyares’ answer? I assume Richard Cullen called Miyares and said something to this effect, “Jason, the Governor is thinking of requesting an official opinion on the primary responsibility of members of boards of visitors. What would be your response?”

    1. walter smith Avatar
      walter smith

      Well, is the opinion wrong, even if Richard Cullen asked for it on behalf of the Governor? And of course, Dem politicos never do any such thing do they? Well, maybe other than Herring’s totally bogus COVID mandate opinion, which was a total bait and switch. I am sure that was not political and just a little innocent mistake. And I am also sure the Dem Delegate who asked for the opinion was not pre-arranged…
      As a matter of law, the opinion is correct.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        I agree the opinion is correct. The conclusion is obvious. I don’t see where there was a need for an opinion, other than for political reasons, perhaps. And, yes, I agree that both sides engage in this gamesmanship.

        1. DJRippert Avatar
          DJRippert

          The rector and his mouthpiece Clayton Rose did not seem to understand who the board represents.

        2. walter smith Avatar
          walter smith

          I think it reflects that the public institutions have gotten far afield of the actual mission, and maybe this was a “flex.”
          Since I am a jerk and enjoy it, if I were GY, I would ask every single BOV member how many sexes are there. Anyone who does not answer “Two” would be removed for not belonging at an educational institution. The sane ones of the Left who answer “two” would then have to get the hate from their Leftist allies, but somebody needs to tell the crazies to shut up. See today’s Cavalier Daily for the oh-so-wise right to threaten Abigail Shrier speech on the 11th.
          Unequivocal my @**!

    2. No one should be surprised by Miyares’ answer. But apparently someone thinks some board members somewhere need reminding what their obligations are. That reminder will have greater impact and authority coming from the Attorney General than someone in the Governor’s office.

      1. Rafaelo Avatar

        “Greater impact and authority,” certainly. Nonbinding, nonetheless. Atty Gen. Op. is just an opinion.

        Imagining how this might come before a court: legislature bans a book. No matter what book: maybe future Woke legislators vote to ban Gone with the Wind or Huckleberry Finn; or conservative ones ban Gender Queer. U Va librarian insists the book stays on the shelves, citing 1st A.

        Must Board of Visitors fire the U Va librarian or do they side with librarian and the 1st A. against the state?

        Tough call for a court, Miyares’ opinion notwithstanding.

        Probably the governor fires the Board of Visitors. Problem solved.

      2. Rafaelo Avatar

        “Greater impact and authority,” certainly. Nonbinding, nonetheless. Atty Gen. Op. is just an opinion.

        Imagining how this might come before a court: legislature bans a book. No matter what book: maybe future Woke legislators vote to ban Gone with the Wind or Huckleberry Finn; or conservative ones ban Gender Queer. U Va librarian insists the book stays on the shelves, citing 1st A.

        Must Board of Visitors fire the U Va librarian or do they side with librarian and the 1st A. against the state?

        Tough call for a court, Miyares’ opinion notwithstanding.

        Probably the governor fires the Board of Visitors. Problem solved.

    3. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Given that Rector Robert Hardie invited Clayton Rose to discuss the role of the board and Rose botched the answer, it seems that both UVa’s administration and Clayton Rose needed some remedial help with board responsibilities.

      Of course, the board represents the owners of the entity in question. And whether the fops and dandies in UVa’s management team like it or not – the people of Virginia, represented by our elected officials own UVa.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        Why not just have the representative of the AG who advises the board remind the members of their responsibilities?

  3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Gee whiz, is anybody surprised at Miyares’ answer? I assume Richard Cullen called Miyares and said something to this effect, “Jason, the Governor is thinking of requesting an official opinion on the primary responsibility of members of boards of visitors. What would be your response?”

  4. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Conservatives, when they hold power, seem to want MORE govt control and influence of public institutions but if Progressives are in charge, they argue the opposite!

    I’d say Virginia’s Higher Ed has done quite well at providing high quality education as well as promoting high demand for it’s offerings.

    And in a shocking thing:

    “VT says all full-time students will receive $275 rebate on their tuition program, and part-time students will also receive $15 back per credit hour. On top of tuition, the university will give full-time students a $20 rebate on their comprehensive fee and $19 to $32 for students who live on campus and have a meal plan.”

    If Conservatives actually took control of Virginia institutions of higher education, it would be a disaster of epic proportions IMO not so different than how they actually operate as a party themselves these days.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      They are in control now. Youngkin’s appointees constitute a majority on all boards. I predict we will see little change despite all the rhetoric.

      1. “Youngkin’s appointees constitute a majority on all boards. I predict we will see little change despite all the rhetoric.”

        If they see their role and cheerleaders, that’s certainly true. I sincerely hope board members take the job more seriously.

      2. I may have miscounted, but looks like Youngkin’s appointees are less than half at UVA.

        Rector and Vice Rector were both appointed by prior administrations.

        https://bov.virginia.edu/visitors-staff

      3. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        a lot of rhetoric… and what they want with “control” is not better higher ed but higher ed they way they want it……..

      4. walter smith Avatar
        walter smith

        They are not the majority at UVA. But the political appointer SHOULDN’T MATTER!
        It is an educational institution. Not a political one (except it has become a political one because of the McAwful Northam appointees and an activist President, much better at instituting Marxism than Sullivan). Next year, GY gets to appoint 5. So it is currently 8 GY, 9 D predecessors. And the Rector in line is the guy is an exec at the company which has taken my D stock down 40% and is all in on the green fiasco and ESG virtue-signaling. I particularly like the page in the Annual Report where D brags about its racial discrimination. I don’t care what color or sex the D employee is who is supposed to generate and distribute the electricity. I want the electricity at a normal, efficient price, not the ineffective, inefficient, economy destroying virtue-signaling price.

    2. “If Conservatives actually took control of Virginia institutions of higher education, it would be a disaster of epic proportions…”

      Like Mitch Daniels at Purdue?

      https://www.purdue.edu/president/mitch-daniels/about/biography.php

      1. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        Exactly right. Progressives want to push their heads into the sand when it comes to Daniels and Purdue.

        Daniels proved that costs could be contained at a high quality public institution of higher learning.

        UVa’s BoV ought to invite Mitch Daniels to address their next meeting.

        1. “UVa’s BoV ought to invite Mitch Daniels to address their next meeting.”

          YES! That would be the perfect contrast to the nonsense from Clayton Rose.

          BTW – Hat tip to you with respect to Mitch Daniels. I believe you were the one who commented about him some time ago. I have been keeping my eye on him since.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            He did and I agree with both of you, however as said before, Daniels is a real conservative not a culture warrior.

            And that’s what is needed IMO.

        2. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Nope. I would WELCOME a real conservative like Daniels into the issue but I strongly suspect he’d not be favored by the AG or Gov.

      2. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        I will admit, you have a good counter example, but it’s NOT a model for UVA or VaTech in my view. I would like to do a comparison between what programs Purdue offers versus UVA/Tech/etc. But your example is a good one.

        Having said that , Mr. Daniels is a TRUE conservative with actual conservative principles not at all like the likes of many GOP these days beating the culture war drums.

        1. I disagree about the culture warrior part, but appreciate the comment overall.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            I totally would agree with a process that followed Mitch Daniels thinking and approach and not the AGs…or Youngkins…

    3. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      ” … MORE govt control and influence of public institutions …”

      What are you talking about?

      Public institutions are part of the government. That’s why they are public institutions.

      Who else would control them other than the goernment.

      The question is whether the government is competent in its control of its public institutions.

      Given the skyrocketing costs of public higher education, I’d say that the government is proving incompetent in managing that group of public institutions.

      1. walter smith Avatar
        walter smith

        Wasting your time with him. Not even up to broken clock status…

      2. walter smith Avatar
        walter smith

        Wasting your time with him. Not even up to broken clock status…

  5. Lefty665 Avatar

    University board members should …act as “cheerleaders…”

    That’s the ticket, dress the Board of Visitors in short skirts with pom poms and cheers of ‘Go Ryan’ and ‘Give me a D, give me an I, give me an E, DIE, DIE, DIE’.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      That was a really stupid choice of words on his part. Shamed the memory of Joshua Chamberlain, he did…

      1. Lefty665 Avatar

        It was so egregious that the temptation to play with it was irresistible.

  6. VaPragamtist Avatar
    VaPragamtist

    This 5-page opinion doesn’t really say anything outside of semantics. Sure, they’re state agencies and as such their primary duty is to the state.

    But Miyares is (intentionally?) silent on how that duty is carried out. While the ultimate duty may be to the state, a BoV could argue that the best way to fulfill their duty to the Commonwealth is through their duty to the university.

    example: InBev has a fiduciary responsibility to shareholders. . .but whether that’s best carried out by putting Dylan Mulvaney on a Bud Light can or firing the people responsible for that decision is left to the discretion of the Board.

    “University board members should “protect the reputation of the institution,” act as “cheerleaders,” and show solidarity once a decision has been made, Rose said.

    Both things are true. Failing to protect the reputation of the institution; showing apathy toward the institution; and publicly railing against decisions already decided all give the impression of inner turmoil. . .make for negative headlines. . .make less students apply, give funders pause in making grant awards, and cause alumni to donate less. . .all of which ultimately works against the interests of the Commonwealth.

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Where was Rose’s acknowledgement that the board represents the Commonwealth? If that was clear, I’d agree with you. But if that was lacking, the opinion is a valid reminder.

    2. Lefty665 Avatar

      Your example illustrates clearly what the right decision was for the Board of Inbev, firing the people responsible. The same logic works for the Commonwealth and UVa. DIE is no better for UVa than Dylan Mulvaney was for Bud Light.

  7. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    And with certainly less than a 20% stake, 6% at the flagship.

  8. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    The UVa Board of Visitors was effectively neutered when Helen Dragas, et al made the tough but correct decision to terminate Teresa Sullivan as the President of UVa.

    When Bob McDonnell reversed that decision and threatened to ask for the resignation of every board member he cemented the Board of Visitors as a group of political hacks who hob knob at meetings and nod their heads “yes” to every university decision like those little replicas of puppies seen on the dashboards of some cars.

    If Youngkin wants to “re-spine” the BoV, the first thing he needs to do is make it clear that the board is entitled to see any information it requests from management and has the right to terminate the employment of any UVa administrator who refuses or resists those requests.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      ” In an exit interview from the position, Dragas stated that, “I believe we did the right thing in that we pushed for needed change … We did it the wrong way in that we misunderstood that when you’re going to try to solve thorny problems at a high-profile, public institution, you need to communicate a lot — a lot more than we did — and with a lot of people. And that was a lesson that I, in particular, and the board learned the hard way.” ”

      Do it again?

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Dragas LEARNED from that failure.

        Not so much for others apparently.

    2. Agreed. I remember that fight.

      A rubber stamping Board of Visitors is worthless.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Safe to say, Drags played a big role in her own failure…..

        It’s not the way that successful change is motivated.

        She effectively engineered a coup and there was a rebellion that then got the Gov involved.

        If Dragas is the “model” that some folks want, one can see the problem!

  9. We can only speculate about the reason for the request, but I’m wondering if UVA is stonewalling the investigation into the shooting to “protect the reputation of the institution.”

    The reputation of any institution is best protected by acknowledging shortcomings and addressing them, not sweeping them under the rug.

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      And UVa certainly has had plenty of issues in relatively recent years:

      1. A lacrosse player killed his girlfriend. Both were UVa studenty-athletes.
      2. A completely unfounded allegation of rape cause the university to suspend all Greek activities.
      3. A Uva hospital employee kidnapped, raped and killed two young women – one a UVa student.
      4. A former football player, reported to have guns in his university housing unit, murdered 3 pf his former teammates.

  10. “Rector Robert Hardie had invited Clayton Rose…”

    What was he thinking?

    Looks like his term expires on 06/30/25.

    Great. So this guy is chair of the board until 2025? Appointing new members to the board is all well and good, but with this kind of leadership, substantive change will be difficult.

    1. StarboardLift Avatar
      StarboardLift

      Well, Hardie married well so there’s that. But let’s hope Bowdoin is not the model for his vision at UVA.

Leave a Reply