The Latest Wrinkle in the Law-Enforcement-for-Rent Saga

by James A. Bacon

The Office of Attorney General (OAG) under former AG Mark Herring failed to adequately conduct a search for documents requested under the Freedom of Information Act by climate-change skeptic Christopher Horner, a Richmond Circuit Court Judge has found. The court ordered the OAG, now under Attorney General Jason Miyares, to conduct a new search.

The issue arose from communications between Herring’s OAG and the State Energy & Environmental Impact Center (SEEIC) backed by billionaire Michael Bloomberg. Under an arrangement agreed to by the OAG, SEEIC would fund the hiring of an OAG attorney to “advanc[e] progressive clean energy, climate change, and environmental positions.” Horner, a Keswick resident and senior fellow with the Competitive Enterprise Institute, exposed the communications but hit a dead end in further inquiries when the OAG claimed an exemption for working papers.

The larger legal issue is whether Virginia’s Attorney General is allowed to strike deals with private parties to fund positions on his staff that the General Assembly has not approved in its budget. Although Herring negotiated a deal to pursue a left-leaning cause, his action could have created a precedent for a successor to collaborate with conservative groups to harness the power of the OAG to pursue conservative causes.

The legal saga began in 2018, but resolution dragged out for years due to “various maneuvers by then-AG Mark Herring’s Office,” according to an article by Government Accountability & Oversight (GAO), a conservative organization.

Horner and CEI documented that the OAG applied, and was subsequently approved, for an SEEIC grant to pay $81,500 per year to hire a special prosecutor to pursue climate and renewable-energy issues. Technically, the attorney would be an employee of the Bloomberg Center at New York University. Similar arrangements had been worked out with numerous other Democratic attorney generals around the country. When Horner detailed his findings in a report, “Law Enforcement for Rent,” the AG’s office dropped the plan. But Horner continued digging.

As GAO describes the decision facing Miyares, a Republican who inherited the litigation from his Democratic predecessor, the OAG will have to decide whether to turn over records requested by the FOIA or continue to keep litigating to defend Herring’s claim of “working papers” privilege.

“We look forward to the results of a proper search,” Horner said in a statement, “and hope Virginia’s new Attorney General will put an end to three and a half years of stonewalling over how the state’s former top attorney come to make such a promise, and what led them to abandon the effort after we started asking questions. Hopefully, he’ll now turn over these public records that have been at issue since 2018.”

According to Legal Newsline, the funding of special prosecutors is now before Virginia House and Senate budget negotiators. There is a move to ban special interest groups from planting activist litigators in the OAG. Says Legal Newsline: “HB30 directs that compensation paid to employees of the AG for performing legal services on behalf of the Commonwealth will derive only by way of appropriation.”


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

31 responses to “The Latest Wrinkle in the Law-Enforcement-for-Rent Saga”

  1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    I see little difference between this and how Youngkin made a position for Wheeler in practical terms.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      You don’t? There is. Maybe if Wheeler’s salary were paid by an outside entity, say the US Chamber of Commerce or Heartland Institute, that would be similar. But it appears Wheeler is on the state payroll and thus no questions about who he is working for. Creating/compressing at-will positions is within the executive branch discretion.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Heck, Youngkin has not taken any salary at all as of yet… who is HE working for…??

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          Again, look up from Twitter and stick to facts. He got paid every dime then donated a comparable amount. He’ll get a W-2.

          1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Potato… potato…

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Vodka.

        2. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          Again, look up from Twitter and stick to facts. He got paid every dime then donated a comparable amount. He’ll get a W-2.

        3. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Not the collective us.

        4. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          How much stock does he still hold in Carlyle?

      2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        He probably meant to refer to Matthew Moran, a lobbyist who is on paid leave from his lobbying group and functioning as an advisor to Youngkin.

        There is some difference between Moran and someone brought in directly to the AG’s office to work on specific projects. That person could use the courts.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Could mean Youngkin.

          Rhetorical question: Is a CEO ever really retired? Especially if his dividends from holdings in his former company is orders of magnitude larger than his salary as governor?

      3. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        That you know of…

      4. Moderate Avatar

        Wheeler’s on the payroll but what about Youngkin’s advisor who’s been feuding with the D’s about policy? I believe I saw that he’s not on the state payroll but is supported by outside groups.

  2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    It is good to see more people and groups challenging government agencies’ misuse of the FOIA. The Youngkin administration is also being sued for its refusal, under the “working papers” exemption, to hand over records. I assume Miyares’ office is defending the Governor. https://www.pilotonline.com/government/virginia/vp-nw-government-virginia-media-20220413-q3iydvf2qnhvlmyygtu6j74nla-story.html

    There is certainly a danger in allowing the AG to accept money, even in a roundabout way, to pay a lawyer to work on cases related to a special interests’ priorities.

    The comment in Legal Newsline about “a move to ban special interest groups from planting activist litigators in the OAG” is totally misleading. The language that the publication is referring to is not an amendment to the introduced bill. The language is not new. It was included in the introduced bill. It first appeared as budget bill language in 2020, as a proposed Senate amendment to the budget bill that was subsequently adopted and included in the 2020-2022 biennial Appropriation Act.

    1. vicnicholls Avatar
      vicnicholls

      So then by saying Miyares accepting money in a roundable way for special interests, that you agree that it was wrong/dishonest for Zuckerberg to pay Democrat party/related to the Democratic party people to work for elections in Democratic majority areas that had an effect on the election? Thank you!

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        Your comment makes no sense. I was referring to Herring, or any AG for that matter, agreeing to take money from a special interest group to be used to hire a lawyer for the AG’s office to specialize in cases related to the priorities of that interest group. My comment had nothing to do anyone making campaign contributions.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      So much sauce, so many geese and ganders…

  3. David Wojick Avatar
    David Wojick

    Horner is a true bulldog. Twenty years ago he and I took a run at the first National Climate Assessment, which I call the National Scare. This investigation led to CEI, Sen. Inhofe and me suing NSF with Horner as lead attorney. We settled with an agreement that the Scare was not Federal policy, which may hold for the later ones.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      So, you lost.

      1. David Wojick Avatar
        David Wojick

        I think we got the most we could, so we won some?

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          When you agree to a settlement in which your adversary agrees not to do that which they had no intention to do in the first place, you didn’t win.

          1. David Wojick Avatar
            David Wojick

            Oh the National Climate Assessment was definately intended to be a policy making input. It is mandated by Congress.

  4. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    If the idea of an employee of an outside entity, especially a think tank “detailed” to work for the govt doesn’t strike one as corrupt, I give up. We’re deep into Alice and Wonderland.

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      For once, I agree with you.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        We agree more than you think sometimes. I’m just not with you on your “conversion” to conservatism… 😉

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Or Booz and Allen…

  5. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    Tall Man Bad (and that way we can keep it as TDS for the VA version) claim of working papers seems a bit of a stretch, but the language is created by or for the Gov for his use, so it is plausible, and the security/privacy concerns are legit as Lefties love to dox people who don’t obey…(BTW, Libs of TikTok has 300k more subscribers since Taylor Lorenz doxxed the owner)
    But the Herring bit makes me wonder about a prior FOIA I made. I asked AG and Gov Coonman Blackface for any docs concerning the decision not to prosecute Louise Lucas. Gov said he had none. I then reminded his Comms person of a Tweet by the Gov and she said …oh, yeah, that’s it.
    I had also asked the AG for any such documents and I would have expected SOMETHING, but I was told nothing. I find that hard to believe. Maybe I’ll ask again…

  6. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    https://finance.yahoo.com/screener/insider/YOUNGKIN%20GLENN%20A

    So, as an insider, in May 2020 he exercised an option for an additional 24,000 shares, and sold 13,000 in August. Of course, at some point he left, and his transactions from then on would not be an insider transactions, but you know of 11,000 shares still held at that point.

    Even still, we know his position in CG was more than $250K… but Va’s financial disclosures are loose to say the least…
    https://www.vpap.org/candidates/180223/conflicts_disclosure/securities/?sei_period=32

    1. walter smith Avatar
      walter smith

      What does Youngkin’s wealth have to do with anything in the story?
      He’s rich. Most people who are insiders in a public company are, or become so. And he was an insider in a sort of incubator of companies and those private equity/venture capital types make a TON of money in their investments. That is why you see all the blind trust investment things at the end. One day CG will “exit” and it will be a big payday for the business sold and for CG…

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Well, it only proves “seek and ye shall find.”

        Younngkin owns +6M shares of CG. At 2.6% dividend yield, you figure whose bread is buttered.

        Governor’s salary — $175K
        CG dividend — $6+ million

        1. walter smith Avatar
          walter smith

          Ok…he’s really rich. So what?
          And what does that have to do with the story?
          Unlike all the Dem politicians imbued with white guilt because they were born into great wealth, what does Youngkin’s wealth have to do with anything? He wasn’t born into wealth, and he TONNED it. Maybe that indicates good executive ability. Maybe he’ll make a good executive. Maybe he pays more in taxes in each and every year than some people earn in a lifetime. So what?
          And I’d like to now demean all the “poor” politicians of both parties who mysteriously get rich for their “service.”

Leave a Reply