The Petersburg – VDOE MOU, a New Petersburg Superintendent and the Limits of State Oversight of Failing Schools

School Board chairman Ken Pritchett and Dr. Tamara Sterling – Credit: Progress-Index

by James C. Sherlock

Petersburg City Public Schools (PCPS) has hired Dr. Tamara Sterling as its new superintendent.

She signed her contract in a September 28 ceremony and will start Dec. 1. Progress-Index reporting brings us the story.

The School Board voted 6-0 to hire her with Virginia Department of Education support because Dr. Sterling:

turn(ed) Franklin from being under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Virginia Department of Education due to its failing schools, to having its schools exit the MOU within a year’s time.

VDOE agreed to her selection because she met the conditions of that MOU, and other than that, VDOE has no control.

Unfortunately, the accreditation of Franklin schools now appears in jeopardy based on recently announced 2021-22 SOL results and an utter collapse in school attendance in the same year. That information did not appear in the Progress-Index story.

I also suspect, because of the late release of those data, that they may not have appeared in the interview packages provided to the school board members.

We all hope that Dr. Sterling will lead PCPS to finally give the children of Petersburg a chance to learn.

In 2004, the Virginia Board of Education (Board) established criteria for identification of low-performing school divisions to undergo a division-level academic review. Petersburg was among the first to fail that review. It has never passed one.

Accreditation and the Petersburg MOU. VDOE offers a one-page version of the Commonwealth’s Accreditation Ratings System.

Those are the standards that Petersburg’s six public schools have been trying to meet for 18 years. The failures to meet them have resulted in:

  • repeated division-level reviews by VDOE; and
  • resulting school board-VDOE MOUs that have offered plans for improvement with state oversight and funding toward those improvements.

None have achieved the aims.

The current MOU, signed April 18, 2016, contains the provision:

In the event a vacancy occurs in the position of the Division Superintendent, the School Board will work collaboratively with the State Superintendent of Public Instruction and the State Board President in selecting … a new Superintendent.

The credentials of applicants should include experience in leading successful school and division turnaround efforts.

By the agreement, the Superintendent and Board President were to be notified at least five business days in advance before making an offer to the preferred candidate. The coordination resulted in the unanimous vote by the school board to hire Dr. Sterling.  

VDOE approval tripped the Petersburg Executive Leadership Recruitment Incentives provision in the MOU. The state agreed to provide funds to help pay her and her new hires.  

In this case, $350,000 is being sent.

VDOE Oversight. VDOE has what is now called an Office of School Quality (OSQ, formerly the Office of School Improvement — OSI).

The director of that office and his/her staff have seven very specific and demanding responsibilities under the MOU. It has had those responsibilities since 2004.

OSQ is the answer to the question: “What has the state been doing to improve Virginia’s worst schools and divisions?”

While the record shows that OSQ has worked hard, they can assess, assist and, with their ratings, embarrass poor-performing school divisions, but VDOE cannot direct them. There have been some successes, as in Franklin, but not nearly enough.

Unfortunately, Franklin itself took a huge step backward in the 2021-22 school year in metrics available too late for the March reviews.

It slipped relative to state levels in SOLs and utterly collapsed in attendance, with 48.1% chronic absenteeism. Those issues were on the record, but late, when Dr. Sterling was hired from Franklin by Petersburg. She met the MOU criteria, so I don’t think VDOE had a choice but to concur.

During the 2021-2022 school year, five divisions were under the guidance of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU):

  • Danville;
  • Greensville County;
  • Petersburg;
  • Prince Edward County; and
  • Richmond City.

Dr. Aurelia Ortiz, Director of School Quality, in March of 2022 updated the Board on the progress of all five. That was before the 2021-22 Spring SOL results, which were bad, and the chronic absenteeism rates, which were worse. As a note, during COVID, accreditation was suspended and no school was permitted to be labeled unaccredited.

Those March 2022 MOU reviews were very thorough.

I offer below only bare bones information from the reviews. I have added editor updates with data not available at that time for 2021-22 chronic absenteeism and SOL results from the School Quality Profiles:

  • Danville – 11 schools; 2 accredited; 9 accredited with conditions. DCPS in 2018-2022 received $810,465 in federal School Improvement Grant (SIG) funds. (Editor’s update: in 2021-22 chronic absenteeism jumped from 22.5% to 28.7% and SOL assessments in math fell even further behind state levels);
  • Greensville County – 8 schools; none accredited; 8 accredited with conditions. GCPS received a total of $553,343 in 2018-2022 SIG funds.  (Editor’s update: in 2021-22 chronic absenteeism soared to from 18.1% to 28.3% and SOL assessments in reading and math did not improve relative to state levels).
  • Petersburg – 6 schools; 1 accredited; five accredited with conditions. PCPS received a total of $5,009,262 in 2018-2022 SIG funds. (Editor’s update: in 2021-22 chronic absenteeism jumped from 32.7% to 38.8% and the SOL assessments in reading and math, unsurprisingly, were the worst in the state, falling even further behind state averages).
  • Prince Edward County – 3 schools; 0 accredited; 3 accredited with conditions. PECPS received a total of $464,314 in 2018-2022 SIG funds. (Editor’s update: in 2021-22 chronic absenteeism declined slightly to a still unacceptable 34.8% and SOL assessments in reading and math, while still below state averages, improved significantly in that comparison. Think what those teachers could do if the division got truancy under control.)
  • Richmond City – RPS was noted to have not updated its Corrective Action Plan since September 21, 2018 – 43 schools; 20 accredited; 23 accredited with conditions. RPS received a total of $3,916,670 in 2018-22 SIG funds. (Editor’s update: in 2021-22 chronic absenteeism soared from 15.5% reported in 2020-21 to 27.7% in 2021-22.  SOL assessments in reading and math declined even further from state levels.

Petersburg schools had the worst SOL results in the state in reading, writing and math this past spring. That proved a boon to RPS, which just edged out Petersburg and otherwise would have been dead last in those assessments.

I expect VDOE and its OSQ have already trained their attention on RPS, whose headquarters is but a seven-minute walk.

But it will require a constitutional amendment for Virginia to take over failing school divisions. Petersburg and Richmond School Boards, to name just two, have continued to run their schools regardless of decades of well-documented failures.

The fact that they can continue to do so forever in Virginia without improvement is a testament to the need for that constitutional amendment to save future generations of children.

And a change to the charter school law.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

33 responses to “The Petersburg – VDOE MOU, a New Petersburg Superintendent and the Limits of State Oversight of Failing Schools”

  1. In light of recent discussion of the situation in Fredericksburg, why isn’t that school system under an MOU? Briefly, what brings a school system to the attention of OSQ?

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      Yep. Agree.

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      See https://doe.virginia.gov/boe/accreditation/2017-school-accred.shtml

      Under the new system, schools earn one of the following three accreditation ratings:

      – Accredited – Schools with all school-quality indicators at either Level One or Level Two

      – Accredited with Conditions – Schools with one or more school-quality indicators at Level Three

      – Accreditation Denied – Schools that fail to adopt or fully implement required corrective actions to address Level Three school-quality indicators. A school rated as Accreditation Denied may regain state accreditation by demonstrating to the Board of Education that it is fully implementing all required corrective action plans

      Fredericksburg attendance this past year would earn them a chronic absenteeism quality indicator at level 3.
      As for the SOL scores, same result without a waiver.

      Unfortunately, there was this on Aug 4, 2020:

      “State Superintendent Waives Accreditation for the 2021-2022 School Year

      “RICHMOND — Superintendent of Public Instruction James Lane today exercised emergency authority granted to him by the 2020 General Assembly to waive annual school accreditation for the 2021-2022 academic year. Schools will be assigned a rating of “Accreditation Waived,” the same rating assigned schools for 2020-2021 under a waiver issued in April.”

      Free pass.

      1. Sorry to hear it. I assume that’s covid-related and not a continuing waiver of accreditation standards for future years?

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          Youngkin has the opportunity to fix this. I’d support him in doing so if it’s more than partisan points.

          I’d support him increasing standards to common core or equivalent,

          I’d support him implementing common core in proposed labs and charters.

          There is no question that most public schools do not do well at teaching the ED demographic. A few do and a few do terrible.

          But I’d support ANY Charter that specializes in that demographic AND fully reports performance.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar

    As bad as it is and it IS bad, Virginia STILL ranks in the top 10 in overall NAEP rankings.

    What that means is that 40 other states are even WORSE.

    The premise behind public schools and virtually every other thing that is govt funded by taxpayer dollars is transparency of their performance.

    That’s what brings us the knowledge that SOME of the public schools in Va, nowhere near most or all…are failures.

    While we have these failure reports, what we don’t have is
    what VDOE is actually going to do to try to reverse it.

    And we know even less about how Charter Schools would do – ESPECIALLY with the ED demographic that is at the core of most if not all of the “failing” schools, -It’s sorta like a magic thing you just have to trust because “everyone knows Charters are better”. Very little data mind you for most of them just a claim and a belief.

    Sherlock, no doubt, will bring up Success Academies which indeed seems to be successful. But how about other Charters in other states? How are they doing? Do they take the problematic ED demographic and turn these kids around?

    Bring this back to Virginia. How would that actually work in Virginia?

    We can hammer all day long on the public schools that are failing but at the end of the day, I need more than hand-waving from those who would just abandon public schools and open Charters with virtually no requirements for taking ED kids much less equal transparency on their performance in using tax dollars,

    As I continue to say – I have zero problems with Charter schools that take the problematical ED demographic AND have equal data transparency on their performance.

    And YES, I would like to see Youngkin address the SOL standards also for all public schools. Let’s get serious and go back to Common Core or equivalent rigor that makes us more competitive to European and Asian PUBLIC SCHOOLS.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        Are you calling Virginia’s Magnet Schools the equivalent of the Charters like Success that you like?

        And no, I do not think most of those schools specialize in ED kids at all – like Success is supposed to.

        Most of these schools are more like Academies for higher performing kids not kids in public schools with terrible SOL scores.

        Need to keep it honest here.

        The truth.

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          No, I am not calling charters magnet schools. Success Academies are not organized like magnet schools. They all have the same curricula.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            Asking about Virginia Magnet schools – do you consider them Charters?

          2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            No, they are not charters. They are organized by school divisions to attract parents whose kids have specific educational goals centered around math, science, International Baccalaureate and other specialties.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar

            So they’re NOT the Charter models you advocate for?

          4. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            No.

          5. LarrytheG Avatar

            so not this:

            ” Who ever told you that charter school kids don’t take SOLs? Or don’t take ED kids? They are public schools.

            https://schoolquality.virgi

            https://schoolquality.virgi…”

        2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          Success Academies, as you know, are designed for and populated by poor minority kids.

      2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Hey! Patrick Henry enrollment from 2019 to 2021 is off nearly 8% and chronic absenteeism has doubled. Sounds like the parents and students are rejecting it!! Surely not for a charter school…!!

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          Nothing says a charter school has to be a good school, especially in Virginia that keeps the successful charter management organizations out by the restrictions in our law.

          Patrick Henry is a bad school.

          https://schoolquality.virginia.gov/schools/patrick-henry-school-of-science-and-arts#fndtn-desktopTabs-assessment

          It’s accreditation won’t change because the last administration gave all Virginia schools and accreditation waiver for 2020-21 and 2021-22

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            re: ” Nothing says a charter school has to be a good school”

            Then why advocate for them if they are not necessarily good or better?

          2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            I advocate for charter schools managed by proven charter management organizations. We don’t have any.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar

            Can you cite some besides Success that produce good results with ED kids?

          4. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            The Broad Prize is awarded annually to the public charter school management organization that demonstrates the most outstanding overall student performance and improvement among the country’s largest urban charter management organizations in recent years while reducing achievement gaps among poor and minority students.

            Regular nominees and winners include:

            – Achievement First
            – DSST Public Schools
            – Harmony Public Schools
            – IDEA Public Schools
            – KIPP
            – Noble Network
            – Success Academy Charter Schools
            – Uncommon Schools
            – Yes Prep Public Schools

            Success Academy is the most accomplished of any. KIPP is the largest.

            For CMO demographics, see https://data.publiccharters.org/digest/tables-and-figures/cmos-demographics-across-time/

            For CMO enrollment by state by year see https://data.publiccharters.org/digest/tables-and-figures/charter-enrollment-state-year/

            For STUDENT RACE/ ETHNICITY DEMOGRAPHICS BY STATE AND TYPE OF SCHOOL, 2019-20 see https://data.publiccharters.org/digest/tables-and-figures/student-race-ethnicity-demographics-by-state-and-school-type-2019-20/

          5. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            The Broad Prize is awarded annually to the public charter school management organization that demonstrates the most outstanding overall student performance and improvement among the country’s largest urban charter management organizations in recent years while reducing achievement gaps among poor and minority students.

            Regular nominees and winners include:

            – Achievement First
            – DSST Public Schools
            – Harmony Public Schools
            – IDEA Public Schools
            – KIPP
            – Noble Network
            – Success Academy Charter Schools
            – Uncommon Schools
            – Yes Prep Public Schools

            Success Academy is the most accomplished of any. KIPP is the largest.

            For CMO demographics, see https://data.publiccharters.org/digest/tables-and-figures/cmos-demographics-across-time/

            For CMO enrollment by state by year see https://data.publiccharters.org/digest/tables-and-figures/charter-enrollment-state-year/

            For STUDENT RACE/ ETHNICITY DEMOGRAPHICS BY STATE AND TYPE OF SCHOOL, 2019-20 see https://data.publiccharters.org/digest/tables-and-figures/student-race-ethnicity-demographics-by-state-and-school-type-2019-20/

          6. LarrytheG Avatar

            how about academic performance? and per demographic ?

            how do we KNOW that these schools are actually performing besides being “nominated”?

    1. I’m personally all for charter schools, and school vouchers, too. What better way is there to allow parents — the ones with the most at stake and the closest view of the classroom — to vote with their feet if, as happens all too often, the happy talk from the bureaucrats leads to . . . just more happy talk. The argument that public schools will be deprived of their better students if they have competition has always struck me as totally self-serving.

      But I agree that SOLs and other assessment criteria should be applied equally and transparently to all the educational options available to parents, including private and church schools. And as far as I know they are, in Virginia. Virginia’s problem, IMHO, is its stingy licensing of charters.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        I’m all for them also but with the same data required of public schools.

      2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        Charters I can support, but not vouchers. Vouchers would be subsidies for rich folks who would send their kids to private schools in any event and probably would not be enough that poor and lower-middle class families could make up the difference between the voucher and the private school price tag.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          cannot support vouchers either. Any school that is funded with taxpayer money needs to also be REQUIRED to accept any/all student demographics at least equal to their demographic percentage that public schools accept AND report fully the academic performance so that they essentially prove they do a better job than public schools do -…

          which is THE claimed premise behind advocacy for Charters…. those “poor” kids whose needs are “failed” by public schools.

      1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        As I told Eric, nothing says a charter school has to be a good school, especially in Virginia that keeps the successful charter management organizations out by the restrictions in our law.

        Patrick Henry is a bad school.

        https://disq.us/url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fschoolquality.virginia.gov%2Fschools%2Fpatrick-henry-school-of-science-and-arts%23fndtn-desktopTabs-assessment%3A9oLlOCuPfIcwXalZpzBdR9EAFYU&cuid=6632217

      2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        As I told Eric, nothing says a charter school has to be a good school, especially in Virginia that keeps the successful charter management organizations out by the restrictions in our law.

        Patrick Henry is a bad school.

        https://schoolquality.virginia.gov/schools/patrick-henry-school-of-science-and-arts#fndtn-desktopTabs-assessments

        It’s accreditation won’t change because the last administration gave all Virginia schools and accreditation waiver for 2020-21 and 2021-22

  3. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    Good luck to Dr. Sterling. The first reform she should consider is strengthening attendance standards. One Petersburg’s biggest problems is a lightweight approach to attendance.

Leave a Reply