Hope Plantation, Bertie County, N.C., circa 1800. The McMansion of its day.
Hope Plantation, Bertie County, N.C., circa 1800. The McMansion of its day.

by James A. Bacon

The Northern Virginia exurbs, like exurbs across the country, are cruising for a bruising. EM Risse would never express himself so inelegantly or imprecisely but that’s the thrust, in colloquial terms, of a new essay, “The Great Submergence,” he has posted on his website.

The United States economy, argues Risse, a former Bacon’s Rebellion contributor, is in the midst of a profound shift — what he calls the U Turn — away from the scattered, low-density pattern of growth widely referred to as “suburban sprawl” (a label he avoids as a “core confusing word”) toward infill and re-development of the nation’s urban cores. This trend, which is taking place for reasons amply documented on this blog, has profound implications for homeowners and political jurisdictions on the metropolitan edge where landowners, developers and speculators valued land with the expectation that it would be developed some day into shopping centers, office parks and residential subdivisions.

Given the cost of providing transportation, utilities and municipal services, the logical limit for development in the Washington metropolitan region is about 20 to 35 miles from the metropolitan center in Washington, D.C., Risse writes. Land beyond that limit, he contends, is experiencing collapsing demand as people seek to live closer to the metropolitan core, closer to jobs and amenities in walkable communities with more transportation options. That collapse he calls “the Great Submergence.”

Some clusters of development may adapt and survive but others will be economically unsustainable and wilt away. Another phrase for “wilt away” would be “dry up and blow away,” just like western mining towns when the claims ran dry, just like Great Plains farming towns during the Dust Bowl and Depression. Risse’s home town of Warrenton, he warns, is the “bulls eye of the danger zone.”

As demand evaporates for single-family dwellings on large lots in remote locations, land and housing prices will fall. Every new single-family dwelling built in Greater Warrenton-Fauquier (and other communities situated more 25 to 30 miles from the metropolitan center) will serve to drive down the value of existing properties. Writes Risse:

The downward trend will be exacerbated by the fact that there are dwellings selling BELOW their replacement cost. Further, there will be many scattered Units that have not been maintained, which will further deflate the market via assessment / appraisal “comparables.”

Declining land and improvement values, he says, will have a devastating impact on municipal tax bases in this exurban dead zone as well as household net worth, much of which is composed of housing equity.

Bacon’s bottom line: I’m in 95% agreement with Risse. The reason I hesitate to say 100% is that there are powerful forces at work to sustain “sprawl,” the most important of which is the slow pace, due to zoning restrictions, at which urbanized jurisdictions close to the Washington metropolitan core can free more land for more compact, higher-density development. If demand for housing exceeds supply in Washington’s urban core, growth will default to exurban communities (beyond the 25-mile radius) planned and approved in the 2000s simply because there is nowhere else to build.

With that caveat aside, I share Risse’s larger concern. A dozen or more exurban counties on the metropolitan fringe of Washington, Richmond and Hampton Roads are likely to experience deflating land values, shrinking real estate property revenues and chronic fiscal stress. Their scattered, low-density settlement patterns have high embedded costs and local governments will be hard-pressed to maintain the supporting services and infrastructure. Once the newness wears off and depreciation sets in, these places will become worn, shabby and dilapidated.

Driving back from vacation on the North Carolina coast a couple of weeks ago, I passed through a dozen hamlets and crossroads in farming communities. I was shocked to see so many boarded up and tumble-down buildings that property owners had simply abandoned. The knowledge economy has passed these inland communities by. Sure, the real estate is cheap but no one wants to live there anymore. The houses don’t even have for-sale signs on them. The price of better houses is so low that it’s not even worth patching up the decaying ones. Virginia’s exurbs have not reached that stage yet. But give them time. Let the shiny newness wear off. In 20 years, we could see the same thing.

Those who miss Risse’s writing on Bacon’s Rebellion should check out the “Current Perspectives” on his website.

Update: Ed Risse has responded to Larry Gross’ comments on this post in the form of an essay, “Blogging, Geographical Illiteracy and the Great Submergence.”


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

8 responses to “The Emerging Exurban Dead Zone”

  1. re: ” shocked to see so many boarded up and tumble-down buildings that property owners had simply abandoned. ”

    important to realize that this is rural America not exurban .

    re: “powerful forces”

    in the last few threads on Education – it became abundantly clear to me the significance of neighborhoods and schools in people making choices where to live.

    In NoVa – not only is housing expensive – but the less expensive homes tend to be in neighborhoods with lower tier schools … and that, in turn drives educated people with kids to more affordable neighborhoods with better schools – i.e the exurbs.

    Despite what Ed Risse believes – the Fredericksburg Area is once again booming with new residential construction and it’s not large-lots – it’s 3 or 4 houses to the acre – in subdivisions with water/sewer on a cul-de-sac – with school bus service to a “good” neighborhood school.

    I posted a link to the best elementary schools in Va (based on SOL reading and math scores):

    http://www.schooldigger.com/go/VA/schoolrank.aspx

    pick a couple in the top 10 and dig down to the student demographics…and you’re going to find schools with 5% or less black population. A couple have 1% – many have similar percentages for free/reduced lunches – in the 2-5% range rather than the state average of about 25%.

    these are also powerful forces.. that essentially power the exurbs.

    In terms of things “collapsing” – we have VRE and one of the largest bus and van and carpool rates in the entire country.

    In other words – we have more and more folks moving away from solo-driving and that is probably going to accelerate with HOT Lanes dues to come online in early 2015.

    The area is already dotted with about a dozen commuter lots – each one holds hundreds of cars (or more)… and more are on the way.

    If you look at places like New York – and the existence of rail like the Long Island Rail Road and the Connecticut Commuter Rail system which has more than 100 stations – it’s hard to believe that the exurbs of Long Island and Connecticut are about to go away anytime soon – because people want to live in single family homes they can afford where there are good neighborhood schools.

    I just don’t think people are going to live in crowded conditions unless they have no other options and as long as our government policies support METRO, VRE, AND Hot Lanes – we’re not retracting…

    If the METRO areas want to grow more dense – they need to improve the failing schools in the more affordable neighborhoods.

    Jim talks about “restrictions” that prevent increased density.

    I’d posit that crappy school doom the neighborhoods around them in terms of appeal and desirability. If you give people the choice for an affordable home with a crappy neighborhood school or an affordable home with a good school – in the exurbs – it’s a game changer.

    advocates of “Smart Growth” would do well to consider the school issue as a significant impediment to attracting new residents rather than repelling them to the exurbs.

    People HATE the commute – they’d do almost anything to escape it – except putting their kids in really bad neighborhood schools.

  2. TooManyTaxes Avatar
    TooManyTaxes

    Jim, you seem to be ignoring the ongoing movement of some businesses out from more expensive locations in cities and inner suburbs to less expensive locations and to be near many workers. I’m not arguing that places like Arlington and Tysons will not attract both workers and residents, but so will outlying locations. Take, for example, Ashburn. Because of commercial growth, Loudoun County was able to lower its real estate tax rate for FY15, while Fairfax County’s commercial growth rate was slightly negative.

    Tysons will certainly attract businesses and residents, but it will be quite expensive. Land prices are high, as are construction costs. They yield higher purchase prices and rents. Taxes are higher, both because of higher values for property and because of additional taxes (Rail District 1, C&I and the new special transportation district). While every area faces C&I taxes, not all have the other two additional taxes.

    Does this mean Tysons will not be successful? Of course not. But the better way to view the market is that more locations mean more choices, which in and of itself seems good to me.

    1. Tysons Engineer Avatar
      Tysons Engineer

      TMT,

      Telling stat, there are no commercial office parks under construction in NOVA outside of a 20 mi ring of DC. There’s not a single office park under construction in Loudoun or PWC right now. The market is speaking, and while tax rates and a perceived “let’s be closer to workers” idea persists, in reality the work force is coming from all over not just the areas near those office parks and developers and office tenants are seeing it. Theres a reason why so many offices want to be closer in and near metro, it improves the centroid of their employment source, as opposed to being on the far side of a more limited pool.

      The idea that an office park should be in say Manassas for instance because a lot of new residents will move to that area has to be considered in the context of, ok people live in the burbs, but not necessarily that burb, which causes long commutes for those who don’t live in Manassas.

      1. TooManyTaxes Avatar
        TooManyTaxes

        TE – I’m not arguing that there won’t be businesses locating near transit or potential transit sites. My point is those locations tend to be quite expensive and “expensive” rent is not the entire market. There are and will be businesses that seek locations away from transit for cost reasons as well as accessibility to where many workers live. I know a number of businesses that left Tysons due to congestion and cost. But I was also glad to see Intelsat choose Tysons despite congestion and cost.

        If you lived in Prince William County, would you rather have a 15 minute drive to an office in Manassas or a ten minute drive to a commuter bus and a 50 minute bus ride — all other things equal? Or even a 40 minute drive against traffic? Lots of people prefer this. Others like to read or sleep on a commuter bus.

        I think both are needed for a successful metro area to prosper. While I will always think people should go to jail for their involvement in the Silver Line funding, I support development around rail stations because they provide more choices for residence and business locations. I also think development in PW, Loudoun, Fauquier and other areas are good too. The more money they generate, the less amount of Fairfax generated tax revenues they get.

        Since we have rail, I support its efficient use. And for many years, I took the Orange Line to D.C. on my own dime even when I had access to free parking. On the other hand, my wife is much happier driving to D.C. (free parking) than when she took the Orange Line (costs also largely paid by the feds). It’s a much easier commute 98% of the time. And there are many more like us. Choice is good.

  3. there are so many ways to look at these issues beyond they more typical “smart growth” perspectives.

    the biggest cost by far in Fairfax and other Nova localities has to be schools.

    The average cost per pupil is $13, 347. The average Real Estate tax bill is about $5000. Fairfax is like most other counties when it comes to school costs in that the tax revenues per dwelling for most homes no where near the actual costs to deliver education services to those homea.

    The lower priced residential have an even worse tax vs services ratio.

    So – does Fairfax essentially encourage lower income people with kids to commute to the exurbs as a way to help keep the tax rate down?

    Do urban areas REALLY want affordable housing for people with kids?

    Are the development “restrictions” that the Jim Bacons refer to – really purposeful restrictions to actually limit “affordable” residential that requires increasing tax rates to cover and exporting it reduces those costs?

    Basically urbanized areas are giant wealth-transfer zones where the rich end up buying down costs to make it more “affordable” to those less affluent.

    Fairfax and American urban areas are the antithesis of the “free market”. There ARE .. REAL free-market cities – but they are called Cairo and Bombay and La Paz. Detroit is what happens when “affordability” numbers go upside/down and the affluent leave for the exurbs.

  4. Yes, late responding, as usual.
    Trends are tough to predict. In 1975 the President’s Council on Environmental Quality’s annual report noted the Census Bureau’s analysis showing that “since 1970 metropolitan areas have grown at a slower rate than non metropolitan counties, in contrast with previous patterns. Central cities had long been losing to growing suburbs. The Census Bureau noted that the new trend was nationwide.

    It didn’t stick. But that’s the point. Rural areas are in some distress, nationwide. But growth out in rural western Loudoun, 50 + miles from DC, continues. I moved out here to our farm because it was 4 minutes from the MARC train across the Potomac, so rail, and bus service have continued growth impacts. So does the availability of the Internet. Slower growth, however, offers opportunities for rural economies that good state and local government policies — conservation easements, support for smaller schools, lower property taxes — can foster and save money on expenditures for large schools and public services.

    1. I had no idea that MARC went west and crossed the Potomac and into West Virginia.

      nor this: ” MARC is purported to be the fastest commuter railroad in the United States.[3]”

      looks like 4000+ people ride MARC west to exurban locales

  5. Yes, we took the line for 20 years before “retiring” to raise sheep, keep a vineyard, etc. MARC to W. Va is thanks to Sen. Robert Byrd. Now service keeps deteriorating, and the line stops at Brunswick and uses buses to W. VA. But a decade and more ago one could pick up the NYTimes at the Brunswick station and read it and the Post into Union Station, while the W. Va folk slept on their pillows from their longer commute. And it got pretty roudy on the way back!

    Snow, downed trees, heat on the rails are among the delayinbg hazards. But it’s a great amenity, because MARC passengers hate to commute and love the rural life, greater independence, smaller communities, and lower costs. I believe that these attributes remain a potential draw, especially with Internet links.

Leave a Reply