The Progressives’ “Opportunity of a Lifetime”

by James C. Sherlock

Virginia faces a crisis of governance during COVID-19, and the repercussions will play out in the General Assembly and in our elections for federal offices this fall.

The political campaigns both within and outside the General Assembly will be about policy rather than the administrative skill to carry it out. In Virginia, there will be pressure to expand the responsibilities of the Department of Health. The Left will want increased oversight and control to be crafted and run by the “experts.”

The so-called “Virginia Way” relies exclusively upon Virginians to lead Virginia government agencies. Accordingly, we can expect Virginia Democrats who run all levels of our government to recruit help from Virginia universities. They will be loath to point out that Virginia’s current health commissioner is a product of a Virginia faculty lounge and that the Department of Health he leads has demonstrated in COVID-19 response that it cannot carry out with competence those duties already assigned.

This column will assess the coming political storm and the way that the press will present it. Virginia’s political process, as always, will operate in the shadows of national reporting, more so today than ever because of the demise of the regional press.

The central conceit of today’s national press is that the media is investigating, reporting and editorializing on government responses to COVID-19 with full background information and open minds.

Conservatives wish to preserve freedom and the fruits of capitalism and the system that produces them. Conservatives support and help plan for crisis actions by government to deal with emergencies.

Conservatives understand the founding documents – the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution – and find them and the expression of individual freedom that is capitalism not only relevant but crucial to the dual goals of maintaining individual freedom and prosperity.

They find in the constitutional separation of powers a logical tool for dealing with crises, ensuring coordination but distributing responsibilities to ensure that they are exercised as close as possible to the people any crisis might affect in this vast nation.  California, Idaho, Florida, Louisiana, New York and Virginia simply are not identical and need tailored responses.

Progressives in the media, the street Left, the cocktail party Left, the faculty lounges and the political class, unschooled in or uncaring about the foundational necessity for and successes of the Constitution, a market economy or personal freedom, want to transform all three in favor of ideas they consider improvements. The progressive philosophy is people can do whatever they wish as long as it is mandatory, and mandated by “experts” from those same faculty lounges.

They see in the COVID-19 emergency an opportunity to legislate full time government surveillance and control of wide swaths of an economy.  Government bureaucracies have proven repeatedly unsuited to exercise that span of control anywhere, even if one thinks that government surveillance and control are good things, which conservatives most assuredly do not.  Progressives have always seemed less interested in the efficient and effective management of such controls, which is a fantasy, than their enactment.  Even if one ignores the Soviet Union, Cuba, Venezuela and pre-capitalist China, we tried it and it failed in the United States.  The 12-year Depression ended not with New Deal programs to control the economy but with rearmament for the Second World War.

If you think I exaggerate about the goals of the left to turn this crisis into opportunity for expansion of government, you must consciously ignore Speaker Pelosi and the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Boston Globe.

Before the latest bipartisan relief bill made it through the Senate, Speaker Pelosi temporarily derailed it by insisting that any emergency relief bill include:

  • Mandated “diversity” on corporate boards and in banks.
  • Expanded tax credits for wind and solar power;
  • Required airlines to reduce emissions;
  • Federalized the rules for state elections;
  • Increased union bargaining power;
  • Prohibited universities from disclosing the citizenship status of their students; and
  • Provided a bailout for some private pensions.

The mind boggles at what the Speaker will demand for the President’s $2T infrastructure bill, much less the agenda for next session if she is still Speaker.

Read the articles and opinion pieces that praise the totalitarian regime in China for its “control measures” that they claim, without evidence, reduced the spread of COVID-19 in China.

Try to find any discussion from those same voices of the responsibilities of states under our Constitution.  Try to find any acknowledgment of the pre-existing, fully coordinated and federally funded federal, state and local pandemic virus operations plans that many Governors and their bureaucracies either ignored or, more likely, had never read much less exercised.  Try to find in today’s press any reference to the state emergency stockpiles that those plans mandated other than fiercely criticizing Jared Kushner for daring to bring up the subject.

There are rays of light with some Governors taking responsibility.  The LA Times reported :

“Gov. Gavin Newsom said California will significantly increase COVID-19 testing capabilities, adding that he “owns” testing lapses in the state that have made it difficult to track the deadly virus. In a Saturday news conference, Newsom announced a task force that he said will work toward a five-fold increase in daily testing in the state by identifying supply shortages and adding testing locations.”[1]

Newsom wants a progressive revolution in politics, but at least he is accepting and acting on the Constitutional responsibilities of his job. Would that we could hear that declaration of responsibility or planning from Governor Northam.

We will face in the fall elections and next year’s federal and state legislatures a full-scale attempt to socialize and control the nation, the states, and free people everywhere, all in the name of being ready for another COVID-19. Discussions of the constitutionality of the transformation will be muted in the mainstream press as it was with the ACA, whose foundational provision that required Americans to buy something they did not want was a near certainty to be struck down, as it was.

Discussions of the competence and suitability of federal or state bureaucracies to shoulder the new policy loads will be suppressed in favor of discussions of the brilliant faculty lounge quarterbacks who will lead them, not the expanded armies of public servants who will have to do the blocking and tackling.

It will be a bold lie — the Left’s passion for government control of every aspect of life predated both the 20th century and the current pandemic – but it is coming.  It will constitute the political battle of our lifetimes.


[1]

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-04-04/gavin-newsom-california-coronavirus-testing-task-force


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

66 responses to “The Progressives’ “Opportunity of a Lifetime””

  1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
    Nancy_Naive

    Anyone know the onomatopoeia for regurgitation?

    “Virginia Democrats who run all levels of our government to recruit help from Virginia universities. ” Richmond College? Regent? Liberty?

    Wait, I’m confused. What is this about Virginia and Pelosi? Amazing, this constitutes the first 1000-word bumper sticker.
    Oh I see, this was satire, wasn’t it?

    1. Steve Haner Avatar
      Steve Haner

      When you and Larry lead with snark, and only snark, I know the point is hitting home. Sherlock is new to this game, and doesn’t have the four decades of state capitol experience that I do, but I don’t disagree with his premise. As interesting as the 2020 General Assembly was, 2021 will be a war. A special session right now would be especially dangerous. After the 2021 elections, probably, he and I can just watch from the sidelines.

      1. Steve, the point did hit home. I’m seeing it at the local level and folks aren’t getting the message, and are getting mad when you try to warn them. Considering local elections are less than a month away for my area, bad joo joo.

      2. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Sherlock and Haner UNLEASHED? or is it Haner and Sherlock?

        😉

        1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
          Nancy_Naive

          Unleashed? Or, unhinged?

    2. WayneS Avatar

      “Anyone know the onomatopoeia for regurgitation?”

      Ralph?

      1. djrippert Avatar
        djrippert

        Perfect.

    3. sbostian Avatar
      sbostian

      Nancy,
      I think Sherlock’s point is that the agenda of the current Democrat leadership of the General Assembly is that of Nancy Pelosi (although I prefer comparing it to AOC’s agenda). After 10 years on the VCU faculty, my observation is that almost all faculty members in the state university system and the private universities (excepting Regent and Liberty) are hard core leftists. The few conservatively inclined professors keep their mouths shut, because they have a justifiable fear of reprisal from the university “leadership”.

      1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
        Nancy_Naive

        After 23 years on CNU’s faculty, I can’t say I disagree. Education has its effect.

        1. CrazyJD Avatar

          Yes, in spite of evidence to the contrary. It’s usually called indoctrination.

        2. Nancy_Naive Avatar
          Nancy_Naive

          Apparently, lack of education has its effects too

  2. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    A honey pot, perhaps?

    😉

  3. James, having experienced some of the bureacratic mess you are referring to, you are correct. I’m seeing the expansion trying to occur at a local level, and yet no one wants to address it, much less admit they are reactive vs. proactive. I’ve seen one or two folks mention it, but that’s it.

  4. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Want more pandemic snafus? Vote Democratic! 😉

  5. johnrandolphofroanoke Avatar
    johnrandolphofroanoke

    Mr. Sherlock is right about the politics associated with the crisis. Abraham Lincoln made a deal with Congress to patch up party unity during the Civil War. In exchange for the support of Congress for the war effort, Lincoln agreed to support major Republican bills such as the Pacific Railroad Act, Morrill Land Grant Act, and the Homestead Act to just name a few. The deal Lincoln made served the nation well. The Easter Basket list that modern Progressives wish to have in exchange for crisis support will not serve the interests of the public. It is a power expansion that will never retract.

  6. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    I am disappointed that this post rehashes the usual talking points about the MSM, especially regarding coverage of China. For Capt. Sherlock’s information, the MSM has been very vigilant in its coverage of the communist Chinese rulers. In 2013, David Barboza of The New York Times won a Pulitzer prize for his coverage of the cronyism and secret wealth of China’s top elite. The Wall Street Journal likewise has probed deeply into the Chinese communist party. Just a few weeks ago, the Chinese government announced it was kicking out reporters from the Times, The Washington Post and the Journal. These are not exactly “cocktail” journalists.
    I consider myself progressive but I did experience the Soviet Union/Russia as Moscow bureau chief for BusinessWeek from 1986 to 1089 and again from 1993 to 1996. I spent the interim four years as International News Editor for BW in New York and handled a lot of stories, notably the fall of the Soviet Union.
    During my first Moscow tour, I experienced the heavy hand of the KGB in some personal ways. I learned what it is like to be under surveillance, to be tailed and to have my phone and telex tapped. I had to be very careful when I spoke with ordinary Russians. They would pay serious consequences.
    So, to be frank, I resent being lectured to about what totalitarianism means. I don’t know Capt. Sherlock’s background but I do know some of the other conservative bloggers here. One big difference: I have been personally through what they are talking about. They have not. And I don’t need lessons about the Constitution. That’s patronizing and offensive. One does not have to be a right-wing American to be patriotic.

    1. sbostian Avatar
      sbostian

      Defending the guild Peter?

    2. Steve Haner Avatar
      Steve Haner

      Which is worse – my solipsism or Peter’s egotist paternalism….a close call. Only he, who lived for a while in the cocoon the KGB allowed him to inhabit, understands anything about communism….

    3. CrazyJD Avatar

      >>So, to be frank, I resent being lectured to about what totalitarianism means.

      Then the question arises: why does it always seem you are defending the ideology, or something close, that requires it in order to be “successful”?

  7. djrippert Avatar
    djrippert

    The right answer from Northam and the Democrats would be to roll back ALL the additional taxing and spending passed in the recent General Assembly session. That would be a start but only a start. The next good move would be to toss “Dominion Dick” Saslaw onto the scrap heap of history and require Dominion to refund its $1B+ overcharge to the ratepayers in Virginia that were billed in excess. Then, a mandatory budget haircut to all organizations within state government. Not just a hiring freeze – job cuts. You know, the kind of job cuts that people working in private enterprise are seeing.

    But that’s not what Ralph Northam has in mind. Instead of decisive action Northam will make cosmetic changes and wait for the big bang of fiscal explosion down the road. Then he and his ilk can really carve up the state along the lines of other highly successful operations like Illinois.

    From The Hill ….

    https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/491259-fiscal-freefall-for-state-and-local-governments-the-crisis-we-are-not-yet

    1. Amen, but, that is not what is going to happen and not what is happening at the local level, at least around here. I have the misfortune of living in an incorporated Town and thus paying dual taxes to the County and the Town. The County is blindly pushing forward with at least a 7% increase in Real Property Taxes while the Town just hired another employee Thursday and is pushing forward with Capital Projects this evening. Reality apparently is not a consideration. Their mantra, the taxpayers are willing to pay higher taxes to support the safety net for the less fortunate. I guess they are comfortable with the size of that unfortunate population growing at least in part due to their tax increases. From the dais “County government is the backbone and fabric of the community”, funny, I always thought it was the residents and businesses that were the backbone and fabric of the community.

    2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      This is the conservative side of “never let a crisis go to waste”–use it as the reason to negate all the actions of the liberals.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Oh worse than that – if it’s not coming from Conservatives, it IS all things “liberal”. 😉

        Either you are with the Conservatives or you are a Pelosi Liberal… one of the boogeymen….

        See, all along, apparently, the “conservatives” here in BR were just “tolerating”… 😉 that sorta explains the unending “labeling”of anyone here who dare challenges the Conservative ideology.

        1. WayneS Avatar

          Grossly oversimplifying the views of conservatives …

          Your partisanship is showing. Again.

  8. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Haner, I may be an egotist but I am not a provincial who has never worked outside of Virginia.

  9. People, let’s not get personal.

  10. sbostian Avatar
    sbostian

    Remember that in a debate, the first to use ad hominem attack is actually surrendering the argument.

  11. I am not a Trump fan, but per Mr. Sherlock, can you imagine the COVID stimulus package if Hillary and Dems were in charge? The first priority would have been restoring the super-enormous electric car subsidies from the last stimulus bill, etc etc. Let’s fix up the regular infrastructure first and worry later about mandates to change America into the partisan liberal vision.

    PS- I don’t want to get too personal either, some of your avatars look the corona virus…not mentioning names.

  12. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    What a bunch of bull, ideological ranting! To respond to so many false accusations would take all day. Just one example: “They see in the COVID-19 emergency an opportunity to legislate full time government surveillance and control of wide swaths of an economy.” Give some examples of such efforts or desires.

    I also resent the implication that anyone other than a conservative is “unschooled in or uncaring about the foundational necessity for and successes of the Constitution, a market economy or personal freedom.”

    1. sbostian Avatar
      sbostian

      Assuming that you are not a conservative, which pro-liberty, pro free enterprise do you advocate for? Which Constitutional principles are willing to fight for if it might require you to stand beside a conservative to defend them?

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        I support capitalism and free markets, but not unregulated. I support the following Constitutional principles, among others: freedom of the press, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, right to a fair trial, the right not to incriminate oneself, guarantee of due process of law, equal protection of the laws, etc.

        1. sbostian Avatar
          sbostian

          I’m surprised to find that you can’t find conservatives to stand with you on those issues. What about the Second Amendment, right to assemble, and others? Are there some constitutional principles that you do not “like”? I am not quite a conservative, rather a 1960’s anticommunist liberal (JFK type). None of my “liberal” friends find that brand of liberalism tolerable. For what it is worth, Thomas Jefferson considered himself a liberal. However, today’s left has anathematized him.

          1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
            Dick Hall-Sizemore

            I never said that I can’t find conservatives to “stand with” me on those issues. I have never accused conservatives as abhoring Constitutional principles, although the gist of Sherlock’s rant was that progressives or liberals are guilty of that. I am not sure why a “1960’s anticommunist liberal” would be intolerable today. If I thought about it long enough, I might put myself in that category. As for Constitutional principles, I support all of them. I am not a fan of the Second Amendment, but it is there and should be upheld. That does not mean that it is absolute. The Supreme Court has made it clear that none of the Bill of Rights liberties is absolute.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Lots of talk about “masks”. Looks like some are coming off here in BR, eh?

        2. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          re: ” I never said that I can’t find conservatives to “stand with” me on those issues. I have never accused conservatives as abhoring Constitutional principles, although the gist of Sherlock’s rant was that progressives or liberals are guilty of that. ”

          yeah, I thought that was kinda revealing, myself. Jim came here
          talking about “issues” like COPN, then it got very partisan… geeze.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      I’m agog also! All this time this is what the Conservatives in BR…. REALLY thought? Great Googa Mooga!

  13. Nancy_Naive Avatar
    Nancy_Naive

    The pot is black, vis-a-vis the kettle. Apparently, I’ve been chastised for snark in the face of blather.

    Okay, here goes. My father was a dyed-in-the-wool Midwestern, career-Navy mustang, Republican, who went through the Depression, WWII, Korea, and Vietnam.

    He never voted for a Democrat, extolled the virtues of every Republican (even Nixon until it became apparent that was sorely misplaced), but he openly admired JFK, RFK, LBJ, and Tip O’Neil (I suspect some of it was just being Irish or Navy or both) and was always quick to give props, even to Carter when things went South in the deserts of Iran. He thought the Democrats were wrong, but spent his side of any conversations telling me why the Republicans were right instead.

    So what does Dad have to do with it? Dad changed in the 90s after he moved from his house into a retirement home with cable TV and began showing signs of Alzheimer’s before finally being diagnosed. He then became vitriolic toward the Democrats, e.g.,

    “Progressives in the media, the street Left, the cocktail party Left, the faculty lounges and the political class, unschooled in or uncaring about the foundational necessity for and successes…”

    “They see in the COVID-19 emergency an opportunity to legislate full time government surveillance and control of wide swaths of an economy. ” (PATRIOT Act much?)

    Amazing how some people claim to love America when they hate half the people in it.

    I guess when it happen to him, he had his medical excuse.

  14. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Dick, You nailed it. I respect conservative views and find them interesting but I really resent the attitude that only they understand the Constitution or personal freedom or free markets. I also resent having people who have not been there telling me what my Russian experience was about, namely a “cocoon.” Trust me, I was on my own a lot and had an AK stuck in my guts and was truly scared when I was traveling and was being followed. I hate to see this, but Bacons Rebellion is deteriorating into a sniping, nasty soundboard for personal attacks. It used to be a place for fun and witty back and forth. Now we’re seeing all forms of arrogance, sexism and so on.

    1. johnrandolphofroanoke Avatar
      johnrandolphofroanoke

      Peter your description of traveling on the other side of the Iron Curtain reminds me of Clint Eastwood facing the KGB in the movie “Firefox”. One of my favorite Cold War movies.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        I don’t think I have heard of that movie, much less seen it. I need to check it out.

  15. Thank you, NN, for the perspective. Sometimes Alzheimer’s really is the best explanation for what people say, including here on this blog. They say one of the signs of Alzheimer’s is the patient’s increasing inability to understand hypocrisy, including his own.

    Uh oh, that sounds snarky, doesn’t it?

    1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
      Nancy_Naive

      Not at all.
      Because he believes there is a problem, I also believe there is a problem.
      Because he believes there is a solution, I also believe there is a solution.
      Because he believes he has the solution, I know it’s not even close.

  16. johnrandolphofroanoke Avatar
    johnrandolphofroanoke

    I think James Madison sums up things very nicely. It seems to me that neither one is taking place at the moment.

    “In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.”

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Madison does not get the recognition he deserves. People are too focused on Jefferson. I plan to immerse myself in Madison this spring and summer. Thanks for this insight of his.

      1. sherlockj Avatar
        sherlockj

        Your time will be well spent. As you clearly know, James Madison was a genius. He wrote the U.S. Constitution after studying previous political systems back to the Greeks. In seven languages. He processed all of that information through one of the great intellects of all time and produced the most successful governing system in all of history. We are blessed that he was alive in that time and took up the project.

  17. Nancy_Naive Avatar
    Nancy_Naive

    Well-written in government form.
    Paragraph 1 identification of the problem or opportunity.
    Paragraphs 2 through 19 boilerplate.
    Paragraph 20 unsubstantiated conclusion.

  18. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Firefox does hit sone good points.

  19. vaconsumeradvocate Avatar
    vaconsumeradvocate

    Wow! what a discussion!
    Taking a different tack than JB, my biggest worries are around the “opportunity of a lifetime” big energy is continues to take to remove long term protections that I as a citizen have depended upon. I happen to appreciate the laws that tried to keep our water and air clean, that were pushing toward significantly improved miles per gallon for vehicles, and that helped make sure those of us forced against our wills to live with dangerous pipeline infrastructure were safe, for example.

    Since this pandemic has come, we’ve seen some things stop – mostly things that I value. For example, the local government that really didn’t want to have to deal with citizens anyway, closed and pushes forward with critical decisions, limiting citizens to 500 word statements (who knows if they will even read them) or audio-taped maximum 3 minute statements (who knows if they will listen) and effectively, cutting citizens out of the process.

    There is an ongoing effort to remove environmental protections that has only intensified since COVID-19 took off. In addition to continuing to remove protections, agency after agency has announced relaxation of regulation and that there will be no fines for polluting for an unknown time due to the pandemic. Industry has a free reign to pollute with abandon! (Virginia has indicated that is not true, but does anyone think the federal government will back us or that Virginia has enough backbone to enforce environmental protection?) Even the pipeline safety agency has announced relaxed qualifications and training for pipeline workers and suspension of drug testing. Work on the Mountain Valley Pipeline near my home continues, with groups of workers from out of state clearly not following the distancing guidelines – or the stop work order and clearly not fixing ineffective environmental protection.

    Laws and regulations are being relaxed for the benefit of business, but processes to take away protections and rights of citizens are pushing full steam ahead at a time when citizens cannot participate or influence them. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission says that its work to change the regulatory process for pipelines will continue during this time. The record shows that citizens do not find that the current system works well for us at all and that our rights are habitually overlooked. However, the industry that abuses us thinks the process needs to be made faster and we need to be further abused.

    When citizens cannot protect our property and our business, which is what is occurring right now (has been, not caused by COVID-19), the American Dream ceases to exist. I would think that all citizens, but especially those that claim to follow and care about the Constitution would be up in arms about this. However, I find no support. They tend to believe that whatever business wants it should get and to ignore my concerns.

    JB is worried that progressives, liberals, Democrats will add requirements that take away rights, add surveillance, etc. I’m worried that these big companies are taking my rights to private property ownership, cutting my voice out of decisions, removing protections I depend upon, and doing whatever they want in my community and to my property. It’s been bad for some time, but as we enter the sixth year of this pipeline battle, I believe in my country less and less, and in the things I thought my country stood for. Today big business can take what it wants. None of us has any motivation to try to build something because a big business can declare what we have necessary to it and just take it; we have no recourse. Adding insult to injury, laws requiring that we have clean air and water, and safety were the first to be relaxed as COVID-19 spread. This just reinforces my belief that we’re being sacrificed and that our Constitution and system of laws are not intended to give everyone a chance to do better but only benefit a few.

    Jim, I see a very opposite picture from the one you fear. I’m experiencing these losses. They are not hypothetical concerns about what those who think differently than I might do; they are happening.

    Somehow the shrill political divisiveness and immediate separation of all into pro or con camps must end. Somehow we’ve got to find ways to work together to address the common good and stop swinging from one winning everything and the other losing everything to finding win/win situations. It doesn’t feel like this discussion is moving us in that direction.

  20. Jane Twitmyer Avatar
    Jane Twitmyer

    To say that conservatives singular lovers of freedom while progressives think government surveillance and control are ”good things” is upside down at best.
    My good friend in high school married one of those 60’s radicals on horseback on the beach in Nantucket. Couldn’t have called them ‘conservative’ by any means. Or how about those tree sitters in the path of the Mountain Valley pipeline? Or Jane Fonda
    getting arrested on the Capital grounds recently?

    Here is one example of rules from government that seem to this progressive should be required. Please tell me why they shouldn’t be\. Why they are sooo hard to enact into law?

    From a press release from Debbie Dingle and The Hill …
    WASHINGTON, DC – Today, the House of Representatives passed bipartisan legislation led by Congresswoman Debbie Dingell (D-MI) that comprehensively addresses PFAS contamination in Michigan and across the country. “Let’s be very clear, PFAS is an urgent public health and environmental threat.”

    According to the chairman of the Senate’s environment committee, “It has no prospects in the Senate,” Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) told Bloomberg Environment in January. “None.” Currently is has been referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

    The White House also objected to the bill, saying in a veto threat that it would impinge on the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to follow the rapidly emerging science on PFAS chemicals.

    Defense Secretary Mark Esper started the PFAS task force on his first day in office in July.
    The military has provided bottled water and filters to the affected areas and is prepared to ramp up blood testing for DOD firefighters that regularly apply firefighting foam.
    “No one — on or off base — is drinking water above EPA’s [health advisory] level
    However, those voluntary EPA standards are in the process of being replaced with a mandatory drinking water regulation.

    I think a better ideological evaluation would be that conservatives can’t deal with change, and in fact are afraid of any change, whatever it is. It is either that or just the corporate money.

    1. idiocracy Avatar
      idiocracy

      How does corporate money have anything to do with DoD-created hazmat messes on military bases?

      1. Jane Twitmyer Avatar
        Jane Twitmyer

        DOD has know for a long time that using that product is s problem … a corporation makes the product. Knowledge about it’s dangers has been around since the mid 70’s, but only started to phase out under duress from Government.

        The history of the Defense Department’s use of these foams and its knowledge of their dangers are detailed in an EWG investigation.

        “Studies have linked the two most notorious PFAS chemicals, known as PFOA and PFOS, to kidney and testicular cancer, thyroid disease, reproductive and immune system problems, and other serious health harms. Because they build up in the human body and do not break down in the environment, PFAS are often called “forever chemicals.”

        Since the 1960s, the Pentagon has used AFFF on bases and on naval ships to fight fires. By the mid-1970s at the latest, both the Navy and the 3M Company, which together developed AFFF, were aware of environmental and human health concerns with PFAS chemicals. The Pentagon started phasing out the use of firefighting foam containing PFOA and PFOS only in 2015, and continues to use foams with closely related PFAS chemicals that may be just as harmful.”

        1. idiocracy Avatar
          idiocracy

          Corporations make all the chemicals and products that DoD uses and disposes of.

          When DoD uses and disposes of those chemicals and products in a manner that causes pollution (and this is far from being the only one), that is on the DoD and nobody else….expect perhaps in the rare case where the corporation that supplied the chemical or product to DoD also supplied misleading/false data about it’s toxicity.

          For example, by 1983, it was widely known that battery acid is toxic, yet in 1983 they were still pouring it out onto the ground at Quantico.

          That is the fault of nobody but the DoD personnel who allowed or ordered that to be done.

          As many billions of dollars are (and have been) shoveled into the DoD, you’d think that maybe they could afford to properly dispose of chemicals, at least to a higher standard than what we might expect from “Billy Bob’s Truck Repair and Strip Joint”?

          Wishful thinking, apparently. There’s no penalties and nobody is held responsible when they don’t. Other than the taxpayer who is ultimately on the hook to pay the clean-up costs.

          1. Jane Twitmyer Avatar
            Jane Twitmyer

            I agree that DOD is responsible, and you would think that the DOD using toxic chemicals on their bases all over the country and the world would have more sense … That is wehy I added the corporate power issue.

            I also think that corporate monies forked over in the campaign process that allows toxic chemicals to be manufactured and sold in everywhere spite of their toxicity just might be a primary problem. The rules don’t get created.

          2. idiocracy Avatar
            idiocracy

            I think the problem with the DoD is that government is *terrible* at policing themselves.

            Even if chemical X is banned for sale, you know that they (the government) will just carve out an exception for themselves and it will be business as usual at DoD.

  21. Jane Twitmyer Avatar
    Jane Twitmyer

    Sorry …. tried to follow Acbar’s instructions to repost and delete so I could edit more BUT … no edit showed up …

  22. Atlas Rand Avatar
    Atlas Rand

    VCA has hit on a major point with local governments now being essentially free to avoid their constituents and do what they want because of the crisis. I’ve heard some idiotic BOS members suggest that tax increases to cover the budget shortfall may be necessary. I guess all the folks losing their jobs who can’t cover the existing taxes will pony up the extra money to cover more county programs. School boards said they shouldn’t have to cut budget because they’re saving money by not operating. Mom also hit on this earlier. Rather than freezing the budget, cutting all nonessentials, and moving to austerity measures, counties and other localities are still seeking to raise taxes and increase budgets. It’s insane.

  23. sherlockj Avatar
    sherlockj

    Several comments:
    1. Most Americans don’t find themselves fully endorsing either conservative or progressive thought.
    2. It is not breaking news that conservatives support capitalism and progressives increasingly don’t. It is not breaking news that conservatives support the entire constitution and progressives would make significant changes to it either through laws that try to skirt it or judges that ignore unfavored parts of it. It is not news that there are adherents on the fringes of both political philosophies that embarrass the rest. Denial is not just a river in Egypt. Both sides need to verbally isolate those people. But progressives and conservatives need to own their positions, not criticize those who point them out.
    3. This column assesses the shape of future political battles. It does not endorse them.
    4. A lot of my Republican friends find me left of them, especially when I endorse increased state regulation of the business of healthcare and breaking up the state-created regional healthcare monopolies. A lot of my Democratic friends and family find me to the right of them, especially when I voice facts and opinions like I presented in this column. That puts me about where I feel I should be.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      I am tired of these generalities about conservatives and progressives. Give me examples of ” progressives [who] would make significant changes to [the Constitution] either through laws that try to skirt it or judges that ignore unfavored parts of it.” For that matter, why is it un-American to want to amend the Constitution? If we had kept the Constitution as it was originally written, we could still have slavery and women would not be guaranteed the right to vote.
      Where is the evidence that progressives increasingly do not support capitalism? (Capitalism as defined as an economic and political system in which a country’s trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state.)
      It is easy to make sweeping generalizations. It is another to back them up with evidence.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Yep – that whole line of thinking is just plain ignorant , and willfully so.

        PLENTY of progressives LIKE capitalism and they like the free market too AND they like the Constitution also.

        You have to be sucking up FOX and Brietbart kool-aid to be so limited in your thinking about this… it boggles the mind.

        Conservatives to the “right” of Jim – do not get elected except in rural areas. If Conservatives want to win Virginia, they need more than smug ideology.

  24. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Captain Sherlock,
    Can you please say what your qualifications are as a medical expert?
    Also, what did you do in the Navy?
    Thank you.

  25. J. Abbate Avatar
    J. Abbate

    Now we may address “The Republican Way”, “The Alabama Way”, “The Mississippi Way”, or any of the conservative governor’s way of ignoring the science and following our current president right down the rabbit hole of arguing with science and fighting against the recommendations of healthcare professionals and real medical experts. If you call ignoring science and stubbornly clinging to keeping people interacting in this volatile pandemic, before calling for sheltering in place, and restricting social intercourse…following the Constitution, I would like you provide me real evidence of that. Without any evidence, that’s simply Constitutional malarky.

    You have praised two governors repeatedly in this blog: Gov. Cuomo of NY (D) and Gov. Hogan of MD (R). Gov. Hogan stands uniquely as a Republican willing to call Trump on his constant malarky and deceptions. The other Governors called out for taking charge appropriately in this emergency are Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine (R), Calif. Governor Newsom (D), Washington Gov. Jay Inslee (D), and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D). Gov. DeWine succeeded by pushing back on Trump’s direction to get the economy going by Easter by closing his schools early and noting, “When people are dying, when people don’t feel safe, the economy is not gonna come back.” Gov. Hogan has pushed back on Trump’s statements, noting, “all the ways “Washington” and “the federal government” haven’t sufficiently helped the nation’s governors. And on Tuesday, when asked by NPR whether Trump was “correct when he suggested recently that states have enough testing kits,” Hogan was blunt: “That’s just not true.”

    Governors currently graded poorly for their response include Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey (R), Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves (R), Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R), Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt (R), Hawaii Gov. David Ige (D), and West Virginia Gov. Jim Justice (R). These governors do not come across as defenders of the Constitution so much as ill-informed, poorly prepared, and stubbornly resisting appropriate established pandemic response (thank you, Mr. Sherlock for your protocol outline).

    Are Republican governors who do not follow Trump down the rabbit hole to be considered anti- capitalist? Are Democrats who take executive action to provide an effective response to the pandemic for their state by ignoring Trump all socialists? Of course not. That argument is ill founded, without proof, and an erroneous generalization that falls on its own fallacies. Northam deserves many appropriate criticism for his response in this deadly emergency, many which have been factual noted here in this blog. In this theme’s overreaching argument, your bias is a saw helping you saw away the very branch that you place yourself on as you try to cut away at Gov. Northam and other Democrats. I don’t see the Dems basically fighting against the medical science which points the way to mastering the curve on this pandemic and getting the economy back in a stable way, but this administration, via its fits and starts and slow overall response and coordination appears to have set the tone for any number of Republican governors to follow suit. Let’s look to one of this administration’s hand-picked key emergency pandemic coordinators, Jared Kushner, who noted how this situation may enlighten us. Jared said, ‘This is a time of crisis, and you’re seeing certain people are better managers than others.” Yes, Jared, we are certainly seeing that.

    https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/04/01/coronavirus-state-governors-best-worst-covid-19-159945

  26. sherlockj Avatar
    sherlockj

    I am for strong governors exercising their responsibilities as the chief executives for theirs states – a core constitutional principle. It matters not to me a whit whether they agree with the President or not. Separation of powers is worth that. It bothers me when they blame their own failures on the federal government whether justified or not or whether or not they have acted capably in carrying out their own responsibilities. I have concentrated on the nearly unimaginable incompetence of the Northam administration because it need to be fixed as best we and can now and to set predicates for legislative fixes later. Finally, to insure they don’t look to that dry hole for information.
    The Democrats in Virginia will make what’re fixes they wish for whatever problems they assess. It is unlikely they will vote for the legislative overhaul of state government I will recommend, but a few might. Those will be the brave ones, because the hospital lobby takes names and executes heretics,

  27. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    re: ” nearly unimaginable incompetence of the Northam administration”

    there is no “incompetence” at all. More and more, we know this is a partisan claim with little to nothing to back it up.

    As far as I can tell, the primary claim is that we’re not doing enough testing and the VDH is “dysfunctional” with little in the way of particulars other than down-in-the-weeds stuff.

    We are letting this partisan stuff divert us from the realities of what we face.

    The virus is not going to “go away”. Social distancing does “work” but ask yourself how long we have to do it. When can we stop doing it if the virus is still around and we have no vaccine?

    The answer is that it’s not going to go away. As soon as we stop social distancing, it’s going to return with a vengeance. Both the scientists on the National Coronavirus Team say this.

    So, how are we ever going to get back to work? Yeah, we can continue to blame Northam but this is really knucklehead stuff at this point. How can we deal with the virus and get back to work?

    Until we get a vaccine, the ONLY way to do this is NATIONAL-scale testing – everyone – and everytime we find an infected, we isolate them.

    We return to work when we all get tested on a continuous basis.

    This is exactly how South Korea and Germany did it.

    We do not have to be stupid and partisan about this. We need to put the politics aside and do what is necessary to go forward.

    The partisan blame game is dumb and actually a threat to all of us.

  28. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    What is enormously curious here is that there is mo mention of Donald Trump, his incompetence or his steady stream of lies

  29. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Yesterday, Stephen D. Haner suggested that I lived in a “Cocoon” when I was a U.S. correspondent in Moscow. Here’s an example of the “cocoon” life I led on Oct. 3 and 4, 1993. I was out on the streets next to the tanks.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=–HaZ3pVH4Q

Leave a Reply