The Latest Obstacle to Solar Power in Virginia: the PJM Project Queue

New connection requests in the PJM system. (Click for more legible image.)

by James A. Bacon

Solar energy is the cheapest source of energy available to the world today. The more solar energy we can generate, the better… up to a certain point. Once solar and other intermittent energy sources comprise 30% or so of the juice supplied to the electric grid, they create problems with reliability during extreme weather events, which can be surmounted only through investment in backup generation and energy storage. Until we reach that point, however, here in Virginia we should be doing everything possible to promote solar.

The Virginia Clean Energy Act (VCEA) has set the goal of achieving a 100% zero-carbon electric grid by 2050 (most of it supplied by solar and wind), but we’re nowhere near 30% renewables. Bacon’s Rebellion has highlighted one of the big obstacles facing solar developers in Virginia — getting large, utility-scale solar farms local permits in counties where residents want to conserve pristine viewsheds and traditional agricultural lifestyles.

It turns out that there’s another obstacle — getting projects approved by PJM Interconnection, LLC, which oversees the electric grid in the 13-state region of which Virginia is a part. There is no lack of proposed solar projects — whether they are economically viable is a different question — and PJM is overwhelmed.

Once solar developers obtain state and local environmental and planning permits, they submit their projects to PJM for evaluation. PJM requires developers to absorb the cost of connecting their projects to the electric transmission grid. Costs vary widely depending upon the project’s distance from the grid and the grid’s ability to absorb additional capacity at the point of connection. Ascertaining that cost requires detailed engineering study. PJM does not have sufficient staff to keep pace with the surge in the number of projects, and approvals are taking longer than ever.

Developers of well-capitalized, utility-scale projects are frustrated because PJM has worked on a first-come, first-serve basis, and the project queue is clogged with small, unfinanced projects that may never be built. Indeed, between 2000 and 2015, only 24% of projects seeking connection nationally were completed — and the percentage is declining.

To work down the two-year backlog, PJM is changing its procedures. It is prioritizing projects that have financing and other attributes that maximize the likelihood that they actually will move forward if approved.

As reported by the Wall Street Journal this morning, The stakeholder-governed organization also is hiring more staff, budgeting funds for automation tools to streamline the approval process, and prioritizing 1,200 projects. Hundreds of other projects, mostly smaller ones, will have to wait.

What it means for Virginia. AgriSunPower LLC, a Richmond-based affiliate of national solar developer Hecate Energy LLC, is one of the developers whose projects will be reviewed by PJM. AgriSun’s most visible project is a $400 million, 280-megawatt solar farm in Pulaski County.

AgriSun CEO Felix Garcia has met with scores of local government officials across Virginia trying to develop other solar-farm projects. Many local officials ask him why the smaller projects they approved already aren’t getting built. The reason for most, says Garcia, is that they can’t get financing. Meanwhile, they’re clogging the PJM project queue, slowing the progress of larger, financially viable projects — like his — from getting built.

The Code of Virginia already requires projects to get bid bonds to ensure that developers fulfill their stated obligations. Garcia recommends that localities consider adding a financial vetting criteria to weed out the 75% of projects that have no financing and are gumming up the PJM project pipeline.

Hope springs eternal, however, and small project developers may hope that PJM approval will get them across the financial finish line. No doubt there would be a hue and cry against any proposal that would be perceived as stacking the deck against the little guy in favor of big out-of-state solar developers.

Virginia regulators need to decide how serious they are about meeting the VCEA 100% zero-carbon energy goals (or even the 30% renewable energy goal that I advocate). That means figuring out how far along Virginia is in meeting its goals. How many solar projects have received local approval? How many of those have received PJM approval? How many projects have been withdrawn? How many are languishing in the PJM queue? If Virginia projects can’t get connected, does that mean Virginia power companies end up importing more electricity from outside the state, and, if so, will the interstate transmission capacity exist to meet the load?

If we don’t know the answers to those questions, policy makers are stumbling around in the dark.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

20 responses to “The Latest Obstacle to Solar Power in Virginia: the PJM Project Queue”

  1. David Wojick Avatar
    David Wojick

    I did not know that nighttime was an extreme weather event.

    1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
      Baconator with extra cheese

      Exactly when we would be recharging all our electric cars, buses, dump trucks, cement trucks, etc.

  2. William Chambliss Avatar
    William Chambliss

    PJM does not approve the solar generation projects. In Virginia, either the DEQ issues permits to construct such projects or, for most utility scaled projects (>150 MW), the SCC issues certificates of public convenience and necessity. PJM approves and quantifies the costs of the generation project interconnecting with the bulk transmission system.

    Yes, PJM has clearly been inundated with interconnection requests from solar developers since the prices for panels has dropped considerably in the past few years. PJM is in the process of reforming its interconnection procedures and will probably impose a moratorium on such studies for a year or two until reforms are in place. The FERC will oversee that effort.

  3. LarrytheG Avatar

    Until and unless cost-effective storage is developed and/or absent some energy breakthrough with hydrogen and/or small modular nuclear reactors, gas will be needed to cover the gaps but the more wind/solar we have, the less gas we need to burn – but yes, we need the standby and from what I hear, we have more than enough right now – already – because, right now we rely primarily on gas from existing plants. As we build more solar and wind, we’ll still need those plants but they will run less and use less gas.

    This never has been an either/or proposition except in the eyes of the naysayers who for some odd reason are opposed to cheaper fuel – even if it’s not “available’ 24/7. The fact is, when it IS available, we burn less gas.

    That’s the rational way to think about this IMHO.

    Between now and 2040, 2050, more innovations are likely going to happen and before you know it all the boogeyman nightmares will be like a fart in the wind.

  4. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Inconvenient questions don’t get answered. Right now probably less than 5% of Virginia’s electricity comes from solar (and basically none from wind, just the 12MW in those two turbines off Virginia Beach.) “Policy makers” believe whatever they were told by the last lobbyist in their office or buying them a drink.

    You have to stop leaving out the storage. Intermittent wind and solar need to be backed by incredible amounts of storage, which the utilities fully understand but are lying about.

    1. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
      energyNOW_Fan

      5% would be quite impressive…considering we import a lot of electrons. 5% in state?

  5. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    I also saw the article about PJM backlog. The idea of only 25% of projects going forward perhaps applies to other energy projects too. Not every case is a winner (eg; ACC pipeline). I feel like I do not have confidence/numbers to prove that solar is so cheap. I realize there are subsidies, and I am pragmatic: if gov’t gives me tax credit, I will take it. Believe by “cheap” we are talking about utility scale large projects. To make it cheap for rooftops, we have to heap on additional subsidies better known as net metering, which basically forcing utils to give people who install solar a lot of money payback.

    PS- But I am among the happiest that coal fired power is no longer the King of America. I feel we need more onshore wind in Va. and we need to get that mostly from MD PA or WV because we do not have the vein of fast mountain-top air that they have. But we can do projects there I assume.

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      I think net metering is very fair. If I am generating and not using everything on site, Dominion gets those renewable electrons for free.

  6. LesGabriel Avatar

    I’m intrigued by the first sentence that solar is now the cheapest source of electricity. Seems that that statement requires several qualifiers. You later acknowledge that not all solar projects are economically viable. One would think that the cheapest source of electricity would by definition be economically viable.

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Not wanting to put words in JABs mouth but in terms of operating cost, it is by far the cheapest. Capital costs are a part of the financial model but to be fair the natural gas fueled generation capital costs are already sunken.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar

      utility scale solar is supposed to be cheaper than on-site rooftop. But utility scale has come down in price a lot in the last few years and actually is cheaper than gas – right now, assuming gas does not get more scarce/more expensive.

      It’s just not “available’ 24/7 and critics say because it’s not , it somehow ‘less’ than gas and other fuels.

      But if it cheaper, and it is, then using it whenever it IS available makes good sense and NOT using it when it IS available makes zero fiscal sense.

  7. Merchantseamen Avatar
    Merchantseamen

    Just read that offshore leases will be up for auction soon off of NY and NJ. These farms will slowly move south to VA and NC coast lines. New England has suffered from 2 nor’easters this year. Nor’easters are very dangerous to the shipping lanes. They break ships and sink fishing boats. In my career I was in many. One was enough for me. These wind fans will not survive. Maintenance will be a nightmare. Carbon Fiber and Fiberglass is not an option. See nor’easter above. Salt water attacks everything with gusto. Except precious metals and true stainless steel and monel. Sea water freezes at some 28 degrees F. Example: Loaded tanker coming from TX carrying heating oil for Bridgeport CT. Winter, nor’easter, frikken cold. From the midships house to the stem (bow) covered with ice on the foredeck some 2″ thick. 2″ diameter handrails swollen with ice some 6″ in diameter. We had so much weight on the foredeck we were down by the head that the anchors were touching (dragging) the water. This is very dangerous. Why you say. All ships carry a “sag” in the middle of the ship some 8 to 10″. Chief Mate calculates what is needed, depending on cargo. With the advent of being heavy in the bow along with water and fuel consumption aft. creates a “hog”. Take a pencil and place your thumb in the middle and pull down on each end. That is a hog. Pull to hard and it breaks. These wind turbines will not pay for themselves. It appears the over speed trips fail on regular bases. Prop feathering fails to work. Inertia brakes can’t hold the weight. These things over speed and tear themselves apart. Are they improving the tech? Maybe. But they are selling the politicians and greenies a load if they think these thing can hold up. Who is going to pay and clean up the pollution that is generated? These turbines do not run dry. Thimble full of lubricating oil in the water brings the wrath of several alphabet agency’s down on you with citations and fines. I expect a minimum of 200 gallons of lube oil close loop pressurized system with all the associated pumps, tubing, gauges and piping. All these thing leak. And they don’t tell you they are leaking, you have to have an alarm system auto shutdown or find it when making rounds. The fines imposed do not provide for “clean-up.” That money sort of disappears.

    1. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
      energyNOW_Fan

      To the extent the negatives are true we the rate payers are the ones responsible financially.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar

      but we do build tunnels and bridges that survive storm and salt water, right? And most ships survive for longer than that (albeit with a lot of maintenance). I would think if
      we can build the bay-bridge tunnel to last for almost 6 decades, why not other similar infrastructure?

      In terms of pollution – thousands of ships full of lubricating oil, right?

      1. Merchantseamen Avatar
        Merchantseamen

        Larry just pointing out the bad side. World War II torpedoed ships off the coast and elsewhere are still leaking oil. To your point. Tankers are carrying some 300, 000 to 700,000 barrels of product. Not including Bunker C fuel oil and lube oils. The difference, the ships are manned with watch standers 24/7 . Highly trained, dedicated, certified and licensed more than a doctor, lawyer or journalist ever thought of being. Wind mills are not manned. So who is around to “nip it in the bud” as Barney would say.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          They are maintained… but not 24/7 on site. Are you familiar with the James River ghost fleet?

          1. Merchantseamen Avatar
            Merchantseamen

            Oh yeah most are junk. There shell plates are thin. Skeleton crews make their rounds on a regular bases. Voids need sounding as well as tanks. To recommission those the Sabine TX and Richmond CA fleets in being would be cost prohibitive. In 91, Desert Storm they tried to bring a lot of those bottoms out. Most failed their ultrasound tests. The “good” ones they did not have enough licensed deck or engine officers in the country to man them. The junk went to scrap. Most shipping companies had been gutted by D.C. politicians after the Valdez grounding. The Merchant Marine is a dieing breed. Some of the fellows I know that are still shipping are on the beach as the ships are laid up without charter. Sort of sad.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar

            yeah, but the point is that lots of things are built for salt-water and storm environments, and they actually are maintained for fairly long lifespans. i would imagine if we can build a bridge/tunnel complex 50 years ago and it’s still going, we can do that with wind turbines also. No?

          3. Merchantseamen Avatar
            Merchantseamen

            Great points. I just don’t think the “materials” are there yet to stave off wind and sea. Eventually they may come along but not in the next 10 years. Not when we still have “cheap” energy bought to market. I believe wind and energy are the weakest and they will not make it the energy of choice by mandating it. It is taking the profit motive out of all the of the alternatives.

          4. LarrytheG Avatar

            I just assumed they’d be using the same materials always used for other infrastructure, no? My understanding was that wind and solar ARE the cheapest energy right now? No? I am of the view that wind and solar ought to be used when they are available and that gas when they are not. I don’t believe we are “mandating” wind/solar when they are not available and the grid will go dark. That’s just boogeyman politics from the “anti’ folks which is hard to understand why. Why not have a grid with diverse fuel sources and generate with the lowest cost fuels as standard procedure?

            Hey, you’re a Merchant Marine guy, right? How are those ships operated fuel-wise? Are they mostly fuel oil? Are any like the Warships that use nukes? Why not?

Leave a Reply