The Next Memorial or the Next Boondoggle?

by Jon Baliles

The Defenders for Freedom, Justice, and Equality organization is run by Ana Edwards and Phil Wilayto and has been publishing quarterly in Richmond since 2005. This summer’s edition from last week is an eye-opener and sure to cause some needed and welcome discussion.

The Defenders published two articles about what is and is not happening in regard to the proposed Shockoe Bottom memorial that will honor and tell the story about the slave trade in Richmond, the Burial Ground, Lumpkin’s Jail, and a big part of the history of this city that has been buried and repressed for far too long.

Well, things are definitely happening, but the City, as well as the leaders of the uniquely opaque National Slavery Museum Foundation, are doing precious little to share their plans with the public.

They detail how Mayor Stoney supported the creation of a nine-acre memorial park and created and kicked off the Shockoe Alliance group that was ideally supposed to develop a plan and detail what the memorial park could become. The Smith Group, a national planning firm, was engaged to outline the possibilities and has a web site that is definitely worth a look.

A summary:

Known as “Devil’s Half Acre,” the site included several structures ranging from a large holding area and what was referred to as a “slave jail” on the lower portion of the site that was subject to periodic flooding, a hotel, tavern, and the residence of Robert Lumpkin, an especially cruel and violent slave trader. Despite its horrific impact on the lives of thousands of enslaved Africans and African Americans, the site was all but forgotten over time—an ugly truth buried by train tracks, a parking lot, an interstate, and other modern infrastructure. Community leaders and the City of Richmond desired to develop a memorial that would reveal its haunting history and interpret its cultural significance.

The Defenders article goes through the process by which the “plan” evolved into a Small Area Plan and then incorporated into the Richmond 300 Plan and received public input and was updated in October 2021. That plan, according to the Defenders, “is supposed to come back to the Alliance and then put up for a second round of public input. As of yet, there is no public timeline for that input.”

The project, when first announced by Mayor Jones, was in the neighborhood of $100 million. The most recent estimate comes in at $220 million. And yet, so far there are no plans we know of and no organization to even begin the planning process or raise the funds to complete the project. The Defenders have a list of excellent questions that any reasonable person would ask before embarking on spending $220 million:

  • Does the National Slavery Museum Foundation have a website or any other online presence?
  • Does the foundation have a board of directors? If so, who are the members?
  • Does the foundation have a director? If so, who is it?
  • What is the current estimate for the cost of designing and building the museum?
  • What is the current estimate for the annual cost of operating the museum?
  • How much money has the foundation raised to date?
  • What amount has been allocated by the City of Richmond?
  • By the state of Virginia?
  • How much has been raised from private sources?
  • What expenses has the foundation paid for to date?
  • How much, and to what entities or individuals?
  • What is the timeline for creating the museum?
  • Are any public meetings about the museum scheduled at this time?

Let’s hope we get some answers before our elected officials start writing checks.

This column has been republished with permission from RVA 5X5.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

23 responses to “The Next Memorial or the Next Boondoggle?”

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Now that’s cool. That might actually get some of the curious off the highway, just like the beautiful spire on the USMC museum a few miles further up the road.

      1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        Easy watering for the gardener. A water hose from the top and all runs down the ramp. Evil Kneivel would have chomped for a shot at this ramp.
        https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/44c92bafd53c4c9f5e35a488706f38b2687957ea8883a1ef7aa145c1ff9e0b54.jpg

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Yeah, but with it located that close to the highway, rest assured some bonehead will leave the highway at 105 mph and make it to the ramp someday.

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Have you ever gotten off the road at those spires? How about thought of it? I always thought it was an Air Force thing, but now that you mention it, it is near Quantico. They’re suppose to resemble contrails going up or something.

        1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead

          Free parking free admission. Paint that on the spire or nail up some South of the Border signs.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            I stopped at SotB once while vacationing with the wife and then 14-yo daughter. Most of the junk is just that, but without warning it changes to an Adam & Eve store without warning. Can’t imagine what some folks do.

        2. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          It is a rendering of the Iwo Jima Flag photo, you dunce. But you knew that. The Air Force statue is beside Arlington Cemetery, visible from the columbarium holding my parent’s ashes.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Oh hey! Now I see it!
            http://res.cloudinary.com/simpleview/image/upload/v1527709436/clients/pwmva/marine_corp_fd223faf-1896-4d88-8c7a-7379ae4d9f75.jpg

            When you’re flying by at 90MPH, you don’t really have time to look at things to the side.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Take more than a crane to lift it off its pedestal.

    3. It resembles one of those ski-jump ramps they use to launch STOL aircraft -except for the grass, of course.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNSO3NqVU2E

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        And the missing burnt spot a couple of hundred yards downfield.

        BTW, there’s a commercial runway in WVa that has a drop that can be used like that too. Of course, you only get an extra couple of hundred feet of instantaneous altitude and you’d better use it wisely.

  1. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    So, is the Tobacco Company still serving prime rib?

  2. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Another question: Where is the evidence anybody will actually visit such memorial or museum and spend tourist dollars while in town? That would be essential information before spending in the hundreds of millions for something beyond just historical markers and a park.

    Continuing to promise to do something continues to pay political dividends that might disappear if something actually gets done.

    1. walter smith Avatar
      walter smith

      Well…THAT’S a silly question!
      The important thing is $220 million of graft opportunity. Who needs visitors?

    2. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
      YellowstoneBound1948

      One of the best comments I have read here in the last year.

    3. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Like, oh say, promising to overturn Roe v. Wade?

      Good politics is the art of making insane promises.
      Bad politics is keeping them.

  3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    This project has been talked about a long time, with not a lot to show for the talking. It also has benefited from a significant amount of state funds. The budget language often combined three elements of the project: Slave Trail, Freedom and Heritage Site, and Pavilion at Lumpkin’s Jail.

    FY 2015–State budget provided $2 million, on the condition that city commit $5 million and provide documentation that it had raised at least 50 percent of remaining funding needed from private or other sources. Language committed state to $9 million or 25 percent of cost of project.
    FY2017–The city obviously had not spent much, if any, of the $2 million. Budget language provided for reversion of $1.5 million, wit $500,000 authorized for the Slave Trail.
    FY2019–Appropriated $790,791 for expenses incurred. Language setting a total cumulative limit of $1 million on Slave Trail and $1 million on Lumpkin’s Pavilion.
    FY2021–Major changes. Appropriated $1 million. Eliminated requirement that city commit to $5 million up front. Eliminated state committal cap of $9 million. The state funds were intended for reimbursement of expenditures made by city, which had to document expenditures before drawing down money.
    FY2022–Additional appropriation of $9 million. Eliminated requirement that funds be reimbursement of city expenditures. City still had to document expenditures and Dept. of General Services charged with overseeing project and ensuring expenditure of state funds made for purposes set out in budget bill.
    FY 2023–Additional $1 million appropriation. Same conditions as in previous budget bill.

    Summary: $12.3 million of state funding provided for project.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      $12M approved with most of any spent so far being on accounting for what little might have been spent. Yep, we’re on our way.

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    FWIW, while watching something on PBS and the slave trade (I think it had to do with the 270 slaves at Georgetown) they mentioned that Lynchburg was home to America’s largest slave brokerage and it was one of the world’s largest. They handled the money mostly, but were not above the occasional body or two.

Leave a Reply