The Tribune of the People

My e-zine column today, “The Tribune of the People,” is a follow-up of a brief blog post I made five days ago. I take a closer look at Patrick McSweeney’s Dulles Toll Road lawsuit pending in the state Supreme Court.

To refresh your memories: In 2007 the General Assembly created unelected, unaccountable “regional transportation authorities” with the power to raise taxes. The Attorney General’s office signed off on the constitutionality, and no one considered McSweeney’s lawsuit against the law to be much more than the irritating buzz of a gadfly. But McSweeney fought his case to the Supreme Court, which ruled unanimously in his favor, forcing lawmakers to get back to work on more ingenious ways to fleece the public.

Now McSweeney has another case before the Supreme Court, this one challenging the authority of the governor’s office to transfer control over the Dulles Toll Road to the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (MWAA). This, too, violates the state Constitution, McSweeney contends because (a) the toll, to be used to pay for the Metro rail extension to Dulles, is really a tax, and (b) the governor has no power to delegate taxing authority, a prerogative of the legislature, to anyone else. The MWAA and its board dominated by Virginia and D.C. appointees has the power, McSweeney argues, to raise tolls/taxes on Virginia commuters as high as they want to pay for the rail project — and there is no way to hold the accountable.

Victory in this lawsuit seems less certain than the first. There are sticky issues regarding the right of the plaintiffs (two Northern Virginia commuters) to sue, sovereign immunity, exceptions to sovereign immunity, and the rule of self-execution. In oral hearings the other day, two judges questioned McSweeney aggressively, suggesting that they are skeptical of some of his arguments. But McSweeney still appears to have a shot at winning the five other judges.

The lawsuits are important because they set the constitutional parameters of the transportation debate: The Governor and General Assembly can’t slough off the dirty work of raising taxes to unaccountable, unelected entities like transportation authorities. If lawmakers want to raise taxes, they have to take the heat from voters, who have made it repeatedly clear in polls and referenda that they oppose tax hikes for transportation.

I dub McSweeney the “tribune of the people” for his role as protector of citizens against the depredations of Virginia’s political patricians. Most Virginians have never heard of McSweeney, whose lawsuits have drawn only a fraction of the media attention they deserve. But they owe him a huge debt of gratitude. Even if he loses this round, McSweeney has put the political class on notice: Craft your legislation very, very carefully. Don’t overreach.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

  1. Groveton Avatar

    “Once the tolls are diverted to a use other than the construction, upgrading, maintenance and debt obligation of the toll road, McSweeney argues, they no longer constitute a user fee. They become a mechanism for transferring wealth from one group (commuters) to another (contractors, sub-contractors, property owners and Metro riders) — in other words, a tax.”.

    There may be hope for “user pays” tolling yet. However, even from this, I take it that the GA could divert the toll proceeds legally. Hence the need for a constitutional amendment (Virginia Constitution) to forbid the GA from doing just that.

    Is there ant chance that will actually happen?

  2. Jim Bacon Avatar
    Jim Bacon

    Candidate Tim Kaine promised not to raise transportation taxes until after the creation of a Transportation Trust Fund lock box. As I understand it, he made a feeble effort early in his administration to push the idea, encountered a lot of push-back, then dropped it. (A constitutional amendment must be passed by the General Assembly two years running, and then approved by voters.)

    Not only does the Transportation Trust Fund need constitutional protection, so do tolling authorities like the Dulles Toll Road. Otherwise, the electorate will never trust the politicians to keep their mitts off.

  3. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    I dunno about the Kaine-bashing… perhaps he might deserve some pillow treatment….compared to the GA…

    the same GA that….

    * – does not record votes in committee

    * – would NOT let citizens vote in a referenda about reducing property taxes

    * – fell all over themselves giving Dominion free rein… in Wise

    * – kissed developers butts on the proffer issues…

    so.. maybe give Kaine a backhand… but then what do you do for those feckless professionals in the GA?

  4. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    I’d like to see one more lawsuit.

    It would challenge ALL unelected authorities in Virginia (including VRE)… in hopes that it would force the GA to develop

    1. – public accountability for the operation of ALL authorities

    2. – clarify what money can be spent for and what it cannot be spent for by Authorities.

    There is serious and widespread distrust with the way that Virginia does business on these issues and basically what many of them are saying is no taxes AND no tolls until we have transparency and accountability.

  5. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    ” until we have transparency and accountability.”

    Gee, if we really knew where the money comes from and where it goes, it might settle a few arguments around here.

    RH

  6. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    would you like a water/sewer authority operating by using some of it’s revenues to provide affordable housing?

    how about a Regional Jail using some of it’s money to provide a beach house as an amenity for it’s employees?

    or a library authority pays it’s director a huge salary….

    You say they can’t do that….

    to which I would answer – how would you know if they did it in the first place and on what grounds would you challenge the expenditure?

    the ONLY way that the Virginia Fish and Game folks got caught spending DGIF money for an African Safari is a citizen that they previously denied information about a fish hatchery won a FOIA court challenge and the judge required ALL the DGIF financial data released.

    Had it not been for that FOIA the public would have been none the wiser..

    Most authorities operate so far under the radar that the public doesn’t even know who operates the authority or what kind of salary they receive or what are approved expenditures….

  7. Michael Ryan Avatar
    Michael Ryan

    “Tribune of the People”?

    You do remember what happened to Tiberias Sempronius Gracchus don’t you?

  8. Jim Bacon Avatar
    Jim Bacon

    To quote Wikipedia: “Tiberius’ political ideals eventually led to his death at the hands of supporters of the conservative faction (Optimates) of the Roman Senate.”

    I’m optimistic that McSweeney can avoid such a fate here in 21st century Virginia, but I don’t think he’s much more popular with the political class than Mr. Gracchus was in his time.

    (Of course, I cannot imagine that McSweeney would approve of Gracchus’ radical land-redistribution scheme.)

  9. Danny L. Newton Avatar
    Danny L. Newton

    I liked Mr. McSweeneys analysis of the transportation problems in Virginia because it is so highly similar to what I see in Tennessee, except we have not kept up with inflation and it looks like we have built more lane miles of road during the same period of time for a smaller population. I am concerned however that McSweeney sees no paradox in the dictatorship of zoning authority (a property rights issue) that would have to take over, more than it does already in order to bring market forces to bear onto the transportation problems. I think he may be onto something when suggesting that this be handled in a small and local way rather than the grand central planning concept. I also don’t see any criticism of the federal actions that have thrown inordinate power into the Metropolitan and Rural Planning Organizations. These organizations are ordained at the federal level but I find it impossible to hold anyone accountable for a stupid policy. The system is rigged so that fanatics have the most influence and most of the fanatics don’t have the slightest idea about how difficult traffic engineering actually is. Fortunately, the congress and the Bush Administration have put performance measures in place to control their actions, but it will take decades to undo the damage already done. They will probably fight it in a passive aggressive manner like the schools fight no child left behind.

    The human body and a transportation system are somewhat similar in that they are composed of various size vessels or roads. The human body secretes a growth factor to make sure that blood vessels are built of sufficient size and blood flow rate as to assure adequate tissue oxygenation. The beauty of the human body is made obvious when one considers that the need is met without intellectual effort or feeling the strain of taking something away from one part of the body to give it to another. Cancer may take over a portion of the body and secrete these same growth factors for the purpose of assuring the survival of a tumor. I think that the economic development forces that try to force growth only take nourishment from one area at the expense of another and are a cancer on the system.

    There is no similar process in transportation for gauging and delivering resources to assure survival of remote cells I think the problem is, like most things, getting a workable definition of need. Transportation need and economic need are best viewed as two different things. We may have adequate resources for transportation need but no hope of satisfying economic development needs. Classic measures of need that were taught in school 40 years ago are not known now even though we have the technical capacity to gather data and respond both with models and in real life with bulldozers very quickly. Those classic indicators are somewhat after the fact and may detect problems only after the problem has become even more difficult to fix.

  10. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    Danny:

    Fascinating.

    RH

  11. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    “I also don’t see any criticism of the federal actions that have thrown inordinate power into the Metropolitan and Rural Planning Organizations”

    Virginia has Planning Districts that predate by decades the MPOs.

    VDOT also has the equivalent of “road planning districts” – multi-county district offices.

    The intent of the MPOs and the Planning Districts was to encourage adjacent localities to NOT duplicate expensive infrastructure and services …..but instead to approach regional issues on a regional basis.

    so the intent of the “power” was to encourage more cost-effective government… and of course the best laid plans… etc, etc…

    What happened with the MPOs is that the pro-growth developer types who used to have to bribe one county at a time… were handed on a silver platter.. a one-stop shopping… ability….

    so now they get to do “earmarking” of Federal funds for developer roads…

Leave a Reply