Under RGGI Virginia Releases More CO2, Not Less

With the March 8 RGGI results, Virginia power producers have now paid $590 million in carbon taxes. Click for larger view.

by Steve Haner

Since Virginia joined the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) compact at the start of 2021, according to data reported by the U.S. Energy Information Agency, the amount of carbon dioxide emitted to provide electricity to customers in the state has grown. Despite two years of RGGI caps and taxes, total CO2 emissions did not shrink, but grew by 3.7 million tons.

That is because the emissions total includes tracking all power producers providing electrons to the state, which is not the same as emissions from power producers located within the state. Virginia’s membership in RGGI is having the exact opposite effect from what its adherents claim it does because, as many predicted, it has forced Virginia to import far more electricity than it used to.

During the two-year period, electricity consumption within the state grew to 130 million megawatt hours, up 11%. Electricity imports grew from 14 million megawatt hours in 2020 to more than 39 million MWH in 2022, up 280%. RGGI has simply driven power production from fossil fuels used by Virginia to other states. As it has for the other RGGI member states.

These conclusions come from EIA data compiled by David Stevenson, director of the Caesar Rodney Institute in Delaware, and long a skeptic on the benefits of RGGI in this region. He added them to the growing list of public comments on the Virginia Air Pollution Control Board’s pending proposal to take Virginia out of RGGI at the end of 2023. More details and citations from Stevenson are contained in a longer discussion which you can read here; and in a table he created, which is reproduced below.

Some effects of two years in RGGI on Virginia. Click for larger view of Virginia electricity production and importation, 2022 compared to 2020. The news is at the bottom, imports up 280%.  Compiled by David Stevenson.

Virginia collected another $66 million last week from electric power producers paying the necessary carbon taxes to use coal and natural gas, bringing the tax total the state has reaped over nine auctions to just under $590 million. The cost of Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) allowances is usually passed on to electricity purchasers. Dominion Energy Virginia wants to do so directly on your bill.

Stevenson points out that the direct cost of allowances, the carbon tax, is just one of the economic impacts on Virginia’s economy from membership and adherence to RGGI. Within the state’s borders, it is providing a strong disincentive for the production of power. Virginia’s native production of power from fossil fuels dropped 15% over those two years. He applies an average monetary value of the power not produced and estimates generators lost $840 million in revenue.

There is a third economic impact. There are higher transmission costs to cover the process of importing power from the states not covered by RGGI. All these dollars are coming from consumers, one way or another. If and when utility-owned fossil fuel plants are closed ahead of schedule, consumers will also be on the hook for the stranded capital costs.

Solar production inside the state is increasing, and some of the imports are from solar or even wind in other states  But Stevenson’s compilation of the EIA data also shows that burning biomass accounts for much of the growth of supposed “non-CO2” generation during the two years. Many doubt it qualifies for a “green” classification, and in one plant in Virginia it is mixed with coal to get an efficient output.

With power demand on the rise, RGGI will force Virginia to become even more dependent on imports, especially during those periods of low or no production from solar or wind. The whole justification for the new regulatory scheme Dominion Energy Virginia demanded and got in 2007 was to finance a massive program of building in-state generation to reduce dependence on imported power.

That is entirely out the window thanks to RGGI and the even more stringent Virginia Clean Economy Act. The plants built under the buildup are underutilized and in danger of becoming stranded assets and all the while CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere here and around the world are growing, not shrinking.

The economic impact of RGGI on Virginia is just getting started. Should Virginia remain under its edicts, CO2 emissions from the electric power sector within the state will need to shrink another 13 million tons by 2030. To get there, all the remaining coal plants will have to close and electricity production from natural gas would have to be reduced by 35 percent as well. Those would represent a loss of about $1.6 billion in revenue.

The same outcome is dictated by the Virginia Clean Economy Act, meaning RGGI is also redundant. One difference is that RGGI includes the tax. VCEA picks consumer pockets by ordering utilities to buy renewable energy certificates when they miss a renewable energy goal.

There is another reason to think about 2030, just seven years away.  That is the year in which another multi-state organization, the PJM regional transmission organization (RTO) predicts serious problems caused by the early retirement of reliable, mostly fossil fueled generators and their (slow) replacement with intermittent wind and solar. A previous article on Bacon’s Rebellion addressed this.

Another interesting footnote goes back to that 2007 legislation. At the time, environmentalists considered it a major victory that the final bill included a legal mandate for Virginia to reduce its electric power consumption by 10% by 2022. We’ve now passed that landmark and the consumption of 130 million MWH instead represents growth of more than 20%. Again, this is the opposite of what advocates intended and promised, the opposite of the General Assembly’s solemn command.

It is as if the law of unintended consequences was created to explain the failures and follies of the climate catastrophe movement. Ignore what its adherents say and focus on what they really do.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

33 responses to “Under RGGI Virginia Releases More CO2, Not Less”

  1. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Were emissions supposed to shrink or grow at a lesser rate?

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Yep, the data not provided is total CO2 emissions per MWh each year.

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        Truly irrelevant if you buy into the theory that CO2 is 1) driving temps higher and higher 2) with catastrophe looming. Actual and major CO2 reductions are the goal which is being missed entirely (and frankly, they knew this would fail — except as a way to force more wind and solar investments.)

        The solution they will assert is to make RGGI a national thing so there is nowhere to go buy excess coal or gas-fired power, or amend RGGI to prevent such “leakage”. That of course the the future that PJM sees and is warning us about.

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Nattering nincompoops of negativity. Can’t copy exactly.

      3. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        Truly irrelevant if you buy into the theory that CO2 is 1) driving temps higher and higher 2) with catastrophe looming. Actual and major CO2 reductions are the goal which is being missed entirely (and frankly, they knew this would fail — except as a way to force more wind and solar investments.)

        The solution they will assert is to make RGGI a national thing so there is nowhere to go buy excess coal or gas-fired power, or amend RGGI to prevent such “leakage”. That of course the the future that PJM sees and is warning us about.

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          “Actual and major CO2 reductions are the goal…”

          Source?

          “except as a way to force more wind and solar investments”

          So an increase in renewables in the generation mix (which is well documented in your piece) would have what net effect on the carbon emissions per MWh…?? And without that increase in renewables, where would carbon emissions be relatively speaking…?? Ain’t rocket science…

        2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          “Actual and major CO2 reductions are the goal…”

          Source?

          “except as a way to force more wind and solar investments”

          So an increase in renewables in the generation mix (which is well documented in your piece) would have what net effect on the carbon emissions per MWh…?? And without that increase in renewables, where would carbon emissions be relatively speaking…?? Ain’t rocket science…

  2. Paul Sweet Avatar
    Paul Sweet

    I wonder how much of the imported power is from Dominion’s Mt. Storm coal plant in West Va.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      It has a rated output of more than 1600 MW, but the point here is it is not higher in 2022 than back in 2007, when the bill was passed to “end imports”. The growth in imports has come from other sources.

  3. If the geniuses who designed RGGI couldn’t get its forecast of CO2 emissions right two years later within a narrow geographic area, why should we give their predictions of global CO2 emissions… and impact on global climate … and impact on global human well being… 70 years from now?

    We are governed by the most incompetent, most arrogant ruling class in U.S. history. It ruins everything it touches.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      They got exactly what they wanted. A revenue stream. Created by a carbon tax that narrows the price advantage enjoyed by fossil fuels over their funding agents (the wind and solar industry.) And another vehicle to brainwash the masses and whip them into line, more useful now that COVID fear is fading.

      Will the third anniversary of Northam’s order to close the schools go unremarked on BR? I remember where we were, sipping beer at a nearby brewery on a lovely Friday the 13th afternoon….

      1. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        The Covid retrospectives on our government’s claims and actions regarding the virus are coming in and they don’t speak well for either the government or the lemmings who squawked, “Follow the government science”, “Follow the government science” like demented parrots. Masking, 6 feet of separation, closing of beaches, curfews, closing schools, the virus was started by eating bats … all under fire.

    2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      “If the geniuses who designed RGGI couldn’t get its forecast of CO2 emissions right two years later within a narrow geographic area…”

      Can you please provide a link to the RGGI designer’s forecast of CO2 emissions? Haner hasn’t provided one…

    3. William Chambliss Avatar
      William Chambliss

      Yeah, damn those guys for failing to foresee the pandemic and then the Russo-Ukraine war…..

  4. If the geniuses who designed RGGI couldn’t get its forecast of CO2 emissions right two years later within a narrow geographic area, why should we give their predictions of global CO2 emissions… and impact on global climate … and impact on global human well being… 70 years from now?

    We are governed by the most incompetent, most arrogant ruling class in U.S. history. It ruins everything it touches.

  5. AlH - Deckplates Avatar
    AlH – Deckplates

    Unfortunately, the RGGI parallels the negative externalities of foreign controlled and cheaply made imported goods. It took a killer virus and the terrible consequences of politicians, with heavy controls on people, for many of us to realize that we are “deliriously dependent” on other countries to make our stuff. So, now “Onshoring” is an often-used term by those CEO’s who have come back to reality. I believe we Virginians are smart enough to see what is playing out here with these unbelievable and completely nonrational controls which has been put into making and distributing our future electricity. Now, do we have the will to change it?

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Thirty plus years of a constant one-sided message of climate doom, now reinforced daily if not hourly, with the claim now that every storm proves “climate change!” — that’s a tough hurdle to overcome. Add in all the economic gain that will accrue to certain folks as the wind and solar get built to “replace” the remaining gas generation. Rent seeking is not ideological.

      1. AlH - Deckplates Avatar
        AlH – Deckplates

        I believe that many of us do not know, what we don’t know. As Mark Twain stated, “We are all ignorant; just about different things.” The inductive reasoning, with substantiated information, put forth in these RGGI articles leads the discussion of the realities of RGGI to rational comparisons. This type of awareness is responsible for reducing my ignorance of the very dumb RGGI precepts. It definitely has to go back on the table for a complete rework.

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Thirty plus years of a constant one-sided message of climate doom, now reinforced daily if not hourly, with the claim now that every storm proves “climate change!” — that’s a tough hurdle to overcome. Add in all the economic gain that will accrue to certain folks as the wind and solar get built to “replace” the remaining gas generation. Rent seeking is not ideological.

  6. William Chambliss Avatar
    William Chambliss

    While I am no fan of RGGI, this analysis is deficient. A glance at the top chart confirms this. VA purchased more than 6.6 million allowances (1 allowance for ton of CO2 emitted) in Auction 54 and only 5.3 million in the latest auction. One must also recognize that while Virginians pay for each allowance, they save the cost of every ton of coal and every therm of natural gas NOT burned to generate electricity. The increase in production from solar and wind also comes at NO fuel cost.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      That’s the thing. I would not call wind/solar “no cost”, but certainly cheaper than gas and using it when it IS available so we burn less gas AND save money in doing so.

      Cannot understand the “logic” of the naysayers.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      That’s the thing. I would not call wind/solar “no cost”, but certainly cheaper than gas and using it when it IS available so we burn less gas AND save money in doing so.

      Cannot understand the “logic” of the naysayers.

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        Offshore wind is the most expensive form of generation. I think if truthfully priced (assume 15-20 years of life, not 30) even more expensive than new nuclear.

        1. William Chambliss Avatar
          William Chambliss

          Will probably be a close run thing, at least in our lifetimes.

    3. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Imagine me disputing you (with fear and trembling), but of course that chart merely reports allowances sold by VA, not allowances purchased by Virginia producers. It’s a big multistate pot as I understand it, with the added wrinkle that some allowances are bought by speculators, and of course producers like Dominion can buy and bank allowances. The merchant generators in particular are selling their output all over PJM and beyond. (Yes, I was initially guilty in writing about this in assuming that $590 million would be paid by VA customers, but it won’t be in full and they may be paying more.)

      And the point of the post is that just because less coal and gas gets burned inside VA to make power, much of that imported power comes from coal and gas. While those imports may not be covered by RGGI carbon taxes, the base cost of fuel is certainly included in the dispatch price. But you get the meaning of “leakage.”

    4. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Imagine me disputing you (with fear and trembling), but of course that chart merely reports allowances sold by VA, not allowances purchased by Virginia producers. It’s a big multistate pot as I understand it, with the added wrinkle that some allowances are bought by speculators, and of course producers like Dominion can buy and bank allowances. The merchant generators in particular are selling their output all over PJM and beyond. (Yes, I was initially guilty in writing about this in assuming that $590 million would be paid by VA customers, but it won’t be in full and they may be paying more.)

      And the point of the post is that just because less coal and gas gets burned inside VA to make power, much of that imported power comes from coal and gas. While those imports may not be covered by RGGI carbon taxes, the base cost of fuel is certainly included in the dispatch price. But you get the meaning of “leakage.”

      1. William Chambliss Avatar
        William Chambliss

        All of Dom, Apco and Coop power produced in VA, NC, MD, WV and OH gets sold into and bought out of PJM at wash prices, as I understand it. Each of these entities participate in PJM as self-suppliers. I don’t know what the charts consider imported power, but Dom has its Mt. Storm unit in WVA, while Apco’s generation mostly resides in that state. The coops’ supplier, ODEC, has a big gas plant in MD. Of the PJM states, NJ, MD, DC, DE, and VA are also RGGI members. Of these states, only VA remains a vertically integrated state. The point here is that the deregulated state generators in PJM states have to buy these allowances as well and must recover that cost in their bid prices into PJM. One would expect wholesale prices in PJM to be increasing as a result, but that is not the case. If VA utilities imports are increasing, you cannot assume that every mWh is from fossil units, at least not on this evidence. VA utilities are either “importing” power from their own units or buying from the PJM wholesale markets at lower prices than their cost of production

      2. William Chambliss Avatar
        William Chambliss

        All of Dom, Apco and Coop power produced in VA, NC, MD, WV and OH gets sold into and bought out of PJM at wash prices, as I understand it. Each of these entities participate in PJM as self-suppliers. I don’t know what the charts consider imported power, but Dom has its Mt. Storm unit in WVA, while Apco’s generation mostly resides in that state. The coops’ supplier, ODEC, has a big gas plant in MD. Of the PJM states, NJ, MD, DC, DE, and VA are also RGGI members. Of these states, only VA remains a vertically integrated state. The point here is that the deregulated state generators in PJM states have to buy these allowances as well and must recover that cost in their bid prices into PJM. One would expect wholesale prices in PJM to be increasing as a result, but that is not the case. If VA utilities imports are increasing, you cannot assume that every mWh is from fossil units, at least not on this evidence. VA utilities are either “importing” power from their own units or buying from the PJM wholesale markets at lower prices than their cost of production

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Thanks for the simplified explanation.

          There was (is?) some talk of Dom leaving PJM.. know anything?

        2. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          I think looking at the EIA reports it is valid to assume that if VA producers generated X, but Virginia consumption was X+Y, Y had to come across the state line. And more is coming across the state line than two years ago. As to how much of Y is from fossil fuels, I can query Stevenson as to whether that is explicit in the data.

          Larry, I don’t see them leaving PJM but they have bounced out of the capacity market for now, I think.

          1. William Chambliss Avatar
            William Chambliss

            Right, I just don’t know if the EIA credits all generation arising in WVA and OH from Apco owned units there to those states alone or divides this production per the ownership interests in each unit.

Leave a Reply