The Mental Mismatches of Modern Society

by James A. Bacon

In his book, The Story of the Human Body, Daniel E. Lieberman, chair of the department of human evolutionary biology at Harvard, recounts how the human body evolved over six million years from its rain forest-dwelling ancestors in adaptation to changing evolutionary pressures like climate change, and then explores how human bodies are maladapted for contemporary life. Modern man has seen the rise of numerous chronic diseases that once were thought to be the inevitable result of aging but increasingly are regarded as the product of post-industrial lifestyles from insufficient exercise and excess consumption of carbohydrates (heart disease and diabetes) to the wearing of socks and shoes (fungal infections and plantar fasciitis) and squinting for endless hours at books and computer screens (myopia).

In the few hunter-gatherer societies remaining on the planet, Lieberman contends, once people have made it through the gauntlet of early childhood, they routinely reach their 70s, and do so without the scourges of obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and other afflictions of modern society. Our medical establishment, he suggests, treats symptoms. We must turn our attention to underlying causes.

I find Lieberman’s case highly persuasive. But, then, I’ve always been fascinated by human evolution, and I’ve always believed that the emotional substrate of human behavior has been heavily influenced by our Stone Age, hunter-gatherer ancestry. If I could wish one thing of Lieberman, it would be for him to entitle his next book The Story of the Human Mind, and devote it to showing how contemporary lifestyles are maladapted to our psyches, which evolved to maximize evolutionary fitness in bands of hunter-gatherers.

Humans are among the most intensely social of animal species. Many species live socially in herds, flocks, schools, and pods. Some species, especially primates, are characterized by systems of hierarchy in which dominant individuals enjoy preferential access to food and sexual partners. Such patterns can be seen in all human societies, even those with the most simple and egalitarian social structures. But humans also have developed an unparalleled capacity for cooperation and altruism. Our proclivities for greed and self-aggrandizement are balanced by proclivities for compassion and self-sacrifice. Humans truly have the most complex psyches in the animal kingdom.

As a social species, we are emotionally wired to crave social interaction. Humans could not survive long as “lone wolves.” We depended upon the group to protect against predators, to cooperate in hunting, and to guard against the incursions of other bands of humans. The emotional pain of loneliness is deeply rooted in our psyches. The need to “belong” is intense. In the early stages of cultural evolution, the group was usually defined as a kinship group or closely allied kinship groups within the band. As human societies grew more complex, the group came to be defined as tribes, chieftainships, kingships, religious sects, nationalities, economic classes, and other affiliations in infinite variety. As human societies became urbanized, more complex, and more subject to flux, many individuals fell between the cracks. They became lonely and alienated. They developed emotional disorders — anxiety and depression foremost among them — rarely seen in simpler societies.

The afflictions of alienation and disconnectedness have intensified in industrial and post-industrial society. In the 1950s, the term “alienation” was quite the buzzword; an entire body of literature rose up around it. Now, arguably, the rise of social media has kicked alienation into overdrive. Digital relationships don’t deliver the same emotional impact as flesh-and-blood relationships. I would also suggest the controversial proposition that the rise of ideologies in which sexual orientation and gender are up for grabs has created even more emotional angst. Whatever the reason, unparalleled numbers of young people today suffer from anxiety, depression, and self-destructive tendencies.

To bring this discussion back to Lieberman’s book, I would suggest that our hunter-gatherer psyches are mismatched with our modern lifestyles. Loneliness, disconnection, and alienation are as much a scourge of modern life as obesity, hypertension and diabetes. We are no more effective at treating the underlying causes of our mental illnesses than we are at treating our physical illnesses. At least we understand the causes of our physical illnesses, even if we seem ineffectual at addressing them. We don’t even fully understand the roots of our mental illnesses.

The primary causes of the mismatch between hunter-gatherer psyches and modern society are not Republican or Democratic in origin. But I do think some things make the mismatch worse and some make them better. I am utterly convinced that the breakdown of stable family structures is an aggravating factor. I speculate that the unprecedented flux in sexual, gender, and other identities is another.

I have no idea what the solution is, or if a solution is even possible. But, as with all things, we must start by understanding the nature of the problem. If we can’t agree on that, there is no hope of finding a fix.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

18 responses to “The Mental Mismatches of Modern Society”

  1. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    The first thing to recognize and understand if that you cannot just look at what is happening in the US and believe it represents the world.

    We have billions of people on this earth – from Africa to India to South America to the US.

    Start there to really try to understand. Don’t just look at the US …. trees, forest…etc…

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Drill down, not up… bonus? Oil!

  2. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    Other than being the Moderator Creator and a few others with special dispensation, how does this discussion shed any light on state, regional, and local public policy? How does reading or contributing to a blog factor in to human development? Many hunters with keyboard weapons are evident, fo rsure.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      It’s illustrative of some/much traditional Conservative “thinking” that involves their philosophical beliefs and concepts of morality but often and usually with a US-only focus as if we are unique in the world and not comparable to other countries.

      It’s the problem that many Conservatives seem to have in trying to understand how the “world” actually works, i.e. : ” I am utterly convinced that the breakdown of stable family structures is an aggravating factor. I speculate that the unprecedented flux in sexual, gender, and other identities is another.”

      ask how that works in Japan or South Africa or New Zealand…etc…

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        You may be on the money in part. Having once been among that tribe of political persuasion, I understand the exasperation of conservatives when and where individuals transgress mores and laws. Population size and density plus aggravating and provocative social media further exacerbated by bitter civil dialogue is a formula for violent expression. We will never see an answer on a blog even BR.

        1. dave schutz Avatar
          dave schutz

          I’m pleased and interested to see this discussion. Topic needs everyone’s careful thought. And, well, Freedom Of The Press inheres to the guy that owns the press, and that’s Jim Bacon!

    2. I have been pursuing the theme of “social breakdown” on this blog for some time now, referencing anecdotes and statistics from Virginia. I have been paying considerable attention to mental illness and family breakdown as causal factors. The purpose of this piece is to build a theoretical framework for understanding why we’re seeing so much mental illness (anxiety and depression), in particular.

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        If you say so. Your concerns which are likely shared by many, however, do not easily translate into public policy regionally, locally, or statewide. David Brooks in an OpEd in today’s NYT summed his observations considering similar social analysis is that mass shooters seek recognition. My NYC gut tells me that observation likely applies to your evolutionary paradigm and observations about mental illness and societal breakdown.

        More people, more isolation of individuals, more provocative social media, more bitter civil dialogue — some will burst out. No theoretical framework will explain individual choices however intriguing they appeal for some universal comprehension. Most, I believe, are as puzzled as are you and wish for explanations that lead to prescriptions.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          One does wonder in terms of “factors” that are said to engender “social breakdown” if such factors are more or less unique to the US and that’s why other countries don’t have such problems.

          so what factors are unique to the US with regard to social breakdown?

          is it race, culture, income, what?

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Could it be slavery enshrined in our founding documents? You know, the documents so many here read aloud to their families on the 4th of July.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Oh you mean that we are “different” from the rest of the world because of slavery?

            hmmm…. no, I don’t think that’ll work for Conservatives…. better to blame culture…

          3. dave schutz Avatar
            dave schutz

            Nor Brazilians, nor Mauritanians, nor Saudis, Burmese, Colombians….http://www.americanabolitionists.com/international-abolition-and-anti-slavery-timeline.html

        2. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          BaQAnon’s Rebellion…

    3. walter smith Avatar
      walter smith

      Wow. Kind of rude to insult the host, but since you asked…
      This is a very sly way of Jim criticizing the stupidity of the lockdowns as a basis for understanding all the suicidal ideation and other problems kids are having nowadays. The social media stuff is bad enough, but the lockdowns and masking and school closures took it next level.
      Then he will tie the disaffected youth to all the SSRI drug prescriptions and point out how the crazy shooters tend to be (1) crazy, (2) known to be crazy, (3) fatherless (as in absence of living in 2 biological parent home, (4) on SSRI drugs.
      This will lead to why the gun policy and the Covid policy will never work and maybe we should encourage people to have kids only after getting married, not pay them to have kids and substitute for the father.
      But if he had started with the social isolation problems from Covid, Larry and the other CDC worshippers would have never read it.
      See, he’s tricking you! Be careful! He’s going to get you to agree that social isolation is bad…and then your whole Covid religion will fall apart!

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        social isolation and breakdown responsible for all the bad stuff going on in the US but not other countries?

  3. This “mismatch” theme is old and I think ridiculous.

Leave a Reply