The Poverty of Hate in Virginia

Source: Southern Poverty Law Center

This column has been republished with permission from VoxFairfax.

Whether or not one accepts or agrees with the designation of hate groups by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the potential for the existence and proliferation of such organizations should be of concern to all. That concern, in turn, relies upon credible information.

For 2021, SPLC identified 733 such groups across the nation, with 20 located or active in Virginia, down from 39 reported in 2019.  That fact alone is promising. Several of the 20 identified as Virginian researched by VoxFairfax were of questionable viability, such as the League of the South’s Virginia chapter, which was dissolved in 2010. While flyers from the Loyal White Knights of the KKK appeared sporadically in Virginia communities in 2020, it appears its activity in the Commonwealth is minimal. Others, such as Voice for Men (Roanoke), oppose misandry (dislike or disfavor of males), which, while hinting of male supremacy, cannot be firmly said to be affirmatively engaged in hate speech.

The difficulty, of course, is rooted in the definition of hate. SPLC’s scope of hate identification of organizations itself appears at times to be extreme. One designation is Beasst Productions (Roanoke), which touts itself as a source of “alternate” music, much of which promotes Nazism and anti-communist themes. Beasst maintains a website from which to purchase the wares categorized by SPLC as hate music.  A review of the titles of available wares is more disappointing than attractive.

Several organizations appear to have made it onto SPLC’s top 20 in Virginia based upon no more than a vague attachment to some national organization. Three organizations reflect no presence in the Commonwealth but are included as “state” locations. Another cited is Wolves of Vinland (Lynchburg), described on the Internet as a neo-pagan, Norse-worshipping club. SPLC characterizes it as “Neo-Volkisch” which often dabbles in neo-Nazi theories.

Publicly available Internet information sometimes leads to questionable assertions. The Public Advocate of the United States (Merrifield) claims on its website that

Since its founding in 1981, Public Advocate has grown into a dedicated group of young conservatives in Washington, D.C., with a network of volunteers and supporters nationwide.

Assuming this claim to be accurate, the potential for Virginians to be made aware of the organization falls mainly to SPLC, notwithstanding the “nationwide” attribute. It is characterized by SPLC as anti-LGBTQ which fails any fair test of devotion to hate. However, a number of listed organizations offer material and activities that contribute to the acknowledged strife in the nation’s civil discourse. The American Immigration Control group located in Monterey since 1983 received $1.3 million in contributions in 2019. Its mission, according to its website, is to stem the “destructive flooding” of immigration. That’s all immigration, not merely that crossing the southern border. While this group is clearly opposed to immigration, characterizing it as a hate entity may be overstating the proposition.

The American Renaissance/New Foundation Century (Oakton) has for many years been a prominent actor in white supremacy, now characterizing itself as devoted to white identarianism. This group, along with American Immigration Control, received initial funding support from the (now defunct) NYC Pioneer Fund, which supported and promoted eugenics commencing in the late 1930s. The fund continues in existence to the present time but with little public footprint.  White supremacy connotes a more cogent sense of hateful discourse while White identarianism reflects fringe credo.  Either characterization may, of course, be encapsulated in hate or hateful speech.

Many of the listees are groups focused on culture-war issues, e.g. LGBTQ and same-sex marriage. Located in Vienna and founded in 2003, the Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation promotes the preservation of western culture and Christianity, largely through the publication and distribution of books devoted to those topics. According to available public information, the organization receives less than $50,000 per year and for that reason is not rated by charity monitors.

On balance, the hate group listings by SPLC are terrific for its own fundraising but of little practical use for the public without increased background and descriptive material. The object remains a valuable information source and service but requires a more intense and useful definitional approach, such as a rating system based upon a set of factors. It would be helpful to know the income of such organizations; membership size, if applicable; website and geographic address; and statement of purpose. Since many of the listed organizations are not-for-profits, detailed financial and staffing information is available through charity monitoring agencies.

SPLC characterized three of the Virginia-located organizations as “general hate” and one a purveyor of hate music. Two others received the appellation of “anti-LGBTQ” entities. Similarly, “neo-Confederate” and “male supremacy” may translate as hate for some but may not be as threatening as White supremacists.  Following the Charlottesville march, it was somewhat surprising that only one Virginia organization – Nation of Islam – was characterized as anti-Semitic.

SPLC needs to up its game in this arena to continue to sustain credibility and respect. The current presentation is tired and subject to losing its cachet as a useful citation. Hate maps may make impressive sound bites for media but suffer from poverty upon inspection.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

23 responses to “The Poverty of Hate in Virginia”

  1. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Well if promoting eugenics in the early 20th Century gets you on the radar, where pray tell is Planned Parenthood on that map?

    1. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      Deflection may metastasize into more serious ideological dysfunction. The notation in the article on eugenics was made to connect some dots between origin and the present.

      1. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        The inane ramblings of a poster who gets “triggered” every time someone dares to question those who he’s sworn his fealty.

        1. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
          YellowstoneBound1948

          McCarthy has nothing to say, which explains his gibberish. I’ve known a lot of people like McCarthy. Almost to a man, they have suffered some great disappointment in life. Mr. McCarthy, if you are reading, I am sorry that I am now your enemy, but it is pretty obvious you are a prick.

      2. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
        YellowstoneBound1948

        This is hilarious. Do you always talk/write like this?

    1. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
      YellowstoneBound1948

      I hope everyone will take the time to read it.

      Almost fifty years ago, I invited Morris Dees to speak at my law school. I chaired the student “Speaker’s Forum,” so it was my call. Dees stuck me as earnest and sincere, and his program was thoughtful and enlightening.

      Years later, the venerated Sons of Confederate Veterans (SCV) stood squarely in the line of the SPLC’s fire. The Center had written the SCV and declared that it was poised to add the SCV to its “hate group” list. The SCV, with over 35,000 members and the ability to defend itself, issued a reply that can be boiled down to two words: “Do it.”

      The SPLC never did “do it.” They had finally picked on somebody their own size. Freakin’ cowards.

      No, the SPLC has devoted itself to prosecuting weak, fringe organizations which, if they even exist, spend most of their time drinking beer and eating fried chicken.

      The SPLC is a bully . . . a tyrant . . . and if I had power over the IRS, I would dispatch a hundred federal agents to Montgomery today, and their tax-exemption would be gone by tomorrow. Not one single government — Republican or Democrat — has the guts to shut down these arrogant elites.

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        Yes, even woke organizations like Heritage Foundation, Federalist Society, YAF, among a few ignore the guard rails of reasonability when they age.

        1. Matt Adams Avatar
          Matt Adams

          Have you ever made a comment that has not invoked whataboutism?

          “Whataboutism or whataboutery is a variant of the tu quoque logical fallacy, which attempts to discredit an opponent’s position by charging hypocrisy without directly refuting or disproving the argument.”

          1. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            Y’all cannot hide your own fallacious comments with a Latin rubric you do not understand. The poster called out the SPLC about which my article revealed its shortcomings. I offered counter comparisons. Yes, I have made many comments, unlike the moral equivalencies in which you profusely engage, with reasons for the comments. In this instance, no hypocrisy, except what you infer, was alleged. If anything, your “whatsboutism” is precisely that which you attempt to criticize. Your silly snark is no evidence of intelligence or insight.

            Try writing a cogent article, like mine, for BR. Provide all with an opportunity to marvel at your narrative skill. I reserve a right never to respond to you again.

          2. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            1) I’ve not invoked a fallacy, you have.

            2) This article was posted by JAB, with a link to a VoxFairfax which was unsigned. So unless you’re JAB masquerading as someone else or you summitted it to Vox, you didn’t write the article.

            3) I’d suggest you learn what a moral equivalence is before you invoke it.

            4) I again suggest you draft your comments using synonyms and realize the frequency at which you misuse words in an attempt to sound superior or intelligent, I’m not sure which.

            5) The article was about SPLC, which much like the ACLU have strayed from this mission statement and are nothing more than political biased machines for fund raising. Your invocation about YAF and the like is clearly a take on whataboutism. I’m sorry that you fail to understand that and that you continually invoke that fallacy.

            6) Clearly you’re unware of what “snark” is.

            7) You’ve written article yes, were they cogent. No they were not, they are nothing m0re than political laced tirades directed at those whom you don’t agree with. I’ve not claimed superior intelligence or mastery at prose, so that’s a strawman wrapped in an ad hom.

            8) I couldn’t care less if you respond, it will not stop me from commenting on your inane BS.

        2. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
          YellowstoneBound1948

          Translation please.

  2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Enlightening article on a topic on which I have encountered only in passing and to which I gave probably too much credence.

    1. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
      YellowstoneBound1948

      I see that Mr. McCarthy has given you his approval. If only he would adopt your writing style. I cannot understand a thing he writes.

  3. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    I would favor a look at another state, say Alabama or Tennessee, to see how our stats look in comparison. Further, the Office of Department of Justice has a website for statistics. Compare that as well. Anyone can spin data, but spinning data isn’t so bad if it causes one to think critically…

    1. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      Per the SPLC map: AL = 13; TN = 28; KY = 9; WV = 6; MD = 11; NC = 28. Raw number comparisons reveal little. That’s why the Virginia cohort was reviewed in some detail.

        1. James McCarthy Avatar
          James McCarthy

          Thanx but the topic is SPLC and its credibility. US has its own criteria. SPLC’s is unknown.

  4. It takes one to know one, I guess….

  5. David Wojick Avatar
    David Wojick

    I never thought hate speech could be so entertaining. Well done.

    If you say you hate hate speech is that hate speech? Or are we allowed to hate some things? Is there a list?

  6. how_it_works Avatar
    how_it_works

    Back when I was in high school decades ago, the existence of a “KKK hotline” in Manassas (yes, Manassas…oh what a shocker!) was well known among the youngsters.

    Apparently some redneck (probably in Manassas Park in one of those “charming” Cape Cods(ok, they were probably charming at one time)) found himself with enough nickels to rub together to buy an answering machine and a phone line, and would record drunken rantings onto this thing. In a Southern accent, naturally.

    The guy finally shut the thing down when it likely dawned on him that the only people calling his “KKK hotline” were kids who were laughing at him. Either that or his 12-step recovery program worked.

  7. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    If SPLC is off the mark and worse (and I sometimes think that also), then why not a Conservative group do the job right and show everyone that a more legitimate and credible list can exist? If that was done, SPLC might
    feel it and do something about it or just dry up and blow away.

    What conservatives mostly specialize in is bad finger pointing with little intention of showing a better way. too bad.

  8. “SPLC needs to up its game in this arena to continue to sustain credibility and respect.”

    SPLC is the hate group.

Leave a Reply