The War on Virginia’s History

Anarchy and nihilism. Mural at the University of Virginia. Photo credit: Ann McLean

by Scott S. Powell and Ann McLean

The United States is under a cultural and ideological attack that threatens its continuity and survival more than at any previous time in the 239-year history of the nation. And since the leaders of this attack think strategically, it should come as no surprise that Virginia would be in the crosshairs of a new kind of battle to transform America.

Virginia is the key state that gave birth to the United States, and this state has more historical sites than any other — approximately 130 in all. Yorktown and Appomattox Courthouse, both in Virginia, were the sites of the final battles of the Revolutionary War and the Civil War. Thus, America-haters know that if the history and culture of Virginia can be denigrated and rewritten, the rest of the country will be easier to take down.

Four of the first five U.S. presidents came from Virginia. George Washington, who led the Continental Army to victory in the War of Independence, would become the first president. Thomas Jefferson, who drafted the Declaration of Independence, became the third president. James Madison, the fourth president of the United States, drafted the Constitution. James Monroe, the fifth and last president among the Founding Fathers, was the brave 18-year-old volunteer soldier holding the American flag in Emanuel Leutze’s famous 1850 painting, “Washington Crossing the Delaware,” sitting in the boat right behind resolute commander-in-chief Washington.

Throughout the ages, there has been a struggle between freedom and tyranny. The United States is the only country in the history of mankind specifically founded on ideas and principles that would establish and protect people’s God-given rights and freedoms. It was Virginians who expressed these “first principles” in the Bill of Rights incorporated into the Constitution, and it is these first principles that are now under the fiercest attack in the present culture war to take down America.

Former President Barack Obama stated shortly before his election in 2008 that his administration would transform America. It turns out that, in his adolescence, Obama was mentored for many years by Communist Party member Frank Marshall Davis. Above all, communists understand that the rewriting of history is essential to gaining and then holding political power. All countries that have succumbed to communist rule — Russia, China, North Korea, and Cuba — had their histories rewritten to erase any connection the people had with their past. Cancellation and erasure are key to transformation. Karl Marx himself wrote, “Take away the heritage of a people and they are easily conquered.”

UVA Being ‘Transformed’

The University of Virginia (UVa), the only American university established by a Founding Father, Thomas Jefferson, embodied the spirit of our nation’s reliance on “the best that has been thought and said.” Jefferson’s university was known for its superb academics, unique atmosphere of decency and honor, and its special ethos of honorable dignity mixed with good-hearted camaraderie. Jefferson designed his “academical village” to promote ideas important to the 18th century, such as his observation that “Commerce between master and slave is despotism. Nothing is more certainly written in the Book of Life than these people are to be free.”

Increasingly, UVa’s tradition of graceful order is being shredded by policies to fundamentally transform the university. For example, in the foyer of the highly trafficked Old Cabell Hall, which includes the auditorium in which incoming student orientation takes place, there are huge murals (some 10- to 25-feet tall) that display a female student’s academic journey as an orgy of indecency, debauchery, and chaos. The murals, sponsored in part by the Office of the University President, are a spectacle showing illicit relationships between professors and students, references to death (skeletons, snakes, vultures, and rats), and even a glowering figure of Lenin.

Admissions tours disparage Jefferson and include vulgar anecdotes and descriptions of riots and mayhem. Both the murals and tours mock the God-honoring vision of Jefferson, treating his ideals as shabbily as the bronze monuments of George Rogers Clark and another of Meriwether Lewis and William Clark, torn down last year.

Who among woke faculty teaches that George Clark was a revolutionary war hero promoted to brigadier general in 1781 by then-Virginia Gov. Thomas Jefferson, and a key figure behind the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, which outlawed slavery in an unsettled vast territory that would become five Midwest states? Who mentions that it was Lewis and Clark who took great risks and made sacrifices to explore the Pacific Northwest and Oregon territories, and made claim for the U.S. before others from Europe did? Melody Barnes, formerly President Barack Obama’s director of the Domestic Policy Council and now director of UVA’s Democracy Institute and co-director at UVA’s Democracy Initiative, takes credit for helping remove those statues.

For the new UVa elite, Virginia history has no special significance or value. The university supported a movement to remove the names of Jefferson and Madison from the regional library, named 50 years ago to honor the special friendship between the two founders, who worked together to produce the Constitution.

Jefferson and Madison and the other framers who gathered at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 had thoroughly studied democracy in all its forms and found them wanting — prone to corruption, intrigue, and abuse of power. That is the principal reason they arrived at a constitutional republic as the best form of government to protect people’s rights and provide more opportunity for the diverse American people.

Similar Attacks at Washington and Lee University

In Lexington, Virginia, a similar assault on the state’s history is taking place at Washington and Lee University, a school that was rehabilitated by Robert E. Lee after the Civil War, when he became university president. Lee was remarkable in being one of only two to graduate without a single demerit from West Point in its 220-year history. Additionally, he strongly opposed slavery and freed the slaves on the plantations inherited by his wife before Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation.

Surely these accomplishments — along with voluminous testimony that Lee was beloved and admired as much by Union soldiers who knew him as he was by the Confederates — constitute an honorable legacy. But the history-haters at Washington and Lee don’t care. They fought to remove Lee’s name from the university he saved and tried to remove all vestiges of Lee from the school’s premises. It was decided to remove Lee’s name from the chapel but leave the full-size marble statue of the “Recumbent Lee” located there. But now alumni must fight to prevent the erecting of a brick wall to conceal from public view this monument of Lee. Apparently, cancel culture believes that if something cannot be seen, it no longer exists.

Admissions tour guides disparage Lee just as tour guides disparage Jefferson in Charlottesville. In late summer 2022, a student tour guide, who felt compelled to state his pronouns, summed up how he and others like to think about the very intentional alienating of affections they perform at Washington and Lee: “We kept the outside, the shell, and on the inside, we’re changing and evolving.”

Other Schools’ Erasure of History

Under Governor Ralph Northam, and now Governor Glenn Youngkin, many colleges across the state experience the same. The Virginia Military Institute removed the statue of Gen. Thomas Jonathan “Stonewall” Jackson, an orphan who persevered to great heights through discipline and Christian faith in God, becoming a dedicated and beloved teacher of cadets as well as black Sunday school students. Jackson’s name was sand-blasted off his famous arch, completely erasing him — along with his exemplary character, resolve, and military skill — as though he never existed.

Virginia’s community colleges have had names stripped: Lord Fairfax Community College has become “Laurel Ridge;” John Tyler (another former U.S. president) has become “Brightpoint.” James Madison’s namesake university has removed reference to those with significant accomplishments, such as Matthew Fontaine Maury, founder of the sciences of meteorology and oceanography, and developer of warfare submarines. Similar agendas have wrought their erasure of history at the University of Richmond, William and Mary, and many high schools.

These changes at Virginia’s iconic academic institutions have all the signs of the totalitarian dystopia that George Orwell described in his classic, “1984,” wherein, “Every record has been destroyed or falsified … every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed. … And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute.”

Virginia’s House Museums Go Woke

Virginia’s house museums have been affected by the appointment of woke personnel to foundations and trusts that oversee the properties, as well as an influx of money. The Thomas Jefferson Foundation, on whose board of trustees Melody Barnes has served, and which administers and manages Monticello — the home of Thomas Jefferson — was the recipient of a $20 million gift from David M. Rubenstein, a co-founder of the Carlyle Group.

The woke remake of Monticello facilitated by Rubenstein’s money has turned the home and grounds of the Jefferson estate into a critical race theory indoctrination tour. Visitors are bombarded with unending references and slander of Jefferson as being a slaveholder. Omitted are such monumental ideas of forward-looking progress expressed by Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence such as “all men are created equal.” Nowhere is there so much as a mention that his document was the first government edict anywhere with a vision to end slavery.

At Montpelier, home of Madison, similarly affected by $10 million from Rubenstein, not one American flag flies on its 2,650-acre site. Madison’s beliefs, which led to the drafting of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights, are sacrificed to a fixation on slavery and racism. The bookstore is replete with works on critical race theory, rather than on the profound thinking and ideals that motivated the Father of the Constitution.

In conclusion, it is increasingly obvious to many with a generation or more memory of Americana that the United States is undergoing a sweeping, Communist-type revolution — one that is not dissimilar from the Chinese cultural revolution. What stands in the way of the completion of this domestic communist revolution are the Judeo-Christian values that still reside in our culture and documents conceived of and fought for by Virginians: the Declaration of Independence, Northwest Ordinance of 1787, Constitution of the United States, and the Federalist Papers.

America’s enemies know they cannot win on the battlefield of ideas because truth will win over falsehood. Their method of operation is to destroy America piecemeal, through its culture, using Marxist tools of demoralization and division. Virginia is the kingpin of the strike that takes down the other states and the country.

G.K. Chesterton reminds us that “the disadvantage of men not knowing the past is that they do not know the present.” Virginia’s political leaders and philanthropists need to wake up. The hour is late, and it is time to get out of denial that so much of what is happening is playing into the hands of our enemies, who want to strip us of our virtuous heritage so that they may subdue America without firing a shot.

Scott S. Powell is senior fellow at the Discovery Institute and author of “Rediscovering America,” a number 1 Amazon new release. Ann McLean received her M.A. and Ph.D. from the University of Virginia, and serves on the Jefferson Council, the Virginia Council, and the Republic of Virginia preservation groups.

This column first appeared in The Federalist and has been republished with permission.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

126 responses to “The War on Virginia’s History”

  1. sal vitale Avatar
    sal vitale

    He is right on. Reading this article has given me more reason to protect by any means necessary my adopted state. I plan to send this article to others in hopes that together we can stop this cancer.

    1. William Respess Avatar
      William Respess

      Mr. Vitale is right to raise the alarm about the attack on Virginia’s history. one element of an attack on US history generally. During the post George Floyd uprising in Seattle, a statue of George Washington was effectively destroyed by vandals while a statue of Lenin has gone unbesmirched. While we cannot know the motivations of the person(s) who carried out this desecration it is ironic that the very state in which Seattle is located is named for Washington.

      King George, upon learning that Washington had stepped down as leader of the Continental Army after victory was achieved in our revolution rather than seizing dictatorial power, said that, if that was true, “he will be the greatest man in the world.” Well, after serving two terms as president, Washington reaffirmed his greatness by gracefully letting his duly elected successor assume the office. As a result, we have subsequently had 46 changes in power. No other country in the world comes close to that record. So, a man who, with his successor Stalin, is responsible for the death of millions of people and with their likeminded socialists Mao, Pol Pot and their ilk have murdered over 100 million, still has admirers in this country and even his effigy is tolerated better in our cities than our country’s founding father.
      All the while this is happening, over 3,000,000 persons from all over the world are streaming through our southern border to find a better life. How many are beating down the doors to get into Russia, China, Venezuela, Cuba, Nicaragua and none of those who are our own citizen detractors would be willing to live in those countries.
      So, Vitale is right. It is time to get the word out by our silent majority. Yes, America can improve but it can do so without defacing, and certainly without destroying, monuments to this country’s greatness and the people who, though imperfect, led the way.

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        I don’t know, frankly. Seems that the 3,000,000 are expressing some common sense by not emigrating to Russia, China, Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua. Given that level of cognition, they will make productive US citizens. With so many unfilled jobs in the economy, more tax paying residents would make a difference. Isn’t that how past immigration ultimately worked out?

        1. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
          f/k/a_tmtfairfax

          A friend of mine who is both an economist and an active Democrat has suggested amending the immigration law to provide H1B visas to everyone here illegally so long as they don’t have a criminal record.

          Providing them with these non-immigrant visas meets their needs by authorizing them to work legally in the United States and to be able to claim full protection of the Nation’s labor laws. It meets business needs for workers. And it doesn’t rub the noses of those people who came to the U.S. legally in the dirt by rewarding violation of our laws for economic gain. Employers who hired illegal workers without these visas would be severely punished.

          It’s too damn sensible for Congress to do this.

          1. Lefty665 Avatar

            I agree with your proposition that finding a way to make legal workers out of illegal immigrants is a good idea.

            However, H-1B visas require specialty skills and at least a bachelors degree. They have traditionally been used to depress US wages for citizens like engineers, IT and scientists.

            If it’s a good idea it needs another vehicle, and illustrates why some of us generally take a dim view of economist’s pronouncements.

            Many illegals now have SS#s and have FICA withheld from their wages with no potential to eventually collect benefits.

            H-1B https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/immigration/h1b

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Do they qualify for Social Security and/or Medicare? Prior to the pandemic certain amusement parks brought foreign students to Virginia, paid them just better than minimum wages, charged them for food, housing (4 to a room in an old barely not condemned motel) and the plane ticket home. No payroll taxes.

            So, if you ever thought “they’re here to take our jobs,” imagine if they don’t pay SocSec and Medicare, and neither does the employer.

          3. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            BTW,
            “H-1B and O-1 Work Visas
            H-1B Visa: Specialty Occupations

            The H-1B visa is for an individual in occupations that require the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and a bachelor’s degree or higher in the specific specialty, or its equivalent.

            The O-1 visa is for the individual who possesses extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics, or who has a demonstrated record of extraordinary achievement in the motion picture or television industry and has been recognized nationally or internationally for those achievements.”

            Don’t think the majority of them meet the spec.

          4. demonstrated record of extraordinary achievement in the motion picture or television industry

            So why was Roman Polanski allowed to stay here? His movies sucked.

            😉

          5. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            He ain’t here now. BTW, do you recall the Casey Chevrolet girl? She also worked for Orsman Chevy up north. The 13-year old in question was her daughter.

          6. Lefty665 Avatar

            Maybe he had a Jeffrey Epstein connection?

          7. Stephen Haner Avatar
            Stephen Haner

            Sponsored an H1 hire when at the AG’s office, for our IT staff. Raised a few eyebrows but she was a great addition.

          8. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            I learned about the H1-B while reading Aviation Week (Including Rockets and Missiles) at work in the 80s. I was perusing the job lists and mentioned to my boss that I was mightily overpaid.

            “Look at all these jobs listed for guys with PhDs and years of experience with very specific skills at wages not even half of what I’m making! Do they really think someone will apply?”

            “Those are H1-B jobs. Every year they have to advertise the job in case an American qualifies, and no, they KNOW no one will apply. Those are slave wages.”

          9. Lefty665 Avatar

            Exactly, and without them instead of 2x your job would have been worth 3x-4x what they were being paid. H-1Bs have been explicitly used to suppress wages of highly skilled citizens for a long time.

            STEM, we don’t need no steenkin’ STEM, we’ve got H-1B.

          10. Lefty665 Avatar

            Exactly, and without them instead of 2x your job would have been worth 3x-4x what they were being paid. H-1Bs have been explicitly used to suppress wages of highly skilled citizens for a long time.

            STEM, we don’t need no steenkin’ STEM, we’ve got H-1B.

          11. Lefty665 Avatar

            And saved money by not paying the wage a citizen with equivalent skills would command. It’s the equivalent of offshoring for cheap labor onshore.

          12. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
            f/k/a_tmtfairfax

            As I wrote, the approach would require an amendment to the law and compromise by Congress.

          13. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Key word: compromise. I haven’t read much lately, but Trump Admin damned near destroyed the California vinyards in 2017. Apparently, a large number of vintners as well as the workers were foreign workers and have been for decades. There was an exodus back to home countries.

          14. Lefty665 Avatar

            Happened to the crabbing industry in the Bay too. They couldn’t get the seasonal worker visas for picking crabs.

          15. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            BTW,
            “H-1B and O-1 Work Visas
            H-1B Visa: Specialty Occupations

            The H-1B visa is for an individual in occupations that require the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and a bachelor’s degree or higher in the specific specialty, or its equivalent.

            The O-1 visa is for the individual who possesses extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics, or who has a demonstrated record of extraordinary achievement in the motion picture or television industry and has been recognized nationally or internationally for those achievements.”

            Don’t think the majority of them meet the spec.

          16. Lefty665 Avatar

            Article says it all.

            When my kids were doing summer jobs at Rehoboth Beach years ago they found that each summer there was a new flood of foreign kids. As you noted living in dorms, no withholdings, etc. It was usually eastern European kids, but one year almost all Russians. Go figure.

            Scabs are scabs even if they were lured under false pretenses by exploiting employers and a complicit State Department.

          17. Lefty665 Avatar

            Article says it all.

            When my kids were doing summer jobs at Rehoboth Beach years ago they found that each summer there was a new flood of foreign kids. As you noted living in dorms, no withholdings, etc. It was usually eastern European kids, but one year almost all Russians. Go figure.

            Scabs are scabs even if they were lured under false pretenses by exploiting employers and a complicit State Department.

          18. That’s actually not a bad idea. I think I could support such a policy, as long as the illegal immigrants with criminal records are promptly deported.

          19. Lefty665 Avatar

            I’d include the 70+ we’ve let in who are on the terrorist watch list. Those are just the ones we’ve identified.

          20. Agreed.

          21. Lefty665 Avatar

            I agree with your proposition that finding a way to make legal workers out of illegal immigrants is a good idea.

            However, H-1B visas require specialty skills and at least a bachelors degree. They have traditionally been used to depress US wages for citizens like engineers, IT and scientists.

            If it’s a good idea it needs another vehicle, and illustrates why some of us generally take a dim view of economist’s pronouncements.

            Many illegals now have SS#s and have FICA withheld from their wages with no potential to eventually collect benefits.

            H-1B https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/immigration/h1b

          22. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
            f/k/a_tmtfairfax

            Congress would need to amend the statute to permit this new use of H-B visas. My friend has persuaded me that this is a good idea.

          23. Lefty665 Avatar

            Like I said, I don’t have a problem with the concept of making immigrant workers legitimate. The H-1B aspect is twaddle. Sweeping more categories of people into it does not seem like a good idea. Other programs for non-citizen workers exist, use them.

            However, I’m not thrilled when immigrant workers are used to suppress wages for citizens. H-1B visas have traditionally been used for that. If that is the effect of widening the use of non citizen workers under H-1B that stinks too. Scabs by another name are no more attractive.

            Some of the job vacancies we currently have are clearly the unwillingness of employers to pay enough wages to attract citizen workers. It is significant that the labor participation rate has not recovered to pre covid levels.

            It seems likely that quite a few people had time to figure out during the covid lockdowns that they resemble the Dilbert line “My job is crappus”. Some of them have figured out alternatives to working “crappus” jobs for low wages as we have emerged from covid lockdowns.

            Although we have been seeing increased wages they are lagging inflation so real wages are decreasing. The idea that workers are not willing to work for increased wages is an illusion.

            In August job openings decreased by about a million. As the Fed squeezes to choke off inflation that number will keep falling and then plummet as the economy strangles. You might ask your economist friend what will happen if he unleashes a flood of low wage workers into a shrinking economy.

            Remember that the last time we had inflation this high Volker had to ratchet interest rates all the way up to 20% to choke it off. You might also ask your economist friend why it is that his profession has changed the way we calculate inflation to suppress reporting of it. If currently calculated as we did in the ’70s we would be at around 2x current reported inflation.

          24. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            “Many say” they migrate here, not to work but loll on the beaches in TX and FL until placed on tax paid chartered rides to Martha’s Vineyard.

        2. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
          f/k/a_tmtfairfax

          A friend of mine who is both an economist and an active Democrat has suggested amending the immigration law to provide H1B visas to everyone here illegally so long as they don’t have a criminal record.

          Providing them with these non-immigrant visas meets their needs by authorizing them to work legally in the United States and to be able to claim full protection of the Nation’s labor laws. It meets business needs for workers. And it doesn’t rub the noses of those people who came to the U.S. legally in the dirt by rewarding violation of our laws for economic gain. Employers who hired illegal workers without these visas would be severely punished.

          It’s too damn sensible for Congress to do this.

        3. Correction: Given that level of cognition, they will may make productive US citizens.

          Also, if they are planning on becoming tax paying residents why don’t they enter the country legally? People who sneak into places usually have something to hide.

          By the way, I am 100% in favor of the United States maintaining a legal immigration system.

          1. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            When you and your family are threatened by death, desperation drives migration. Doubt they have given much thought to receiving W-4 forms. Most choices over death are preferable. In my parents days, the gold in the street was the prize. As kids we often snuck into the local theatre without paying and had nothing to hide.

          2. Ruckweiler Avatar
            Ruckweiler

            So illegal immigration is ok with you? Why then don’t we just invite the entire world in? Then, people like you would be happy, maybe.

        4. William Respess Avatar
          William Respess

          I didn’t say they wouldn’t make good citizens nor did I, or at least I think I didn’t, say or imply they were not cognizant of the intelligence of leaving the circumstances where they existed to come to the US for a better life. There is still a lot to be said for orderly, legal immigration.

          1. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
            f/k/a_tmtfairfax

            My friend’s plan does not provide for permanent residency or a path to citizenship. It’s a compromise.

      2. …we have subsequently had 46 changes in power. No other country in the world comes close to that record.

        Haiti has had about 65 changes in power since 1802 — or did you mean peaceful changes in power?

        😉

        1. William Respess Avatar
          William Respess

          I take your point.
          I should have said, in some manner, that changes of power since Washington have occurred in a constitutional fashion rather than by coup, revolution, etc. Thanks for making the point for me. I believe I was intimidated from using the word “peaceful” because the snarks that line in ambush would have reminded me of Jan. 6.

          1. I was only kidding. I knew what you meant.

            And good point about 1/6.

          2. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            Too soon to omit Jan 6 from history. Advocates will continue to tout it as a peaceful protest, First Amendment rally, and No Big Deal.

          3. Lefty665 Avatar

            Another Jim McCarthy “silly walk”. Make stuff up, trot it out. Keep up the good work!

          4. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Hey, you’re talking about someone who has tried to state that J6th was “Mob Rule”.

            That was a comment in response to mine pointing out the Founders explicitly avoided direct democracy because it’s mob rule.

          5. William Respess Avatar
            William Respess

            You are too modest. Your point was still a good one.

          6. Lefty665 Avatar

            Italy has averaged close to 1 change in power per year since WWII too.

          7. Lefty665 Avatar

            Italy has averaged close to 1 change in power per year since WWII too.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Shades of McCarthy!

    1. sspowell Avatar

      That’s a cheap shot. Everything here is factual.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        including the massive communist conspiracy that include Obama, Northam and most Democrats and institutions.

        for sure.

        JAB says he tries for “thoughtful voices”. egads…

        these folks are IN his tent, right?

        Waiting to hear from Haner and Sherlock…

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          More Bircher, ya know, equating civil rights to commies.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            same ones, they “come out” from time to time

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Bacon’s Rebellion is Virginia’s leading politically non-aligned portal for news, opinions and analysis about state, regional and local public policy. Read more about us here.

            Politically non-aligned? Orange juice just came out of my nose.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            VPAP knew it long ago. Any casual reader knows it and those on the right do for sure and that’s how they get to write blog posts like this – apparently BEFORE JAB read it and saw that commie stuff.

          4. Wait. What? Were you drinking orange juice when you read that, or does your body produce it naturally? Because, if it’s the latter, the local high school’s juice dispenser is on the fritz, sooo… …maybe you’d be willing to fill in temporarily? As a service to the community…

          5. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            You should see my Clockwork Orange milk dispensers

          6. Uhhhhh, no thanks…

            :-0

          7. Lefty665 Avatar

            “Politically non-aligned?”

            Politically diverse, inclusive and equitable maybe? 🙂

      2. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        The authors omitted the date at which the sky over VA is to fall.

      3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        Nope. Jefferson was not at the 1787 Constitutional Convention.

        1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead

          In a sense he was. Madison and Jefferson corresponded between Philly and Paris. TJ’s protege was able to filter some of the suggestions and retain the best ideas.

        2. Good catch, sir. I am embarrassed that I did not notice that myself.

    2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      I honestly can’t believe it took two people to string together this tripe.

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Speaking of war… just got an intercepted Russian communique across my desk. The Russians are redeploying en masse to western Ukraine in and around Lviv. The plan involves opening a new front by breaking out of the POW camps and rearming themselves…

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Whaaaaaaa! They telling true things again.

  5. Donald Smith Avatar
    Donald Smith

    It would be nice if the governor and Speaker of the House of Delegates showed some concern over this important matter. During the election, the Virginia GOP acted as if the state’s heritage was something worth attending to and defending. Since the election….?????

    When I wrote the article about VMI sandblasting Jackson’s name off Jackson Arch, I wondered if VMI did it to taunt Governor Youngkin and Speaker Cox. I wondered if VMI was testing them, to see if they’d respond.

    If it was a dare—it appears the VMI leadership won.

    1. M. Purdy Avatar

      VMI was not testing them. The issue isn’t VMI, the issue is that Republicans don’t want to take on this fight because its’s a political loser and (present company excluded) is led by the likes of folks like one of these authors who was asked to leave her last official post because of her crazy comments.

      1. Donald Smith Avatar
        Donald Smith

        If you’re right, then Team Youngkin failed the test. But—how can you be so sure it wasn’t a test, to see what the Youngkin administration’s reaction would be? The only other explanation that makes sense is that a critical mass of VMI students and leaders really couldn’t deal with seeing the name “Stonewall Jackson” on an arch. Which, if you think about it, makes them look petty, even weak.

        As for it being a political loser—nah, I’m not buying that. I think many Virginians are shocked by watching their history be sanitized and their ancestors demeaned. Sticking up for Virginia’s heritage may be a political loser in the minds of WaPo readers and in college faculty lounges. But those folks I just mentioned look like losers themselves. So Team Youngkin shouldn’t listen to them.

        But hey—Virginia’s entering a new political season in a few months. We’ll soon see, won’t we?

        1. M. Purdy Avatar

          As you know, I’ve been following events at VMI very closely. The ‘Jackson’ removal was part of a broader push to deemphasize Jackson. The rationale, as we’ve discussed, was not particularly compelling. I think the belief among the subcommittee was that if they just got rid of Jackson, they could keep the rest, which is effectively what they did, with the exception of some smaller, frankly pretty outrageous stuff. Trust me, the last thing anyone at VMI wants is to further politicize the school. They just want to be left alone, and removing the obvious bits of Stonewall was they way they decided to do it. As for the Confed. thing being a political loser, just look at how Republicans in general are handling it. Barely a peep out of anyone in Congress over the federal naming committee. Youngkin had dodged the issue at the VA capital, and he forced the de facto leader of the preservation movement (one of the authors) to resign. The last thing any national R, apart from Trump, wants to do right now is to appear in line with the Jan. 6 and Unite the Right rabble. Remember, the former was awash in Confed. and racist iconography, and the latter was precipitated by the vote to remove a state of R.E. Lee.

          1. Donald Smith Avatar
            Donald Smith

            If VMI just wants to be left alone, and be a woke stop for progressives taking a day trip from the DC area, then let it go private.

            The problem is–when people see VMI, they always think that VMI represents Virginia. There’s a reason that the VMI Corps of Cadets routinely marches in presidential inaugural parades. It’s because the cadet corps represents the state of Virginia.

            If VMI no longer wants to bear that responsibility, if it wants to remake itself as some generic military institution that doesn’t offend anybody, then let it pay its own bills. Virginia can spend the state funds that currently go to VMI on more teachers, police and nurses.

            The people of Virginia are not obligated to support a military institution. If Virginia’s primary military institution has decided that it wants to be woke, then Virginians can decide that they really don’t need a military college anymore.

          2. M. Purdy Avatar

            “If VMI just wants to be left alone, and be a woke stop for progressives taking a day trip from the DC area, then let it go private.” On what basis would you say that they’ve gone “woke,” apart from some of the misinformation on this site and John Reid? They’re literally implementing DEI training that every other public college, if not college, has in VA, most if not all fortune 500 companies have, and the military has adopted. It teaches such woke concepts as that people are born into different degrees of privilege and that we should avoid giving into our own personal biases to make better decision. Not exactly Marxist indoctrination. You want VMI to remain the sole outlier, but at the cost of having graduates out of step with the military, private sector, and the rest of academia. Just to use your own argument, why would Richmond pay for that? And be careful what you wish for; if you make the case as a Republican (I assume) that VMI is not worth supporting, it won’t be Republicans jumping to take you up on it.

        2. James McCarthy Avatar
          James McCarthy

          That’s it!! The whole magilla is a false flag for sure to test Youngthing’s Virginality.

          1. Donald Smith Avatar
            Donald Smith

            You’ve earned your cookie! Go upstairs and find Mommy.

  6. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    My bet is that VA survives the alleged war on its history as history tends not to fade away like old soldiers. It may get bruised, black-eyed or otherwise injured but the panic about Marxism and communism is overwrought. Maybe the Lost Cause recedes even further into the dust bin. The continual pressing of panic buttons makes the pushers feel better. That reaction is the other side of the cultural war coin. The survival rhetoric hurts ears.

  7. Moderate Avatar

    I don’t get the Obama references. There doesn’t seem to be a link between him and the issues raised.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Psst, he’s not whi.., er, uh,… VIRGINIAN! Yeah, that’s the ticket! He’s not Virginian!

    2. M. Purdy Avatar

      There is no connection. These authors are fanatics.

  8. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “The War on Virginia’s History Myths and Legends”
    Fixed

  9. Ken Reid Avatar

    the part about the mural piqued my curiosity.
    UVA describes it this way. I think the authors should have provided some pictures from the mural so we know what they are talking about https://reveal.scholarslab.org/old-cabell-hall-mural

  10. I would consider the Civil War and World War II to represent the greatest threats to our country’s “continuity and survival more than at any” … “time in the 239-year history of the nation”.

    1. So what’s a little hyperbole among friends?

      😉

    2. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      Reread the article to be sure about the Red Scare. It frightened me NOT in the 1950s – but it’s scarier today because it’s socialism.

      1. Sure. Everyone will have their own list. I was trying to point out the silly point that this issue comes close to being a material threat, as Wayne also underscored.

  11. It goes without saying that I share the concern that there is a “war on Virginia history,” and I think the authors have done a good job of documenting it. That war is being fought in virtually every cultural institution across Virginia.

    I think this essay could have been strengthened, however, if it had omitted references to Barack Obama, communists, and Karl Marx. That creates a distraction from the indisputable core of the argument. Predictably, many readers and commenters will focus on those debatable propositions rather than deal with the assault on Virginia’s history.

    What the injection of “communists” into the narrative overlooks is that the leftist movement has undergone a sea change. Communists believed in waging class warfare in which the proletariat (working class) would one day supplant the bourgeoisie. That strain of leftist thinking is almost dead in the United States. The architects of wokism have demoted the class struggle to a secondary concern. Indeed, while wokists (the vanguard of the intellectual class) are more than happy to alter the system to their pecuniary benefit, they are not looking for a wholesale transformation of the economic system. They are focused on bringing about cultural change and de-legitimizing the founding principles that thwart their bid for power.

    1. Randy Huffman Avatar
      Randy Huffman

      Conservatives need to do the same, we need to bring the tide back, one item at a time. It’s late in the game, but not yet over.

    2. When you search for the Marx quote, this site is the second result.

      Might not even be real!

    3. Does that mean there is NOT a red under my bed?

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jh9q3nqVnlM

        1. What a great song. One of my favorite early Kinks tunes.

    4. M. Purdy Avatar

      I think you just got a taste of why she lasted all of a week in her last official post.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        The commies thing was not a bug but a feature.

        1. M. Purdy Avatar

          Indeed. Was the whole “Confederacy is the Ukraine and Union is like Russia” thing also a feature;-)?

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            an “enhanced” feature.

  12. Visitors are bombarded with unending references and slander of Jefferson as being a slaveholder.

    Unending references? I don’t doubt it. I’m sure it is mentioned ad nauseum throughout the tour.

    Slander? No. Thomas Jefferson was a slaveholder. Therefore, it is not slander to state as much. I do think it is disingenuous, and ultimately counterproductive, to dwell on almost nothing but that during a tour of Monticello, though. I know I will not pay good money to visit there as long as that is the overarching theme of the tour.

    1. William Respess Avatar
      William Respess

      How, the world turns. John Kennedy, whose reputation continues to be burnished after nearly 60 years from his death, said of Jefferson on the occasion of a dinner at the White House honoring 49 Nobel Prize winners said, “I think this is the most extraordinary collection of talent, of human knowledge, that has ever been gathered together at the White House with the possible exception of when Thomas Jefferson dined alone.” Now, after those 60 years, no lilliputian scholar, particularly those with no likelihood of ever making any impression on history, can summon the integrity to recognize that progress towards a better world requires that we be guided by imperfect but gifted men and, increasingly, gifted women if we are to achieve anything as a society.

    2. M. Purdy Avatar

      Yeah, that statement is insane. The truth is a defense to defamation. And Jefferson is honored throughout grounds…like everywhere, so I have no clue what they’re talking about.

  13. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Nice rendering of January 6.

  14. M. Purdy Avatar

    “Additionally, he strongly opposed slavery and freed the slaves on the plantations inherited by his wife before Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation.” This statement strikes me as too categorical to be historically founded. He did not “strongly” oppose slavery, rather he was ambivalent and expressed both opposition and reluctant support at different times. At one point he was court ordered to manumit his FIL’s slaves because after initially refusing to do so for financial reasons. As for freeing his slaves before the EP, this is sort of misleading. He freed his slaves located in his estates (including, Arlington House), which had been occupied by federal troops. He had no actual power to manumit them, as they were already federal contraband.

  15. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “The United States is the only country in the history of mankind specifically founded on ideas and principles that would establish and protect white males’ God-given rights and freedoms.”

    Fixed it for you…

  16. M. Purdy Avatar

    “Additionally, he strongly opposed slavery and freed the slaves on the plantations inherited by his wife before Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation.” This statement strikes me as too categorical to be historically founded. He did not “strongly” oppose slavery, rather he was ambivalent and expressed both opposition and reluctant support at different times. At one point he was court ordered to manumit his FIL’s slaves because after initially refusing to do so for financial reasons. As for freeing his slaves before the EP, this is sort of misleading. He freed his slaves located in his estates (including, Arlington House), which had been occupied by federal troops. He had no actual power to manumit them, as they were already federal contraband.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Never let it be said that our ancestors lacked humor…

      “Yeah, I freed my slaves! That’s the ticket. History will record my magnanimity. YOU ARE ALL FREE! Where are they anyway?”

      1. M. Purdy Avatar

        Right, under the terms of the EP they would have been free anyway, both de facto and de jure. And let’s clarify the timing– the EP was announced in September 1862 after Antietam to take effect in Jan. 1, 1863. Lee freed his slaves in late Dec. 1862, but it was both a factual and legal foregone conclusion: his slaves were behind Union lines and some had apparently already escaped to the north. So it’s a formality that Lee freed his slaves, and something no doubt the slaves themselves neither knew or cared about. They were free, or at least freer than they’d have ever been.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Well, could be worse. It’s not like they buried bodies on the lawn.

  17. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “The United States is the only country in the history of mankind specifically founded on ideas and principles that would establish and protect white males’ God-given rights and freedoms.”

    Fixed it for you…

    1. Donald Smith Avatar
      Donald Smith

      Eric, if you keep this up, you might be a full troll someday.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        We all grow… well, some of us.

      2. Lefty665 Avatar

        But currently he has to settle for Eric the half a troll short of a full load.

    2. William Respess Avatar
      William Respess

      Eric the half troll, if he is the author of the quote about the US being the only country founded to give rights to white men, might want to think about the Swiss Republic. Founded in 1848, it took 123 years until 1971 to give women the franchise. By contrast, it took women 131 years to cajole their US husbands, fathers and sons to grant them the right to vote. Of course, the intervening years between 1789 and 1920 were perhaps a little less liberal than the 51 years between 1920 and 1971. And if my recollection is correct, during that interval, Swiss men voted down at least once releasing women from the bondage in which they were held from 1848. So maybe the US experience is not as hypocritical as Eric seems to conclude. If I am not mistaken, Russia’s serfs were still bound to the land in 1789 and I can only imagine the authoritarian conditions under which other common folk were oppressed (including men) in places like China. So perhaps the formation of the United States in 1789 stood out even brighter than we think to oppressed people than it does today where there are many pretenders to democracy–like maybe the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, which starves men and women on a nondiscriminatory basis–and was actually the bright spot in human history that many if not now most of us used to believe and, to steal a quote from John Glenn, “a giant step for mankind” even though only a first step out of the muck that was the rest of the world. What is a half troll anyway? Maybe they are of the kind that live under a bridge hybridized with something else.

      1. M. Purdy Avatar

        What is the point of your post? Yes, most countries are worse than the US on many fronts. But the original statement stands. The country was created for white men. That doesn’t mean it didn’t evolve, or even that the founders recognized that the country and society could change (of course they did).

        1. William Respess Avatar
          William Respess

          Mr. Purdy, I think you didn’t get the point. Eric the half troll didn’t say that the United States was created for white men. He said it was the ONLY country in the history of mankind founded to protect the rights and freedoms of white men (I paraphrased a bit there a bit but focus on his word “only” if you can). As this blog amply demonstrates, when you use hyperbole to make a point you had better be right. It is form of hubris to misstate a person’s views to provide a platform for your own. The deeper point, and one apparently too subtle for some, I hoped readers would take from my comment was that the United States was not immaculately conceived so that it threw off all of the old conventions of mankind like no suffrage for women and, unfortunately, not slavery either. However, it was (in my view at least) a great first step for mankind. But, unfortunately, imperfect greatness is not only not admired, but also not acceptable to 21st century zealots. I am surprised that there is not also a movement today to condemn nature for spending so many million years wasting her/his time with australopithecus, homo habilis, homo erectus and the like rather than create homo sapiens right out of the blocks. Maybe it is because evolution is the only way we can progress.

          1. M. Purdy Avatar

            Got it. A bit of misunderstanding all around, I think. The “only” was not his word; it was in the original blog post. His addition was “white males’” to make the point that the framers were not necessarily focused on the rights of ALL people, but more to establish the rights and liberty of all white men. The original blog post is filled with hyperbole, overstatement, and inaccuracies. Its overall thrust is that the U.S. was founded upon “immaculate” principles (to use your term), but there are serious flaws to that assessment. A more perfect union was achieved through a centuries long process of fighting literally and figuratively for change. The premise that any sort of change to the status quo is a communist conspiracy is silly.

          2. M. Purdy Avatar

            Got it. A bit of misunderstanding all around, I think. The “only” was not his word; it was in the original blog post. His addition was “white males’” to make the point that the framers were not necessarily focused on the rights of ALL people, but more to establish the rights and liberty of all white men. The original blog post is filled with hyperbole, overstatement, and inaccuracies. Its overall thrust is that the U.S. was founded upon “immaculate” principles (to use your term), but there are serious flaws to that assessment. A more perfect union was achieved through a centuries long process of fighting literally and figuratively for change. The premise that any sort of change to the status quo is a communist conspiracy is silly.

          3. William Respess Avatar
            William Respess

            I agree completely with your last sentence. Do you agree that not every person who advocated for change in the past which brought us closer to a more perfect union, for example, one from the 18th century who fiercely advocated for and actually made a major contribution to creation of and the adoption the Bill of Rights, but did not at the same time advocate for amendments 13-15, deserves to be erased from history. And just one last thought, would we live in a better world today if the Constitutional Convention had foundered over the “peculiar institution” and the United States devolved into 13 little countries each striving for its own parochial view of what a perfect government looked like?

          4. M. Purdy Avatar

            If you’re talking about Jefferson, no, he should not be cancelled. I think he was one of the great founders and laid the foundation for the rights based underpinning of this country and others. (You can’t make anywhere close to the same statement about those who fought for the Confed., BTW.) At the same time, I think we can be honest and open about his deep hypocrisy on the issue of slavery and his personal shortcomings. The idea that he’s being cancelled at UVa, BTW, is just not true. You can’t swing a dead hokie without hitting some honorific to Jefferson at UVa, and that’s not going to change. What is happening is that people are becoming less enthralled with the myth, and more disturbed by the reality. That’s healthy; he was no saint. People should question their history.

          5. William Respess Avatar
            William Respess

            I stated it the way I did to leave room for Madison and likely Washington also. But for the sake of other commenters I am ready to move on.

          6. M. Purdy Avatar

            Madison for sure. Washington is worthy of admiration for different, but obvious reasons. I think the Founders deserve a degree of understanding and respect that the Confederacy doesn’t deserve and didn’t earn.

          7. William Respess Avatar
            William Respess

            I included Washington mostly because he presided. I could have included George Mason but he didn’t, in the final analysis, endorse the Constitution. I didn’t get into the Confederacy issue because I have yet to find a person who supports erasure that is willing to discuss it dispassionately. I do, however, accept that it is a more complicated matter and too many subtleties to discuss in the more straight forward way than the role of the founders is. Have a nice day.

  18. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    The author of this piece needn’t worry, The Onion has filed an amicus brief to SCOTUS on behalf of such works…
    https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-293/242292/20221003125252896_35295545_1-22.10.03%20-%20Novak-Parma%20-%20Onion%20Amicus%20Brief.pdf

    JAB should follow suit and file an amicus brief as a parody of The Onion. We should not allow this opportunity to align the mirrors to pass.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/04/us/the-onion-supreme-court.html

    1. The Onion’s amicus brief contains the best description of parody that I have ever read:

      Parodists intentionally inhabit the rhetorical form of their target in order to exaggerate or implode it—and by doing so demonstrate the target’s illogic or absurdity.

      It’s also hilarious.

    2. These are two of my all time favorite pieces from The Onion:

      https://www.theonion.com/cheney-returns-to-camp-crystal-lake-1819567549

      https://www.theonion.com/cheney-vows-to-attack-u-s-if-kerry-elected-1819567556

      “A vote for Kerry is a vote to die in your own bed at the hands of Dick Cheney.” That’s good stuff.

    3. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Far better than many real briefs I’ve had to plow through.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        It is a REAL brief. They submitted it to SCOTUS. I suspect 6 may actually snicker.

    4. The Onion’s amicus brief contains the best description of parody that I have ever read:

      Parodists intentionally inhabit the rhetorical form of their target in order to exaggerate or implode it—and by doing so demonstrate the target’s illogic or absurdity.

      It’s also hilarious, and brilliant.

    5. These are two of my all time favorite pieces from The Onion:

      https://www.theonion.com/cheney-returns-to-camp-crystal-lake-1819567549

      https://www.theonion.com/cheney-vows-to-attack-u-s-if-kerry-elected-1819567556

      “A vote for Kerry is a vote to die in your own bed at the hands of Dick Cheney.” That’s good stuff.

      1. Lefty665 Avatar

        Maybe they’ll do a follow up, The Return of the Daughter of Cheney.

  19. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    There is not much point in weighing in at this point, but for the record the statement that UVA is the only school that traces to one of the Founders is outrageously false, so false I stopped reading. Franklin’s role in the history of Penn cannot be dismissed, but of course to these two blind mice only Virginians can be founders. Neither side really wants history taught, they want to use history as a club against the other side.

    1. M. Purdy Avatar

      The whole thing is riddled with inaccuracies, political finger pointing, and exaggerations. This does not lend credibility to the idea that the anti-take down crowd is just a bunch of normal folks with a good argument.

  20. Rafaelo Avatar

    Minor correction, or maybe a postscript to the article: the Jefferson Madison Regional Library isn’t changing its name any time soon.

    Yes, self-described “descendants of enslaved persons” urged deleting the names Jefferson and Madison.

    But a nameless volunteer lawyer authored a legal memo saying no you can’t, sent to the library’s director and their lawyers. The library’s own lawyers then confirmed no you can’t.

    Now the library Director dutifully recites on the website: “the Library Board does not have the ability to change the name of JMRL without a revision of the regional agreement between participating localities, Albemarle, Charlottesville, Greene, Louisa, and Nelson.”

    The website does not say but the fact is, changes require unanimous consent. The Greene and Louisa Boards of Supervisors already voted a resolute NO.

    But let’s not take a victory lap. The library continues to collect opinions on the name change.

    A wise policy. The First Amendment is not necessarily about the quality of the discourse. It is also a safety valve, simply to blow off steam.

Leave a Reply