The CIA's Rositzke
The CIA’s Rositzke

By Peter Galuszka

About 32 years ago, I was driving my dark green Audi Fox through Virginia’s lush horse country near Middleburg in search of a 350-acre farm owned by Harry Rositzke, author, educator and linguist. He also was one of the highest ranking spies in the Central Intelligence Agency which ran secret operations against Ukraine and other Soviet republics from 1949 to 1954.

Rositzke, who died in 2002, seemed an odd prospect for gentleman farmer. He had been born in Brooklyn and sounded like it. He had an extreme sense of street smarts, as I found when I was working on a newspaper story on spying in Virginia.

From what I remember of my interview — I lost my notes years ago — I had no real idea just how active the CIA had been in actually recruiting local language speakers, often displaced persons or recent emigres, giving them a smattering of training and then kicking them out the side door of a dark-colored C-47 at night onto the potato fields of Ukraine, the Baltic States and also Russia.

Mind you, these black drops were just a few years after the Soviet Union and the U.S. were suspicious allies who had helped defeat Germany, Japan and Italy. Things turned nasty very quickly and, as history moves forward, we seem back where we were 60 plus years ago.

Today, Vladimir Putin is massing Russian troops on the Ukraine border after annexing Crimea. He claims that America has a history of meddling in Ukraine, an independent nation since the 1991 split up of the U.S.S.R. The ironies are delicious. Putin, a former KGB spy in East Germany, is right.

The spy acronym for the early Cold War infiltration efforts was REDSOX, according to espionage historian Matthew Aim. The specific ones against Ukraine were labelled AERODYNAMIC with others being AEROOT (Estonia), AEQUOR (Byelorussia), AECOB (Latvia), AEGEAN (Lithuania) and AESAURUS (inside Russia itself).

The operations were run out of a CIA base in Munich and were headed in 1951 to 1954 by Rositzke.  “We were sending people into the Ukraine, people forget that there was an active resistance movement there… We’d fly them in and parachute them from C-47s. We never lost a plane. We were pleased to see how inefficient the anti-aircraft sources were,” he told The Washington Post.

Aim believes that up to 85 agents were air dropped in denied areas of Eastern and Central Europe from 1949 to 1954. The British MI6 intelligence group likewise sent agents there.

It isn’t clear what their missions were, but reconnaissance, establishing covert networks and sabotage are possibilities. The strange part is that anywhere from 75 to 100 percent of the air drop covert missions were failures, according to Aim and others.

One problem is that the American spymasters probably didn’t know what they were getting into. It wasn’t the same as setting up French underground groups during World War II; émigré groups fought each other and many if not all of the missions had been thoroughly compromised by Soviet counter-intelligence before they ever got off the ground.

According to Aim, one British agent named Myron Matviyenko had been in command of three teams of MI6 infiltrators who had jumped into Western Ukraine and Poland but turned them all in to the Soviets. Another theory is that Soviet super spy H.A. R. “Kim” Philby had learned of many of the missions while a British Embassy official in Washington and quickly passed the information along. Many of the agents simply vanished.

Rositzke at one point is quoted as saying that the missions were so rushed that the CIA hadn’t had time to vet the agents. In any event, he bought his farm near Middleburg in 1955 as a place to retire and eventually did. Little did I know as I was driving away from Rositzke’s estate with the big oak trees that I would be working in the Soviet Union myself as a news correspondent four years later. I ended up doing two tours of three years there.

In 1996, as I was preparing to leave Moscow for the last time, I went to a new museum opened by the KGB at their famous Lybyanka Headquarters. The guide was an elderly, grey haired man with ice cold blue eyes, sort of Putin-like. He was a retired KGB officer and I was mesmerized that their exhibit had photos and relics from compromised American and British covert ops in Ukraine and the Baltics.

One dead giveaway was that the CIA was dumb enough to use stainless steel staples in the fake passports it made, the guide said. Everyone knows that true Soviet passport staples are old-style iron and they always smudge the paper with rust. This could be easily spotted by checking a passport. No smudge? Instant spy!

I asked if the CIA still made the same mistake after all these years. He stared at me coldly for more than a minute before responding: “No, they make others.”


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

10 responses to “Ukraine Secret Ops: A Virginia Spy Story”

  1. the more I read about the CIA the more I believe a good many are buffoons correctly sent on a fools errand.

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Which is exactly what they want you to believe.

      Remember when the Canadian Embassy smuggled six Americans out of Iran after the hostage crisis started? Remember all those Americans with, “Thank you, Canada” signs? There was no mention of the fact that CIA agent Tony Mendez and a still-secret agent known only as Julio sneaked into Iran, went to the Canadian Embassy and ex filtrated the six Americans. That part of the story was only revealed in 1997.

      Who do you think found Bin Laden? Nancy Pelosi?

      Who figured out Operation Ivy Bells where the US bugged undersea optical cables used for Naval communications within the Soviet Union? The Russians didn’t think it was possible to bug optical cables – especially optical cables underwater within its territorial waters. The Russkies also had “advanced” sound detection devices that would certainly detect any foreign submarine which ventured into the Sea of Okhotsk. The recording devices could only run for a month so the CIA and the US Navy had to go back every month to recover and replace the device. They were never detected. In time, Bell Labs made a nuclear powered listening device that was used in many undersea taps.

      Operation Ivy Bells was betrayed by an NSA traitor, not a CIA employee. That traitor would eventually be found when a Russian defector gave him up.

      After being told of the many, many incursions into their territorial waters and long after the Soviet Navy had been significantly compromised, Russians recovered one of the undersea recording devices and put it on display in a museum so that naive liberal Americans can snicker over the buffoonery of the CIA.

      Which, of course, is exactly what the CIA wants.

      1. ahem.. it was the CIA that told us of WMD… that got themselves a field facility in Benghazi and then managed to blame others for a lack of security – when they had been told repeatedly that everything there knew they were CIA and were coming to get them.

        I’m not going to say that there are not successes .. just that over and over, we see botched operations… (which I will grant are high risk).

        but FOX news has a bad habit of getting retired CIA types coming on the air to comment on current events.. and I have to tell you that some of these folks are not playing with 52 card decks.

  2. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    LarryG and DJR,
    Both of you make good points about the CIA, etc. I didn’t mean the column to be a put down of the agency, rather a look at history at the time.
    A few points. Ivy Bells was a Navy/NSA operation, not CIA, as far as I know. As far as WMD, my recollection was that the CIA had extreme doubts about Saddam having such weapons but was overruled by Rumsfeld, Cheney, etc.
    In general, my impression is that the CIA can be often center left in its analysis and is brought to the right by the Pentagon and others.

    1. I’m less kindly in my assessment of the CIA since the NSA debacle .. and both are in my view menaces to privacy and liberty these days.

      IN my view, one would have to be warped to believe that security agencies should have carte blanche access to bulk phone and internet records but many from the intelligence community continue to embrace that position.

      and we now have every little podunk town with a SWAT team that have nothing to do 99% of the time and when they actually do have something to do – they act like a bunch of trigger-fingered vigilantes… who have cornered the likes of Bonnie and Clyde … knocking off kids and senile geezers.. for engaging in “threatening” behavior.

      I’m a law and order guy – but this as gone over the top.

    2. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Best explanation of Ivy Bells I have seen in the public domain …

      http://nsarchive.wordpress.com/2013/07/12/not-quite-another-year-of-the-spy/

      ” … Operation Ivy Bells, a joint NSA, Navy, and CIA mission that tapped Soviet deep sea communications cables.”

      NSA analyzed the communications. Navy planted the taps. CIA dreamed up the operation and oversaw its execution.

      Also, the op was betrayed by an NSA employee.

  3. mbaldwin Avatar

    No doubt mine is an outdated perspective, recalling that time in 1965 when an Allen Dulles type led me to consider the CIA, which visited the U. of Chicago Law School campus — without riots or sit ins! I opted for environmental law.

    Certainly the CIA has made, still makes mistakes (but not about the WMD), but surely it and the NSA offer some benefits we discount. Even doubting those, do we not delude ourselves that those institutions and practices present our democracy’s greatest threats? Reform or eliminate them and we face far more potent and vexing problems from rising disparity of wealth, politics-corrupting money, politics-corrupting religion, paralyzed government, ideological divisions, narcissistic social incentives, community-disrupting and employment-crippling economic and technological forces. The CIA and NSA present comforting but deluding targets having little relevance to what’s needed to reduce the fragility of our democracy, at least as I see it!

    1. A good counter perspective yes and my complain sounds a little too much like some of the conspiracy folks.. but I agree – both are needed – but under control.

      When they come in front of Congress and deny they are collecting bulk info and get caught in that lie.. it bothers me. It bothers me that the POTUS himself seemed unaware.. of the scope …

      but curious to know more the WMD issue.

      and perhaps the kidnapping, renditions, and torture while they told the SCOTUS it was out of their jurisdiction.

      I’m still wary … and uncomfortable… in part because technology is exploding ..

      here’s an example of what I mean:

      Checkpoints, which the government insists are voluntary, are creating a backlash because of the presence of uniformed police officers. Some police departments won’t participate anymore.

      A tactic used by the federal government to gather information for anti-drunken and drugged driving programs is coming under criticism in cities around the country, and some local police agencies say they will no longer take part.

      The tactic involves a subcontractor for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that uses

      off-duty but uniformed police at voluntary roadside checkpoints

      where motorists are asked on their behavior behind the wheel. In some cases, workers at the checkpoints collect blood and saliva samples, in addition to breath samples. NHTSA has said previously that the surveys do not collect any DNA. Drivers are not charged at the checkpoints.”

      the problem is the technology is now available but you have folks running these agencies who are willing to use it – even if it violates people’s rights.

      what idiot at NHTSA thought this was within the bounds ?

  4. much worse.. how in the world does an agency like the NHTSA go from a neutral data-driven reporting agency to one who actively threatens the privacy rights of people? This is not the first time that the police have set up general roadblocks and subsequently had the SCOUTUS shut them down.

    but now we have non-police agencies collaborating with the police to do essentially the same thing.. ostensibly for a “good” purpose.

    I’m from the school that if you’ve done nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear but it bothers me greatly that a time may come when a policeman could just pull me over for no reason… just because he wanted to look me over further.

  5. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Ripper,
    Interesting. Txs

Leave a Reply