The VMI Class of ’25’s Elephant in the Room

by the staff of The Cadet

The Virginia Military Institute (VMI) Rat Mass of 2024+3 is now the Class of ’27. That recognition brings a time to pause and reflect on the past and future of what was and is no longer. The mantle will soon pass to the Class of ’25 for their Ratline next year and it is time to address “the elephant in the room.” Unless ’25 brings it back, the Ratline will continue to degrade into a risk-averse basic training curriculum providing little more to incoming Cadets than how to march and endlessly repeating the Inscription on the Parapet and the VMI Mission. While the knowledge and understanding of this information is important for a Rat undergoing our indoctrination phase, what value does it provide if Rats do not have the time management skills, self-discipline, or physical ability to compete in our academic and military environment?

It was the administration, not the First Class, that dictated the date for “breakout.” The activities were known well in advance not only by Rats but by parents who asked on social media how they could attend. The much advertised “fakeout” (fake breakout) to try and add a little mystery was an open secret, and directly pinpointed the true date of “breakout.” Though the First Class, and especially the Rat Disciplinary Committee (RDC), worked hard, a majority of the Corps were not involved in the event that took place on Tuesday afternoon, starting around 2:00 p.m., and only lasted several hours. Turnout for the Second Class sweat party was weak, at best. Professors scheduled exams the next day requiring many to choose between participation and their grades. Coaches and (the senior cadets who mentor Rats) in NCAA programs were notified and briefed on the events, of which they immediately informed their freshman players. Rats were not even required to fill the sandbags used to depict their class year in the photo. They are now returning to storage until needed for the next spectacle.

The administration stated the main Rat Mass priority is “retention” with the Dean continuing to brief the Board of Visitors (BOV) on the failing numbers for Corps and, especially Rat Grade Point Averages (GPAs). An increasing number of Cadets who would normally be placed on academic suspension are being held in the Corps, while the Dean advocates for General Order 1 restrictions on Corps events that limits the “leadership laboratory” experience of VMI to no more than a few hours a week.

The Blue Book and other official documents have now expunged the term “Rat” in favor of “New Cadet.” Photos soliciting donations in the name of “One VMI” show cadets packing stands for basketball and football while first Class Ratline activities were canceled in favor of mandatory attendance at those games.

Alumni are enticed with parades when they visit, while over their four-year cadetship, Cadets now pay over $10,000 in fees for uniforms the Institute retains. On Parents’ (now family) weekend and special events with the Board of Visitors and other VIPs, such as “tomahawk steaks” for the football team, the Dining Facility serves great meals but routinely runs out of Corps favorites, and many cadets cannot eat lunch due to class schedules. These cadets can buy replacement meals at the PX with the Dining Facility contractor paying VMI a portion of the profits.

For the proposed transgender policy, one that will have immense impact on the Corps, the Superintendent tells the BOV “the Corps” fully supports it. Later the BOV is told administration-invited LGBTQ+ representative(s) spoke for the Corps. When The Cadet submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for the names of the Cadets on the Committee so members of the Corps could provide their views to be part of that process, the request was denied on the grounds it would violate the privacy of the cadets on that secret committee and any records associated with developing the policy were also kept secret from release under the “Superintendent’s working papers” exemption. As a result, the Corps has no idea who speaks for them, although the Superintendent proudly boasted to Governor Youngkin’s Freedom of Speech Summit that, at VMI, cadets have an “obligation” to “speak truth to power.”

The administration, during the 25 Jan. BOV Executive Committee (ExCom) session committed to explore “…something that we can do about those [public comments critical of the administration] that have a very, very hostile, negative, toxic effect.” However, when the Commandant’s Staff raises issues with the Human Resources Director with what they perceive to be their own hostile work environment, the recording of that meeting is lost but the Inspector General (IG) is tasked to conduct an investigation into the participants of this meeting to determine if another recording was made.

The BOV passes resolutions attesting to VMI’s commitment to Free Speech and viewpoint diversity but takes no action against administrators working with the media to question the honor of its own cadets and uses the IG to investigate and clear itself of any wrong-doing despite substantial evidence provided by alumni and others. Some of this supports a hypothetical conclusion: officials provided false and misleading information to the media, an action that could violate state code Virginia § 18.2-209. The employee involved is promoted to Executive Officer (XO) to the Superintendent and, comparing public records of his old pay to that received by the incumbent’s position he filled, appears to result in over a $30,000 pay increase. The BOV, with the exception of a few members, remains silent.

The Institute manages a massive recruiting campaign based on its unique honor code, but when the BOV and VMI are sanctioned and fined for making false and misleading statements to a Court of Law no one is held responsible.

Alumni, parents and guests marvel at the pristine barracks architecture from the outside, while the interior is in a state of disrepair such that some of the facilities are unusable by cadets, and capabilities as simple as Wi-Fi connections are a continual point of humor for the Corps. The administration, in the meantime, seeks $5M in additional funds for NCAA sports “to win.” Unlike Harvard, Cornell, and other schools, as long as there are parades and football games against The Citadel, it seems, the alumni donations will roll in without many of the donors knowing what those funds actually do, and do not, pay for. Furthermore, it is a well-known joke within the Corps that these alumni — those that make huge donations through the Keydet Club and other non-profit donation organizations— that they ask Cadets “how they did against VT” (a rivalry that hasn’t existed since 1964, hasn’t been held by VMI since 1974, and doesn’t have a game scheduled until 2026).

VMI and its Agencies continue to solicit donor funds in the name of preserving VMI’s legacy while the current academic calendar now only schedules the Joint Commissioning Ceremony on May 15th where traditionally a New Market ceremony and memorial parade recognizing VMI’s veterans and the New Market Cadets was prominent.

The Cadet-athlete divide is growing, with one first classman opining, “… Cadets [are] mad about having to fund a losing team that doesn’t care about the system because they are still being lied to by their coaches and severely undercutting the VMI mission in a massive, noticeable, objectively measurable way…. Every athlete rolled [drummed out] for an honor offense adds more ammunition for the [media] to investigate our leadership into making drastic decisions with little planning. It’s not like cadets don’t want to do well in their sport, we obviously see that with swim, rugby and hockey!” Notably, sports like swim have produced excellent Rats and maintain the class system, while club sports such as rugby and hockey continue to win despite slashed budgets and an ever-smaller amount of time for these passionate Cadets to practice due to General Order 1.

Images of Rats participating in “Ratline activities” fill the Institute’s social media accounts while a number of cadets cannot conduct complete military training after their M14s were confiscated, as if there were not over 1,400 more in barracks, and they were moved to another room after their Rat roommate complained he “feared” them. Rats no longer face the feared “third stoop gauntlet” returning to their rooms in barracks and an increasing number of Cadets won’t risk being disciplined for enforcing the Ratline or facing demerits, penalty tours and confinement for the offense of “failure to intercede when witnessing Ratline abuse.” Every Ratline activity is subject to multiple “observers” from the Corps, the Commandant’s staff, Diversity representatives and others.

Compared to the average Army basic training company, which has only two to five medics, VMI continues to shoot down plans and punish Cadet leadership for conducting physical training and military training that is “too risky” – while the average Rat platoon has a team of three EMTs and also bolsters a battalion team, with reserves to be used for Casualty Collection Points (CCPs).

The only bright spot was those approximately 55 brave souls in the Class of ’25 who were about to protest their Brother Rat’s severe punishment and loss of rank for “unauthorized Ratline activity” when he tried to properly discipline a Rat. Before they even met as a class, the administration backed down. Reportedly, over a dozen Rats of this cadre member’s company also were preparing to stand up for him.

Alumni gleefully remember when they hear that “resurrection week” is at VMI, when “Hell Week” is brought back before breakout. Few understand that resurrection activities were replaced by frivolous “rat missions” for silly tasks. Even then the administration abruptly cancels them as potential “hazing,” and severely punishes Dykes for doing as much as assigning their Rats the task of completing 2,024 pushups (spread out over the entire week). Long gone are the days of morning sweat parties, physical training, push privileges for all classes, and motivational/leadership alumni guest speakers.

Today’s reality is that the “Corps will never completely run the Corps.” In truth, it never did, even in the Old Corps. When their cadets have issues, parents don’t call the First Class President, they call the administration and the administration responds. But in the past the administration worked in good faith to find a middle ground. When they did not the Corps simply stopped enforcing the Ratline until balance returned. With the threat of losing the greatest developmental system to raise the next “great VMI product” (a graduating First Classman of good character), the administration responded quickly to the leverage. Now, VMI views itself as a “great liberal arts college” with a suffering engineering program and professors retiring and being replaced in droves. Cadets who abused the Rat system were punished, mostly by the Corps, and Rats were not coddled.

The harsh reality administrators must face, as their predecessors did, is that if VMI is truly to develop leadership as all its marketing and fundraising promotes, there must be a middle ground where the Corps is truly empowered and mentored rather than being dictated to. Control is not mentoring and a “zero-defect” environment is not one that develops leaders of VMI’s historic caliber.

The situation mandated by many who never shared and do not support the VMI experience ultimately harms the Rats. Many are disappointed they did not receive the full measure of the VMI experience they desire and expected.

Following the theory of Occam’s razor, the rising first class of ‘25 has a simple choice. They can, as “the 55” heroically demonstrated, follow the examples from the past and simply refuse to enforce the Ratline unless they are the lead with support from the administration, or it is time VMI remove the façade. Suppose they had Hell Week and no Cadre reported to their week-long pre-Hell Week training? What if the Corps, as in the past, simply said “no” and demanded their right to bring their issues to the BOV?

If they do not, it is best for VMI to be honest with itself. Publicly acknowledge the term “Rat” is dead and all freshmen are “new cadets.” Rename the Ratline what it really is, “new cadet orientation” executed by a select cadre under supervision of the Commandant’s staff. Eliminate all uniforms, except those required for parades, to save Cadets money and adopt a dress code for classes like every other Virginia College and University. Turn over discipline from the Cadet Committees to the Commandant’s staff and make all but the fourth stoop in barracks a dormitory-like environment. Finally recognize that “breakout” is really “class day” and convert it to a social event with tailgates and other celebratory activities.

Time to move out of the Potemkin village.

Republished with permission from The Cadet, a publication produced by VMI cadets and alumni. 


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

14 responses to “The VMI Class of ’25’s Elephant in the Room”

  1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    1924 versus 2024. What a difference 100 years can make! I found Uncle Charlie’s VMI scrapbook. 100 years ago VMI was tuition free and institution expenses were just 450 dollars.
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6226cc710d05ae38623c1b5a1f433f67086c060ca985d988d67ffa3b704e7d95.jpg

  2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    100 years ago VMI had a real report card. You were graded on how you stood in comparison with your classmates. Far more meaningful than a near worthless GPA. Uncle Charlie was a pretty good student. Except for marching and drilling. I hope his dad never saw the 53 demerits.
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1814fa9968d02b63562c1f9437fd21c637738bffc792f41e57c1d01b5d7ba2bc.jpg

  3. LarrytheG Avatar

    I’d be curious to hear how VMI compares to other such service academies beyond the “tradition” part and more with respect to
    it’s grads. Are they truly unique and heads and shoulders above
    the grads from other institutions like VMI?

    1. I’m a retired infantry officer with 30 years of service, two tours in Vietnam. I have served alongside, under, and above USMA, VMI, Citadel, Army ROTC, and OCS officers. Up to about the grade of Captain, the USMA officers were a bit more disciplined (with a few notable exceptions). With a few years in grade as Captain, I couldn’t tell the difference in their source of commission and didn’t care.

  4. Not Today Avatar

    I remember being heavily recruited to attend Texas A&M, a school with, at the time, a similar mentality. They flew me out in an attempt to convince me to attend. Upperclassmen arrived to pick up their ‘nerdlings’ and treated us to such joyous spectacles as country line dancing lessons and a live showing of the Rocky Horror Picture Show. Despite the full ride offer, I declined, and the president of the university sent a letter of apology to every prospective student on that trip. It was an unmitigated disaster. I see, 30 years later, advocates of this approach to recruitment remain. Abuse doesn’t build character. It creates scarred survivors and reveals the character of its perps.

  5. CAPT Jake Avatar

    The opening paragraph is delightful red meat for the VMI detractors, allegations the Ratline isn’t what it used to be (and never was). Presumably the Cadet Staff has an exhaustive list documenting the conditions affecting every Ratline. I don’t know what “indoctrination phase” is. We, the Class of 1985, did not use the term. We had the cadre, our Rat Bibles and our dykes. We had to learn and development our individual strengths, own self-discipline, and personal time management skills necessary to complete the Ratline. It takes an entire cadetship to master these.

    By criticizing the administration, does the Cadet Staff have documentation the administration directly stated to the Class of 2024’s leaders exactly when Breakout would occur? Otherwise, this is simply shouting into the wind. For as long as there has been a Ratline there has been tension between the Institute’s academic mission and VMI’s peculiar military regimen. Generally, the administration particularly the Dean, wants Breakout to happen in late January or early February so Rats can improve their grades. The first class wants to prolong the Ratline to demonstrate its “control.”

    The sole reason a person attends VMI is to obtain a college education. Period. Full stop. All the ancillary benefits, leadership, comradery, athleticism, access to Alumni and the distractions, the Ratline, are secondary. Breakout has for at least 40 years happened in February. I know. My Class’s breakout was February14. It’s stamped on the class side of my ring.

    Retention is a big deal to the Institute and the Board of Visitors. Finances is the reason. Can the Cadet Staff produce documents showing a deleterious effect between “Corps event” limitations and “‘leadership laboratory’ experiences”?

    Regarding the terms Rat and new cadet, the editorial’s assertions are not 100% accurate. The 2022 New Cadet Handbook2023-24, this year’s current version, uses the word “rat” no less than 126 times. Regarding packed stands, I visited the VMI Alumni Agencies website and clicked on every single link associated with “giving.” Not one web page has photographs of “cadets packing stands for basketball and football” games. None.

    On the subject of tuition and fees, Virginia Tech fees exceed $7K per student excluding the fees assessed students comprising Tech’s Corps. Crozet Hall ran out of food when I was a cadet. It also served some meals cadets wouldn’t touch. With respect to the opportunity cadets have to purchase meals at the post exchange, the editorial appears to be referencing the catering policy (G.O.#30). If not, no matter. What is the point? The paragraph’s closing sentence implies it is wrong for VMI to receive remittances for food served in the PX. Is The Cadet Staff asserting all food served to cadets on Post be covered (free) as part of a cadet’s board?

    Moving on to who “speaks for the Corps.” A Class’s leadership speaks for its Class. Have the individual Class leadership triumvirates met with and described to the Superintendent their respective positions regarding transgender cadets serving as members of the Corps? Have they provided letters documenting their positions? Selected first class leaders are granted direct access to the Board of Visitors during their regularly scheduled meetings. None of these leaders has so far spoken about the transgender issue. If there is disagreement, why haven’t these leaders provided their respective Class’s positions to the Cadet Staff for publishing in The Cadet newspaper?

    The administration will always have critics, every administration does. It needs to move on. The administration has made (numerous) hasty and poor decisions. It will be criticized by its supporters for those bad judgements. In other news, the Commandant is retiring. This may be the solution to issues surrounding him and his office. The matter of the reassignment of the former director of communications is not going away anytime soon.

    VMI was sanctioned. True. The Board of Visitors was not. The administration acted in a reprehensible manner. It attempted to circumvent state law, fraudulently give a contract to an otherwise unworthy but virtue-signaling company, all while masking its activities. When its actions were exposed, it played fast and loose with the facts, coerced the Attorney General’s designated counsel, an alumnus no less, to mislead the Court. He then, at the conclusion of the trial, admitted he had failed to produce documents under discovery. Finally, the Institute threw the former director of diversity, now departed, under the bus blaming her for the mishandling of the aforementioned contract. The trial judge could have, and should have, been more exacting when rebuking VMI. But he wasn’t. That case is closed. Future cases are pending.

    Barracks isn’t pristine and Alumni don’t “marvel” at it. The reasons Alumni donate to VMI are as numerous as the blades of grass in the Parade Ground, as is their interest or disinterest in how VMI spends its resources. Soliciting donations to VMI is the Alumni Agencies job. That job has no bearing at all with the commissioning of cadets into our nation’s Armed Forces. Similarly, the organization does not affect the Post’s sculptures or new naming conventions assigned certain annual celebrations.

    The Board of Visitors is the body empowered to “oversees the development, revision, and implementation of a strategic plan for the accomplishment of that mission.” Explain to the Board’s members how the terms, names, and events the Cadet Staff dislikes is relentlessly injuring the Institute. If the Cadet Staff is unable to demonstrate persistent harm, then do not expect anything to change. The Board of Visitors, admittedly under now mostly former members, made the changes described when proposed by the immediate past prior superintendent. Understand, attempting to reverse those changes now will most likely be opposed by the current administration, Alumni and donors, making support unlikely from the current Board’s members.

    Every Ratline is different. I suggest the Class of 2025 develop their Ratline plan before graduation this year and get out in front of those topics it knows will be issues for the administration. It should develop alternatives so the plan demonstrates value in every activity showing how each component builds on the others to deliver a complete product, a Class, at the end of the Ratline.

    This remainder of the editorial fails to make any sustainable arguments. It references happenings, events, or reports only the Corps know about. However, “step-offs” have been very rare occurrences (“stopped enforcing the Ratline until balance returned”) at VMI. Additionally, phone calls to the administration have been enduring since Smith Hall was constructed. It always had phones and cellular telephones are by comparison a recent invention. With respect to professor retirement, employee turnover happens every day, everywhere.

    Overall, cadets railing against the administration, the Commandant and his staff are fairly normal. However, this editorial takes issue with some unique VMI elements, chiefly the Alumni, the Alumni Agencies, and the Board of Visitors. Why? What is the objective?
    As the superior frequently says to the subordinate, “don’t bring me a problem without a solution.”

    Whether Cadet Staff members know it, you are already Alumni. When their respective Classes graduate, they become members of the Alumni Association, an Alumni Agencies constituent. A lot of the Cadet Staff’s brother rats will donate to VMI, a lot of them. Some will donate a lot of money. A lot.
    Criticizing donors supporting college education come across as cheap shots.

    What are the actual problems? What are the solutions the Cadet Staff and more importantly the Corps’ officers and Class leaders offering? And yes, the Alumni Agencies has its faults.

    Perhaps the editorial’s use of an elephant in its headline is an apropos metaphor. I recommend eating the elephant one bite at a time.

    1. SmallTowner Avatar
      SmallTowner

      Excellent reply. You nailed it.

  6. Greg Long Avatar

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/07a1f15667cf347fc084dfacb89868e80bbe11751cd036531b0ba0cbd6b2885a.jpg CAPT JACK need some fact checking himself. I will address only a couple points

    1. The cadets are “on the ground” we are not. If they say something I trust them on their honor it is accurate.

    2. The opinion refers to the “Blue Book” and not the New Cadet Handbook. While “Rat” does appear in the Blue Book”, the term “Rat” only appears in references to New Cadets such as “New Cadets (Rats)” that clearly indicates the new term is replacing the traditional term”. The Term “New Cadets” is used extensively. The Opinion is accurate that “Rat” is replaced, and is being replaced by “New Cadets”.

    3. In regard to the Court Case, it is unquestionable from the public documents and the documents linked to the numerous articles in The Cadet over time that BOTH VMI and The Board of Visitors were defendants (hence the “Virginia Military Institute, et al”). The motion for sanctions was filed and granted against both defendants. Any legal case against VMI must include the BOV as a defendant. The VMI Attorney, Mr. O’Leary, and the attorney from the Attorney General’s Office represented the Defendants and that is clear from the Court documents online at the Rockbridge County Circuit Court and linked to the articles. CAI’s motion for sanctions requested sanctions against the defendants (VMI and BOV). Those were granted and so the BOV members were sanctions. No evidence was presented to the Court that Mr. O’Leary was, in any way “coerced”. The attorney from the the Richmond Office of the Attorney General clearly stated to CAI’s attorney and the Court that HE id not know of the contract. CAI’s attorney raised, in that Court hearing that Mr. O’Leary did not answer in Court if HE knew. He had several opportunities to say he did not know or was coerced. He did not. Further, if Mr. O’Leary was “coerced” it could only have effectively come from his superior (Maj. Gen. Wins). Also, in researching some of the VMI FOIA request were someone asked for the records on the contract VMI denied the request, in part, citing the Superintendent’s working papers” and that indicates that, although Mr. O’Leeary did not reveal it in Court, Maj. Gen. Wins himself had knowledge of this. If the procurement office did not have legal review of the contract then they violated their own rules and that is highly unlikely as the Procurement Officer could lose her contracting authority. Also, no one “threw the former DEI director under the bus”. She had no authority to award the contract to NewPoint and could not have done so herself. No evidence was provided in any Court documents showing she was being blamed. VMI’s defense was they awarded the contract and did no wrong in doing so. Bottom line is the authors of the opinion are correct.

    4. Although the Class of ’85 broke out on February 17, 1982 (if my math s correct) and this was a week day (a Wednesday), the records from the VMI archive at the time show the events started at 5:00 am and went through an entire day of sweat parties, rifle runs, etc. A far cry from the accurately documented 2:30 “after class for a few hours” events the opinion documents. CAPT Jack also fails to cover the rigor of that resurrection week and breakout “in the trench” pales in comparison to breakouts in the past couple years under the current administration. CAPT JACK also fails to note that prior to breakout on 15 Feb in the Morning rats ran around the parade field, had a sweat party at noon, rifle PT for military duty in the afternoon, and a sweat party at night. On 16 Feb the day began with another rat run, another noon sweat party, Military Duty (afternoon) sweat party, and a final sweat party at night after which THE FIRST CLASS voted after “Taps” if the rats should break out. The events above occurred on the 17th. All this is a matter of record, so, if anything, the opinion piece downplayed how watered down the ratline and breakout is now. The Class of ’82, that (again if my math is correct) was the first Class when ’85 brokeout was one of the last, if not the last, class to breakout “in barracks” before (based on the recommendation of ’79) breakout was moved to “the trench” for safety reasons. But it remained touch with a touch week proceeding it, not what it’s been under the current administration.

    5. CAPT Jack should be more concerned with the disinformation VMI and the alumni agencies are putting out to convince alumni that nothing has changed and it has been this way “for decades”. Just as they did in court with CAI, false and misleading information. The “Bottom line” is what the editorial says… if this is what VMI IS and HAS BECOME, do the honorable thing and “own it” instead of trying to convince people nothing has changed.

  7. Carmen Villani Jr Avatar
    Carmen Villani Jr

    Excellent analysis Greg. To the point about the lawsuit, go to the following link and you can see that the “Board of Visitors VMI” is listed as “Defendant2.” If there are problems with the link, the case number is CL22000215-00
    See: https://eapps.courts.state.va.us/CJISWeb/CaseDetail.do

    Regarding tuition and fees, I went to both school’s website. I believe it is important to look at in-state and out-of-state costs. There is a distinct difference between the two categories and between the schools. Apples to apples comparison may be a challenge here, but I believe this data provides a better perspective than the mere “7K per student” reference made by “CAPT Jake.”

    First year in-state – VPI – $37,252; VMI – $34,824 (includes $3,350 in “indirect costs”)

    First year out-of-state – VPI $58,750; VMI – $66,476 (includes $4,300 in “indirect costs)

    VPI – https://www.bursar.vt.edu/content/dam/bursar_vt_edu/tuition/fall-2023/2023-2024%20Tuition%20and%20Fees_v4.pdf

    VMI – https://www.vmi.edu/about/offices-a-z/financial-aid/tuition-and-fees/

    The most important issue brought forth is honor and ethical behavior. What does VMI General Order 46 require? “Members of the Virginia Military Institute community are committed to the highest ethical standards in furtherance of our mission.” Does being sanctioned by a judge meet that standard?

    It goes on to further state the commitment to “honor, integrity, and accountability.”
    See: https://www.vmi.edu/media/content-assets/documents/general-orders/GO46.pdf

    In General Order 13, the following statement is made by the Superintendent: “As Superintendent of the Virginia Military Institute, I expect us to maintain a culture of civility and mutual
    respect.” Yet those of us who have challenged policy decisions or actions have been vilified on social media and referred to as “unhappy alumni who want to stoke the worst fears” by the Superintendent.
    See: https://www.vmi.edu/media/content-assets/documents/general-orders/GO13.pdf

    Then the President of the BOV and my Brother Rat has stated that VMI “strongly supports free speech.” Really? Then why does a VMI professor write an op-ed in the Cadet newspaper criticizing policy anonymously?
    See: https://cadetnewspaper.com/news/447/a-professors-perception-of-dei-and-its-impact/

    From the President of Alumni Free Speech Alliance (AFSA):

    “We ask the Secretary (of Education) and the Youn(g)kin administration to take a serious look at the situation at VMI, especially the ‘command climate’…serving under a leadership team that appears to be flaunting established law and engaging in intimidate tactics to attempt to silence critical voices should not be one of them (obstacles).”

    From Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) & Student Press Law Center (SPLC):

    “FIRE and SPLC are concerned by the Virginia Military Institute (VMI) administrators’ course of conduct toward the independent student newspaper, The Cadet. VMI’s cumulative acts seeking to bend the paper to administrative pressure and interfering with its staff’s activities squarely contradict the Institute’s obligations under the First Amendment, which demands the VMI RESPECT (emphasis added) the editorial independence of The Cadet.”

    Does “bully,” “intimidate,” and “interfering,” even remotely sound like “civil discourse,” which at the recent BOV meeting a presentation was made that VMI is “leading the way on civil discourse?”
    See: https://www.thefire.org/news/vmi-administrators-bully-student-newspaper-over-unflattering-coverage; https://www.thefire.org/research-learn/fire-letter-virginia-military-institute-september-21-2022

    Like Greg Long stated, I believe the editors at the Cadet newspaper. They should be applauded for their courage in taking on VMI officials who have broken the trust of many alumni! Leaders lead by actions, not words. There should be accountability at the highest levels but there is little evidence that has taken place.

    Carmen D. Villani, Jr
    VMI ’76

  8. Bob X from Texas Avatar
    Bob X from Texas

    As predicted,
    D.E.I. ruins everything it touches!!!!!!

  9. Greg Long Avatar

    Good analysis Mr. Villani I assume at this point the next development will be an article in one of the media outlets VMI and its alumni agencies (VMI AA) hid behind and cooperated with to attack the cadets’ paper in the past will soon hit the internet to try and again discredit them and alumni… I hope I am wrong.

  10. Michael Staso Avatar
    Michael Staso

    I agree with Greg Long and Carmen Villani regarding Capt Jake and his comments to this current VMI Cadet’s article. His statements perpetuate the same story as the VMI Administration and the VMI Alumni Association (AA), which is “there’s nothing to see here, all is well, move along” while things are going rotten to the core at VMI. The truth is as told by Cadets living in barracks today, and documented in the Cadet newspaper, which reflects how bad things really are today on post. What has been conveyed by them though is but a small fraction of the issues that do exist there that the administration and the alumni association would be happy to keep alumni, donors, parents and others in the dark about. Many in power at VMI today advocate for change in a system that has endured and worked well for over 150 years, producing the VMI graduate, revered in the past, as its product. These changes may appear trivial to the ill-informed, but every other little cut, accumulated, ultimately kills the VMI experience. The current administration (and AA) is severely lacking in both character and honor. One has to but look at the recent court case that verified that VMI engaged in deliberate subterfuge in its procurement activities to make that determination. How can the model it presents serve to guide Cadets as honorable and just graduates when much of what they see emanating from Smith Hall is but smoke and mirrors? The VMI Administration also lacks civility, engaging in public attacks against its own alumni, as the current Superintendent has done recently on Facebook and other media. NCAA Sports has become outsized in its influence over the running of the school, which I found impossible that anyone wouldn’t realize if they but looked at how it creates a dual track experience at VMI and fosters the athlete versus non-athlete divide within barracks. The Administration’s solution to an NCAA program that is running a significant deficit each year is to raise the athletic fees to all Cadets and explore additional commercial sponsors for funds, while all the time ignoring the need to make cuts to its bloated staffing and infrastructure. Does giving a free walk to tenure to poor performing minority professors over white or asian males forbode well for the future of academic rigor at VMI? Does having senior VMI faculty state that VMI is more akin to the University of Maryland than one of the US Military academies in their opinion indicate that we are giving our young children to the right-minded individuals for “molding” in a miltary-based system? Does taking a large number of Professors out of military uniform do the same? Watering down of the rigor of the VMI ratline doesn’t bode well for VMI’s future either. Lowering admission’s standards does so even worse. Was VMI routinely matriculating graduates in the past with high school GPAs below 1.5? Does the elimination of SATs for admission really assist in instituting an admissions process based upon merit or one of special (race or sex based) considerations? How about admitting obese female minority applicants, which appear to have three times the acceptable body weight for their height? Has VMI made these sacrifices in standards at the altar of the DEI god for appeasement? You can’t ignore these facts that represent individual “cuts” to the VMI experience unless you want to hide under a rock.

  11. It’s past time to close these state-run “military institutes” that serve no military purpose. Vestiges of the pre-Civil War South.

  12. LarrytheG Avatar

    VMI alumni association suspends members who it says misused thousands of email addresses
    The alumni used the information to encourage classmates to donate to a private foundation rather than to official fundraising campaigns.

    https://cardinalnews.org/2024/02/16/vmi-alumni-association-suspends-members-who-it-says-misused-thousands-of-email-addresses/?utm_source=ActiveCampaign&utm_medium=email&utm_content=VMI+alumni+association+suspends+members+who+it+says+misused+thousands+of+email+addresses&utm_campaign=Monday%2C+January+15%2C+2024

Leave a Reply