The Junk Science Behind a Property-Valuation Study

Junk science

by James A. Bacon

When you examine every issue through a racial lens, everything looks like racism. It’s even easier to find racism everywhere when you resort to junk science (or social science, as the case may be).

A case in point is a new study by Housing Opportunities Made Equal of Virginia (Home), which purports to find that systemic bias in real estate appraisals results in under-valuation of properties in predominantly African-American neighborhoods in the City of Richmond. This bias harms African-American property owners, the report contends, despite the fact that if the bias actually exists it would mean African-American homeowners would be paying lower real estate taxes.

So, how does HOME demonstrate bias?

The story begins in 2022 when Dr. Andre Perry with the Brookings Institution make a presentation in Richmond showing that home values are much lower in majority-Black neighborhoods than in predominantly non-Black neighborhoods. While acknowledging that part of the difference arises from differences in the homes and opportunities available in the neighborhoods, his statistical analysis showed that different valuations occur even when comparing “identical homes in neighborhoods with identical (non-racial) characteristics.”

Inspired by Perry’s research, HOME Virginia conducted secondary research and cross-tabulated Richmond tax assessment data (valuation, size, condition), with American Community Survey demographics, supplemented by 50 interviews with homeowners in majority Black neighborhoods.

“Overall, home values tend to be lower in majority Black neighborhoods than in other neighborhoods where Black residents are relatively few,” HOME says. “Racial demographics predict about half of the inequality between neighborhoods in the City of Richmond.”

Source: “Policy Approaches to Racial Disparities in Neighborhood Home Values and Related Risks of Displacement

Some of the gap in home values, HOME concedes, can be explained by the facts that residents of Black neighborhoods tend to live in smaller homes in worse physical condition than residents of non-Black neighborhoods and that they have longer commute times.

But after adjusting for the housing-related factors, HOUSE goes on to argue, the gap persists “even when essentially all other factors except for the racial demographics of the neighborhoods are held constant.” That gap, HOME Virginia calculates, is about 17%.

HOME traces that difference to “explicit forms of institutional racism” such as redlining, urban renewal projects, the demolition of stable Black neighborhoods caused by Interstate construction, and the shortchanging of Black property owners in eminent-domain condemnation. Redlining, Interstate routing, and urban renewal unquestionably were discriminatory and did harm Black property values. Although those practices ended more than a half century ago, HOME Virginia suggests that the pernicious impact persists to this day.

It is one thing to argue, however, that those malign practices negatively influenced Black wealth accumulation back then and quite another to suggest that they bias the discipline of real estate assessments a half century later.

There are two critical factors affecting home valuations that HOME Virginia overlooks in its comparison of modern-day real estate valuations: crime and schools. People pay a premium to live in safe neighborhoods with good schools.

It is intuitively obvious that people place a value on neighborhoods where they don’t have to worry about their homes being burgled, their cars broken into, or their belongings stolen off the front porch. People prefer living where they can stroll around the neighborhood at night without fear of being mugged. They  tend not to enjoy the routine sound of gunfire or find it exhilarating to dive for cover to protect themselves from the random spray of bullets.

According to RealListingAgent.com, “Generally speaking, the more crime happens in or around your neighborhood, the less your property will be worth. A 2019 study in the Nordic Journal of Criminology, based on the experience in Sweden, found that housing prices drop by 1.5% for every 1% increase in crime.”

Likewise, households with children place a premium on living in neighborhoods with good public schools. In the Richmond metropolitan area, Richmond public schools are widely seen as a dumpster fire. Public perceptions are reinforced by abominably low Standards of Learning pass rates for most schools.

Now, we can debate the reasons for higher rates of crime and poor educational performance in majority Black neighborhoods. We can probe why many middle-class Blacks flee these neighborhoods as soon as they have the financial means to do so. Even if we accept the proposition that high crime and poor schools are the legacies of historical racism (which I mostly don’t), that is very different from saying that the system for assessing real estate values is biased.

To exclude the impact of crime and schools from an analysis of property values renders the study worthless. The HOME report is not a serious query into the causes of neighborhood variation in property values. It is a polemic dressed up in social-scientific language designed to further an ideological conviction that racism is systemic and to advance a series of redistributionist public policy remedies. It contributes to the unjustified sense of victimhood and grievance that divides our society today. It is reprehensible and should be condemned.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

69 responses to “The Junk Science Behind a Property-Valuation Study”

  1. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Jim – you have to have wealth and income to live in a "good" neighborhood.

    It's not the other way around.

    If you have few assets and a low paying job, you're not likely to be able to "pay a premium" to live in a good neighborhood with good schools.

    RTD had several articles about it recently:

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/05715926a3f752db4dcf34fe8809f03b320657dce906724fe1dde8502e6b4611.png
    https://richmond.com/many-va-schools-still-intensely-segregated/article_af88c101-a973-534b-9400-5a481398dfb3.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=email&utm_campaign=user-share

    black folks and white folks go to largely segregated schools decided by neighborhood income demographics.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Now give me Hispanic and Asian. Let's look at the same picture for other ethnic groups who have been subjected to various levels of discrimination over previous decades.

      Jim and I do live in a great neighborhood, and the home values are growing at an insane rate (about 10% per annum). That's because the sale prices are doing that. Consumer choice drives the sales values in this neighborhood and in inner city Richmond. Jim is right that perceptions about crime and the schools are huge factors that cannot be disregarded. More grandparents than parents in this neighborhood, but they are here mainly because the grandkids are also in the West End. So the schools…

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        They have those charts Steve but how many were also subjected to 100+ years of Jim Crow policies?

        https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6f33d772ce806a9f397304e2806966267aaa31b5de2f867117e1c6b4cd99db2e.png

        https://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2021/january/wealth-gaps-white-black-hispanic-families-2019

        You and Jim were probably lucky to have the wealth and assets to buy right?

        With respect to crime and schools, I agree 100% but if you are a low income person with few assets, do you really have a choice?

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          Lucky to be a descendant of a string of stable marriages. Lucky to have parents and grandparents who were all college grads and valued education. Lucky to be an American. But nobody handed me the degree and the jobs or made me start investing so early. Nobody made me stay away from crime, drugs, or made me honor my marriage for 50 years. Plenty with my "luck" are broke.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            You’re right. It’s luck combined with good decisions. But, there is a “Lucky Sperm Club” that sets a likelihood of getting the chance to make good decisions that have an impact.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            You’re right. It’s luck combined with good decisions. But, there is a “Lucky Sperm Club” that sets a likelihood of getting the chance to make good decisions that have an impact.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            plenty others never had the start/opportunities you had, also because their parents were sons/daughters of slaves, uneducated and never had a chance at a decent education or a job with benefits because of Jim Crow. Your forefathers did not have that disadvantage and in turn, you had advantages others did not have.

            Blacks did not suddenly become well-educated with college degrees when Jim Crow ended… it was generational impacts from it. Just simply recognizing that seems to be a struggle for some.

          4. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            You’re right. It’s luck combined with good decisions. But, there is a “Lucky Sperm Club” that sets a likelihood of getting the chance to make good decisions that have an impact.

        2. James Kiser Avatar
          James Kiser

          Since people alive today haven't been subjected to 100 years of Jim Crow you argument doesn't apply.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            didn't affect their descendants?

            Have anything to do with income and wealth disparities?

        3. Randy Huffman Avatar
          Randy Huffman

          Jim Crow era has been over for decades. Taking your statistics at face value, my question is why such a wealth gap still exists after over 3 decades of an era where systemic racism generally ended. I also wonder what the data would show if you tossed out the top 1%, because we all know the wealth gap in general has risen consistent with the markets.

          More importantly, nothing here in your arguments are inconsistent with Jim, his focus is on the question of whether property valuations are bias on their face. Nothing in your data refutes that position, correct?

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            I do appreciate your civil approach to the discussion, thank you.

            Last question first. I trust the assessments themselves. They do show some disparities. I'm not entirely sure, the reasons behind them and don't put great stock in the study that JAB references.

            Jim Crow has not been "over" for 100 years at all. Many of us alive right now saw blacks denied access to public education right here in Va.

            THe 1% is interesting. So you may doubt the gap itself on a per capita basis? DO you have a view why the gap persists? Is it the 1% primarily in your view?

            Do you think that there are no existing impacts to blacks today that emanate from Jim Crow polices that affected their parents, grand parents and great grand parents , that, in turn, affected generational
            wealth and handing down wealth?

            Any answers here?

            https://www.pewresearch.org… .

            I found this also that has some relation to the 1% idea:

            https://www.richmondfed.org/publications/research/economic_brief/2022/eb_22-17

          2. Randy Huffman Avatar
            Randy Huffman

            So my bad for posing questions at a time I have no ability to do my own searches as I am out of town, sorry. But I will respond with a real life example.

            I graduated college in the late 70’s and went to work for a CPA firm. Getting into college and into tougher courses was not easy unless you were prepared, I had zero contacts and very limited underlying classes, I did it by working my tail off. One of my mentors told me that the easiest way to land a great job was to be Black, and better yet, a woman. When I got to my National based firm, most there were white, but the firm was actively recruiting blacks and Hispanics. Those who got in were very hard working and deserved getting in, but then it was up to them how successful they wanted to be. Promotions were merit based, period.

            my point, affirmative action has been ongoing for over 4o years. The era of discrimination in housing has generally been over for decades. Firms have been actively recruiting and providing opportunity for minorities for decades. The issues being talked about today are identical to what was talked about in the 70’s, when the issues were very real.

            I reject the notion that systemic racism has been ongoing this whole time, there has to be other dynamics in place. I just have no understanding of what it is.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Affirmative action did help many blacks – if they had gotten through k-12 with decent grades and got accepted into college and could pay for it. The vast majority never got that far – and still don’t.

            It’s not ongoing systemic racism – but it is continuing generational impacts from their parents, grandparents , etc not able to get a good education, good job with benefits etc… so the children did
            not have the education to go higher to college or get jobs that paid well, had benefits, allowed house purchase and sending their kids to college.

            Not only disparities today in income and wealth. Disparities in things like how many blacks are doctors or officers in the military or CEOs, etc. How many in prison. How many live in high income neighborhoods. How many have college educations, Master Deg, PHDs.

            And home ownership and valuations as discussed in this blog post. It’s related and the disparities
            range wide on many metrics. I agree, it’s NOT modern day system racism, I agree.

            I’ve tried to provide links to authoritative sources with actual data .. mostly from the Federal Reserve which is a more centric source than Brookings.

          4. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Let me give you some background for me. I worked in a Navy Lab. It wanted people with degrees in math with a B or better average. They aggressively sought out blacks with those qualifications. They barely existed. They had to recruit nationwide to find one or two and so the percentage of black employees was like 1 or 2% for the degreed guys but all the janitors and cafeteria folks were as well as the laborers..were black.

            Degreed black workers got high wages, a good pension, health care for them and their families, and benefits for higher ed. None of the lower-paid workers got anywhere near that. In 34 years, I saw maybe 5-10 degreed black mathematicians. Interestingly, one of them was: https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f9fec03081b5b083bfdc4c7b254f0482c8cc03fe85a7261ed6be1098f03739da.png
            she went to segregated black school: https://www.dinwiddie.k12.v

            and a black college.

            her father was an uneducated share cropper.

            You can google her to get more details ..

            https://edu.lva.virginia.go

            she was one of very, very few black women to get a college degree in mathematics.

            About half of our scientists were white women, also aggressively recruited.

          5. Randy Huffman Avatar
            Randy Huffman

            Thanks for the link, she looks like a special lady.

          6. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            100 years ago in March 1924, VA passed two racial segregation laws that remained on the books until 1967. 68 years ago, VA spearheaded "massive resistance." Admiration for your efforts in the BR silo.

          7. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Sometimes, it’s hard to tell that they really don’t know, never really got the fully story in school or they do know but just refuse to admit that Jim Crow continued well into the 21 century and the effects of it
            are still with us but BR continues to write as if it’s not relevant.

      2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        “Jim is right that perceptions about crime and the schools are huge factors that cannot be disregarded.”

        They were not disregarded. They were adjusted for in the underlying study.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          indeed:

          " By controlling for commonly held causes of price differences including education, lower home quality, and crime, this paper suggests that bias is likely to be a large part of the unexplained devaluation of Black neighborhoods and some perspective on how anti-Black beliefs distort the value of assets. "

          https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/2018.11_Brookings-Metro_Devaluation-Assets-Black-Neighborhoods_final.pdf

          1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Yep, and they also controlled for quality of schools in the area. You would think JAB would at least read a little of the article he cites rather than jumping right to his forgone conclusions. Might find himself with a little less egg in his face.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            I admit I had not read the Brookings study but went back after you posted….

            Brookings: " By controlling for commonly held causes of price differences including education, lower home quality, and crime, this paper suggests that bias is likely to be a large part of the unexplained devaluation of Black neighborhoods and some perspective on how anti-Black beliefs distort the value of assets. "

            https://www.brookings.edu/w

            page 19

            then went back to see exactly what JAB said:

            " To exclude the impact of crime and schools from an analysis of property values renders the study worthless. "

            Did he not read it also or Steve too ?

            If Brookings actually DID allow for these factors, and one believes the study, what does one attribute the disparities to?

            Is there really some institutional bias/racism continuing, or what?

          3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            It is all about the narrative in the BR echo chamber. Why would anyone bother to look into what JAB and company claim if it validates their belief system? But really JAB should at least do it… it took me all of 5 minutes.

          4. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            It is all about the narrative in the BR echo chamber. Why would anyone bother to look into what JAB and company claim if it validates their belief system? But really JAB should at least do it… it took me all of 5 minutes.

          5. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            It is all about the narrative in the BR echo chamber. Why would anyone bother to look into what JAB and company claim if it validates their belief system? But really JAB should at least do it… it took me all of 5 minutes.

          6. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            It's a pattern of late IMO.

          7. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Some folks want to believe what they want to believe I think and dispute anything that contradicts it even if the data confirms it – they still reject it. JAB seems guilty of that in this instance.

  2. James Kiser Avatar
    James Kiser

    You should try living in Augusta County where the avg assessment went up 45%.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      How often does Augusta assess?

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        I can’t remember when it was last done, but assessment was signed by the Chancellor of the Exchequer.

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        I can’t remember when it was last done, but assessment was signed by the Chancellor of the Exchequer.

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          Just reexamined my letters from Henrico. Assessment up 59% 2018-24.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Doesn’t surprise me. Comparing my assessments to houses for sale, the assessment has always been a shade lower and lagging. Maybe they removed some of the slack?

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            we've easily doubled over ten years…. I would say…

          3. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            That’s 7%/yr. That’s the same as the mean S&P.

          4. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Let's see. Paid 25K for a lot in 1985 or so , now assessed at 80k… what's that?

          5. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Gimme a break! I’m retired. But here goes
            (80/25)^0.025=1.0295

            3%/yr — same as inflation roughly?

          6. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            thanks! taxes on that unimproved lot with no access to water/sewer and no guaranteed septic is awful.

          7. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            BTW, that’s 6.9%/yr same as Larry’s average over 10 years.

          8. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            But, did your tax rate remain constant? That is, did your tax go up 59%. (just the tax part. don’t include fees)

  3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “To exclude the impact of crime and schools from an analysis of property values renders the study worthless. “

    “But after adjusting for the housing-related factors, HOUSE goes on to argue, the gap persists “even when essentially all other factors except for the racial demographics of the neighborhoods are held constant.” That gap, HOME Virginia calculates, is about 17%.”

    Right after stating this they cite Perry et al 2018 as the source for this conclusion.

    This is that document – you might want to skim it… In it they clearly demonstrate that they adjust for quality of schools and crime rates. Your entire critique seems to be unfounded.

    https://www.brookings.edu/w

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MSPUS

    FWIW, median US house sold Q1-2024 was $420,800 and in Q1-2015 was $289,200.
    (420.8/289.2)^0.1=1.038 meaning average rate of 3.8%/year.

    From the two samples below Virginia homes are a good investment.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      IF you owned a house and had enough income to keep up with taxes.. you were golden.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        You can always take a home equity loan which should pay the taxes.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          well depending on the address right? If the house is in a run-down section and in bad repair?

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            You protest the assessment. The home equity loan is damned good evidence of the assessed value. If you can’t get the loan, then really complain.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            FLS in Fredericksburg had it's loan recalled not because it was not paying all on time but because the bank believed they would not be able to pay in the future. IOW, the bank believed future revenues would decline and recalled the loan.

            Similarly, loans for homes in "declining" places are problematic. even if gentrifying… it's risky business with the adjacent/nearby properties that may not be viable.

            Banks worry about going broke if the loan investment goes belly up – so two houses of equal assessment may not be perceived the same way depending on where they are.

          3. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Sure. Banks can — at any time — recall a loan on any adverse information. If a borrower gets drunk and kills some guy then the bank can recall his mortgage. By the same token, they can recall the widow’s mortgage too. Both increased the risk of failure.

            In some states, if you have savings, checking and/or investments with the bank, they can seize that money too.

          4. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Sure. Banks can — at any time — recall a loan on any adverse information. If a borrower gets drunk and kills some guy then the bank can recall his mortgage. By the same token, they can recall the widow’s mortgage too. Both increased the risk of failure.

            In some states, if you have savings, checking and/or investments with the bank, they can seize that money too.

  5. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    how it works… you don’t pay it back, you just service the loans. They don’t tell you what to want; they just loan you the money to buy it.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyaitC91hEM

  6. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    I do not have access to the HOME report. Does it say that the system for assessing homes is biased or systemic racism results in lower valued homes? There is a difference. If it says the assessment system is biased, I would disagree. Assessments are based on fair market value as required by the state constitution. That the fair market value in predominantly Black neighborhoods is attributable to historic patterns of racism I would agree with.

  7. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    You lost me at Brookings…

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      That is how denialism works…

      1. walter smith Avatar
        walter smith

        Says the denier of reality.
        How many sexes Troll?
        It’s called wisdom and lived experience. Knowing a tree by it’s fruit. Or in this case “leaflets three, let it be.”

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          Wow, Walt, never knew anybody with a clover phobia…

          I am interested in how you answer your obsessive question? How many sexes are there, Walt?

          1. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            There are two sexes. Science. Come on Troll – say it and be canceled by your tolerant friends.
            Brookings is a far left org, which almost all “NGOs” are nowadays. I know what it will say before having to read it.

            By the way, how come so many NGOs get money from the government? Seems to me, if an NGO, there should be no money from G…
            Another thing needing fixing to free us from the Marxists. Hire a NGO to do what the Govt can’t do…and shut up peasants! We’re the smart people. Stay in Walmart where you belong!

          2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            “There are two sexes. Science.”

            Ummm… google “intersex”, Walt then maybe take another swing… this one was a clear miss… science indeed…

            And now we see your denialism really ramp up with anything offered by a NGO is not be trusted without even considering what it is that is being offered. That is denialism at its core. Thanks for the demonstration.

          3. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            IMax much

          4. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Mumpsimus…

  8. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    https://www.iaao.org/upload

    I especially liked the tax rate table showing tax rates in the colonies were higher than those today.

  9. Lefty665 Avatar
    Lefty665

    Does HOME think that like Goldilocks there is some valuation that is "just right", not too hot or too cold or too high or too low? If so, how does HOME decide a value is just right? Can any valuation be anything but too high or too low?

    Schools and crime certainly play a part in home valuation, and Richmond schools are terrible. Could that in part be due to the people who are running them? Is there a racial component to Richmond's government and school management problems? If so, does that feed the disparity in home values?

  10. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “To exclude the impact of crime and schools from an analysis of property values renders the study worthless. “

    “But after adjusting for the housing-related factors, HOUSE goes on to argue, the gap persists “even when essentially all other factors except for the racial demographics of the neighborhoods are held constant.” That gap, HOME Virginia calculates, is about 17%.”

    Right after stating this they cite Perry et al 2018 as the source for this conclusion.

    This is that document – you might want to skim it… In it they clearly demonstrate that they adjust for quality of schools and crime rates. Your entire critique seems to be unfounded.

    https://www.brookings.edu/w

    1. The main body of the Brookings study did not include crime. States the study: "We did not include census tract measures of crime in our analysis because we are not aware of any comprehensive publicly available data source at the ZIP code or census tract level for crime incidence." The study touched upon crime in an appendix. Depending on the methodology used, crime accounted for between 4% and roughly 20% of property valuations.

      Brookings did consider school standardized-test scores among the neighborhood amenities that impact housing values. The methodology is not clear, but schools appear to be lumped into a group of six amenities considered, including the EPA walkability index, number of restaurants, number of gas stations, percent of population using public transportation, and average commute time.

      More relevant to my post, while the Brookings study addressed crime and schools, HOME Virginia did not. So, my critique stands.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        The HOME cites the Brookings study and says "Secondary Research":

        " In 2022, HOME hosted a summit in Richmond that was dedicated to fair housing issues. One of the invited speakers was Dr. Andre Perry, a researcher from the Brookings Institute. Dr. Perry presented evidence showing that, in the Richmond metropolitan area, home values are much lower in majority Black neighborhoods than in neighborhoods with very few or no Black residents. He showed that the gap in home values is partly the result of differences in the homes and opportunities available in different neighborhoods—but only partly. Perry’s statistical analysis showed that homes in majority Black neighborhoods still receive lower valuations even when comparing identical homes in neighborhoods with identical (non-racial) characteristics. Ellen Robertson, then vice president of the Richmond City Council, was in attendance for Dr. Perry’s presentation at the fair housing summit. She asked HOME to look into disparities in neighborhood home values and recommend ways the City of Richmond could address the problem. In response, HOME conducted secondary research and cross-tabulated Richmond tax assessment data (e.g., valuation, size, condition) with American Community Survey demographics to understand both the national level context and the local specifics of this problem."

        So their study is not really based on the Brookings study/data – it's separate and independent of it, they just cite it ?

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          “In response, HOME conducted secondary research…”

          My read is the HOME study that JAB critiqued is the secondary research and Perry is the primary research that reached the conclusion of systemic racism in the appraisal figures.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            I would think if the HOME study cites the Perry/Brookings study but is not actually based on their data that it’s deceptive. OTOH, if it IS based on/tiering on the Brookings data, JAB should not discount it. Even if it’s not, the Brookings data itself is fairly clear that it DID consider the crime and other factors. GOOD Journalism IMO, makes it clear.

      2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        HOME started with the assumption that the findings of Perry et al were accurate. The primary purpose of HOME was to provide recommendations to Richmond on how to counteract the impacts of those findings not to re-investigate them. Your critique is indeed invalid and seems to be a bit of a straw man.

Leave a Reply