Too Fearful to Cross the Rubicon

Washington and Lee

by Donald Smith

Maximus:  Still no word?

Quintus: Not a sign.

Maximus: How long has he been gone?

Quintus:  Nearly two hours.

“He” was a Roman liaison sent to see if the Germanic tribes lined up across the valley from Maximus’ (and Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius’) legions wanted to avoid a fight.  Shortly after Maximus’ conversation with his executive officer Quintus, the liaison’s horse rode back into the Roman lines.  Strapped in the saddle was the liaison’s headless body.  Across the valley, the leader of the Germanic tribes held up the head and shouted defiance.  “They say no,” said Maximus.

Earlier this past week, W&L students blanketed a plaque honoring Traveler, General Lee’s horse, with apples.  This effort was endearing — and also offered the W&L leadership an opportunity to NOT escalate the ongoing fight over the place of Confederate heritage in the public square. This wasn’t a Faithful Slave monument.  It was a plaque about a horse, which mentioned General Robert E. Lee and the United Daughters of the Confederacy.  Here was a chance to demonstrate that wokeness hadn’t crushed common sense at Washington and Lee.  

The students offered their school’s leadership a chance to show Virginians that W&L leaders and faculty could handle complex thoughts and reason through complicated subjects.  America’s history is complex.  It can’t be properly handled by shallow, emotional thinking.  The apples were a plea for the W&L leadership to demonstrate that they understood that.  That they really could walk AND chew gum at the same time.

They said no.  

The Germanic tribal chief wasn’t stupid.  He knew the Roman legions wouldn’t just shrug and go home.  He knew there would be consequences.  The W&L leadership isn’t stupid either.  They know the risks they’re running. They know this will make them look silly.  Just like VMI’s sandblasting of Stonewall Jackson’s name off of Jackson Arch made VMI look petty, even silly.  (When I asked VMI to explain why they felt compelled to do that, they responded that they felt they had no other choice.  They couldn’t come up with any alternative approach.  Not a good look for a school whose mission is to produce leaders who can master complex problems, in my opinion.)  But, apparently, W&L decided (like VMI) that it was worth the risk of being derided.  Of being perceived as an academic and institutional figure of fun.

Now, we get to speculate why they chose to do that.  And no, we don’t have to take W&L’s pretty press releases at face value.  We don’t have to accept their excuses … sorry, justifications as Gospel.  Gil Grissom, the star of CBS’s “CSI” TV show said it best:  follow the evidence.  Connect the dots, apply common sense, and the real reasons quickly become obvious.  Wokeism!  Yes, it sounds trite.  But it appears to be true at Washington and Lee.

Donald Smith was raised in Richmond. His mother was born in a house not far from VMI, and family members still live there.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

27 responses to “Too Fearful to Cross the Rubicon”

  1. Wahoo'74 Avatar
    Wahoo’74

    Superb article. W&L President Dudley must be fired. Immediately. Is their Board of Trustees up to the task?

    Dudley makes Leon Trotsky, Vladimir Lenin, and Josef Stalin – the infamous Marxist Troika – look like MAGA Republicans.

  2. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    I have but one request of BR contributing authors. Please, if the conclusion of your piece is going to be solely woke, or wokeism, would you drop it in an abstract so I can move straight to the comments?

    You do realize that the W&L leadership already knows that the big money donors are down with all of this, and that student outrage ends at the first kegger, right?

    “Tempest, meet teacup. Teacup, tempest.”

  3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    The article gives the impression that a large section of the student body covered the site with apples. “W&L students blanketed a plaque…with apples.” “This effort was endearing.” “The students offered their school’s leadership a chance….”

    The rest of the story? In the linked article, the W&L magazine reported that “a few students and alumni collaborated to place dozens of apples on Traveller’s grave….” [Emphasis added] The alumni were, no doubt, members of the dissident group, The Generals’ Redoubt.

    The reaction of some other students:

    “[M]e personally,” said one student, “I couldn’t care less
    about the dead horse of a man who’s probably annoyed in his grave that students like me are attending his institution[.]”

    “NO ONE CARES GO TALK ABOUT IT WHERE PEOPLE CARE[.]”

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    It’s coming. Can you feel it? The vibe is underfoot; it’s unmistakable. Should be here within a week. It’s being formulated now. Reviewed, rehashed.

    It’s the obligatory, soon to be published in BR, letter from the “incredibly wealthy” W&L alumni who has “had enough” and is vowing to remove from his Will the amazingly large, but usually unspecified, donation to the school’s endowment.

    “See this check? It is for a kazillion dollars. I wrote it intending to give it to you for your birthday. But, I’m tearing it up! You’ll never get another dollar from me!”

    “But, uh, you’ve never given me anything before.”

    Can’t wait. Who will it be?

  5. Donald Smith Avatar
    Donald Smith

    Most of the comments downthread (as of the time I’m posting this) seem to have this general theme: “The W&L community doesn’t care about this, so drop the whole subject!”

    True, W&L doesn’t have to care about this subject at all. But the rest of us get to factor this action into our overall assessment of W&L. We also get to use it as one more bit of evidence to support our assertions that wokeism is undermining our universities. And it’s on W&L and its supporters to convince us otherwise.

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      “We also get to use it as one more bit of evidence to support our assertions that wokeism is undermining our universities.”

      How does the replacement of a horse’s headstone with one that does not perpetuate the Lost Cause myth undermine the entire university system? Are you saying that without perpetuating the legacy of the Confederacy in Virginia our educational system is nothing…?

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Yes.

      2. Donald Smith Avatar
        Donald Smith

        Oh, the Lost Cause made them do it? You mean, like the Devil made Flip Wilson’s reverend’s wife buy that dress?

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PJzBjinhV4

        Or, does the W&L leadership see Lost Causers everywhere, just like Haley Joe Osment saw dead people everywhere?

        “Are you saying that without perpetuating the legacy of the Confederacy in Virginia our educational system is nothing?”

        I’m saying that the W&L leadership, and the folks defending them, look pretty silly and foolish now.

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          Lost Cause eradication is indeed a just and worthy goal. Stone Mountain is the final blow…

          https://www.salvationsouth.com/to-reckon-with-robert-e-lee-atlanta-history-center-monument-film/

          “The original carving in the 1920s was a private endeavor that petered out as Confederate veterans died off and the money ran out during the Great Depression. Massive resistance to Brown v. Board of Education inspired a state-sponsored revival of the project in the 1950s. Georgia’s anti-Black governor, Marvin Griffin, was elected with the promise that the state would buy the mountain and finish the carving. In the same spirit, the state legislature in 1956 added the Confederate flag to the state flag, and white folks began sporting “Forget, Hell!” rebel license plates on their cars. I remember that angry spirit, but didn’t realize how much it connected with Stone Mountain.”

    2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      I don’t know if you saw this or not.
      https://columns.wlu.edu/statement-regarding-the-relocation-of-plaques-to-a-new-exhibit-in-university-chapel/
      It would appear that the Traveller stone is to be replaced with a new one. As well as other bronze plaques denoting Lee’s office and Traveller’s stable and so on. The old markers will be on display for a new exhibit “Remembering Robert E. Lee”. Odd title for a school trying to forget how to spell a four letter last name.

      Will the new signs pass the sniff test for Eric and Mr. Purdy? Hard to say. Fickle noses.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        Will they satisfy Donald Smith?

        1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead

          Threading the needle will never satisfy. W and L does not have to worry about much. 1.9 billion dollars locked up in endowments.

          1. WayneS Avatar

            Threading the needle will never satisfy those at the extreme ends of the spectrum. However, if the school follows through in good faith with everything that was mentioned in the press release at the link you posted, I think most people will see it as a good compromise.

          2. Donald Smith Avatar
            Donald Smith

            “I think most people will see it as a good compromise.”

            The fact that a compromise was necessary in the first place, that some critical mass of people at W&L was apparently so triggered by the mention of Robert E. Lee and the UDC on a plaque that they had to dig up the plaque…well, you almost feel obligated to taunt (as Robert E. Lee would say) “Those People.”

          3. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            I agree. It was unnecessary to compromise. A form of retreat. The logical conclusion of retreat is defeat. This is what separated Robert E. Lee from Fighting Joe Johnston.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          It does have the added benefit of making the more than casual observer have to look it up.

          See? Teaching.

      2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Historical exhibit – fine with that… but of course it is not my call…

        The question is actually will it be considered too much of a slight to REL (and his horse apparently) for Donald and The Generals Redoubt crowd to swallow…?

        1. Donald Smith Avatar
          Donald Smith

          We’re too busy laughing at your side right now. We’ll get back with you later.

          1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Sounds like a “yes” to me… alas…

  6. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    I have but one request of BR contributing authors. Please, if the conclusion of your piece is going to be solely woke, or wokeism, would you drop it in an abstract so I can move straight to the comments?

    You do realize that the W&L leadership already knows that the big money donors are down with all of this, and that student outrage ends at the first kegger, right?

    “Tempest, meet teacup. Teacup, tempest.”

    1. Donald Smith Avatar
      Donald Smith

      “I have but one request of BR contributing authors. Please, if the conclusion of your piece is going to be solely woke, or wokeism, would you drop it in an abstract so I can move straight to the comments?”

      No.

      “You do realize that the W&L leadership already knows that the big money donors are down with all of this, and that student outrage ends at the first kegger, right?”

      Duly noted. If your assessment is correct, that says a lot about W&L students and big donors. We can all adjust our assessments of W&L accordingly.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        You have already.

  7. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    The article tries to give the impression that a large section of the student body covered the site with apples. “W&L students blanketed a plaque…with apples.” “This effort was endearing.” “The students offered their school’s leadership a chance….”

    The rest of the story? In the linked article, the W&L magazine reported that “a few students and alumni collaborated to place dozens of apples on Traveller’s grave….” [Emphasis added] The alumni were, no doubt, members of the dissident group, The Generals’ Redoubt.

    The reaction of some other students:

    “[M]e personally,” said one student, “I couldn’t care less
    about the dead horse of a man who’s probably annoyed in his grave that students like me are attending his institution[.]”

    “NO ONE CARES GO TALK ABOUT IT WHERE PEOPLE CARE[.]”

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      “NO ONE CARES GO TALK ABOUT IT WHERE PEOPLE CARE[.]”

      Ici?

    2. Donald Smith Avatar
      Donald Smith

      Dick, if you haven’t spoken with me—and you haven’t—how can you state definitively what the article does or doesn’t try to do. You can’t.

      “NO ONE CARES GO TALK ABOUT IT WHERE PEOPLE CARE[.]”

      Well, that’s obviously wrong. Someone must care quite a bit, to go to all this trouble and risk looking foolish and petty. Which, I will stipulate, W&L has every right to do. It’s a private institution. If this is what their students need, in order to feel safe and empowered—and that’s what it looks like, IMO—then OK. Duly noted.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        I am not trying to state definitively what the article is trying to do. I am just providing the parts you left out.

Leave a Reply