Transgender Issues — Whose “Centerpiece,” Youngkin’s or the Post’s?

by James A. Bacon

The latest Washington Post spin on its recent public-opinion poll about transgender issues in Virginia schools is a window into the unconscious biases of WaPo reporters and editors.

Here’s the lead (my emphasis):

Education is an important factor for many Virginia voters this fall, but transgender issues, one of Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s most controversial education cornerstones, is a low priority for voters, according to a Washington Post-Schar School poll.”

A 70 percent majority of registered voters say that education is a “very important” factor in their vote for the Virginia legislature this year, whereas about half as many (34 percent) say transgender issues are very important to their vote.

“I’m not seeing in the data that the trans issue and how that is playing in public schools is a big driver right now in the electorate,” said Mark J. Rozell, dean of the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University.

The message: Youngkin has made transgender policies a “cornerstone” of his education policy, but Virginians aren’t going along.

“More voters disapprove of Youngkin’s handling of transgender issues than approve, 43 percent to 37 percent,” writes the Post. “And asked which party they trust more to handle transgender issues, 50 percent choose Democrats while 33 percent choose Republicans.”

So, where’s the bias?

Transgender issues emerged from the cultural ether in Virginia only a few years ago, and “progressive” school boards began adopting policies and practices that had never been seen before. Former Governor Ralph Northam codified the first set of state guidelines. Youngkin rolled out new rules, most notable for protecting the rights of parents, and numerous school boards promptly rejected them.

The Post could have framed the story this way: Education is an important factor for many Virginia voters this fall, but transgender rights, a cornerstone issue of the Democratic Party and progressive school boards, is a low priority for voters.

That would have been just as accurate.

By the way, according to the Post’s own poll, 39% of Virginia voters say that public schools are “doing too much to accommodate trans students,” while 25% say schools are handling things about right and 21% say they are not doing enough. That sounds to me as if a plurality believes schools are too accommodating. I’m not sure how that squares with the assertion that the public doesn’t support Youngkin’s transgender guidelines.

As for the guidelines constituting the “centerpiece” of Youngkin’s educational policy, I would take issue with that characterization. The dominant focus of the Youngkin administration by far is reversing the collapse in educational achievement among Virginia’s public-school kids.

Team Youngkin has consistently drawn attention to declining performance in standardized tests and the need to raise standards after years of lowering them. The administration has focused on reversing the slide in reading, addressing the teacher shortage, and countering the surge in absenteeism.

So, yes, the public is absolutely right that Virginia has bigger public-school fish to fry. I expect that Youngkin would fully agree. Why doesn’t the Post explore the issues that the public does think are important? Like learning loss. Perhaps because delving into the causes of learning loss would expose the monumental failure of progressive K-12 policies, which have turned schools into incubators for social change. Sticking to peripheral issues like transgender rights creates less cognitive dissonance for WaPo reporters.

The Post’ s appetite for the transgender issue seems boundless. The newspaper delves deep into the nuances of public attitudes. Should trans students compete in girls’ sports? Whose bathrooms should they use? Who decides which pronouns to use? The latest poll went so far as to use a “randomized question wording experiment” to see if support for policies varied when framed differently.

Has the Post ever polled parents about the breakdown of discipline in schools? About grade inflation and the erosion of standards? About cell phones in the classroom? About the rise in absenteeism? About the role of classroom disorder in demoralizing teachers? About the emergence of a generation increasingly unprepared to thrive in the knowledge economy?

Not that I recall. If anyone is making transgender issues the “centerpiece” of anything, it’s the Post with its selection of educational topics. Team Youngkin has plenty of other ongoing initiatives. It would be interesting to know if Virginians support those. Don’t count on the Post to find out.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

26 responses to “Transgender Issues — Whose “Centerpiece,” Youngkin’s or the Post’s?”

  1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    In terms of the ongoing election, it was Youngkin who attempted to make transexuals in schools a cornerstone issue. No amount of gaslighting will change that fact.

    1. It was the Progressives that decided a school rule was more important than bipartisan legislation passed by a supermajority. I think that qualifies as making something a cornerstone issue.

      The attorney general indicated that a bipartisan supermajority of the General Assembly enacted VRFRA to extend its protection of Virginia’s religious liberty. He argued that if a government policy largely burdened an individual’s religious exercise, then the government is required to show that the burden is necessary to achieve the “government’s compelling interest.” Also, the government should use lease restrictive means in pursuit of that interest.

      With regards to Vlaming’s case, Miyares stated that letting the teacher choose between his religious belief and his employment gave a substantial burden on Vlaming. However, the school board lacked a “compelling interest” to justify the burden they put on Vlaming’s religious freedom and “failed to use less restrictive means,” like considering Vlaming’s recommendation to use the student’s name instead of using transgender pronouns.

      Miyares urged the court to look beyond the general anti-discrimination law established by the school and scrutinize further if Vlaming really intended harm to the particular claimant. He argued that the school board should prove to Vlaming that his decision to pursue his religious belief “threatened the peace, safety, or good order of the school,” which the school board had not proven yet.

      https://www.christianitydaily.com/news/virginia-attorney-general-supports-religious-freedom-of-teacher-fired-over-transgender-pronoun-policy.html

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        According to this site, the following is a form of gaslighting:

        “Denial: Denial involves a person refusing to take responsibility for their actions. They may do this by pretending to forget what happened, saying they did not do it, or blaming their behavior on someone else.”

        https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/gaslighting#how-it-works

        I’d say that just about fits the bill…

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Saint Ronnie… “I don’t recall”, “I can’t hear you”, etc.

    2. It was the Progressives who decided a school rule was more important than bipartisan legislation passed by a supermajority. I think that qualifies as making something pretty important, especially an issue that didn’t even exist just a few years ago.

      The attorney general indicated that a bipartisan supermajority of the General Assembly enacted VRFRA to extend its protection of Virginia’s religious liberty. He argued that if a government policy largely burdened an individual’s religious exercise, then the government is required to show that the burden is necessary to achieve the “government’s compelling interest.” Also, the government should use lease restrictive means in pursuit of that interest.

      With regards to Vlaming’s case, Miyares stated that letting the teacher choose between his religious belief and his employment gave a substantial burden on Vlaming. However, the school board lacked a “compelling interest” to justify the burden they put on Vlaming’s religious freedom and “failed to use less restrictive means,” like considering Vlaming’s recommendation to use the student’s name instead of using transgender pronouns.

      Miyares urged the court to look beyond the general anti-discrimination law established by the school and scrutinize further if Vlaming really intended harm to the particular claimant. He argued that the school board should prove to Vlaming that his decision to pursue his religious belief “threatened the peace, safety, or good order of the school,” which the school board had not proven yet.

      https://www.christianitydaily.com/news/virginia-attorney-general-supports-religious-freedom-of-teacher-fired-over-transgender-pronoun-policy.html

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        “I think that qualifies as making something a cornerstone issue.”

        You might be able to argue that the action of a school board handed Youngkin a potential campaign issue but it is up to Youngkin what he chooses to make central (or a cornerstone) to his education policy. It is clear to anyone paying attention that this is where he made his bed. Hey, who can blame him? Supposedly, this is the cornerstone issue that got him elected…. maybe not so central to voters now though… guess we will see…

        1. If you combine the transgender issue itself with isolating parents, vilifying them when they speak out, and making our schools less safe from actual violence, it was certainly important to the Younkin victory.

          I would say the cornerstone issue was a cold hard look at Democrat governance, and running against that.

          BTW – You replied before I finished editing my previous comment.

        2. If you combine the transgender issue itself with isolating parents, vilifying them when they speak out, and making our schools less safe from actual violence, it was certainly important to the Younkin victory.

          I would say the cornerstone issue was a cold hard look at Democrat governance, and running against that.

          BTW – You replied before I finished editing my previous comment.

          1. “. . . vilifying (parents) when they speak out, . . .”

            Parents are welcome to speak out and they do. It’s when they shout, scream, call Board members and other speakers names, spout lies, and threaten violence that they are ejected and, if necessary, arrested.

    3. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Wasn’t there a report a teacher 800 number?

  2. LarrytheG Avatar

    Pretty sure it’s the Conservatives and Youngkin who made transgender an issue… and continue to…

    and the legitimate question is – do voters support Youngkin and Conservatives on the issue?

    totally agree with Eric’s “gaslighting” comment. It’s the way of
    Conservatism these days…

  3. Progressives change the rules, and when conservatives push back, they’re the ones responsible for creating the controversy. Sure. Whatever floats your boat.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      like transsexuals never existed until now?

      went through this before with homosexuals…

      a long battle before conservatives finally admitted there was such a thing… and yeah
      they can serve in the military and be elected to
      office and all sorts of things instead of hiding in shame!

  4. 25 + 21 = 46% of people who don’t believe schools are too accommodating. Which is a bigger number than 39%.

    Gold star for creative math, though.

    1. Andrew Buckles Avatar
      Andrew Buckles

      To be fair, they did use the word plurality “the number of votes cast for a candidate who receives more than any other but does not receive an absolute majority.”

    2. LarrytheG Avatar

      pro forma gaslighting?

      1. Lies, damned lies, etc.

    3. Andrew Buckles Avatar
      Andrew Buckles

      To be fair, they did use the word plurality “the number of votes cast for a candidate who receives more than any other but does not receive an absolute majority.”

      1. Yes, and he split one group into two side to create the illusion that the Too Much group was the one with a plurality. But the plurality of people believe either they are accommodating enough or too little.

        1. Rosie, you’re lumping in the “just right” category with the “not enough” category on the assumption that those responding “just right” are OK with progressive transgender policies. You can’t make that assumption. Progressive policies occur in progressive school districts. There are many districts (mostly in conservative localities) with very different practices. Some people responding to the poll may think their district’s policy is “just right” because it is conservative, not because it is progressive.

          1. I can’t access poll, but your own description says it’s about public schools, not the district of the respondents. It also provides no breakdown of polling demographics, though that would be interesting to see.

            So you split the polling and are making shaky assumptions to make the data fit.

    4. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Private school

  5. “The Post could have framed the story this way: Education is an important factor for many Virginia voters this fall, but transgender rights, a cornerstone issue of the Democratic Party and progressive school boards, is a low priority for voters.”

    Very true. Progressives also like to cover up the issues it brings, and take retribution against anyone who speaks out.

    Former Loudoun County Superintendent Scott Ziegler convicted of special ed. teacher’s retaliatory firing

    https://www.foxnews.com/us/former-loudoun-county-superintendent-scott-ziegler-convicted-special-ed-teachers-retaliatory-firing

  6. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Well, the Post didn’t create a policy…

  7. No matter one’s position on the transgender issue, is this a teacher who deserved to be fired?

    https://youtu.be/iQaAaIO4Eaw

Leave a Reply