by James C. Sherlock

Nursing home operators, paid by government insurance programs on a per diem basis for caring for their patients, make higher profits if they understaff than otherwise.

The less staff they have, the higher their operating margins.

The federal government, with much experience in such situations, tries to offset those incentives with disincentives. It thinks, reasonably, that patients should actually receive the care that is paid for with government insurance funds.

In Virginia, some senior members of the health committees of the General Assembly are in love with our nursing home operators, offering legislation as gifts. That love is requited in the form of unlimited campaign contributions from the operators.

Touching story.

This being Virginia, that is legal. And too common.

However, help for patients is available and very active on another front: fraud charges brought by states and the Justice Department in federal court.

The unanimous Supreme Court opinion in Universal Health Servs., Inc. v. United States 136 S. Ct. 1989 (2016) • 195 L. Ed. 2d 348 Decided Jun 16, 2016 provided precedent for such filings under the False Claims Act.

The Court validated the government’s theory of law that a provider can be guilty of making a false claim based on the underlying representation that the care provided complies with the government Conditions of Participation.

Grossly understaffed nursing homes can be guilty of criminal or civil false claims or both by accepting payments for services which they do not provide or provide inadequately.

Both state and federal governments know exactly who those understaffed nursing homes are and have the payroll-based data to prove that some could not have provided it.

And they are taking the worst offenders to court.

Potential penalties: 5 years in federal prison, triple damages and fines on each count.  That is independent of mail and wire fraud charges that often accompany False Claims charges.

Background. Conditions of Participation (CoPs) are qualifications developed by CMS that healthcare organizations must meet in order to begin and continue participating in federally funded healthcare programs (Medicare, Medicaid, CHIPS, etc.).

Those government programs pay certified nursing facilities per diem reimbursements for their patients. In other words, nursing homes do not submit invoices for medical care, housing, feeding or anything else, just for days patients spent in the facility.

Patient acuity is the measure of the severity of illness or medical conditions of a patient and the intensity of nursing care required by a patient. That assessment is made for each patient as part of the admissions process.

Per diem payment rates are adjusted for both those patient acuity assessments and for regional costs. They are paid with the assumption that the necessary nursing care has been provided.

State and federal efforts to prosecute nursing homes for fraud. Medicaid Fraud Control Units (MFCUs) exist in every state Attorney General’s office. Virginia has one with a good track record.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General Medicaid Fraud Control Units (MFCU’s) Fiscal Year 2022 Annual Report outlines the criminal and civil outcomes achieved by MFCUs in FY 2022, including total recoveries of $1.1 billion with an ROI of $3.08 for every $1 spent.

From that report’s Exhibit B2 you will see that nursing facilities were the subjects of by far the largest number of open criminal cases (128). We don’t know how many of those open cases may be investigating Virginia nursing homes.

But Virginia ranks among the worst states in the nation for nursing home staffing.

Definitive Healthcare reported on July 12 that the average CMS staffing score for Virginia nursing homes is 2.1 out of a possible five. Among the states, only Indiana, Ohio, Louisiana and Texas rank lower. In the CMS “overall” score, only five rank lower. Barely.

An indictment on one of the open fraud cases from 2022 was returned in February 2023:

A federal grand jury in the Western District of Wisconsin returned an indictment yesterday charging Kevin Breslin, 56, of Hoboken, New Jersey, and KBWB Operations, LLC, doing business as Atrium Health and Senior Living (Atrium) in Park Ridge, New Jersey, with a scheme to defraud Medicare and Medicaid in connection with the delivery of or payment for health care benefits, items, or services.

The indictment charges the defendants with health care fraud, six counts of wire fraud, three counts of mail fraud, conspiracy to commit tax fraud, and conspiracy to commit money laundering.

The indictment alleges that when the defendants obtained money from Medicare and Medicaid,

they certified that they would follow all required quality of care standards, but they did not do so, and that they would operate their facilities with adequate staffing, supplies, and services, but they did not do so.

Oops.

Bottom line. Those nursing homes that are understaffed have readily available remedies.

If they do not have enough nurses and/or enough of the right types of nurses for the size and acuity of their patient load, they can reduce the patient load until that mismatch is remedied.

That need not require moving any patients.

As it happens, their highest acuity populations are the same patients who generally stay the shortest periods of time — patients requiring skilled nursing services. Nearly all of those are discharged within 100 days of arrival, some in much shorter periods of time.

Facilities can, on their own, stop taking new patients until their level of nurse staffing aligns with patient needs, and then resume taking new ones.

That won’t cure the vulnerability of long-time abusers of the rules, but will avoid prosecutions for future violations.

The winners are the patients. Which is the goal of the government in prosecuting the bad guys.

Updated Aug 22 at 15:40 to define potential penalties.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

26 responses to “Understaffed Nursing Homes and the False Claims Act”

  1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    I am waiting for the Virginia Attorney General’s office to announce that its MFCU has brought fraud charges against some nursing homes based on understaffing.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Not holding your breath, are you?

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plxpY8KLA-Y

    2. WayneS Avatar

      I hope he prepares those cases better than he did the two you mentioned in your article: Miyares Loses in Court

  2. Robert L. Maronic Avatar
    Robert L. Maronic

    I wonder what are the penalties for convictions in violating federal or state law? Perhaps I missed this information in the commentary?

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Really? You think there might actually be such? Wet noodle lashings, if any.

      1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        See the actual sanctions above. A medium size nursing home chain could expect tens of millions of dollars in damages and fines, as well as, by state action, losing the state licenses for those facilities.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          But, ya know, before anyone pays such penalties, someone else has to prosecute them.

      2. Mark Kleiman Avatar
        Mark Kleiman

        The individual executives responsible can also be excluded from working for companies that touch Medicare or Medicaid money. The exclusion sanctions are easier to impose than the criminal penalties. Not as strong a deterrent, but it does get the owners’ and execs’ attention…

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Sorry. 5 years in federal prison, triple damages and huge fines on each count.

      “18 U.S. Code § 287 – False, fictitious or fraudulent claims. Whoever makes or presents to any person or officer in the civil, military, or naval service of the United States, or to any department or agency thereof, any claim upon or against the United States, or any department or agency thereof, knowing such claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent, shall be imprisoned not more than five years and shall be subject to a fine in the amount provided in this title.

      The False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729, provides that anyone who violates the law is liable for a civil penalty in addition to three times the damages. Two possible charges here:

      1. False Claims – Presenting, or causing the presentment, of a false claim for payment or approval. 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729(a)(1)(A).

      2. Conspiracy – Conspiring to violate the False Claims Act. 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729(a)(1)(C).

      Congress made clear that the law imposes a penalty (then called a forfeiture) for every violation of the False Claims Act. This means, in a prosecution for making false claims under 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729(a)(1)(A),

      “Each separate bill, voucher or other “false payment demand” constitutes a separate claim for which a forfeiture shall be im­posed and this is true although many such claims may be submitted to the Government at one time.”

      Health care fraud can also generate huge numbers of False Claims Act penalties. For example, in United States ex rel. Drakeford v. Tuomey, 792 F.3d 364, 386 (4th Cir. 2015), a hospital compensated its physicians in a way that violated the Stark Law against physician self-referrals. In other words, the hospital bribed the physicians to practice there. A jury found that the hospital violated the Stark Law and therefore the False Claims Act. It further found that Tuomey had submitted 21,730 false claims to Medicare with a total value of $39,313,065. The district court assessed 21,730 civil False Claims Act penalties. Ultimately, the hospital was on the hook for $119,515,000 in FCA penalties.

      For more, see The False Claims Act and Fraudulent Medical Billing https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/the-false-claims-act-and-fraudulent-medical-billing-20238#:~:text=The%20most%20egregious%20and%20blatant%20violation

      That does not count wire fraud and mail fraud charges and any money laundering that may occur.

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “ The less staff they have, the higher their operating margins.”
    An earmark of private equity ownership, no doubt?

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      A feature, actually, of per diem payment design.

      The fines and jail time associated with the False Claims act are meant to discourage malignant use of that feature.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Have they?

        Justice for sale
        Who will buy?
        Who would like to sample the supply?
        Who’s prepared to pay the price
        Avoid a trip to the hoosegow?
        Justice for sale.

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Have they?

        Justice for sale
        Who will buy?
        Who would like to sample the supply?
        Who’s prepared to pay the price
        Avoid a trip to the hoosegow?
        Justice for sale.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Whew. New Jersey man. For a moment, I thought it might be Senator Rick Scott.

    2. Lefty665 Avatar
      Lefty665

      Private equity and more generally for profit ownership.

    3. Robert L. Maronic Avatar
      Robert L. Maronic

      The less staff the nursing homes have, the LOWER their operating cost. Paying overtime is much less expensive than hiring additional staff.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        By a half… plus.

  4. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    In reviewing the 2022 Annual Report of the OIG of the MFCUs, I could not find a single instance in which a nursing home was prosecuted for understaffing under the False Claims Act. There were cases of patient neglect and abuse, but almost all of these involved specific single providers such as aides and nurses. There were cases of fraud, but these involved various types of false billing.

    The New Jersey case cited by the author seems to be an outlier. The allegations there go way beyond understaffing and involve money laundering, tax evasion, and stealing from employees, among other charges.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      You could not find it because it did not happen in 2o22.

      It is perhaps OK with you that I raise the issue, now, though, that the precedent has been set by Clarence Thomas’ unanimous 2016 opinion for the Court and the 2022 case I have cited.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        I tried the link to the court case. It took me to the OIG annual report on MFCUs.

    2. Mark Kleiman Avatar
      Mark Kleiman

      These cases have been tough to bring under the False Claims Act because many judges are not big fans of this law and seek to limit it where they can. Here’s the excuse frequently used to let nursing homes off the hook:

      Medicare and Medicaid pay a per month or per day charge for a whole shopping basked full of goods and services – housekeeping, nutrition, medication, nursing, etc. That some services are not provided because of inadequate staffing doesn’t mean that all services haven’t been provided. And since it’s hard to break down the value of what hasn’t been provided, unless the breakdown is tantamount to “no services at all”, the judges often won’t allow False Claims cases.

      Some people would say we need better judges.

  5. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Basically, this is white collar crime. It’s expensive to prosecute, even more expensive to investigate, and has a readymade defense baked in to the law, “Oops, we misread that provision all this time. Let’s negotiate.” Unless someone uncovers a signed document that reads “Hey guys, I think we found a way to cheat the system,” intent is virtually impossible to prove.

  6. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    I don’t think this law is going to be of much help in Virginia. The Supreme Court case dealt with a facility that used untrained, non-certified, and unsupervised personnel. That is not the problem we have been discussing. The problem at issue is understaffing.

    Until the recent legislation, weak as it is, was enacted, there were no nurse/aide staffing standards in Virginia law or regulation. Therefore, the state could not claim that a nursing home was committing fraud, when it submitted a claim for payment, because it was violating minimum staffing requirements. In addition, there is the issue of a “shopping basket” of services issue that Mark Kleiman pointed out.

Leave a Reply