by Donald Smith

The Congressional Naming Commission (CNC) was authorized as part of the FY2021 National Defense Authorization Act. Its eight commissioners included two retired Army generals, a retired Navy admiral and a retired Marine Corps general. It also had academics with imposing credentials. One commissioner is a professor emeritus at United States Military Academy West Point and another is a senior official at the American Enterprise Institute. The commission’s chief historian, Connor Williams, took a leave of absence from his faculty position at Yale to serve on the CNC. The CNC even had an elected federal official — Austin Scott, a Republican congressman from Georgia.

The CNC recommended — among many, many other things — that all active U.S. Army bases named for Confederate generals be renamed. And, in the Preface to Part 1 of its report, it appears to pick a fight.

This is how the CNC report’s Preface characterizes monuments erected to Confederates and the Confederacy in the years following the Civil War:

Most importantly, during the end of the nineteenth century and the start of the twentieth century, the South and much of the nation came to live under a mistaken understanding of the Civil War known as the “Lost Cause.” As part of the “Lost Cause,” across the nation, champions of that memory built monuments to Confederate leaders and to the Confederacy, including on many Department of Defense assets. In every instance and every aspect, these names and memorials have far more to do with the culture under which they were named than they have with any historical acts actually committed by their namesakes. (Preface, page 3).

The obvious implication of this statement goes well beyond changing some base names. The commissioners presume to pass judgment on (a) what these names and memorials meant to everyone and (b) what the “real” motivations for those statues were. Think about that.

People who read the CNC report will naturally read between the lines and conclude that the CNC has determined that anything or anyone associated with the Confederacy is odious and not worthy of public recognition. The paragraph I quoted above talks about monuments to “Confederate leaders and to the Confederacy.” But a few paragraphs earlier in the Preface, the CNC said this:

In passing the 2021 William M. “Mac” Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act, the United States Congress determined that Confederates and the Confederacy no longer warrant commemoration through Department of Defense assets.

The average American can connect the dots. The CNC — which claims to be speaking with Congress’ approval — sure seems to be sending the message that “Confederates” (which presumably includes the lowest-ranking private) are unworthy of respect by the Defense Department. I’m sure that many of the descendants of those Confederates will not only get the message — they’ll notice its judgmental and arrogant tone.

Interestingly, the CNC does not define the term “Lost Cause.” I suspect that, for each of us, that term means something different. If the Lost Cause was something so odious that simply being associated with it justifies condemnation and cancellation, then shouldn’t we define it? Shouldn’t we all operate off one common, agreed-upon term? Especially when we’re discussing a contentious topic. There is no Glossary in the CNC report. So, it’s quite possible that, for the CNC, the term “Lost Cause” meant whatever the CNC wanted it to mean.

Did the CNC think we’d accept its judgments and recommendations as diktats? Apparently so. Unfortunately, there’s apparently no way to ask questions about, or demand explanations for, its recommendations. The CNC has dissolved itself. Its point-of-contact email for public relations matters now returns error messages when you try to contact it. Think about that, too.

What a fine way to handle our country’s heritage. You can read the report for yourself at The Naming Commission’s website.

Donald Smith was raised in Richmond. His mother was born in a house not far from VMI, and family members still live there.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

30 responses to “The Naming Commission’s Diktats”

  1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “What a fine way to handle our country’s heritage.”

    What the CNC is trying to tell you, Donald, is that the Confederacy is not our country’s heritage… it never was…

    1. James Kiser Avatar
      James Kiser

      Hmmm. That means anyone can come in and claim that something is not part of our heritage good or bad. Is that what you are saying?

      1. I guess history began yesterday?

        1. James McCarthy Avatar
          James McCarthy

          History commences every second.

      2. We can decide which parts of our history to memorialize, and it’s not unreasonable for people to want to rename a building to someone that wasn’t fighting against our nation.

      3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        No but the Confederacy is not nor ever has been a part of “our country” by which I assume Don means the United States – perhaps he doesn’t… who knows these days. You understand what secede means, right?

        1. Donald Smith Avatar
          Donald Smith

          If we’re adopting the position that anyone who ever fought against the U.S. government or military is persona non grata on any DOD asset—that excludes many brave colonial Loyalists, Confederates, Native American warriors and followers of Pancho Villa. Descendants of all of those great leaders later joined, and added valuable vitality to, the American military. The descendants of Confederate and Union soldiers bled and died together on Omaha Beach (29th Infantry Division). The descendants of Navajo warriors were the code talkers who bedeviled the Japanese. E Plurubus Unum…out of many, one.

          You’re a shallow “fella,” Eric.

          1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            As to your list, Don, I certainly don’t honor colonial Loyalists (especially those who actively fought counter to our cause) and Pancho Villa was certainly no friend of the US. Got no problem with taking down any public memorials that may honor them if that is what the relevant elected officials decide is best. I will note that none of these individuals ever swore an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the US, however, so you might just be comparing apples to oranges here. Probably the closest equal comparison you would find there is Benedict Arnold – that might be an apt comparison. Nor were their statues erected in a campaign to advance the supremacy of their descendants’ race over another.

            But now really, you want to compare the plight of Native Americans to that of the Confederacy…?? That is pretty reprehensible.

            Finally, I have no problem with honoring anybody’s descendants whose actions in their own life warrants such honor. I encourage and applaud such actions. We are now all Americans indeed. The point of my comment. The Confederacy was OUR enemy and was never a part of US heritage. I wonder, Don, how you would take it if Ivy Meeropol (Rosenberg’s granddaughter) would have been honored with an Academy Award for her Heir to an Execution film… if you were offended, would that make you “shallow” fella…?

            Finally, make no mistake, I have ancestors who did things in their lives that were reprehensible. Some owned slaves themselves. I would never argue that they be honored publicly for those actions.

        2. James Kiser Avatar
          James Kiser

          It is still part of The US history. Don’t forget the so called traitors were forgiven by those that actually fought them. Unlike people over a 100 years later.

          1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Yes, destroying the Confederacy and the underlying rebellion is indeed part of US history. The Confederacy itself, however, was never a part of our country.

          2. James Kiser Avatar
            James Kiser

            The people were and they did much for the country both before and after the War between the States.

          3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Benedict Arnold was an “American” hero… until he wasn’t.

    2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Yes it is. I was at Gettysburg yesterday. Loads of southern heritage everywhere I stepped.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Yes, the military victory at Gettysburg is indeed a part of the heritage of the southern US, James. Excellent point.

        1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead

          Hey Eric. I am going to General A.P. Hill’s 4th burial today in Culpeper. Did you know that Hill penned in his will that he wished to be buried standing up? You should come. 2 p.m.

          1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            That sounds fascinating, James, someday I will retire and have time for such things. Today (as a part of my 48 hour furlough) I have a wedding to attend. Enjoy your day!

    3. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Define “our”.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        US of A

    4. Donald Smith Avatar
      Donald Smith

      And, with reasoning like that, you’ll always be less than a full troll.

  2. Now to erase the use of Indian names [US Army Helos, etc.] —- they lost their war against our government too…

    1. There’s a number Native peoples who aren’t thrilled about their language being used to name American buildings, cities, etc.

      1. I’m sure there also numbers of Irish people who aren’t thrilled about their language being used to name American buildings, cities, etc.

        And, there are no doubt numbers of German people who aren’t thrilled about their language being used to name American buildings, cities, etc.

        So what?

      2. I’m sure there also numbers of Irish people who aren’t thrilled about their language being used to name American buildings, cities, etc.

        And, there are no doubt numbers of German people who aren’t thrilled about their language being used to name American buildings, cities, etc.

        So what?

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          Really? I have not read that anywhere. I have a great many pre-US revolution german, irish and scotch/irish ancestors. If I am supposed to be offended, I would like to know about it… ; ) …. really, is this a thing…?

    2. Donald Smith Avatar
      Donald Smith

      I’ll be addressing that in an upcoming article.

    3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      It is not the losing of the war that makes them unworthy of public honor by the US, it is the abandoment of the US and it’s Constitution which they swore to defend and uphold followed by the war against the US itself all with the goal of perpetuating slavery (which they happened to lose) that makes them unworthy. [It is also the history of the erection of many such statues in a campaign to promote white supremacy over a subjugated black population.] Let’s say they won and we were now two countries. Would you be arguing that US statues to Confederate generals were necessary part of preserving its heritage then? I sincerely doubt it.

  3. It is obvious that our current system for naming things is deeply flawed and offends large numbers of people. Therefore, I think we should do away with using words to name things and adopt a system by which we assign a unique number to every single thing in the world. Everything will be numbered chronologically based on the precise date & time it was created, built, manufactured, produced, born, or otherwise came into existence. The purely chronological nature of the system makes it objectively fair and equitable.

    Sure, conversations will become incredibly confusing, and no one will have any idea what anyone else is talking about, but at least no one will be offended by a bunch of letters arranged in a certain order.

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Name bases after the military alphabet. Recruits will thank you.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUjZziFw58w

      1. Just don’t put Fort Romeo too close to Camp Juliet…

        1. Donald Smith Avatar
          Donald Smith

          Important safety tip—thanks, WayneS!

Leave a Reply