Funeral service for Jayla McBroom, victim of a fentanyl overdose. Photo credit: Washington Post

by James A. Bacon

Drug dealers are lacing opioids, marijuana and cocaine with  fentanyl in the Washington area, reports The Washington Post. The city medical examiner identified the super-addictive and often deadly drug in 95% of the 85 overdose deaths through March this year. Law enforcement authorities are seeing similar increases in fentanyl overdoses in Arlington and Alexandria as well.

Writes the Post:

Emily Bentley, Alexandria’s opioid response coordinator, attributes the recent spike to dealers lacing substances with the cheaper, more addictive fentanyl. She noted that unsuspecting marijuana users may be taking drugs laced with the synthetic opioid, broadening the types of drug users who could be impacted.

Society has not yet come to grips with the fentanyl scourge. If we thought crack cocaine was bad in the 1980s, fentanyl is worse. Fentanyl is cheap, like crack, but it is even more addictive — reportedly 50 times more potent than heroin. Dealers have discovered they can create a market for their product by mixing it with other drugs. Thousands of Americans are dying.

How do we deal with this? Perhaps legalizing and tightly regulating marijuana will help. Creating a legitimate marijuana industry will keep the trade out of the hands of fentanyl dealers who contaminate the weed as a way to hook new users. But what about cocaine, heroin and other illegal substances? Do we legalize them, too, on the grounds that only a legal-but-regulated industry can guarantee safety? Or is that a bridge too far?

Another tack is to treat fentanyl dealers as the ruthless, conscienceless, and murderous scum-suckers that they are. Law enforcement should prioritize locking them up. If it can be demonstrated in court that a drug dealer laced a drug with fentanyl, and if a customer unwittingly consumed the powerful narcotic and died as a result, the dealer should be convicted of homicide, thrown into prison, and never let out again.

A crack-down-on-fentanyl movement might run into resistance from the end-mass-incarceration-crowd, especially if it turns out that fentanyl distributors are disproportionately Black. I have no idea if that’s the case; I’m just pointing out the political reality. But here’s another reality: In Washington, D.C., according to the Post, fentanyl overdoses are occurring disproportionately among African-Americans. Forty-six percent of the city’s population is Black, but four out of five overdoses deaths are of Blacks.

If our society truly cares about the well being of all Black people — as opposed to the well being of the tiny fraction of Blacks who have violent encounters with law enforcement — then we need to take this scourge seriously. We can start by taking murderous drug dealers off the streets.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

22 responses to “Time to Take the Fentanyl Scourge Seriously”

  1. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    With all the hoop-de-do over govt’s involvement in vaccines , what justifies govt involved in this issue?

    Serious question.

    Both on the “help people” and “lock em up” aspects.

    what exactly is the justification of the government being involved?

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      I realize that you are trying to be ironic, but such a silly question does not help your cause.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        I don’t really have a cause, and it really is a serious question in a day and time when people question the role of government in issues like masking and vaccines.

        we argue about the purpose and legitimacy of government – “my body, my choice” and so I ask what is the role of govt when it comes to things like oxycodine, fentanyl, etc?

        I’m just looking for simple answers… perhaps one that people think are silly to answer… but give it a shot!

        1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
          Dick Hall-Sizemore

          The role of government is to protect the public from dangerous substances, particularly those about which the public has little knowledge. As one commenter noted, there is a role for oxycodone. (I just talked to my sister, who had just returned from the hospital following knee replacement surgery. She said that she had just taken oxycodone and was feeling fine.) Even fentanyl has beneficial uses. But, because these drugs are powerful, it is in the best interests of the public that their manufacture, prescription, and use be regulated. That is government’s role.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Thanks. Yes. So government believes it has a Constitutionally legitimate role in protecting the public and public health in general and that includes restrictions and mandates.

            so far,so good?

  2. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
    Baconator with extra cheese

    Fentanyl needs to be made legal so as we don’t have an equity nightmare like we did with weed. Sell it at the ABC store for all I care.
    If you make it legal you’ll get rid of all those pesky inner city shootings over drug tuff.
    And I agree government shouldn’t be involved. Let the scum and dumb OD and die in the streets. I could care less anymore.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      A fully predictable side show to the new open border policy…

      https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fentanyl-seizures-texas-mexico-border-immigration/

  3. James Kiser Avatar
    James Kiser

    Being that 99% of all fentanyl comes across the border from Mexico and is manufactured in China until we close our borders and secure them, and execute all people in the drug trade you will not stop it. Democrat communists make too much money off of it. To hell with helping the saddicts till they want to quit nothing changes.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      didn’t we have a similar attitude towards Columbia and cocaine? What about methamphetamines – they don’t come from offshre, right? I just don’t see stopping fentanyl and as more successful than stopping cocaine…myself

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        You make a valid point. It could be argued that, as long as there is demand (a market) for something, be it alcohol, pot, meth, cocaine, etc., there will be someone supplying it. However, the same argument could be made about firearms and liberals, including me, would like to restrict their sale.

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          How’s that going for you? Walk through some RHHA neighborhoods at 1 a.m. and report back….or ride around on 95 waving your middle finger at reckless drivers….

          My point really was that coke has/had a high end constituency, but fentanyl not so much. Nobody defends that and nobody really wants it. I certainly strongly object to Jim’s implication that black folks want it left alone.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Anything there is a demand for will motivate suppliers. Pretty sure Prince died of fentanyl, though.

            People who want drugs will obtain them from folks who will find out where to get them and supply them. Govt tries to determine/rank them in terms of “harm” and acts accordingly on enforcement, which can be pretty Draconian; people who don’t pay close attention can end up ruining their lives at the hands of the government.

            People with money, power and influence will usually fare much better, so it’s the folks at the other end that usually pay the price.

            What really happens if govt stands back? Do more people get hooked and harmed or does it level off?

            I look to other developed countries on this – they have far fewer people in jail because drugs are not really criminalized. Do those other countries have large numbers of addicted people?

            Most other developed countries have far less people in jail because of their different drug policies and I do wonder if our current policies are counterproductive because they do seem to spawn crime similar to how prohibition fueled gangs and organized crime in the 20s and 30s.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            You guys…. and your racial stereotyping!

            ” Preference for fentanyl higher among young, white, frequent opioid users”

            https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/09/190918115918.htm

          3. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Thank you Sacklers.

        2. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Slight difference… the CIA isn’t using fentanyl to keep extreme right wing dictators in place. I don’t think so anyway. Maybe we should check.

      2. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        Ah, but all the cool people put the white powder up their nose, including rich donors to both parties, all the Hollywood glitterati, media types. Sherlock Holmes. Coca Cola….Fentanyl is just the ChiComs killing us in a way other than COVID. Probably a few files on Hunter’s laptop…

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Yes, coming across the borders… through the PORTS. No fence can solve this.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        If there is demand for it, it will come in whatever way it can, just as other drugs like cocaine did. The “borders” issue is only relevant until they find other paths which including Canada now apparently.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          It’s simple logistics. A backpack, or a shipping container, which has the lower cost?

  4. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    Fentanyl. What a sinister drug and epidemic. I don’t think we have seen the peak of this yet. Restricting accessiblity seems like the smart move. But in today’s world how? Lord have mercy.

  5. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Anybody watching the Sacklers?

  6. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Conotoxins — invest now. Bye-bye opiates and oids…

Leave a Reply