Three Warnings? You’re Out of a Job.

by Kerry Dougherty

Unbelievable. If what Abby Zwerner’s lawyer said yesterday in her press conference is true, it wasn’t enough to sack only the superintendent of Newport News Public Schools over the near-fatal shooting of a first-grade teacher by an armed 6-year-old. A host of other indifferent school administrators need to join him in the unemployment ranks.

Oh, and they all need to buckle up for legal proceedings that could blow the roof off that dysfunctional school system.

Here, watch for yourself. I’ll wait:

Diane Toscano is not an ambulance-chasing lawyer. She’s a well-respected, experienced Virginia Beach attorney who once worked as a prosecutor. She just notified Newport News of her intention to sue on behalf of the wounded teacher, which may be part of the reason the school board decided yesterday to fire George Parker, the city’s school superintendent.

Toscano knows the law and seems confident that the chronic apathy that infected administrators at Richneck Elementary School will be enough to take this case out of the Workman’s Compensation meager coverage and open the schools to full liability for Zwerner’s injuries.

I wish Toscano and her client success. Sometimes the only way to get the attention of fat and happy do-nothing soft-on-wrongdoers bureaucrats is to sue the britches off of them when their lethargy results in great harm.

By all accounts school officials in Newport News have routinely ignored teachers begging for help in maintaining discipline in their classrooms.

But for the love of God, when teachers come to school administrators and say they have reason to believe a student has a gun on school property and that he wants to hurt people school brass should at least pick up the phone and summon the police.

That didn’t happen at Richneck Elementary on January 6th, where Toscano says administrators were “paralyzed by apathy” and did absolutely nothing to prevent the near-fatal shooting of a teacher.

The first complaint was lodged that morning at about 11:15 by Zwerner herself, who said the boy in question was threatening to beat up another student.

Next a teacher told administrators that a crying student told her this kid showed him the gun he was packing and threatened to shoot the other child if he tattled.

Another teacher told administrators that it was believed the child had a gun, but that she was told it was late in the day, not to worry about it.

Well, the teachers WERE worried. So were some students. But, according to Toscano, the administration slumbered on.

Surely by now rumors of a gun on campus are taken seriously at most schools. Why would any school official gamble that rumors were false? Common sense would dictate the school administrators err on the side of caution, on the side of protecting students and faculty.

Unless, of course, it is school policy to sweep discipline problems under the rug and pretend all is well.

Firing the superintendent last night amounts to nothing more than an empty gesture if others in administration who demonstrated indifference to an armed student on campus don’t follow Parker out the door.

More importantly, the school district must immediately institute a strict zero-tolerance policy for discipline problems and stand behind their teachers who are struggling to maintain order in their classrooms.

A successful lawsuit by a dedicated teacher who nearly lost her life while teaching children how to read may be just what Newport News Public Schools needs right now.

This column ran first in Kerry: Unemployed and Unedited and is republished with permission. 


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

85 responses to “Three Warnings? You’re Out of a Job.”

  1. James Kiser Avatar
    James Kiser

    Thank the Dept of Education under Obama for the regs saying you couldn’t punish troublemakers in schools. And it actually goes back further that that. Park View HS in Loudoun County had a kid show up with a gun. Did they expel him ? Nope put him in another HS. The other issue the is that these Superintendents and other administrative officials get all their benefits when they leave and the taxpayers foot the bill. They should be fired and get nothing.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar

    I don’t have any trouble at all firing any/all who failed to perform their duties but it seems a pretty big jump to then say this:

    “Unless, of course, it is school policy to sweep discipline problems under the rug and pretend all is well.

    Firing the superintendent last night amounts to nothing more than an empty gesture if others in administration who demonstrated indifference to an armed student on campus don’t follow Parker out the door.

    More importantly, the school district must immediately institute a strict zero-tolerance policy for discipline problems and stand behind their teachers who are struggling to maintain order in their classrooms.”

    1. VaNavVet Avatar

      Big jump is right. How does Kerry profess to know what the school discipline policies were?

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Innately?

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          echo chamber…

      2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        I know what NN discipline policy is, PBIS. No out-of-school suspensions.

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          So if the school had out-of-school suspension then the staff that (supposedly) searched the kid’s backpack would have found the gun…. 🤷‍♂️

        2. LarrytheG Avatar

          got data?

    2. Toriessian Avatar
      Toriessian

      I just want to know what you have to do to get fired “for cause”. If letting a 6 year old shoot a teacher isn’t “for cause” what is?

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        which one are you talking about? The Sup ? did the SUP “Let” that 6yr old do it?

        1. Toriessian Avatar
          Toriessian

          https://apnews.com/article/newport-news-school-shooting-a40dfad64388aadf1f90211177412522

          “About an hour later, another teacher went to an administrator and said she had taken it upon herself to search the boy’s bookbag, but warned that she thought the boy had put the gun in his pocket before going outside for recess, Toscano said.

          “The administrator downplayed the report from the teacher and the possibility of a gun, saying — and I quote — ‘Well, he has little pockets,’ ” Toscano said.

          ************************
          With this level of negligence yes I’m willing to say the administration of the school let a 6 year old shoot his teacher.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            The SUP did?

  3. Maria Paluzsay Avatar
    Maria Paluzsay

    The firings – without severance – need to go all the way up the food chain, and let’s replace the school board as well. Teachers need to be able to teach and not be concerned with ruffling “management”. We can implement this across the state. 2 birds, one stone – our kids could learn, and I’d bet the teacher shortage would improve dramatically.

    1. VaNavVet Avatar

      Implement what across the Commonwealth firing all superintendents and school boards?

      1. For a start…

        😉

        1. Warmac9999 Avatar
          Warmac9999

          The wonders of progressive thinking right in your face.

          1. I was joking…

          2. Warmac9999 Avatar
            Warmac9999

            Why?

          3. Because people who take themselves way too seriously amuse me.
            Especially when they self-identify as conservative but display totalitarian / authoritarian tendencies.

            Or something like that.

          4. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Kinda like being amused by a rattlesnake in the tent. Well, as long as it’s in the other guy’s tent, I suppose….

    2. Andrew Buckles Avatar
      Andrew Buckles

      He was not fired without severance, he is collecting full pay through June of 2024. That amount will likely be over 350k by that time.

  4. Warmac9999 Avatar
    Warmac9999

    Just another reason for school vouchers in the hands of parents. My bet is that there have been quite a few potential violence incidents swept under the rug to give the appearance that things are calm and cool. Wait till the depositions get rolling and all teachers and administrators have to testify under oath. Only thing stopping the truth will be lack of disclosure mandated by the courts. The payoff will be quite large.

  5. Andrew Buckles Avatar
    Andrew Buckles

    Ladies and Gentlemen… He was not “Fired” in any sense of the word you and I might be fired. According to the BBC

    “The superintendent’s salary was over $250,000 (£200,000) per year, according to local news outlets. He will continue to receive full salary and benefits until June 2024 because he was fired “without cause”.”

    Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-64406295

    I would like to offer myself as the next superintendent, and I promise to do nothing for 3 years for half that amount. How can they refuse?

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Same thing happened with the Loudoun super. He even was compensated for the car allowance.

    2. Good plan. By doing nothing, you minimize your chances of being fired “for cause”, which means they’ll have to pay your full contract even if they get rid of you before your 3 years are up.

      😉

    3. I want to know who was the administrator at the school who didn’t think it necessary to involve law enforcement until after someone was shot.

      And the one who didn’t think the shooter should be searched because he had “little pockets.”

      And the one who refused “because the school day was almost over.”

      These may all be the same person. Perhaps it was the Assistant Principle who resigned. But I hope it comes out.

  6. Warmac9999 Avatar
    Warmac9999

    Yep! I don’t think throwing more money at public government schools is the answer. It has become indefensible and the politicians look foolish at best and uncaring at worst.

    1. killerhertz Avatar
      killerhertz

      Except nearly every Republican I have seen run for BoS or delegate put this as part of their election platform. Insanity esp given what’s happening in recent years.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        so no money for security or metal detectors?

        1. killerhertz Avatar
          killerhertz

          What’s so hard to understand? If funding follows the student this is moot. Resources and labor allocated to the government schools will be reallocated to the private sector.

          1. Warmac9999 Avatar
            Warmac9999

            A quite good start.

        2. Warmac9999 Avatar
          Warmac9999

          Well, whatever security was involved, a six year old defeated it. Maybe we ought to try something different.

  7. Nevertheless, I am still adamantly opposed to ‘zero tolerance’ policies.

    You might say I have ‘zero tolerance’ for zero tolerance policies.

    1. I don’t know what Mr. Dougherty means by zero tolerance, but I do remember the child suspended for two days because he ate his Pop Tart into what resembled the shape of a gun.

      If that’s zero tolerance, I’m with you. NO WAY!

      Somewhere in between, there has to be a tough but sane approach.

      The disciplinary case of a then-7-year-old shaping his breakfast pastry into the shape of a gun in 2013 has been resolved.

      Joshua Welch was a second grader at Park Elementary School when he was suspended for two days.

      “It was already a rectangle and i just kept on biting it and biting it and tore off the top and it kinda looked like a gun but it wasn’t,”

      Joshua said at the time. “All I was trying to do was turn it into a mountain, but it didn’t look like a mountain really, and it turned out to be a gun, kind of.”

      https://foxbaltimore.com/news/local/35-years-later-pop-tart-gun-suspension-resolved#:~:text=Joshua%20Welch%20was%20a%20second,Joshua%20said%20at%20the%20time.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        That’s a good example of “zero tolerance”. It’s more formally called, “I’m just followink orders.”

      2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        Whataboutism with a single example of a moronic decision changes the subject without dealing with the problem.

        1. Lefty665 Avatar

          Perhaps it will help you gain insight that the problem of violence in schools is not with teachers, guidance counselors, psychologists and social workers. Those front line people understand the problems, they face them daily.

          The problem is with school boards, administrators and policies like DIE. That is where the change needs to happen. It is also why your misguided notion to add another layer of bureaucracy in the form of CSBs in schools is so profoundly dysfunctional.

        2. The disciplinary failures here go way beyond the presence or absence of “zero tolerance” policies. They lie in the realm of “zero discipline”.

          With that said, proper discipline can be maintained in schools without implementing “zero tolerance”. And it was, at least until relatively recently.

          “Zero tolerance” policies are an admission of failure on the part of those responsible for maintaining discipline in our schools. They say: “We aren’t capable of administering discipline in a fair and appropriate manner, so we need an explicit set of rules which tell us exactly and precisely what to do in every situation without deviation.”

          1. “Zero tolerance” policies are an admission of failure on the part of those responsible for maintaining discipline in our schools.

            I agree completely.

            The comments that opposition to zero tolerance means one must be wishy washy are laughable.

            I have been volunteering at youth programs off and on for over 40 years. I have no aversion to discipline, but have a very commanding presence and very rarely need it.

            If everything is prescribed, schools wouldn’t need administrators. Computer programs could do the job.

            With that said, there should be some absolutes, like situations when schools must call law enforcement. I’m very surprised those don’t already exist on a state level. Or perhaps they do but were ignored.

        3. In what sense have I not dealt with the problem? Have you not read my other comments over the last several days? I am a strong supporter of discipline, and have been very vocal about how the lack of it leads to problems.

          Zero tolerance, however, is a descriptor with an unfortunate history when applied at schools. I don’t think I am the only one who associates it with mindless absolutes that can destructively tie the hands of administrators.

          Discipline – Yes
          Zero Tolerance – No

          “A zero tolerance policy is one which imposes a punishment for every infraction of a stated rule. Zero tolerance policies forbid people in positions of authority from exercising discretion or changing punishments to fit the circumstances subjectively; they are required to impose a pre-determined punishment regardless of individual culpability, extenuating circumstances, or history.”

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_tolerance#:~:text=Zero%20tolerance%20policies%20forbid%20people,%2C%20extenuating%20circumstances%2C%20or%20history.

        4. Matt Adams Avatar
          Matt Adams

          That example wasn’t “whataboutism”.

          Zero Tolerance will do far more harm than good. It’s been studied.

          https://www.apa.org/pubs/reports/zero-tolerance.pdf

          https://jlc.org/news/zero-tolerance-policies-good-bad-and-ugly

          1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Good lord, I am upvoting Matt… that is how off the rails this conversation is…!

      3. That is exactly the type of ‘zero tolerance’ I’m taking about.

      4. Warmac9999 Avatar
        Warmac9999

        But his suspension sent a rather broad message to all the kids and their parents. And that is the real point of zero tolerance.

        1. Sorry, no.

          You can show you mean business and still demonstrate that you have a functional brain.

          1. Warmac9999 Avatar
            Warmac9999

            How? Actions speak louder than words.

          2. Schools absolutely should not punish students when they have done NOTHING wrong. That sends the message that punishment is indiscriminate and capricious. The students won’t be taught to respect authority. Adult behavior like that teaches them to resent authority and rebel from it.

            Adults should always model good behavior. That includes how discipline is administered.

            When a parent gets angry and lashes out at a child for no reason, that does damage to a child. Children from dysfunctional families like that don’t need more of the same at school.

            The school in Newport News had an abundance of extremely bad behavior to discipline. There was no need to make up stupid stuff to discipline. That’s just crazy.

        2. You’re right. It sent a “rather broad message to all the kids and parents” that the people who run the school are brainless drones.

          1. Warmac9999 Avatar
            Warmac9999

            I wonder if that happened again at that school.

          2. Probably. A lot of kids eat pop-tarts at school.

          3. Warmac9999 Avatar
            Warmac9999

            I wonder if the school supplies the pop-tart? 🤡

    2. I don’t know what Mr. Dougherty means by zero tolerance, but I do remember the child suspended for two days because he ate his Pop Tart into what resembled the shape of a gun.

      If that’s zero tolerance, I’m with you. NO WAY!

      Somewhere in between, there has to be a tough but sane approach.

      The disciplinary case of a then-7-year-old shaping his breakfast pastry into the shape of a gun in 2013 has been resolved.

      Joshua Welch was a second grader at Park Elementary School when he was suspended for two days.

      “It was already a rectangle and i just kept on biting it and biting it and tore off the top and it kinda looked like a gun but it wasn’t,”

      Joshua said at the time. “All I was trying to do was turn it into a mountain, but it didn’t look like a mountain really, and it turned out to be a gun, kind of.”

      https://foxbaltimore.com/news/local/35-years-later-pop-tart-gun-suspension-resolved#:~:text=Joshua%20Welch%20was%20a%20second,Joshua%20said%20at%20the%20time.

    3. Warmac9999 Avatar
      Warmac9999

      So you are for squishy reasonableness policies. Well, here is an example. Teachers and administrators sweeping things under the rug and now the explosion brought to you by a six year old.

      1. No, I am for reasoned discretion on the part of reasonable people.

        High school junior who’s never been in any trouble in school exits house headed for school.

        Kid’s car won’t start. Contractor dad says “I’m already late for a meeting, take the spare company work truck. You do not want to miss your exam”.

        School officials/sheriff’s deputies search vehicles in student parking lot during school.

        Kid gets jacked up for bringing two “switchblade weapons” to school.

        “Switchblade weapons” are actually manually operated utility knives which were in a locked tool box on the truck.

        Kid never opened the locked toolbox until required by officials, and he never touched one of the utility knives.

        Dad visits school. Explains what happened. Makes it clear that kid did not intentionally bring “weapons” on school grounds, and that he did not at any point touch or actually possess one of the utility knives. Reminds school officials that kid has never been in any trouble before.

        School officials are “sympathetic”, but the school’s “zero tolerance” weapons policy requires that the kid serve one semester in “alternate school”, with the real troublemakers, where things do not go well for him.

        As I said, I adamantly oppose “zero tolerance” policies.

        1. Warmac9999 Avatar
          Warmac9999

          This was a dumb decision. There was no intent. Zero tolerance is a starting point for a decision, not an ending point. Reasonableness starts wherever and whenever somebody wants it to start and that is arbitrary. Give me the a clear and unambiguous starting point and adjust from there.

          1. The words “zero tolerance” have meaning apart from how you as an individual may view them.

            If Ms. Dougherty hadn’t included “zero tolerance” in the article I would have been completely supportive of it.

          2. Warmac9999 Avatar
            Warmac9999

            The problem is you want to start in the undefined reasonable. I want a defined starting point.

          3. I actually think all articles and commentary related to the shooting by the 6 year-old have lacked clarity at times.

            In my view, there are at least five somewhat distinct issues here. It would be best to discuss each separately.

            1. The child’s access to the gun owned by his mother

            2. The school’s lack of effective response to extreme behavior leading up to the day of the shooting, and how that type of behavior should be dealt with

            3. The school administration’s gross and repeated negligence on the day of the shooting

            4. State and Federal mandates

            5. General school discipline to maintain classroom order for an effective learning environment

            Blending all these into one is not helpful.

            If it is made clear that a statement is only applicable to #3 above, then I think there may be room for some hard and fast rules, particularly mandates about when law enforcement must be brought in.

            But I still wouldn’t label it “zero tolerance.” That descriptor carries too much baggage. Labels like that aren’t helpful. State specifically what is recommended point by point, and avoid potential misunderstandings.

  8. Unsung Heroes

    I don’t think it’s been mentioned but there are some unsung heroes at the school who should be recognized. The teacher, Abigail Zwerner obviously cared for her students and despite being shot in the chest, took them to safety.

    But what about the students? At least one student was told by the shooter that if he told anyone about the gun, he would be shot. But in spite of a very credible threat of death, that student did what was right anyway. Wow!

    “Around 1 p.m. — an hour before the shooting — another teacher reported that a student had come to the teacher crying, saying that the boy had shown him the gun at recess and threatened to shoot the student if he told anyone, Ms. Toscano said.”

    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/25/us/newport-news-shooting-teacher-superintendent-school-board.html

    At the appropriate time and in whatever way is proper, the students who went to their teachers to warn about the student with the gun should be recognized. Despite their very young age, they displayed incredible courage and did what was right and necessary.

    They had more courage and brains than the school administrators for sure.

    1. killerhertz Avatar
      killerhertz

      Just imagine what would have happened if the teacher that stopped the student hurt him. They woulda burned down the city!

      1. Just out of curiosity, who is “they”?

        1. killerhertz Avatar
          killerhertz

          MAGA and QANON

  9. Kenneth Reid Avatar
    Kenneth Reid

    I think it’s very evident based on the permissive system in Loudoun schools that allowed two girls to be sexually assaulted with little consequence for the perpetrator that the school administrators in many districts in this state are afraid to discipline kids — and in particular, kids from disadvantaged backgrounds. In Loudoun, the NAACP has been on the warpath for years over alleged “inequities” in disciplinary proceedings for kids of color vs. white kids. I am pretty sure these activists have infiltrated the Newport News schools, which are largely non white, and other districts, and have exerted undue pressure on the School Boards to ensure “equity” is above all carried out , regardless of the consequences. In addition, the more disciplinary actions a schoolhas, the worst impact it has on annual performance reviews and No Child Left Behind. This is clearly a freak incident; not too many 6 year old kids bring guns to schools, and of course, liberals will blame the gun, not the parents. But my guess is based on some of the comments here from former school teachers (like Mr. Majors) about violent kids leads me to believe that even the little elementary schoolers can be threats to teachers, staff and other students. And, the schools are looking the other way about this, which is truly awful. Or, they are just throwing up their hands knowing it’s their job to educate kids in the 3 Rs not morality.

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      “…liberals will blame the gun, not the parents…”

      I have not seen a single person of any political persuasion suggest that the parents are not to blame for this child being able to access their gun and take it to school. Please post a link to anyone stating this.

      1. Kenneth Reid Avatar
        Kenneth Reid

        no. youve been blaming the Gun this whole blog. But why not answer my question — do you feel there is a climate of permissiveness in the public schools in Virginia, especially in Democrat-controlled areas like Newport News, Loudoun, and Fairfax that leads to this situation?

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          Show me one comment where I specifically said the parents are not to blame for the child gaining access to the gun. This is what you wrote above and it is false. I suggest you retract your “inaccuracies”.

          And I have already commented on the basis of your rhetoric. No “climate of permissiveness” is responsible for faculty not finding a gun during a (supposed) search of the student/backpack. Incompetence may very well be to blame but not PBIS.

          1. killerhertz Avatar
            killerhertz

            Schools advocate DEI. Schools fail to act in the name of DEI. Not a stretch.

          2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Please demonstrate where DEI was invoked in the failed search of a 6 year old for a gun in school…

          3. killerhertz Avatar
            killerhertz

            Evidenced by the fact that no rational individual would keep a child like this in school with normal children unless they had some other motivation. DEI was at the core of the state educational priorities during the last admin and this is a focus at the local level. All the other leftists comments indicate as much with ideas like “this boy deserved a normal education like everyone else”. Laughable.

          4. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Sorry but mentally disabled (including those that act out aggressively) kids have been forced into mainstream since… well we had some in my school so quite some time. DEI was certainly not a factor. Further, you have yet to demonstrate that DEI in any way was invoked during the supposed search of this child.

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          I don’t see anyone saying the parents (or any gun owner who allows a child access to their guns) are not to blame when that happens. Can gun laws help there, of course, but that does not excuse the owners/parents – which is what Ken claims liberals are doing.

    2. killerhertz Avatar
      killerhertz

      And why was this Loudon sex crime not investigated? More importantly the attacker identified as trans and was permitted to use the women’s facilities. All in the name of diversity, equity, and inclusion!

      1. Kenneth Reid Avatar
        Kenneth Reid

        it was investigated and the kid was initialluy in the jiuvenile detention center after he raped the first girl, but was released (as reqire by law). But rather than putting him in a special program for at-risk kids, which Loudoun has,he wassent to another high school where he committed the 2n assault (October 2021). The kid, then 15, pleaded guilty In january 2022 to two counts of forced sodomy and something else. i think it was a suspended sentence. or he’s on probation with supervision. He’s no longer in the LCPS system. Also, while there were reports he was wearing a dress, it was not a transgender thing, per se, but no question Lcps permissiveness when the woke school board was elected in 2019 played a huge part in staff ignoring the first rape

  10. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    That community is already in the process of dissolution where each man begins to eye his neighbor as a possible enemy, where nonconformity with the accepted creed, political as well as religious, is a mark of disaffection; where denunciation, without specification or backing, takes the place of evidence; where orthodoxy chokes freedom of dissent; where faith in the eventual supremacy of reason has become so timid that we dare not enter our convictions in the open lists, to win or lose. — Learned Hand, jurist (27 Jan 1872-1961)

    Died in 1961? So the social media was envisioned sometime before 1961 at least. Quite possibly this quote is the design document.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      The whole district! My HS did that in a month!

      1. Footnote for last 5 lines: “<=A group below state definition for personally identifiable results."

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          how many students in NN Schools?

        2. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          It would mean, at least as I perceive it, that the number is sufficiently small enough so that with minimal effort, e.g., Google and a few choice keywords, someone could identify an individual.

          For example, if there were 2 Technology Offenses (online threat?) then there is sufficient reporting online to get names.

          “ Question: If I am only publishing aggregate data tables, do I still need to be concerned about disclosure avoidance?
          Answer: Yes. The aggregation of student-level data into school-level (or higher) reports removes much of the risk of disclosure, since no direct identifiers (such as a name, Social Security Number, or student ID) are present in the aggregated tables. Some risk of disclosure does remain, however, in circumstances where one or more students possess a unique or uncommon characteristic (or
          a combination of characteristics) that would allow them to be identified in the data table (this commonly occurs with small ethnic subgroup populations), or where some easily observable characteristic corresponds to an unrelated category in the data table (e.g., if a school reports that 100% of males in grade 11 scored at “Below Proficient” on an assessment). In these cases, some level of disclosure avoidance is necessary to prevent disclosure in the aggregate data table.”

          https://studentprivacy.ed.gov/sites/default/files/resource_document/file/FAQs_disclosure_avoidance_0.pdf

    2. killerhertz Avatar
      killerhertz

      Data, esp when collected by the institution, is easily manipulated. This is evidenced by the fact that all of these and prior offenses from the child in this story were likely not reported by the admin.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        “This is evidenced by the fact that … were likely not reported…”

        One of these things is not like the other….

        1. killerhertz Avatar
          killerhertz

          My point is there was evidence they ignored the reports from the teachers. Who knows if his prior offenses, which apparently were frequent, are included in this data. I’ve read reports that this was incredibly frequent with this boy, leading me to believe these numbers would be much higher for that school district.
          But nah, let’s ignore the most plausible explanation.

      2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        “This is evidenced by the fact that … were likely not reported…”

        One of these things is not like the other….

    3. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      As colossal of a failure that this instance was, it is far less indicative of a systemic failure and condemnation of PBIS than, oh say, a half dozen successful searches of students wherein guns had been found, would be.

Leave a Reply