by James A. Bacon

It caused a brouhaha last year when U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland assigned the FBI to look into threats of violence against local school officials by parents protesting woke school policies. The announcement struck many as paranoid and detached from reality, but it apparently reflected a widespread concern by local officials that the peasants with torches and pitchforks demonstrating at school board meetings genuinely represented a threat to their personal safety.

A case in point: Fairfax County Public School system has published a request for proposal to pay up to $200,000 for “social media management services” to “monitor social media threats, harassment, hate speech and bullying.”

According to Parents Defending Education, which has published a copy of the proposal, the RFP encompasses “active listening,” “deep and dark web sources not visible through traditional search engines” and “Open Source Intelligence.” It further seeks to “classify aliases, usernames, emails, websites, etc.” and “visually identify relationships and connections between persons.”

School officials spending tax dollars to gather intelligence about their political enemies? This is beyond extraordinary. It is increasingly apparent that (a) the “progressive” wing of Virginia’s political class is increasingly afraid of the people it rules, and (b) is increasingly willing to wield the power of the state to repress them.

In moving, in effect, to criminalize their ideological foes, Fairfax school officials who prattle about racial “oppressors” and “victims” show themselves to be the oppressors.

There is likely a slender justification for monitoring the Web. It has become all too common for yahoos (of all political stripes) to issue threats of physical harm from the anonymous safety of the Internet. I have no doubt that Fairfax school officials have received “threats” of some kind. Whether they are credible is another issue. One wonders what role the Fairfax County police might play in investigating them.

I suspect, however, that the Fairfax police would consider it outside of their purview to monitor online “hate speech,” “bullying,” and “harassment,” much less to compile dossiers on the political opposition. I certainly hope that to be the case. If law-enforcement authorities did actively collaborate with Fairfax school officials in this matter, Virginia would be well on its way to becoming a police state.

Update: And then there’s this… Parents Defending Education has discovered that Fairfax schools paid a PR firm, Yes& Agency, $99,000 in 2020 for “strategic communications” to gain control over the narrative about admissions policy to the Thomas Jefferson School for Science and Technology. Once more case of elected officials using taxpayer money to vanquish their political foes.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

31 responses to “The Peasants Must Be Controlled”

  1. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “Legitimate Political Discourse”

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      🙂 But I was looking for Observer Effect.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        There is no such thing as an unbiased observer; the observer affects the observed or the observed affects the observer.

        Both forever changed…
        https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2021/03/30/21/41141874-0-image-a-35_1617135725337.jpg

  2. The Left has learned well from East Germany and North Korea!!!!

  3. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    There’s a valid point of discussion in the FCSB action. Most folks do not seem to have a reservation about stationing a police presence in every school building. Except for the “anonymous tip line” suggestion, the usual suspects on this thread have not offered a constructive notion for the school boards to create some defenses against them. Lotsa yammer jammer but little cognizable, constructive offerings.

    Whether an anonymous tip line might be effective could depend upon Youngkin revealing the contents of the tips forwarded to him reporting the threats of divisive teaching–or is it divisive learning?

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Tip line…so hard to signal when I’m being facetious. 🙂 Some people making threats on line want to be seen and no need to hire a contractor to find them. People conspiring, planning acts of real violence on some dark web channel, well we have NSA and other alphabet agencies spending billions on trying to find those. A couple hundred grand to some contractor won’t catch those. People coordinating an angry demonstration or lining up a crowd for a public hearing, well, that’s the First Amendment in action. Grin and bear.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        And yet, sometimes they shoot up schools without a single alphabet soup agency making a move to thwart.

  4. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    They could start with an anonymous tip line… 🙂 That always goes over well.

    Brain freeze….what is the scientific principle that what you observe changes in response to being observed? Darn aging brain. But it might apply here, you go searching for something lo and behold you find it.

    1. The Hawthorne Effect?

    2. how_it_works Avatar
      how_it_works

      Heisenberg effect?

  5. I am 100% sure that if conservative politicians announced that they were going to monitor threats from the left that certain people who comment on this blog would accuse them of inventing “boogeymen”.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Yeah, kinda like that time back in the Bush administration when the FBI said that Right Wing extremists were a greater threat than Muslim extremists and the Democrats went ape. Democrats? I may be wrong about that part.

      If I remember just after they walked it back some guy in Texas flew his plane into the IRS building in Austin.

  6. It is increasingly apparent that (a) that the “progressive” wing of Virginia’s political class is increasingly afraid of the people it rules…

    It is a big mistake for any wing of the “political class” to assume that they “rule” the people.

  7. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    This might backfire on Fairfax. Groups like Parents Defending Education are going to get stronger from this. FCPS doesn’t seem to understand. They are the ones being watched.

  8. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    You know a anti-masker parent literally threatened the entire Page County school board (hardly “woke”) publicly, don’t you? I think they should take these people very seriously.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Well if you know about it, the cops do and the law would support an arrest and conviction now. I would cheer that.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        It does and they did arrest her. The issue she had was that her threats were too explicit. Clearly, though, she is not the only one who has been whipped up into such a frenzy.

  9. James C. Sherlock Avatar
    James C. Sherlock

    We cannot let it be OK for a school division or any one other than a law enforcement agency to surveil citizens in this way. Even they need a warrant.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      This is all public. Sorry Boss, but puttin’ it on the streets doesn’t need a warrant.
      https://newbeautifulera.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/gary-larsen.png

      1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        We’ll see. LCPS is a public agency. Not sure this is legal. The AG’s office can check. if it is not illegal, we should make it so.

        Constitution of Virginia

        Article I. Bill of Rights
        Section 12. Freedom of speech and of the press; right peaceably to assemble, and to petition

        “That the freedoms of speech and of the press are among the great bulwarks of liberty, and can never be restrained except by despotic governments; that any citizen may freely speak, write, and publish his sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right; that the General Assembly shall not pass any law abridging the freedom of speech or of the press, nor the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for the redress of grievances.”

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Don’t see how actually listening to the $#!^ people put in the public domain inhibits what they say. After all, if they don’t want people reading it, they can keep it private.

          1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            “That the freedoms of speech and of the press are among the great bulwarks of liberty, and can never be restrained except by despotic governments”. Emphasis on despotic.

            “Don’t see how actually listening to the $#!^ people put in the public domain inhibits what they say.” Really? LCPS will be terribly disappointed. It is clearly meant to do so. We will just disagree on this.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Threats of violence are not protected speech, Bubba. And the right to self-defense, not just involving guns, includes monitoring for threats.

            For example, Experian monitors the web and the dark web for threats against me, and my personal data. Are not all persons and organizations permitted to do the same?

          3. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            Bills of rights protect against government. The question is what can the government do and how. Not what Experian can do.

          4. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Right. Which is why they are seeking an Experian-like company to do it.

        2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          “…being responsible for the abuse of that right;”

          Pretty key phrase there…

  10. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    York County Schools spent upwards of $1M for a centralized system of electronic door locks and hardened doors for all of its schools.

    Which is the better deal?

  11. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    I would ask if this is a unique proposal, not done anywhere else or in local governments? Because I am feeling this may be more or less just expanding onto what FfxCo may already be doing.

  12. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Gosh, this is horrible. Why, it’s almost as bad as creating databases of pregnant women.

  13. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    If this bothers BR regulars, you would think this would at least garner a double take:

    https://www.virginiamercury.com/2022/02/10/virginia-lawmakers-move-to-end-ban-on-police-facial-recognition-technology/

    “Lawmakers passed the existing ban on the technology last year following reporting by The Virginian-Pilot that found police officers had begun using the technology with little oversight and no public disclosure.

    The newspaper reported that one of the primary purveyors of the technology, Clearview AI, was emailing officers directly offering them free trials. The company relies on images harvested from social media and other public sources.

    The company retained six lobbyists in Virginia this session with the goal of “making it legal for law-enforcement agencies and other public safety entities to use” the technology, according to public records compiled by the Virginia Public Access Project.”

  14. Schools have always had to take bomb threats and other online threats seriously as they can not afford to miss the real one.

Leave a Reply