by James A. Bacon

The story of the six-year-old school shooter in Newport News generates endless attention. It seems indicative of so much that is wrong with our society today.

Law-enforcement authorities are rightly focused on the question of how a six-year-old child (a) managed to lay hands on a gun that his parents claimed to have stored out of his reach; and (b) how he managed to bring the gun into school and evade a search of his knapsack. Guns and young children don’t mix any better than guns and alcohol. Though the remedy is less than obvious, it should be clear to all that America has a gun problem.

America also has a violent-child problem, and the solution to that is even more opaque.

The violent-child problem is national in scope, as The Wall Street Journal makes clear in a front-page article today. “Violence among children has soared across the country since 2020, a stark reversal in a decades-long decline in juvenile crime,” the newspaper writes.

In the U.S., homicides committed by juveniles acting alone rose 30% in 2020 from a year earlier, while those committed by multiple juveniles increased 66%. The number of killings committed by children under 14 was the highest in two decades, according to the most recent federal data.

In Washington, D.C., 214 children were arrested for firearm-related crimes in 2022. Sixteen juveniles were shot to death last year — most by other juveniles.

The authorities quoted by The Wall Street Journal attribute the spike to a toxic mix of easy access to guns, disputes arising from social media, and a general breakdown in social order commencing with the COVID pandemic. School closures kept children at home, often without adequate supervision. Losing what little structure they had in their lives, many immersed themselves in toxic social media. When in-school classes resumed, many adults found it impossible to restore discipline. Meanwhile, criminal justice reforms meant to reverse the school-to-prison pipeline meant that many violent children suffered no consequences for their criminal behavior.

Darcel D. Clark, a Bronx district attorney, supported a law that ended the automatic prosecution of 16- and 17-year-olds as adults. Now she has second thoughts about the New York “Raise the Age” legislation. As the WSJ summarizes her thinking, “Too many juveniles arrested on gun possession charges are released quickly because such cases are typically sent to family court — and some of the minors are going on to commit more serious crimes or are being murdered themselves.”

So, what do we do?

Literally as I was writing this column, an email appeared in my inbox citing the Newport News shooting as reason to address the unsafe storage of firearms. The missive from the Brady’s End Family Fire program assert that 4.6 million children live in homes with unlocked or unsupervised guns; 33% of gun-owning parents who thought their child could not access a household firearm had a child who reported that he could; and eight children every day on average are unintentionally injured or killed due to family fire.

As a non-gun-owner, it strikes me as prudent and reasonable to hold adults responsible for the storage of their firearms and their misuse by their children. This week, says Brady’s, a Safe Storage Bill introduced in the state Senate would mandate all firearms be stored and made inaccessible to children under 18. One can debate the practicality of the bill, but at least it aspires to address a real problem.

But there is so much more to gun violence than unsafe storage. Children are acquiring guns on the social media-fueled black market. And once mayhem takes hold in a community, adults and children alike begin arming themselves for self-protection. How do you stop that? What about the youths given a slap on the wrist by the criminal justice system? What about arguments that erupt on social media outside the purview of adults and violence-mitigation teams? How do we inculcate children with impulse control and anger management? How does our society create six-year-olds raging with so much anger that they threaten to kill their teachers… and then follow through?

Social breakdown is so pervasive and has so many facets and causes that the phenomenon is only imperfectly understood. Before we start flailing around with new laws inspired by the conviction that we must “do something,” perhaps we should pause long enough to study and understand holistically what we’re dealing with. And before curtailing the rights of the overwhelmingly law-abiding majority of citizens, perhaps we should try enforcing the laws we’ve already got.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

44 responses to “The Violent-Child Problem”

  1. Matt Adams Avatar
    Matt Adams

    “Guns and young children don’t mix any better than guns and alcohol. Though the remedy is less than obvious, it should be clear to all that America has a gun problem.”

    That’s a false narrative. Gun’s and unsupervised young children do not mix. If you’re a firearm owner and don’t take the time to teach your child about that firearm, to respect that firearm and how to proper employ that firearm, you are wrong.

    A firearm is a tool and as such someone needs to be taught how to use it, it’s not inherent. America has a social media problem not a firearm problem.

    Also, it’s against VA law to leave a firearm unsecured where a child can access it, so unless we start prosecuting current laws, less not try passing new ones to ignore.

    1. killerhertz Avatar
      killerhertz

      I trust a well mannered child raised w/ respect for firearms than I do a zoomer or millenial driving around while watching tiktok. Both are tools that are capable of inflicting harm.

  2. Literally as I was writing this column, an email appeared in my inbox citing the Newport News shooting as reason to address the unsafe storage of firearms.

    Existing firearm laws already address what happened in Newport News. How will raising the age to 18, change what happened with respect to a 6 year-old?

    One reason for lack of compliance with gun laws is lack of knowledge about what those laws require and the potential legal and financial consequence of failure to obey them. Changing the laws every year and passing new ones will not help in this regard.

    …perhaps we should pause long enough to study and understand holistically what we’re dealing with. And before curtailing the rights of the overwhelmingly law-abiding majority of citizens, perhaps we should try enforcing the laws we’ve already got.

    I’ll second that!

    Law makers seem oblivious to the actual cause of problems, nor are they very curious. We don’t even know the details about Newport News.

    The problem they are most interested in solving is how to get reelected. Pass laws in haste and then brag to voters about what a good job they have done. Then do the same thing next year, and the next, but the problems continue.

    1. killerhertz Avatar
      killerhertz

      Politicians don’t care about improving anything. They’re in the business of power at the expense of your misery

  3. VaNavVet Avatar

    Refreshing to see JAB acknowledge that America has a gun problem. Perhaps a start would be to allow gun violence to actually be studied as a public health issue.

    1. Why not study guns as a health issue? Two reasons:

      1. They suck at it. When public health officials study something they know nothing about, it is a disservice to the issue.

      2. They aren’t doing their own jobs, why divert attention so something outside their field? How about studying mental health issues? Drug abuse? Prescription abuse? Over mediation of youth? Have we got any of those licked yet? Or about a hundred others?

      1. Plus, when the CDC did study legal firearms use to protect individuals, the findings did not fit the liberal Democratic ‘guns never save lives’ and tried to bury the research.

    2. Nothing is preventing anyone from studying violence as a health issue.

      1. VaNavVet Avatar

        I believe that Congress has prevented the CDC from studying gun violence, namely the Republicans in the Senate.

        1. Actually, the only thing congress has prevented CDC from doing is advocating or promoting gun control

          Anti-gun groups routinely make false statements about this issue.

          It’s analogous to the misinformation they routinely put forth regarding the Protection of Lawful Commerce Act.

        2. The 1996 Dickey Amendment has prevented the CDC from doing advocacy for the gun control lobby, under the guise of research.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Which included tracking gun related deaths.

            Didn’t that amendment also require States and localities to track and report PD shootings? Well, that didn’t happen.

          2. Tracking gun related deaths was not proscribed.

            RE: Well, that didn’t happen.

            No, it didn’t, and this reinforces my argument that until they enforce the laws they already have, they do not need new ones.

  4. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    You raise some hard questions. I was pleased to see that ”
    it should be clear to all that America has a gun problem.” Unfortunately, based on the interpretation of the Second Amendment by the current Supreme Court, I don’t see any solution to this problem.

    Being fortunate enough to have been able to raise my daughter in a household in which there was always a parent present and to have grandchildren in that same situation and who have been home schooled to boot, I find it hard to understand or realize the problems faced by children whose schools were closed and who had to stay at home due to COVID restrictions. American society has transferred responsibility for raising children from the family to school and day care centers. When the schools and day care centers had to close, kids had to stay home and most had no structure to guide them.

    1. In our family, there was never any question about who should take responsibility for our children’s education, (or anything else for that matter).

      I changed careers specifically so that we could move to an area that would be suitable for raising our children. It was our number one priority, not just in word, but also in deed(s).

      These days people don’t even feel responsible for their own deeds. Alec Baldwin thinks he has no responsibility for shooting someone, because the dude who handed him the gun said it was okay. Responsibility for firearms doesn’t work that way. EVERYONE who touched those firearms should have checked them.

      1. killerhertz Avatar
        killerhertz

        That’s because you are probably not some beta male soyboy

    2. Mr. Hall-Sizemore:
      I appreciated your comment about raising and educating children, but respectfully disagree about the interpretation of the Second Amendment.

      When Supreme Court rulings become unmoored from the text of the Constitution, the justices become unelected oligarchs, not justices.

      There’s a process for changing the Constitution. Doing it through “reinterpretation” is lawlessness.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        One can make a strong argument that the recent Supreme Court decisions were “unmoored” from the text and the history of the Second Amendment. See:

        https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/07-290_amicus_historians.pdf

        1. Thanks for the reply.

          I find it extremely ironic that on the very day that I read the following in the news:

          “Biden once again urges Congress to pass assault weapons ban”

          You link to a brief documenting the fact that states are charged with regulating firearms, not the Federal Government.

          Perhaps it’s been some time since you read the brief, but were you aware of that?

          The brief is rich in history, (with which I am already familiar), but makes several fundamental errors. I won’t elaborate on them all, but with reference to Heller which is the subject, the writers fail to understand the difference between the power to regulate, verses the authority to protect negative rights.

          The Second Amendment provides a negative right.

          Negative rights:
          “Those rights that prohibit government from acting in certain ways; rights that are not to be interfered with.”

          As documented within the brief, the power to regulate firearms is given to the states, not the Federal Government. The Supreme Court, however, has the final authority to decide if a state law violates any negative rights protected by the Constitution. That is what’s at issue in DC vs. Heller.

          I am willing to examine other assertions of the brief if you are interested, but suffice it to say, it does NOT contain the “strong argument” you suggest it does.

    3. What interpretation of the Second Amendment would allow a solution to America’s ‘gun problem’, in your opinion?

      1. Even with our current Supreme Court, the state of California has implemented quite an oppressive system for gun owners.

        Has California solved the gun problem?

        HALF MOON BAY, Calif. (AP) — An agricultural worker killed seven people at the farm where he worked and at another business in Northern California, plunging the state into mourning again in the wake of its third mass killing in eight days.

        https://apnews.com/article/northern-california-shootings-3eb00c19a36ad129ca7f0063f4b2aaf9

        1. Yes. It’s amazing. They passed a law banning high capacity magazines, and surprise, surprise, criminals are not obeying it…

          1. I don’t think our liberal friends here at BR appreciate just how restrictive California is with respect to firearms.

            Anyone who frequents online firearm retailers knows that one of the most frequently asked questions with respect to almost any firearm is whether it is legal to own in California. Most often, the answer is “no.”

  5. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Have we discussed the two kids killed at the Des Moines Charter School?

    1. This?

      What we know: 2 students killed, 1 person in serious condition after shooting at Des Moines outreach center

      Police say that evidence also indicates that Walls cut off a court-ordered GPS ankle monitor about 16 minutes before the shooting.

      I think the public would have been better served if he were confined, rather than fitted with an ankle monitor. Harder to get guns in prison.

      https://www.kcci.com/article/des-moines-police-shooting-multiple-injuries/42623740

      1. Or if they do… law abiding citizens are still safe…. once again the Left wants dangerous people to walk among us so those miscreant’s rights are maintained.

        1. Warmac9999 Avatar
          Warmac9999

          The democrat fascist shock troops are ANTIFA – a violent bunch whose history goes back nearly 110 years.

    2. Nancy

      You seem to have lost interest in the Des Moines shooting, but it actually contains elements that are common to many gun deaths in the country.

      1. It was gang related
      2. The shooter had a criminal record

      Police allege that the incident originated from a dispute between opposing gangs. They did not provide further details.

      The criminal complaints says Walls is “a known gang member affiliated with a local hybrid criminal street gang” and that the two teenage victims were members of an opposing gang.

      According to court records, Walls has had prior encounters with police in which he was carrying a gun. He was on probation at the time of the shooting for two drug offenses. He also was on supervised relief on two cases filed in June for interfering with West Des Moines police and public intoxication, both involving firearms.

      https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/crime-and-courts/2023/01/24/18-year-old-charged-with-murder-in-des-moines-education-program-shooting/69834721007/

  6. LarrytheG Avatar

    re: ” The violent-child problem is national in scope,

    is the violent-child problem INTERNATIONAL in scope?

    Are we UNIQUE to the world?

    Over 200 countries in the world, more than 30 developed countries.

    Other countries had COVID, shutdowns, public schools with “violent” kids right?

    Why is it that it is the US that is “coming apart”?

  7. Warmac9999 Avatar
    Warmac9999

    Iran has a gun problem. Their people can’t defend themselves and are often just shot down by government agents. How about the Uighurs in communist China? Seems to me much of Western Europes populace can’t defend themselves from invasion.

    1. The world is still a very dangerous place.

      Ukrainians Should Own More Guns After War Ends, Law Chief Says

      Russia’s war in Ukraine has tipped the debate in favor of broader gun ownership.

      https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-06-21/ukraine-gun-laws-top-official-calls-for-looser-restrictions-after-war

  8. killerhertz Avatar
    killerhertz

    What was clear from the COVID lockdowns and reports of mental health crisis is that things are only going to get worse. No amount of gun legislation will do anything. A start would be divesting from government education camps.

  9. William O'Keefe Avatar
    William O’Keefe

    Jim, your ending comment, “Before we start flailing around with new laws inspired by the conviction that we must “do something,” perhaps we should pause long enough to study and understand holistically what we’re dealing with. And before curtailing the rights of the overwhelmingly law-abiding majority of citizens, perhaps we should try enforcing the laws we’ve already got.” is spot on.
    Knee jerk reactions to “do something” make some feel good but don’t get to the heart of the problem. The needs to be a comprehensive, objective study of the gun/mental problem we obviously have in this country. CDC has been prevented by Congress from doing any research and analysis. That ban should be removed. But that is not enough. The President should appoint a bi-partisan commission to do a comprehensive study that addresses guns, gun violence, actions that affect mental health, and actions that are consistent with the Second Amendment.
    Closer to home, Governor Youngkin should do something simiar. He should hold the leaders of the two parties in the General Assembly in joining him in designing the scope of a study/commission and openly discuss balanced membership.

  10. vicnicholls Avatar
    vicnicholls

    Its not practicality, but having a gun stored in a safe and then separate ammo, means you basically are screwed, because if someone decides to ‘do something’ (criminal), you would have to get to the safe and get out the gun, go to the safe, and get out the ammo, load ammo, and be ready.

    This is a parent problem. I never ever touched a gun when I was a kid without parental or adult supervision. Did I know where they were? Yes. Were they loaded? Yes. Problem again:not guns, parents. Or maybe I should say people who should not have had children.

    1. I don’t understand the problem.

      They all have the muzzles of their weapons pointed in a safe direction and they are all practicing good trigger discipline.

      Clearly, somebody trained them well.

      1. Warmac9999 Avatar
        Warmac9999

        Mom is well protected.

      2. killerhertz Avatar
        killerhertz

        Eric the half a troll wants the kids to point it at the camera man like what prosecutor Binger did in the Rittenhouse case did w/ the jury.

  11. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    People are doing something. Buying more guns. 61,000 NICS firearms checks for Virginia in December. March is usually the top selling month for some reason.

  12. Guns and young children don’t mix any better than guns and alcohol.

    I disagree. I started teaching my son how to safely handle a firearm when he was four years old. By the time he was six, he was a pretty fair shot with an Ithaca Model 49 youth rifle, and the safe procedures for picking up, carrying, handling, loading, aiming and firing the weapon were ingrained in his mind (cleaning it, too).

    He understood at an early age what a gun is, and how dangerous guns can be in the wrong hands, or when used in an unsafe manner.

    1. Can’t remember for sure, but I think I started with my boys about 5 or 6 years old. That was with a bb gun.

      Properly trained and supervised, youth are amazing examples of proper gun handling and use.

    2. vicnicholls Avatar
      vicnicholls

      Ditto – but I knew what to touch, where it was, loaded or not, and no I didn’t screw with it.

  13. James Kiser Avatar
    James Kiser

    Try John Lott”s web site for research or Justfacts.com for information on firearms, general violence and juvenile violence which is on a steady rise in certain zip codes. the constant caterwauling about firearms totally ignores the fact that more people are beaten to death than are killed by long guns. If you want to get to a solution than you have to study the problem from all angles and look at the FACTS not the emotion.

  14. Bob X from Texas Avatar
    Bob X from Texas

    If the “Felon in possession of a firearm” laws were enforced , gun crime would drop dramatically.

Leave a Reply