By Peter Galuszka

More media accounts are showing up now that 84,000 acres of lands south and east of Fredericksburg have been leased for possible hydraulic fracturing drilling for natural gas.

This Sunday’s Richmond Times-Dispatch published a map showing the leased area covering big swaths of land from the Fort A.P. Hill military area east across the Rappahanock River on  into the historic Northern Neck. These are some of the loveliest parts of the Old Dominion, featuring  sloping valleys, rich bottom lands and meandering creeks and rivers that are filled with wildlife, not to mention farms and homes.

The newspaper quoted Mike Ward, executive director of the Virginia Petroleum Council proclaiming fracking as being safe and that the construction activity to place wells only takes a few months. “It’s like a construction site,” Ward said. “As it’s being done, there is going to be truck traffic. There’s going to be noise. There’s going to be some dust in the air. There’s going to be mud around the area. But that’s short-lived.”

Really? To be a better idea, I started surfing YouTube to see what the local impact of constructing fracking wells is really like. I happened upon several films from rural Harrison County, W.Va., an area where I lived as a child from 1962 to 1969.

The videos show an area in western Harrison County near the college town of Salem in landscape surrounded by rolling hills and dairy farms. There has been coal mining in the area and natural gas has been around for decades, but fracking wells are something new.

The videos depict an ongoing nightmare for neighbors who have found their quiet, bucolic existence interrupted 24/7 by the roaring of diesel generators, huge floodlights, and many, many trucks. One woman says that the well site across her road starts up around 4 a.m. and she can’t get back to sleep so she’s constantly tired when she goes to work.

Water and construction trucks, many 18-wheelers, are a big problem. They sideswipe cars on rural, two-lane roads or block traffic for a half an hour after they get stuck trying to turn around. The heavy trucks crumble pavement on country roads. Some local ones have had to be repaved four times since drill site preparation began a couple of years ago when the fracking craze began.

It seems likely that areas near Fredericksburg and on the Northern Neck and Middle Peninsula will taste some of the same problems if fracking begins. The Taylorsville Basin in the area may hold 1 trillion cubic feet of gas.

Further questions abound about the company that’s putting together leases for the area. It is an obscure company called Shore Exploration & Production Co. with offices in Dallas and Bowling Green. The plan, company officials have said, is to put buy up gas leases and then flip them to a drilling company.

The company insists it won’t use a “watery” method of fracking but can’t seem to explain its supposed substitute which is to use some form of nitrogen. In West Virginia, wells can need up to five million gallons of water that must be trucked in. Does this mean that trucks carrying nitrogen will come in instead?

Answers seem to be as fleeting as the Shore company which has two full-time employees and has no annual report or website. It has never drilled a well itself, just exploratory ones. One official told a newspaper that having an annual report and website “would provide information to competitors.”

That statement alone should give tremendous pause. What happens if you live in the country of the Northern Neck and a gas well emerges next door? What happens if your life is disrupted by 24-hour diesel generators, lights and dozens of heavy trucks? What happens if the “flow-back” ponds that contain waste, including radioactive material and methane from the drilling area below, breach?

Eastern Virginia is not used to such challenges. As a former resident of West Virginia where such challenges are common, I know well what this kind of set-up can mean, especially in Virginia that has some gas wells in its southwestern tip but has little experience with fracking.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

7 responses to “The Perils of Gas Fracking”

  1. Virginia needs to put reasonable measures in place to deal with the negative impact of fracking. Drillers (or the truckers they employ) should compensate for the extra damage they cause on state roads. Homeowners should be protected against the significant nuisance of noise and vibrations from construction activity. Water quality should be monitored to ensure that fracking isn’t harming water supplies.

    But fracking should move forward. It will create jobs and economic opportunities for people in a rural part of the state with little else going for it.

    1. virginiagal2 Avatar
      virginiagal2

      Just a quick comment – I do not think that this part of the state “has little else going for it.” My husband and I looked at buying land in this area, specifically because it was beautiful and quiet. We didn’t, but not because there was anything wrong with it that needed to be improved.

      I’m not sure when farming and other rural pursuits became something to be dismissive about. Being beautiful and rural are things going for the area, not faults that need to be corrected.

  2. Les Schreiber Avatar
    Les Schreiber

    This topic has become so much about politics.I am still looking for some unbiased scientific research on the topic.

  3. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Did a series of searches on the Legislative Information System for the Virginia General Assembly. Used “fracking”, “hydraulic fracturing” etc.

    Only one bill came back in the searches – HB915. That bill would have mandated that hydraulic fracturing be allowed on any state owned land where an oil and gas exploration permit was issued.

    In other words, it was “pro fracking”.

    It died in committee.

    No other mention of fracking of hydraulic fracturing in the regular 2014 session.

    However, the Imperial Clown Show in Richmond found the time needed to commend 244 different people, places and things during the session.

    If fracking is a big deal (and I suspect it is) – where is our legislature on the matter?

    A broader bill would have prevented exploration for oil and gas in the Eastern Virginia Groundwater Management area. It passed in the Senate by 28 -12 but was tabled in the Committee for Commerce and Labor.

    I believe that committee votes are not made public. Therefore, whoever decided to kill the bill in committee remains unknown to the voters.

    http://www.richmondsunlight.com/bill/2014/sb48/

  4. Breckinridge Avatar
    Breckinridge

    I wouldn’t be eager to live next to any form of drilling, short term or otherwise, but these permits are hardly by right. There are
    EPA rules and state and local rules. Gas drilling is already going on in other places in Virginia and so far nobody has pointed to problems. I suspect a call to or some search time on the DMME website would be productive.

    Senator Stuart’s bill, which was seen as a total prohibition, did pass the Senate and I’m sure they vote to table it was recorded by a few dozen lobbyists on either side of the issue, if not by the clerk. In fact there is probably a paper vote sheet you could look up. But the failure of that bill does not mean no regulations exist. Hardly.

    Frankly I’m curious about the use of nitrogen since it is highly abundant (78 percent of the atmosphere) and it’s the use of water in this process that worries me the most. The water table in that part of Virginia is not unlimited and that was one of Senator Stuart’s concerns, as I recall.

  5. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Les,
    What science are you talking about? The point of the post is that fracking wells are taking them to spots unused to them and there are plenty of dramatic local effects. Did you watch the video? There’s really not much science about it.
    As for “unbiased” science, what are you referring to? Whether fracking hurts groundwater? Release methane in the air? Create flowback waste ponds? What?
    Fracking has been around for years but it has been primarily used in remote areas of the U.S. Southwest that are dry and don’t affect local populations much. The current waves has taken it to the wetter, more populous East although West Virginia and Pennsylvania and Ohio have seen gas wells for years. The oil industry began in Pa. and in Baku.
    But if you see a study you consider unbiased are you going to say, go ahead and frack and to hell with the neighbors? Virginia simply isn’t ready for this as DJR’s note says.

  6. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Kinda stunned (maybe not) with Bacon’s remark that rural areas like the Northern Neck and Middle Peninsula “have little else going for them.” This typically thoughtless comment makes on wonder how well Connecticut-born and DC-bred Mr. Bacon who is a self-described “Virginian through and through” really knows the state.
    The Taylorsville Basin runs through valuable pine lands and rich fields of soybeans and corn and truck crops. It is a major component of the state’s seafood industry. It is where lot of people rich and poor find bucolic solace by residing there. It’s unemployment rates are slightly higher than or comparable to those in beloved Richmond. They are NOT on the levels of the Eastern Shore or Southside of the coalfields. Maybe that was where Mr. Bacon, writing as usual from his windowless, basement office imagines them. Jim, all rural areas are NOT the same!
    There is something contrarian and scary about Jim’s analysis. he pretends to be a conservative this or a conservative that but his judgments might as well come out of Moscow’s Gosplan — “Let”s frack Eastern Siberia it has little else going for it.”

Leave a Reply