The New Racial Calculus in UVa Admissions


by Walter Smith and James A. Bacon

On March 20, 2022, The Cavalier Daily student newspaper trumpeted the fact that the University of Virginia set a record low acceptance rate, offering slots to only 9,534 applicants, or 19% of the nearly 51,000 total. Of particular note, 52% of the offers went to “students of color” — up from 41% the prior year.

Only a little more than half of students who get accepted to UVa wind up enrolling there, so it’s not known what the ultimate composition of the entering class will be. But it is possible that entering first-year students will comprise the first class in which a majority of students are comprised of racial/ethnic minorities.

That would be no accident. In 2020, UVa recruited a vice provost of admissions, Stephen Farmer, whose most heralded accomplishment at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill had been  setting records for recruiting first-generation students and students from underrepresented minorities. At the time, UVa’s Racial Equity Task Force had recently articulated the goal of building a student body that “reflects the racial and economic demographics of the Commonwealth of Virginia.”

An analysis of acceptance numbers, provided by the University of Virginia and summarized in the table above, shows that UVa admissions this year clearly favor African-Americans, in-state students, and legacy students. If you are an in-state African-American applicant whose parent is an alumnus, your odds of getting accepted are roughly four times that of an out-of-state White applicant with no family connections.

The preference shown to in-state students is non-controversial. UVa is a legal entity of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and it is financially supported by state tax dollars to benefit the citizens of Virginia. The lofty, idealistic reason for admitting any out-of-state students at all is that geographic diversity in the student body exposes everyone to different perspectives. The cynical reason is that UVa charges out-of-state students twice as much money to attend.

Preferences shown to ethnic minorities and legacies, by contrast, arouse the passions. Preferences based on accidents of birth seem antithetical to the principle that admissions to Virginia’s flagship university — one of the most elite universities in the country — should be based on merit. 

Probing deeper than the numbers provided in The Cavalier Daily article, one of us, Walter Smith, used the Freedom of Information Act to ask UVa for a detailed breakdown of the admissions data. We compiled the numbers in the table above.

Traditionally, SAT and ACT standardized test scores have been seen as a tool for promoting merit in college admissions, providing a more objective measure of applicants’ aptitude for college-level work than where they went to high school or what grades they earned.

Increasingly, however, SAT scores are seen as tools of class and racial privilege, and many elite universities have downplayed them in favor of different admissions criteria. Indeed, UVa made SAT and ACT scores optional for this and next year’s admissions classes.

The UVa Admissions office is vague, though, about the qualifications it is looking for.

“It is our privilege and responsibility to consider everything you submit to the admission committee, so that we get to know you as a student and person,” the Admissions website says. “Your academic performance in high school provides helpful information, but we do not make admission decisions based on grades and numbers alone. We strive to build a varied, dynamic class of students who will thrive at UVA, strengthen our community, and change the world for the better.”

Admissions applications must include grade transcripts, recommendations from a counselor and an academic teacher, and a submission from the college “Common Application” used by 900 institutions nationally. That application includes a Common App essay, designed to reveal “character, background, and value as a potential student.” The Common App website contains a Q&A addressing this topic: Why do schools want a diversity essay?

Many universities believe a student body composed of different perspectives, beliefs, identities, and backgrounds will enhance the campus learning and community experience.

Admissions officers are interested in hearing about how your unique background, identity, beliefs, culture, or characteristics will enrich the campus community, which is why they assign a diversity essay.

Listed examples of diversity include, in this order: race/ethnicity, gender identity, disability, sexual orientation, nationality, socioeconomic status, immigration background, religion/belief system, place of residence, family circumstances, extracurricular activities related to diversity. “Include vulnerable, authentic stories about your lived experiences.”

Thus, the priorities of the Common Application and the University of Virginia are aligned in making “diversity” one of the most significant criteria for accepting students. The radical shift in admissions should come as no surprise.

In at least one way, it can be said that UVa’s demographic profile does look more like Virginia — the percentage of White students now closely tracks the percentage of White high school graduates in Virginia. On the other hand, the percentage of Asian students far exceeds the percentage of Asians among high school graduates, while the percentage of Blacks and Hispanics still falls far short of their proportional share of the population.

But if Blacks fall short, it’s not for a lack of trying by the Admissions Office. The university admitted a far higher percentage of Black applicants than for other groups.

The stats also raise questions about favoritism for legacies. Officially, the UVa administration is mum about legacy status. The admissions website says only: “Legacy status is acknowledged in our review process.” But legacies for every demographic category, both in-state and out-of-state, are given offers at significantly higher rates than non-legacies. The reason? Presumably because alumni are more likely to open their pocketbooks when their children, nieces, nephews and grandchildren are admitted.

One reason that the admission of White students held up this year is that so many of them are legacies — 38% among in-state Whites and 29% among out-of-state Whites. If you’re a non-legacy, out-of-state, White applicant, however, you face long odds getting into UVa — only 13%. You’re stuck in the muck at the bottom of the selection pool.

What we cannot tell from these numbers is the degree to which admissions have become divorced from objective measures of merit, such as scores on nationally standardized tests such as the SATs and AP exams. If we can uncover that data, we will get back to you.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

55 responses to “The New Racial Calculus in UVa Admissions”

  1. It’s great to know the breakdown of those accepted and those who arrive on campus.

    The data that is lacking at ALL universities [and which, as far as I can tell, is never reported] is the breakdown of students who return for a second year. Also – how many of these first gen and minority and under-represented students actually graduate in four years? five years? six years? or never?

  2. Lawrence Hincker Avatar
    Lawrence Hincker

    Note to the authors: resubmit your FOIA request and ask for GPA and SAT scores broken down by race. They have these data and are required to disclose.

  3. WayneS Avatar

    These Non-resident Aliens: Are they Greys, Reptilians, Nordics (Plejarens), or some other kind?

    Because otherwise, “Non-resident Alien” is not a race.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Certainly a minority… for now.

  4. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    I want to compliment the authors on a fair point without the rant.

    I’m not convinced that all college admissions MUST be solely on merit.

    And I do understand and support the idea that the student body ought to reflect our demographics.

    And we know some group is going to legally challenge it – again – but I’m just not sure where it says in the Constitution or Code of Virginia that merit is mandated.

    I’ve pointed out before that the percentage of black doctors in this country is around 4-5% – not representative of our demographics. Similar percentages hold true for other professions like engineers or military generals.

    The reason why is not agreed to by the various factions but a good number believe it’s not merit per se but how merit is achieved and whether there is truly equitable access to the ladders that must be climbed to obtain success.

    Having said that , it’s a tough gig to try to help someone become a doctor or engineer is they lack the pre-requisites but I also point out that some colleges including UVA have a reputation of getting their enrollees to graduation – I think it’s 90%. Can they maintain that percent if they change to a demographic from a merit approach?

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Do you want to be operated on by a physician who did not get into or graduamedical school on merit?

      If you are personally brave, how about her operating on your kids or grandkids?

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        Silly equivalency given the rigors and requirements of internships. While you may see your doctor’s educational material on the walls of his/her office, you will not see their GPA.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          the question is , why do they use that equivalency in the first place…….

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Get in? No problem. It’s get out that counts. You’re assuming that failing to make established entrance requirements means failure to achieve.

        Whaddya call the guy who graduates last place at the USNA? Anchorman. Whaddya call the guy who graduates last place at EVMS? Doctor.

        Cardiac Surgeon: We need to replace a heart valve.
        Mechanic: What’s that cost?
        Cardiac Surgeon: $100,000.
        Mechanic: Wow! That’s a lot! I only charge $2500 to replace valves.
        Cardiac Surgeon: Can you do it through the exhaust pipe?

      3. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        I very much STILL support the license requirements for Doctor, Lawyer, airline pilot, x-ray tech, police, nurses, etc.

        For any given profession or occupation – there are standards and anyone who meets those standards is qualified to do that work.

        It’s the standards that determine qualification, not just academic merit.

        Here’s a question for you.

        Do you require your Doctor to tell you his/her class standing?

        Or for yourself, Did you advance in the military based solely on your academic merit?

        Do you think the military is now “woke” for being concerned about the demographics of their leadership?

        ya’ll conservatives types got your views but I sometimes wonder if you confuse issues like merit.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Oooh ouch. Renaissance man will have the answer…

        2. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
          f/k/a_tmtfairfax

          When I was in law school and when I took two bar exams in two different states, we were each assigned a number that was the only identification on our test submissions. No professor or bar examiner knew who was submitting what. Only after the submissions were reviewed and graded did the professor or bar examiners know who the student or applicant was. This seemed and still seems pretty darn fair to me.

        3. Merchantseamen Avatar
          Merchantseamen

          Coast Guard License said I could do the job. For me to get the job within the company, (aboard ship) it had to be on merit. It is a difference. BTW The License had to be renewed every 5 years unlike other professions.

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Give it time on the professional ranks. The real test is current med school and residency demographics. First people have to want to be in those jobs and perhaps not everybody does.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        I don’t know the current percent of the schools. That would be an interesting data point.

  5. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    There is no assumption in presenting numbers. The numbers are numbers. What is unknown is was there skewing based on race or ethnicity of some sort. I don’t know. Perhaps a disproportionate number of extremely qualified black candidates applied and a really crummy bunch of white kids applied and that explains the disproportionate offer rates. That seems highly unlikely (do your Bell Curve distributions and run a Monte Carlo to calculate the odds – it seems highly unlikely with 50,000 applications). I have asked for the optional SAT data, and we’ll see if we can get it. I have also asked for financial aid award data. Again, we’ll see. Another aspect I wish to examine is the Common Application and the “diversity” aspect. Is this a backdoor way to inject race into the calculation? It appears to me if I were a white student applying, not a legacy, I would aim for “Race or Ethnicity Unknown” which has higher offer rates across the board from “white.”
    The problem I have with all of the DEI stuff is to me it is explicitly racist – the administration is basing decisions on race. Apparently, me believing in MLK’s wish for his descendants to be judged on the content of character, not the color of their skin is racist. That’s crazy world. And that is the world of higher education and K-12. And, by the way, it does not help race relations, it increases tribalization and separateness and grievance.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      not really about race, but about generational economic disadvantage as a result of past systemic policies.

      Ya’ll make it about race! Not about race but about those whose families have suffered economic disadvantage due to past policies..

      If UVA wants to incentivize enrollment for those that are economically disadvantaged but in their estimation can attain a degree, what’s the argument against?

      1. walter smith Avatar
        walter smith

        “Disadvantage as a result of past systemic policies” means … what exactly, Larry?
        What’s the argument against?
        Lemme see…suppose you have a 1400 SAT and a 3.7 from a good high school and all sorts of extracurriculars and are white and don’t get in.
        Now suppose you are the same white kid, but you are quiet about race so that you fall into “Race/Ethnicity Unknown” and you get in?
        Is that “fair”?
        Now suppose you are a black kid living in NoVa, not good enough to get into TJ, but a 1300 GPA, living in the suburbs and with 2 parent, gov’t employee parents. You get in. White kid in Galax with 1300 and living in poverty doesn’t get in. Fair?
        And of course you have heard of the mismatch theory? Which is not really a theory…
        but let’s start at the beginning there Larry – please define “disadvantage as a result of past systemic policies” in some term that is not based on race.
        What about a member of the lucky sperm club? Should that kid be discriminated against because he has rich parents? Is that his fault? He has the GPA and the SATs and all other qualifications…
        By the way the rich are already discriminated against in our Communist funding. Do you know that rich parents get to pay full price? That if you have saved money for a child in the child’s name, the metrics used expect that saved money to be spent? Essentially, two families can have the same level of income, and if one lives check to check because it has a vacation home and expensive cars and no savings, it qualifies for money, while the other same income family lives beneath its means and has saved a lot of money and is expected to pay it. Sound fair?

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          walter, over decades, policies that discriminated against people like denying them access to a good education or voting or to own land or get a job that provided health care and retirement.

          the two-parent thing is a conservative canard. Lots of divorces all races – the difference is what is the economic status of the single parent?

          When someone has a crappy education they cannot live in a decent neighborhood and send their kid to a good school – that kid grows up with the same issues and the cycle repeats.

          nothing to do with race per se but the folks who actually make it about race – claim it’s others like UVA.

          UVA is not making it about race. Not a word about race as far as I can see. It’s the critics who are making it about race.

          1. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            Willfully blind. And I note you didn’t provide your definition. And the two parent family bit is not a canard. It’s just true. Maybe UVA doesn’t state explicitly what it is trying to achieve because it would be per se illegal? Maybe that is why UVA won’t provide me the metrics that define success for the $340k a year DEI director who reports directly to Jim Ryan…

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            not the single parent the economic status.

            If the single parent makes good money, they live in a good neighborhood and have childcare, can afford tutors, or even private school. If you’re uneducated and poor single parent – none of it.

            Doesn’t UVA do something similar for their sport students or some alumni?

            How much does the Athletic Director and Coaches get paid?

  6. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    As opposed to when all y’all got iin…

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2bhFCts-Rt0

  7. Matt Hurt Avatar
    Matt Hurt

    Here’s the problem with all of this as I see it. We’ve noticed that the mule is no longer in the barn, and now we’re closing the barn door. We’re really not solving the problem by lowering admissions standards, but applying a band-aid to a gushing arterial wound.

    If we want our colleges to represent our population (which I agree is a worthy goal), then we need to produce high school graduates from each subgroup that are ready, willing, and able to be successful in college. We have not done that in K-12. For example, we have significant gaps in reading and math skill attainment among our subgroups. If a student is behind in reading and math, that student is less likely to have the foundational skills necessary to succeed in college. Please understand that reading and math skill attainment is not the only problem that should be addressed to fix this problem, but it is a big one.

    Up to this point, this issue has not been effectively addressed. The Republicans traditionally have not shown much interest in this problem, and the Democrats had been working to lower the bar so that all kids could “equitably” stumble over it. I am very much encouraged that the current administration seems adamant to do something about it. Now, let’s see if they’re willing to put their money where their mouth is. I am very anxious to see if they will employ improvement science strategies to make things really better, or if they will instead issue top down mandates that won’t correlate with real gains in outcomes.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Many colleges have accepted students that then had to enroll in remedial programs.

      I suspect that is what UVA is planning for their enrollees that need more help to succeed.

      The problem with “fixing” the K-12 problem is that it’s never going to be fixed when k-12 schools serve neighborhoods that are demographically different in parental education levels and income.

      Region VII probably does not have this problem as much as the more suburban and urban schools do but all you need to do is do a build-a-table search on a per school basis for a county like Chesterfield (or Henrico, or Fairfax, etc) to see the problem.

      At TJ, in Fairfax, we see the impact of this bifurcation. Just 2% of blacks get into TJ.

      Colleges like UVA look at this and they KNOW that “waiting” is not a viable strategy.

      1. Larry, the more “white saviors” try to help Black people, the worse it gets for them. White saviors promote one gimmick after another — from easy home ownership to easy college loans. The result? A massive wipe-out of Black wealth during the 2007 real estate crash, and hundreds of thousands of Black college drop-outs carrying loads of debt they can never repay. White saviors are now wrecking our public schools, which are setting records for Black academic failure, and White saviors have promoted rhetoric and criminal justice reforms that have led to the greatest number of assaults and murders in Virginia since the 199os, with Blacks being the primary victims.

        The ideology of White saviors has been a total disaster for poor Black people in America — literally the worst thing since Jim Crow. But, then, the White savior ideology isn’t really about helping Black people. It’s about making White saviors feel good about themselves — feeling morally superior — by posturing about helping Blacks. Results don’t matter. Never have.

        1. James McCarthy Avatar
          James McCarthy

          White saviors!?!?!? Wow. A new cohort of social/political influencers. Where can folks enroll for training?

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Start by learning Latin…

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            It’s who JAB is, apparently.

          3. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            He used to call it “The White Man’s Burden”.

        2. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Yeah, it was so much better when we actively suppressed them.

        3. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          see, when you start off with ‘white saviors”, we know where you are coming from and it’s not a good place.

          ya’ll are the problem, not the solution.

      2. Matt Hurt Avatar
        Matt Hurt

        I reject your premise that the problem cannot be fixed.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          well, did not say that. said when….

          and that’s where institutions like UVA also wonder how long and when.

          Read JAB’s “white savior” response and you get an idea of differing perceptions that pretty much tell us how long it will take to deal with the issue.

          read JABs words below…

          1. Matt Hurt Avatar
            Matt Hurt

            The problem with “fixing” the K-12 problem is that it’s never going to be fixed when k-12 schools serve neighborhoods that are demographically different in parental education levels and income.
            This is what I reject.

  8. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    My son was eminently qualified for UVA and got in, did fine. But at the time I was fully engaged at the Capitol working for the AG and his application got noticed, and maybe got special attention. His admission was first announced to me, not to him, in a phone call from Stuart Connock, then their Richmond lobbyist. UVA has played these political games since those phone calls came from Mr. Jefferson’s secretary….

    Nothing new here. Unless the authors remain convinced that white people are always more qualified and if the demographics are changing it must be anti-white racism. That your claim, Jim? UVa has two and a half centuries of original sin to work off.

    Fifty years ago when I got into W&M, even then, “merit” included skill at sports, high school participation in theater, student government, the school newspaper. If you were an Eagle Scout you sure put that on the application. It has never been just SAT’s and grades. (The admissions director sniffed at my national merit recognition.) You boys may think you were smarter than the rest of us, but at W&M we knew better. 🙂

    1. “Unless the authors remain convinced that white people are always more qualified and if the demographics are changing it must be anti-white racism. That your claim, Jim?”

      White people always more qualified.. No, that is not my claim, and there is no way anyone could reasonably infer that it is. Such a belief is demonstrably untrue, and there is zero basis for you making the insinuation. I’m surprised and disappointed that you would even ask the question.

      If the demographics are changing it must be anti-white racism….. No, as I stated clearly in the article, the clearly demonstrated bias is in favor of Blacks and, to some degree, Hispanics, not against Whites, to make up for past discrimination. Call it “anti-racism,” which seems to be the popular term in academia.

      But as I also made clear, there is much that we don’t know. We don’t know the average grades and SAT scores of the accepted applicants. (Although even if we did, there would be methodological issues associated with applying that data.)

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Then I’ll ask you. Remember “swim tests”?

      2. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        So no reaction to my joke about phone calls from President Jefferson….sigh.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Remember “swim tests”?

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        I do, but took it in stride…was that a white privilege holdover? As I recall if you failed it just meant you had to take a PE class in swimming.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          By the time we got to college, yes, it meant Swimming 101 for us, but in the 40s and 50s it meant no graduation for you. In those days, public pools were strictly white.

          1. Stephen Haner Avatar
            Stephen Haner

            Not at the O clubs that were our main recreation until Dad retired from the AF. But if you say so…I think that one is a stretch.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Oh, I thin not, Babbalooey. There are plenty of pages on racism, college swim tests, and graduation requirements. White people used to be quite blantant.

            Military pools are were I spent every day June to September, but Harry Truman made sure we were introduced to those not like us.

    3. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Your interview was captured on film…
      https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gpuAeIEXoAc

  9. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    The assumption in this post and many of the comments is the admission of some students in minority groups is not based on merit, but on “accidents of birth”. It is irresponsible and unfair to assume that the UVa admissions office offered admission to some students that it did not think would be successful. Did some Black or Hispanic students get lower SAT scores than some white students were not accepted? Very likely. But that does not mean that those Black or Hispanic students don’t have what it will take to be successful in college, i.e. they have merit.

    All major colleges strive, legitimately, to have a diverse student body. Diverse in terms of gender, race, ethnicity, and geography. I recently heard of a session at a Yale alumni reunion led by a college admissions officer. The admissions officer told those alumni frankly that Yale purposely tried to diversify its incoming classes. An example that he provided were applicants from a certain (unnamed) high school. Based on SAT scores and high school grades, Yale could admit every applicant, but it wouldn’t. Afterwards, an alum from Virginia asked him if the high school were Thomas Jefferson in Fairfax. He confirmed that it was.

    Another factor overlooked in this discussion is the composition of the groups of students applying for admission to UVa. The number of white applicants dwarfs the number of Black, Hispanic, and Asian students. I can’t prove this, but I would bet that the “quality” of those students in terms of scores, grades, and other attributes was higher than that of the body of white applicants. Many, if not most, white high seniors aspire to go to UVa. and many apply even if they have little hope of being accepted. Perhaps because the average of pools of Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians could have been higher than the average of the white pool, a higher proportion of the minority pools was selected that was selected from the white pool.

    These are all legitimate alternative explanations as opposed to the one that some minority admissions were based on something other than merit.

    By the way, the incoming class at UVa. next fall will include a lot of athletes who may have been admitted based on their merit, but it was not on their academic merit. I don’t hear these alumni raising questions about that process.

    1. Wow, Dick, you’re normally a pretty objective guy. But this time you have suspended your critical reading facilities. You suggest that the post asserts that UVa is basing its minority admissions on “something other than merit.”

      That is a possibility, but we did not state it as a fact. To the contrary, we wrote the following:

      What we cannot tell from these numbers is the degree to which admissions have become divorced from objective measures of merit, such as scores on nationally standardized tests such as the SATs and AP exams. If we can uncover that data, we will get back to you.”

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        So, you dog whistled… well, if you can’t tell then why bring it up?

        1. walter smith Avatar
          walter smith

          How come only Libs hear the whistle?

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            We’re not the only. We’re just finally beginning to ask, “You know everyone hears that, right?”

          2. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            No, I don’t. You hear that because you only see, and only hear apparently, through a racial lens. Again, you are the racist. Making judgments based on race. The definition of racism. Or are we updating the definition, like the ever moving vaccine definition, to “racism is anything I don’t like spoken by anyone who disagrees with me over my Marxist/secular humanist worldview”? Seems that way to me…

  10. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    I agree with those who posted that grades alone are not and should not be the only criteria for admission to a college or university. But those factors should be set forth in writing so that prospective students know what they are facing and how judgments are made. Basic due process requires as much with public institutions. And if private institutions take public money, they too should be required to provide this information.

    Any admissions decision carries with it some level of subjective judgment but the process should be as objective as possible. There should be a paper trail for each prospective student. The process should be audited periodically to make sure that the school follows its process. If race or ethnicity is used as a factor, it should be so stated. Of course, race is a suspect category under the Constitution, generally subject to strict scrutiny review.

    I seriously doubt that most institutions of higher learning could make the showing to pass strict scrutiny. That’s why the colleges want to keep their processes invisible. But that same level of invisibility is what colleges used for decades to keep out women, blacks, Jews and other unfavored groups. We need to continue to try to treat everyone fairly.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      UVA is putting a lot on the line. If they enroll folks who are in need of remedial help , perhaps a lot, UVA is essentially making a commitment to support them and get them to graduation.

      If they fail, it will surely discredit their approach and leave them open to heavy criticism.

      UVA is not alone in this. A lot of colleges are doing this – and so is TJ attempting a version of it – because – as you say – prior academic performance is not the only criteria for judging potential.

      I’ll trust UVA any day over the critics who seem obsessed with race and discrimination.

      1. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
        f/k/a_tmtfairfax

        Don’t you think that any institution considering factors beyond grades, which can be reasonable, needs to publish what else they consider and how they consider those factors?

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          in a world where strident critics will do whatever they can to claim that anti-white racism is in play… ?

          Also, all along, when admitting sons/daughters of alumni or other favored groups like those on the sports teams – have they EVER been fully open about their criteria?

          And if they do publish their criteria – those who oppose the idea that anything other than academic merit should be the criteria will then look to find instances where the criteria were not followed. With the critics, there is no end point where they accept policies they do not agree with. That’s just the way it is these days.

          And, human nature with ANY institution – they do circle the wagons – it’s the way people are – they are loyal to the institutions they work for.

          1. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
            f/k/a_tmtfairfax

            I think questioning the automatic admission of alumni children is work worth doing.

            Institutions that take federal or state funding should be required to document their admission’s process and make it public. Employees should follow that process or face immediate termination.

            People need to know. If a college adds points for an applicant whose parents and grandparents did not attend college, it should so state. And how many points.

            I don’t think colleges can make the showing necessary to make decisions based on race. We will see what SCOTUS does on this issue.

Leave a Reply