The Honor Code Is the Heart of the VMI Experience

by Carmen Villani

Honor does not see color of skin. Honor does not see gender. Honor does not see socioeconomic status. What it does see is the “dream” of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. — judging a person based upon content of his or her character.

Honor is not a casual word that is tossed around and then largely ignored at the Virginia Military Institute. It is the essence and foundation of the VMI Experience. This system is predicated upon character and starts with the Honor Code — a cadet will not lie, cheat, or steal, nor tolerate those that do. That code is not “suspended,” waived by granting “amnesty,” or compromised by circumstance. It is the moral compass for those who currently wear the VMI uniform and those who have. It is fiercely guarded by the Corps of Cadets and alumni alike. Violation of the Honor Code is not an option if a cadet expects to graduate from VMI.

With the Honor Code at its core, the Honor System then turns to education, embracement, and enforcement. Education begins with the Honor Court president speaking to the new cadets highlighting the Code itself, the importance of it during their cadetship, and the serious consequences should a cadet not abide by it. A guideline is posted in every cadet’s room to serve as an overview of the Honor System, reflecting its importance in everyday cadet life. Time is then spent with Honor Court representatives in the first couple of weeks of their cadetship learning the Honor System in greater detail and addressing any questions or concerns.  There is also a mentoring system in which each cadet is paired up with a First Classman (senior) thereby providing another avenue from which to learn and ask questions.

Once introduced to the Honor System, new cadets quickly learn that the Upperclassmen embrace this system. They come to realize that it produces an environment where their word is not questioned by fellow cadets or their professors. Locks on doors in barracks are not required. Possessions accidentally left someplace will be there upon the cadet’s return.

The Corps of Cadets entrust the solemn responsibility of ensuring the integrity of the Honor System to the Honor Court. The Honor Court is comprised of members from the Corps. Cases are brought to trial predicated upon two criteria. The first: did the cadet commit an honor violation? The second: does the evidence prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he/she is guilty?

Articles in the media have suggested that skin color is a factor. (See “VMI, under fire for expelling Black cadets, considers changes to Honor Court system” in The Washington Post). I would strenuously disagree with such an assertion.  Investigations are painstakingly thorough, and a member of the faculty provides oversight to ensure the integrity of the investigation. The cadet is provided ample opportunity to defend himself/herself before the Honor Court and an appeal process is provided should the cadet believe the verdict rendered is incorrect. The secrecy of investigations and trials allows a cadet to return to the Corps without prejudice if found innocent.

As has been stated by others, there are no degrees of honor at VMI and as such, there can be only one penalty in the event a guilty verdict is rendered and that is dismissal. The drumout is a clear message to the Corps that the Honor Code is being enforced and that Honor Court has carried out its responsibility entrusted to them.

In a letter dated October 19, 2020, the Governor’s Office referred to the “appalling culture of ongoing structural racism at the Virginia Military Institute.” Such a description is troubling given that the Governor himself is a VMI graduate and, like myself, a former president of the Honor Court. To make such serious allegations without a proper investigation runs counter to the way the investigative process is done with the Honor System at VMI. Additionally, State Senator Janet Howell, D-Fairfax, needs to rethink her comment about the “importance” or “relevancy” of VMI. Now more than ever, our nation needs the steadfast values of honor, principled leadership, and accountability that VMI strives to achieve each and every day.

In closing, our nation’s first President, George Washington, said: “Still I hope I shall possess firmness and virtue enough to maintain what I consider the most enviable of all titles, the character of an honest man.” Nearly two centuries later, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. spoke of a “dream” whereby we as a society “judge by content of character,” not “color of skin.” We at the Virginia Military Institute strive for and have achieved both with great success!

Carmen Villani, Virginia Military Institute class of 1976, is a former president of the Honor Court.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

26 responses to “The Honor Code Is the Heart of the VMI Experience”

  1. Don Crawford Avatar
    Don Crawford

    Well said, Carmen. VMI’70

    1. Thank you sir!

  2. sam elias Avatar
    sam elias

    If VMI wants to stay relevant or, hell, even be in existence a decade from now, they better fix their problems. That or go private. Pretty simple.

    1. Mr. Elias,

      In July of 2020, then Superintendent Gen. Peay put out a comprehensive plan to address whatever problems VMI may have been experiencing ( See https://vmi.app.box.com/v/GeneralPeayLetter-29July2020). Unfortunately, that wasn’t good enough for the Governor and members of the State Legislature. As for privatization, that is not a viable option. VMI is not perfect, no person or institution is. Contrary to what State Senator Janet Howell believes, VMI is more relevant and important to this nation than ever before.

      1. sam elias Avatar
        sam elias

        So in 2020, years after most institutions decided to tackle challenges of diversity, they decided to put out a plan…well, color me unimpressed. And it sounds like the elected officials were even less impressed. Tell me, did they or did they not refuse to remove Stonewall J. in 2020 as well?

        1. Just a suggestion Sam, but if you spent more time researching and being less consumed with your bias against VMI, you might come to realize that VMI does not come close to resembling the narrative you are putting forth on this forum.

          To your points:

          One of the “Core Values” listed on Southern Association of Schools Commission on Colleges (organization that does college accreditation) is: “Continuous Quality Improvement”
          See: https://sacscoc.org/

          Fact: VMI has been accredited since 1926 and “reaffirmed” in 2017.
          See: https://sacscoc.org/institutions/?institution_name=Virginia+Military+Institute&results_per_page=25&curpage=1&institution=0011N00001h9E1XQAU

          VMI conducts 14 Surveys, most of which are done on an annual basis. Believe there is an effort to identify problem areas and adapt?

          See: https://www.vmi.edu/about/offices-a-z/assessment-and-institutional-research/survey-research/

          Insular? Go to the “News” tab of the VMI webpage and see 35 pages of VMI activity. I believe most people would realize that VMI is anything but that. 11 Rhodes Scholars and recipients of Fulbright scholarships (See: https://www.vmi.edu/news/headlines/2019-2020/virginia-military-institute-a-top-fulbright-producer-.php ) is hardly “insular” in nature. It might be with regard to honor but then again, I would argue that our society should embrace it, not shun it like you have done.
          See: News – https://www.vmi.edu/news/

          As for the statue issue, and since you use the Washington Post as a news source, consider the following appearing in a November 2017 article pertaining to the current Governor of Virginia:
          “Now he says he wouldn’t meddle with local decision-making. He touted the board of visitors at Virginia Military Institute, whose members he will appoint as governor, as an example of local decision-makers who grappled with a Confederate-era statue and chose to keep it up.”
          See: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/what-virginias-governor-elect-ralph-northam-d-promised-during-his-campaign/2017/11/23/a6a2dc4e-c992-11e7-8321-481fd63f174d_story.html?utm_term=.a8cf9d6612d6&itid=lk_interstitial_manual_16

          How about we go back even further (June 2015) to the previous Virginia Governor, Terry McAuliffe:
          “But not statues. I mean, Robert E. Lee, Jefferson Davis, these are all parts of our heritage,” he added. “And the people that were in that battle, the Civil War, many of them were in it obviously for their own reasons that they had for that. But leave the statues and those things alone.”
          See: https://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/246012-va-gov-leave-confederate-statues-alone

          So what’s your point?

          1. sam elias Avatar
            sam elias

            My point, sir, is that both you and VMI are dinosaurs.

          2. When colleges that strive to produce graduates that embrace honor, provide an excellent academic education, instills a servant leader mindset, and demands accountability become extinct in this nation, so this nation will go as well. Colleges may have different techniques but if they achieve the goal stated above, they should be protected, not become extinct.

            As for my own life, I will one day go before God and receive my judgement. I will be held to account for my actions but I hope that He will say – job well done my good and faithful servant.

          3. sam elias Avatar
            sam elias

            I understand. You’re a clearly a good man. God bless, and I hope our exchange was not overly negative.

          4. God Bless you as well Sam. Civil discourse is essential to the essence of this nation. We should not expect for all of us to agree on everything. I loved my parents dearly but we didn’t always agree. What we did agree on is that we should treat others as we wish to be treated. If we, as a nation, did just that one thing, we would be much better off. Thank you for the comment.

  3. William O'Keefe Avatar
    William O’Keefe

    An expectation that students will no lie, cheat or steal is not an onerous burden. These are the basic values of a good person. In the case of VMI, it is clear that too many–political elites and the media–have rushed to judgment before the evidence was laid before us.

    1. sam elias Avatar
      sam elias

      Why did VMI lie about the request that the honor code be suspended? Seems like honor doesn’t mean much for the school.

      1. The Feb 9 email you referenced in another comment came from the alumni association, not VMI. The alumni association is a distinct entity, and since the investigation began has had a cooperative tone and has urged alumni to cooperate with B&T. I would be very surprised if they intentionally lied to the alumni community to rile alumni up regarding the investigation while also urging cooperation. It seems to me the email stems from miscommunication.

        However, after reading the report and thinking about B&T’s explanation regarding suspending the honor code, I’m not sure where the issue stands.

        B&T claims they never intended for the honor code to be suspended, but they want VMI to commit not attempting to discern the identities of interviewees. If an interviewee does lie, VMI apparently is prohibited from determining who that individual is and pursuing the case.

        Further, B&T says they simply requested “amnesty,” not a suspension of the honor code. They expect interviewees to be truthful but that if a previous honor violation is revealed in an interview, VMI should not pursue it.

        Taken together, it seems awfully close to suspending the honor code.

        1. sam elias Avatar
          sam elias

          I’m supposed to believe that the alumni association didn’t speak to VMI’s leadership before that email was sent? What are they, grossly negligent on top of being dishonest?

        2. sam elias Avatar
          sam elias

          I’m supposed to believe that the alumni association didn’t speak to VMI’s leadership before that email was sent? What are they, grossly negligent on top of being dishonest?

        3. owen dunlap Avatar
          owen dunlap

          Keydet — i would not waste my time with sam elias on this – he has posted many times on this one subject ( a resolved dispute as we know ) here and other VMI related post. In his mind the VMI AA lied in a 9 Feb email and B&T was just ” misunderstood” when they asked for “amnesty for any honor code violation” – and acted surprised that VMI took that to mean ” amnesty for any honor code violation” – thats just how he sees it

          1. sam elias Avatar
            sam elias

            It’s resolved now, that’s for sure. Ironic that a school that drones on endlessly about it commitment to its insular concept of ‘honor’ has no plausible explanation why they blatantly misrepresented what the investigators actually asked. Real honorable there, owen.

          2. owen dunlap Avatar
            owen dunlap

            my guess is that B&T talks to VA ( the client) and VA talks to VMI ( the party being investigated) — whatever communication there is between B&T and VMI directly certainly would be with VMI staff and its lawyers not the VMI AA and its separate law firm – so i see where the VMI AA might have gotten something wrong

          3. sam elias Avatar
            sam elias

            Read the report. Read who the recipients of the Jan. 25 email were and the investigator’s explanation. If the alumni assoc. didn’t know about that, they’re incompetent.

          4. From the Barnes & Thornburg February 12 Progress Report:

            “the Team would like to take all possible steps to ensure that cadets are comfortable disclosing information about relevant conduct without fear that disciplinary action, including Honor Court proceedings, might result.”

            From my letter Mr. Elias, cadets are not brought before the Honor Court for telling the truth. For the “Team” to make a statement such as the one above, let’s agree that – they didn’t understand the Honor System at the time or such a statement could be construed as when cadets are talking to us, the Honor Code doesn’t apply. Is it unreasonable to construe that as a request to “suspend” the Honor System?

          5. sam elias Avatar
            sam elias

            No, it’s not. And certainly not when B&T never used the term. I know it’s convenient to believe the world is black and white. But it’s not.

          6. While B&T may not have used the term, consider what was stated in the January 25th email from them that you have referred to:
            “While I know that lawyers are known for semantics,..”

            Sure sounds like Meena Sinfelt (B&T) recognized that there could be a misunderstanding and that she sought to clarify.

            When I asked if it is unreasonable to construe the request by B&T as a request to “suspend,” your replied – “No, it’s not.” If I merely look at that from a “black and white” perspective, then you agree with me. However, considering your entire comment, I believe you may not have meant it that way.

          7. Correction: The report came out February 4, not the 12th.

  4. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    I don’t see the relevance of this blog post. I think everyone gets what an honor code is. Not exactly unique. In waxing eloquently about it, the author does not address the key question. The Post reports that Blacks represent 43 percent of expulsions but are only 6 percent of the student body. People of color are 54 percent of expulsions but are only 21 percent of the student body. What about this? The author was at VMI more than 45 years ago. Relevance to today?

    1. Peter,

      What your point fails to understand and what I did point out in my editorial piece is that skin color DOES NOT enter into the decision of whether or not an Honor violation has been committed. Have you taken the time to speak with recent VMI Honor Court Presidents? I have and they have conveyed to me a similar message as the one I put forth.
      If everyone understands what an honor code is, then what does color of skin have to do with it? You put forth statistics. What about evidence showing that a wrongful decision was made? VMI is bound by privacy laws so if there was a wrongful verdict, then why doesn’t the person in question allow VMI to reveal the evidence in the case? Were any of the cases that created these “statistics” appealed?
      VMI is about character. Some things should stand the test of time. Honor is one of them and the fact that I graduated nearly 45 years ago is irrelevant.

    2. owen dunlap Avatar
      owen dunlap

      Peter – the percentages you note are from a very limited window – 5 yrs i think? that the WaPo obtained and published- anyway a small sample set. They for sure give good reason for VMI to dig deeper and look this issue ( i have not yet read the part of the B&T partial report that covers this but will this weekend) but ultimately each of the men or women drummed out were tried and convicted with legal representation involved and were found guilty . There were others found not guilty im sure. I dont know if VMI is turning over a larger data set to B&T or if that has even been requested by them or the state . Each case should be looked at on its own merits not ” well we drummed out a white female last week, who do the charts say we can drum out next so its all proportional to the make up of the corp?”

Leave a Reply