by Phil Leigh

About eighteen months ago Richmond Mayor Levar Stoney remarked that the removal of Confederate statues would not cost the city’s taxpayers any money because non-profit donors would provide the funds. About the same time the Mellon Foundation announced a $250 million grantmaking effort “to reimagine and transform commemorative spaces to celebrate America’s diverse history.” Translated to plain English, the Foundation was giving Stoney and others the money they want to destroy Confederate monuments and promote cultural genocide against the south.

According to Luke Rosiak other “charitable” foundations—Kellogg, Ford, Rockefeller, and Carnegie—are the chief donors to Democrat school board election candidates seeking to disseminate Critical Race Theory throughout America’s educational system. Although such foundations are supposed to be do-gooders, they were typically organized to avoid inheritance taxes for family decedents. They are staffed by cultural elites whose conduct underscores the ancient wisdom: “Idle hands are the devil’s workshop.”

Although we all treasure memories of some teachers from our youth, today’s education majors enter college with the lowest College Board scores of all disciplines, but graduate with the highest grade point average. After graduation they start their careers in a system corrupted by teachers’ unions that are determined to avoid responsibility for job performance but simultaneously demand that pay be based on seniority and nearly worthless academic credentials rather than competence. Even though only 25% of high school students are proficient at reading, nearly all teachers typically get “outstanding” job performance reviews. The unions always claim that the solution for poor student performance is more money for teachers and administrators. Even though many teachers are not union members, they seldom object to union agendas.

Few Americans realize how much taxpayer money is spent on education. Consider Washington, D. C., a place where reading proficiency is even under the low national average. Washington spends $30,000 per child on public education. That means that taxpayers are paying $120,000 a year to educate the children of a family with four students in school. If it is a single-parent family, the $120,000 figure is not only larger than the family pays in taxes but is also likely even larger than the breadwinner earns in income. Consider that if the $120,000 were directly paid to the parent, he-or-she could hire a PhD to come to the home each day to tutor the family’s four children.

The teachers’ unions are presently obsessed with lecturing about so-called racial equity — a euphemism for Critical Race Theory — to pretend that they are doing something both noble and useful while disguising their failure to teach reading, writing, arithmetic, and other useful disciplines. Organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center provide them with essays that will satisfy the currently low standards for a class reading. Yet the essays are nothing more than indoctrinations into Critical Race Theory, so-called antiracism, and identity victimhood. Simultaneously, the USA ranks 30th in math proficiency out of 36 industrialized nations.

The obsession with race has led the teachers’ unions and their race-hustling allies into a place where they really don’t know what they want. They sometimes simply argue against the status quo. According to Rosiak, one school board concluded that their “special needs” classes should reduce the number of blacks because they were an excessive share of such students thereby racially stigmatizing black children. Another school district concluded that they needed more black students in the “special needs classes” because an increase yielded extra taxpayer funding for the district.

If you want to keep Critical Race Theory and other poisonous doctrines that demean America’s traditional values of equality of opportunity and personal responsibility out of public schools, vote against all Democrat candidates in your local school board elections.

Phil Leigh publishes the Civil War Chat blog. This column has been republished with permission.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

27 responses to “The Road to Hell…”

  1. Virginia Gentleman Avatar
    Virginia Gentleman

    “Cultural genocide” — “the road to hell” —- so Christian of you ….

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      whatdoya expect from a guy that writes; ” Civil War Chat blog” ?

    2. VaNavVet Avatar

      Vote against all Democrats is really painting with a broad brush. So tribal of him from a guy who most likely has not actual experience in a public school classroom.

  2. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
    Baconator with extra cheese

    Not big on the rhetoric of this commentary. I believe the author is as trying to make a somewhat valid point.
    I do hope RVA does go full blown ridiculous with Monument Avenue. The nicest street should move towards being equitable with the worst schools in the state. It’s only fitting.

  3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “Consider that if the $120,000 were directly paid to the parent, he-or-she could hire a PhD to come to the home each day to tutor the family’s four children.”

    So, the Conservative position is that we should have a $30,000 per child tax payer funded payout to each and every parent… but a $15/hour employer-funded minimum wage is a bridge too far.

    1. walter smith Avatar
      walter smith

      The Conservative position is you are a troll.
      Let’s suspend reality and mandate a $15 minimum wage and all will be well, amirite?
      The Big Mac will not cost more! In the real world, actions have consequences. You know, like suppressing American oil and gas production, and then being surprised that prices rise. I only took two courses of econ, but I seem to remember that if demand rises, supply should increase. So if you restrict supply while demand is rising, prices really rise.
      Why do you think McDonald’s has kiosks now… Preparing for your idiot “minimum” wage?
      The real minimum wage is zero. You hurt young workers, mostly minorities, with this idiocy. And the youngsters don’t learn good work habits, so they can then never be hired to hold a job and go on welfare and vote Democrat…forever…cuz you care!
      I think the point of the article is that education is concerned with things that are not education, and costs too much to boot.
      The Liberal position is we will print money forever to “educate” your kids to hate America and vote for us because of some kind of intersectional stupidity that makes you a victim of some invisible force, but we won’t care because we will live like kings while making everybody else live hand to mouth like peasants…
      That’s a fair summary, isn’t it?

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        “…but I seem to remember that if demand rises, supply should increase. So if you restrict supply while demand is rising, prices really rise.”

        If you think that is how upstream oil works, you need to go back to econ class….

        The “point” of the article is fairly explicit. The Conservative position is that all parents should just be given $30k per year of taxpayer money for each child to do with as they wish. For that single parent of four, that amount about 10X what you begrudge giving her (or her kids) in a raise for a minimum wage job. Further, with this tight a labor market NOW is the perfect time to increase the minimum wage…. but, the Conservative position is always to lay the burden on taxpayers instead of corporations… it is how you roll…

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          You now have been heavily doused with cooties…. so sorry…

          1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            “What do you mean cooties? Ain’t no cooties on me!”

            Now you’ve got me focused on Dinah-Moe Humm… where are my zircon-encrusted tweezers…?!

        2. walter smith Avatar
          walter smith

          On taxpayers instead of corporations…
          Are you using a pseudonym for AOC? Or Fauxcahontas?
          Your lack of basic knowledge of reality makes me wonder…
          Yep, now is the perfect time to raise wages and make the inflationary spiral even worse…
          Now is the perfect time for idiot Libs (but I repeat myself) to be patriotic and impeach SlowJoe and install Sorta Black Hillary with the same cackle and open up domestic oil and gas production and turn off all the illegals coming in (who aren’t tested for the Chinese Flu and who lower wages). But since you hate America and Americans, you won’t.

          1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Nice propaganda screed there, Sport. I will simply repeat that it is you and yours who wish to stick American taxpayers (instead of corporations) with a giveaway 10x that of shifting to a $15 minimum wage. There are some 16 million workers who would see their salaries increase under our proposal at about $10,000 each (with no new federal stimulus dollars entering the economy). There are some 50 million school aged kids in the US and you wish to flood the economy with $30,000 each in taxpayer-funded dollars (that is about an order of magnitude difference, in case you were wondering). Surely with your two econ courses you can tell which one will drive up inflation (the new Conservative hypocrites’ boogie man) more… hint, it ain’t an increase in minimum wage…

          2. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            Under our proposal… What proposal? You mean the Leftist unicorn fantasy world or do you have a real proposal? Are you referring to Build Back Broke?
            And quit your stupid (but that is all you know) argument of $30,000 to the parents for each child – that is the money already being spent, and obviously not very well…(Hey, asking for a friend – how do those “teachers” vote usually?).
            16,000,000 x $10,000 = $160,000,000,000 …Magic!
            So why not $500 per hour, then we can have 16,000,000 new millionaires and hit them with a 40% Millionaire’s tax ? And balance the budget! Woohoo – Lib math solves everything!

          3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Welp, if your opinion is that we are spending $30,000 across the board for 50 million kids in the US and therefore giving it directly to parents does not represent a stimulus, then the same logic applies to any potential stimulus for minimum wage increases to $15/hour (aka “our proposal”). It is in one way or another (or combination of ways) a transfer in the economy. Either from corporate profit (shareholder returns) or drawn out of the economy itself through retail pricing and put right back in via employee pay. So still if you don’t like our transfer of funds in the economy, yours is the same X 10.

          4. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Welp, if your opinion is that we are spending $30,000 across the board for 50 million kids in the US and therefore giving it directly to parents does not represent a stimulus, then the same logic applies to any potential stimulus for minimum wage increases to $15/hour (aka “our proposal”). It is in one way or another (or combination of ways) a transfer in the economy. Either from corporate profit (shareholder returns) or drawn out of the economy itself through retail pricing and put right back in via employee pay. So still if you don’t like our transfer of funds in the economy, yours is the same X 10.

          5. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            None so blind. Enjoy living in your hovel when the lights are turned out… You can’t spend yourself rich, except in Unicorn Economics, now known as Modern Monetary Theory.

          6. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Then don’t try to spend 10X that amount on the back of the taxpayer… you can’t spend yourself rich…

  4. tmtfairfax Avatar
    tmtfairfax

    The idea that we allow private foundations eternal life is absurd and wrong. Give them 25 years of tax-free life and then they need to liquidate and pay inheritance taxes as if they were a taxable estate.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Corporations too. Trusts post 1986 have drop dead clauses. Why should any entity outlive its usefulness because of unlimited lifespan? Rome, are you listening?

    2. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      An interesting idea. End the perpetual influence. Apply the principle to 501c(4) PACs and others making the shelf life one year. Not sure how classical conservatives will be comfortable with enforcing a modified Rule Against Perpetuities. Keep n mind that the idea applies to UVa and others.

  5. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    I’m reading a book recommended by Matt Hurtt, an educator from SW Va and Director of their Comprehensive Instruction Program – “The Smartest Kids in the World”.

    We did not suddenly get to this point and much less as a result of “woke” and CRT. The problem has been there for decades way back before there was a Culture War.

    The Culture War ignorati could give a rats behind about the issue.

    It’s a political war and this is one weapon against the ‘leftists”.

    Read the book, then come back with real proposals instead of culture war blather.

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      There has always been a culture war Mr. Larry. Just ask John Scopes. It will never end. I know about that book. Not a bad read.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Well, there has always been disputes about evolution and science and what public education should do or not, etc…. but that pales in comparison to what is going on now and I really don’t see where it improves things at all – the goal seems to be to tear down public schools and see what is left.

  6. Super Brain Avatar
    Super Brain

    Private foundations are frequently used to avoid transfer taxes, especially by employing family members Conservations set up many foundations. The American dollar has no political party or religion.

  7. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    One hopes that soon the anti-wokeists wake up to realize they are neo-wokeists. What is, in fact, being “demeaned” is logic and debate. Where oh where are the WF Bluckeys gone? Long time passing in favor of buzz words in place of reason.

  8. James Kiser Avatar
    James Kiser

    Tax the foundations at 70%.

  9. Donald Smith Avatar
    Donald Smith

    Well, that was somethin’, wasn’t it?

    I’m sure Mr. Leigh means well, but he might want to take another read of the room before he writes stuff like this. (If he HAS read the room well, then this is a room I’d prefer not to be in).

    I am a proud descendant of SIX Confederate soldiers, and a strong defender of the upsides* of Confederate heritage. But this guy is way out on a limb.

    * There were downsides. Oh boy, were there downsides.

  10. John Martin Avatar
    John Martin

    complete, ignorant and uninformed opinion

Leave a Reply