The “Black Jobs” Narrative is False, Harmful

By Derrick Max

Derrick Max

While most of the post-debate news coverage is still rightly focused on the mental acuity (or lack thereof) of President Biden, the use of the term “Black jobs” by former President Trump in the context of low-income, unskilled jobs that will be impacted by our open southern border, bothers me almost as much. This type of false categorization leads to policies and beliefs that do great harm to the African American community.

Sadly, there is a bipartisan failure to understand or appreciate Black economic vitality. Blacks, in the current false narrative, are poor and in need of both protection and assistance. From Trump’s inartful claim that low-skill jobs are “Black jobs,” or Democrat contentions that African Americans don’t have or can’t get IDs to prove citizenship to vote, or most recently, Governor Hochel saying that black kids in the Bronx “don’t know what a computer is” – the picture painted of Black Americans is one of hopelessness and despair.

This narrative ignores the fact that the progress of Black Americans since slavery is nothing short of amazing. If you separate out Blacks in the United States and rank their combined GDP, they would have one of the largest economies in the world on par with the economies of Mexico, Canada, and Italy — and ahead of every country in Africa.

In 150 years since emancipation, Black progress is something to be cheered! “Black jobs” in this context include being President and Vice President of the United States, being a justice on the Supreme Court, cabinet members, Generals and Admirals in the military, and CEOs of some of the largest corporations in the Fortune 500.

In Virginia, “Black jobs” include a former Governor, the current Lt. Governor, the Speaker of the House, and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate. It includes being a billionaire co-founder of a major entertainment company and resort. I could go on.

Most people don’t realize that from emancipation through 1965 Black income grew at a faster pace than white income. While growing from a base of basically zero is easier, this progress was real and significant. Black economic growth occurred despite the struggles of recovering from slavery and living through overt racist policies like Jim Crow.

The above doesn’t even include major sports, where Black Americans were not even allowed to participate until the 1950s. Now, “Black jobs” include the majority of players in both basketball and football. Likewise, “Black jobs” in music, the sciences, and politics are a continued sign that Black American achievement is nothing less than exceptional.

No doubt racial injustice in this country is ongoing. But ignoring Black success by focusing on an exaggerated Black despair is not the answer.  White communities need to hear of the rich history of Black accomplishments, and Black communities need to see and celebrate their rich and successful history.

Black entrepreneurs helped fund the abolitionist movement alongside wealthy white businessmen. Why is this narrative ignored? We would rather falsely act as though wealthy whites were and continue to be oppressors, and Blacks were and continue to be poor and oppressed. Shame.

This narrative hurts Black agency – as young African Americans are told their jobs are unskilled and thus they will remain poor. Even more overtly, Albemarle County Public Schools in Virginia has an “anti-racism” curriculum where students are forced to watch a video that characterizes whites as “privileged” and Blacks as “oppressed.”  One video even told students that only white families could live in big houses. Easily falsified by those in more economically diverse communities, but factual to Blacks living in our troubled inner cities.

Solid academic research shows that success in life is highly correlated with one’s belief in their own ability to improve their standing. While studies show the importance of access to education and capital in improving one’s economic position, such resources are meaningless if the recipient of those resources doesn’t believe in their ability and agency to use those tools to improve their lives.

Generalizations that tell African Americans their lot in life is to have a low-skilled, low-paying job will lead to economic exit. It will destroy agency. Why study? Why follow the rules? Why try if your future is limited to low-paying “Black jobs” that will keep you on the outside of the American dream. Are we surprised that this narrative, buttressed by critical race theory in our schools, is leading to hordes of young African American youth opting to loot and burn our major cities, often grossly defended by liberal commentators viewing these illegal acts as justified and a part of some sort of self-service reparations?

I have seen the impact of the “Black jobs” and “blacks are poor” false narratives firsthand on how Black students negatively view themselves and their community. When I taught economics to Juniors and Seniors in one of the poorest neighborhoods of Southeast, DC, I would ask my students, all of whom were African American, “What percent of Blacks are poor?” I would let them discuss as they mentioned Oprah, Obama, and various Black athletes before they would inevitably answer, “90 percent?” I would then say, no, and immediately, they would all yell out, “95 percent?”

When I would tell them that the official poverty rate of the U.S. Black population was under 20 percent – they were sure I was lying. When I would tell them that almost fifty percent of African Americans are in the middle to upper-income classes, it would be a near mutiny.

We must do better, especially for students born into very difficult circumstances. Not only must they find the means to overcome their everyday reality, but they must also see that all jobs (engineers, physicians, scientists, Presidents, professors, investors) are jobs open to them. Only then can they harness the grit and agency necessary to achieve the American dream. We must retire the “Black jobs” narrative forever.

Derrick A. Max is president and CEO of the Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy, which first published this commentary. 

 


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

53 responses to “The “Black Jobs” Narrative is False, Harmful”

  1. GeorgeWallaceandGromit Avatar
    GeorgeWallaceandGromit

    What utter nonsense. No amount of positive thinking is going to overcome the bell curve. Boomer conservatives attachment to egalitarianism is nothing short of a secular religion, complete with original sin, saints, prophets, and miracles. They’re all too happy to admit blacks are better at sports because of superior physical ability, but mention anything from the neck up, and they flat out reject evolution.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      I'm of the view that the bell curve is the same regardless of race.
      Am I wrong?

      1. WayneS Avatar

        I don't think he is talking about the same bell curve you are thinking about.

        I suspect this is "The Bell Curve" to which he is referring:

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bell_Curve

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          No, it’s the same one. Does it apply to all races equally?

    2. Derrick Max Avatar
      Derrick Max

      I used to work with Charles Murray and have discussed this book with him often. I think you misread the data. While there appears to be differences at the mean, the downward slopes, even at the tail, are filled with people of all colors. This, was my point. I also think there are multicollinear issues with how Murray's book handled the impact of education, which may have biased the data toward whites. There are also directional issues, which have been pointed out by many. I think academic research on agency, grit, and hope prove that "positive thinking" has a HUGE impact on success. I wrote about this in the DailyWire which may be behind a paywall: https://www.dailywire.com/news/hope-drives-african-american-exceptionalism

    3. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Frankly, I can't understand what you are saying. That's the bad news. The good news is I have a friend called ChatGPT that helps me untangle comments like the one you posted.

      Here's what ChatGPT – 4o had to say …

      The quote provided contains several logical inconsistencies and contradictions. Let's break it down:

      1. "No amount of positive thinking is going to overcome the bell curve."**
      – Logical Inconsistency: This statement dismisses the impact of positive thinking and effort entirely, implying that the bell curve (which typically represents a distribution of traits or abilities) is immutable and not influenced by individual actions or mindset. This is a deterministic view that ignores evidence of personal development and the role of environmental factors in shaping abilities.

      2. "Boomer conservatives attachment to egalitarianism is nothing short of a secular religion, complete with original sin, saints, prophets, and miracles."
      – Contradiction: The statement criticizes "boomer conservatives" for an attachment to egalitarianism. However, it is more common to critique conservatives for opposing egalitarianism, as egalitarianism is typically associated with more progressive or liberal ideologies. The comparison to a "secular religion" with religious elements like original sin and miracles is metaphorical but lacks coherence when applied to a political or philosophical stance.

      3. "They’re all too happy to admit blacks are better at sports because of superior physical ability, but mention anything from the neck up, and they flat out reject evolution."
      – Contradiction: This part of the quote suggests that "boomer conservatives" acknowledge physical differences but deny intellectual differences, attributing it to a rejection of evolution. This is inconsistent because acknowledging any biological differences typically implies acceptance of evolutionary principles. Furthermore, the statement generalizes a group’s beliefs without considering the diversity of opinions within that group.

      Detailed Analysis:

      – Deterministic View of the Bell Curve: The assertion that "no amount of positive thinking" can change one's position on the bell curve overlooks the role of education, effort, and environmental influences in altering outcomes. Many studies in psychology and education show that mindset and effort can significantly impact performance and abilities (Dweck, 2006).

      – Mischaracterization of Political Views: The statement misrepresents conservative views by labeling their approach to egalitarianism as a "secular religion." Conservatives are often critiqued for promoting meritocracy and opposing policies aimed at enforced equality (egalitarianism). This portrayal seems more fitting for a critique of progressive or liberal ideologies, which are more commonly associated with egalitarian principles.

      – Biological and Intellectual Abilities: The claim that conservatives recognize physical differences but deny intellectual differences due to a rejection of evolution is contradictory. Accepting physical differences due to evolutionary reasons while rejecting intellectual differences for the same reasons is inconsistent. Additionally, the broad generalization fails to capture the nuanced views individuals within any political group may hold about evolution and human abilities.

      In summary, the quote presents a deterministic view of human abilities that ignores the role of effort and environmental factors, misrepresents the political views of conservatives regarding egalitarianism, and contains contradictions about the acceptance of biological differences. These inconsistencies undermine the overall coherence and logical validity of the arguments presented.

      1. GeorgeWallaceandGromit Avatar
        GeorgeWallaceandGromit

        How old are you?

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          Nobody like you when you’re 23…

  2. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    https://virginiamercury.com/2024/07/10/research-shows-heat-exposure-disproportionately-affects-black-richmonders/

    https://richmond.com/heat-waves-highlight-racial-inequalities/article_2dcb98f7-e9ae-5ce7-8d12-0bc10e54dfe6.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=email&utm_campaign=user-share

    But, but, but the racial lens is so deeply ingrained, so pervasive it becomes a club for the climate change s&%$show. See above, two media at the same time. The real point, of course, is it has nothing to do with race and everything to do with 1) being able to afford a decent house with AC and insulation and 2) living in an urban heat island with little shade and lots of concrete and asphalt. Everybody in the same situation faces the same challenges with no reference to skin color.

    1. Derrick Max Avatar
      Derrick Max

      The Racial Climate Justice movement is so backwards. A booming economy, with reliable and affordable energy, is what is needed to lift all communities out of poverty. But, we are falsely told windmills and solar will cure what ails our urban blighted neighborhoods. Sad.

      1. walter smith Avatar
        walter smith

        It's the whole problem with the Racial Industrial Complex. From slavery through Jim Crow into the MLK Civil Rights movement, tons of progress was made. Then the Govt decided to "help" and has made things worse….

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    trump is false and harmful.

  4. Randy Huffman Avatar
    Randy Huffman

    Regarding second paragraph on voter ID issues, I remember seeing this video a few years ago and dug it up on the Daily Wire.

    Bottom line, white elitist liberals feel voter ID requirements is racists. Blacks interviewed in Harlem disagree.

    https://www.dailywire.com/news/watch-black-americans-debunk-liberal-talking-point-that-voter-id-is-racist-theyre-ignorant

  5. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Mr. Max is right to point out the progress made but it's going to take more than "A booming economy, with reliable and affordable energy" to deal with the adult folks with 3rd grade educations and their kids in schools where they will be lucky to get a 3rd grade education.

    We are as segregated as we have been for awhile but it aligns in neighborhood schools that serve economically disadvantaged kids whose parents lack the education to get good paying jobs in a booming economy and are limited to those "black jobs". The "booming economy" thing is what Conservatives have offered for as long as I can remember but it won't happen until the kids in 3rd grade learn how to read and write so they can finish getting a good education which will then afford them a better ability to get those good paying jobs.

    You can easily identify these schools by doing a simple build-a-table retrieval from VDOE for a county like Henrico and see the problem.

    Mr. Bacon and others here talk about absenteeism and disruptive kids. That's what happens when you get a terrible education in the 3rd grade. From that point on your fate is determined and the kids know it. The only reason they come to school at all is that they're supposed to and that's where their friends are.

    1. walter smith Avatar
      walter smith

      Larry to the rescue of the abject failure of the government!
      When discrimination was real – abject poverty post-Civil War through Reconstruction and Jim Crow and into the MLK Civil Rights time, blacks made huge progress. Then the govt decided to "help," and has made things worse, not just for blacks, but for society as a whole.
      The #1 fixable problem is illegitimacy. Quit having babies out of wedlock. Quit absolving sperm-donor baby daddies of responsibility. Quit paying women to have the babies out of wedlock. We know the success formula – graduate high school, get a job, get married, have kids. 80% chance of a nice middle class life.
      Better behavior. Less crime, Better schools. Less incarceration. On and on…an idea so crazy, it might work! (Especially because it did work for many black families prior to the "help").

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        so, before when blacks did "better", it was because they were not having kids out of wedlock and now they are?

        1. walter smith Avatar
          walter smith

          Largely. You can check it out…
          And to the extent there were children in the broken families, grandparents often helped. But since the govt “helped”, black illegitimacy has gone from around 20% to over 60%. The white rate has gone from something like 5% to 40%. Overall the rate is at or above 40%. It’s societal breakdown and you can’t throw enough money at it to fix it.
          Really simple solution – say the truth.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            so "helping" caused more illegitimate births?

          2. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            Is there a point to your graph?
            Didn't your mother ever tell you "I don't care what Johnny does. You can't do it!"?

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Looks like it’s not just a US problem, right?

          4. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Pssst… show him the black poverty rate trend between Jim Crow era and today. There is a negative correlation between black poverty and single parent households.

          5. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            oops.. I had chopped off the dates, it looks like it became a worldwide trend:

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e89bbd11a44ccfe1a3423447f0079107003eb7466e3f830ac631bef117c6af19.png
            not just a US thing.

            Do you think it's independent of race or not?

          6. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            I never said it had anything to do with race. I have always said it affects blacks more due to the higher rate. And, as stated before, just because other countries are also increasing doesn’t make it right, or optimal. It doesn’t. Time for grown ups to speak the truth.

          7. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Are we talking about the effect it has on kids learning in school, failing?

          8. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            Much more complicated than just that. All sorts of behavioral problems. Not just in school. Much higher incarceration. Lots of drugs, alcohol, family abuse. Worse school outcomes. More prisons.
            If we just got back to family formation as it existed for millennia, we would have better schools, less crime, better social fabric, and spend less money.

          9. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Do you think out of wedlock is different than single parent from divorce?

          10. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            Well…do you?
            Since you use different words to describe it, it IS different.
            And that brings us to a different, but related, issue.
            No Fault divorce from an overall societal point of view was a mistake, particularly where there are minor children.
            The presence of a father is a very important factor in growing boys into men. Too many grow up without that moderating influence. I don’t have the studies handy, but I also believe there are bad effects on the girls, but the effect is worse for the boys. And worse for the society because the boys do the violent crimes, require the costs of incarceration, etc

          11. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            So I’m working on figuring out where we both are on the issue – more granular. I don’t disagree with you on the lack of Dad and somewhat might depend on the kid. Do you think the education level and income level of the single parent matter in terms of the welfare of the child? IOW, do you think a child with a educated single parent making a good income is better off in terms of learning? Different than if out of wedlock or divorced? What say you?

          12. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            In general, more income can help. In general, more income is tied to better education. In general, better education is tied to ability AND effort. But even in a wealthy single parent – Mom – home, the absence of Dad’s presence is felt. Look at confluence in school shooters. Broken homes and on SSRIs..
            Here is a church attendance stat. If kids attend church regularly with Mom, a 15% chance of kids attending as adults. If regularly with Dad, a55% chance. If regularly with both, something like 70 or 75%.

          13. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            so for the blacks today working “black jobs” and have kids, they themselves don’t have very good educations and that’s why they work low income jobs?

          14. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            Now you are back to making no sense. What is your point?
            My point, regardless of race, is family formation and stability is hugely important. A main factor in outcome, regardless of “smarts.” You can be at the lower end of the IQ range, white, black, red, yellow, purple – finish high school, get a job, get married, have kids, repeat generationally. As I told my kids, if you want job security, do a good job.

          15. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            simple questions to ascertain if we agree. Do folks working “black jobs” have good educations ?
            I’m pretty sure they do not. Agree?

            Even if you have “family”, but a poor education, you’ll likely not have a good paying job. Right?

            Only need to have average IQ to get a good education and a good job, right? Lots of people with
            average IQs and good education have good paying jobs. right?

            I totally agree about your advice to your kids. ANY JOB, even a low paying one , you will be highly
            valued by an employer and maybe even paid better than others but a low paying job will not buy you
            a house, get you employer-provided health care for you or your kids, and not much of a 401K. Won’t
            build wealth for your kids.

          16. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            What’s a “black job”!?!?!?!?!?!!!!
            What’s a “good education?”
            OUr education system doesn’t work. And yet, one can succeed without an education (trades). And even outside of trades. Throwing more money into schools is not the answer. Out current education system – higher ed – is a wasteful sorting mechanism for the “elites” who aren’t “elite.” At all.
            Our K-12 is flawed every State. By the fed DOE and the State DOEs. We need freedom. Let the counties be different. Somehow little Richmond County did a fine job for me, and I am sure on a minimalist budget.

          17. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            I’m going by what Trump was saying is a “black job”. A low income job I presume.

            No, you cannot succeed in a trade job anymore without a basic education and even then , you may not get health care for you or your family. You can’t afford to live in a good neighborhood with good schools (where kids DO learn and succeed) with not only basic education but wider and deeper programs that include the trades.

            K-12 education works JUST FINE in a LOT of schools – where the kids score 80-90% on reading SOLs.

            Do you want to see a list of the K-12 schools in Henrico county where the SOLs are in the 80’s and 90’s?

            These are LOTS of successful schools with lots of successful kids and a large number headed for higher
            education.

          18. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            And that has little to do with the school. It has to do with the family more, which leads to better income, better housing, “better” schools. Build the house on a solid foundation first. A solid family.

          19. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            You can be a husband and wife together with poor educations and low income jobs, right?

            Doesn’t education play a role in what kind of job and income?

          20. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            As usual, back to missing the point. Back to One Note Larry, Looking at the World Through Race Colored Glasses, everything is Racy now…
            Somehow, post-slavery, during Jim Crow, with horrible/no education systems dedicated to black adavancement, blacks advanced. How?
            Was it by “acting white?” Families staying together and pulling together and beating the odds? Maybe “acting white” works for all racial groups? Maybe it’s a humanity thing? It is.
            How come our noble elites don’t preach what they practice? They seem to stay in stable marriages to raise their kids. Look at Jim Ryan with 5 kids, but there are many of the Washington so-called elites who are married and stay married, too. Why don’t they suggest that? (Because as Marxists they want to destroy the family…but for others too…because power above all and we don’t care how much suffering you plebes have to do while we cling to power)

          21. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            I don't know that Jim Crow improved the lives of black folks at all.

            And not having access to a minimal/decent education meant they could not do jobs that required an education, so most were poor and unable to build wealth or even afford things like healthcare.

            It went on like this for many family cycles, didn't it?

            When did it change and get better?

            Is there some thought that even if poor and uneducated that if they had a mom and dad , they'd somehow get an education and escape their circumstances and then be able to bring up their kids to b e better educated, etc?

            I don't doubt for a minute that some, somehow, managed to succeed but most did not and today we see many of their descendants, still uneducated and working low paid job that were described as "black jobs".

            No?

            I just don't see how, married or not, if they don't have a decent education , (live in a school district with good schools) how they can do well in the modern economy. It's a cycle.

          22. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            Yes. The quality of education results has dropped. Family formation. Harder to insist on doing your homework, having discipline, being disciplined from the single family home. In the midst of adversity, that worked, despite the odds. No amount of money great enough can be thrown at fixing the disfunction to your satisfaction, and you can never get to social justice “equity” no matter how much time effort and money you throw at it. Different people are different – even within families.

          23. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Again, I don’t doubt that mom/dad/family is better than out-of-wedlock but a lack of education with mon or dad is not going to bode well for the kid if they can’t afford to live in a good school district because they can’t afford a house in the good school districts. They live is lower income neighborhoods where the schools are uniformly full of low income , economically disadvantaged kids who are already behind on reading skill when they hit
            kindergarten. Neither mom nor dad have the education themselves to help them.

            I was hoping we might be able to agree on some basic facts – like how much education the parents probably have or is the parents actually did get a good education in the past but no longer?

          24. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            Because your “facts” aren’t facts.
            Maybe people live in crappy neighborhoods and have crappy jobs not just because they went to a crappy school. Maybe their broken home parents made bad life choices and their parents did and all they know is a culture of disfunction, so they can continue to make bad life choices. But it can be reversed. AND, even in a crappy school district, you can escape. many people did. And still can. But the DEI regime encourages accepting victim status, does nothing to improve outcomes, and makes matters worse. But, other than that, how was the play Mrs. Lincoln?

          25. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            So when you see the GAP for blacks – what do you think? too many making crappy decisions? When you
            see ENTIRE schools in a county like Henrico that are black and the 3rd grade reading SOLs are in the 50’s, what does that mean when in the same county there are schools where 3rd grade reading SOLs are in the 80’s,90’s?

          26. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            The questions Larry – instead of racist assumptions – how do the black kids do in the “good” schools? And how do the white kids do in the “bad” schools? Human agency matters. And, if a black or white or red our purple student desires to achieve, does the crappy school stop that? Or does motivation matter? Do parents matter? Explain the Asian thing… You can lower the costs and improve outcomes pretty easily. But it would require being “mean.” Kick out disrupters. Have standards. Demand parent involvement – and ignore parent complaints asking for special treatment. Why we need freedom in school curricula, standards, etc.

          27. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            No racist assumptions at all.. just questions as to why Henrico schools are largely segregated and few kids of higher income parents go to the bad schools in poorer neighborhoods because the parents purposely only buy homes in the “good” neighborhoods with the “good” schools and the ones with poor incomes don’t have that choice. The “Asian” thing is largely NoVa. When you get out into RoVa.. it goes away. The Asians in NoVa are high income folks. They actually have the highest incomes in NoVa that all others. Will it help if I do a retrieval for Henrico schools to show the demographics? How can entire schools be “bad” or “good” rather than a mix across all schools where some parents do good and some not so good? Why are dozens of entire schools “bad”?

          28. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            Prove your virtue and move to the Hood. Not all “Asians” are rich. Not all “Asians” live in NoVa. Income is a sorting factor. Reality. The exact same home in a “bad” neighborhood is worth less than that home in a “good” neighborhood. Poor whites live in the bad school districts, too. But the “school”, by itself, does not determine outcomes. One can escape the bad schools by achievement. You drank too deeply from the victim Bible… Are there people in the bad schools who have decent achievement scores? How? Don’t they go to bad schools? How dare they achieve in a bad school and ruin Larry’s non-stop single cause factor?

          29. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Prove what and why? Your point?

            The Asians in NoVa as a demographic have the highest incomes in the region. That's a fact.
            https://www.neilsberg.com/insights/virginia-median-household-income-by-race/

            Totally true about who is stuck in poor neighborhoods.

            And totally true one CAN escape and some but most do not if their parents are poorly educated and make low incomes – those "black jobs" again.

            so why go to bad schools? You go to the school in the neighborhood you could afford to buy a house in.

            Would you like me to list out the schools in Henrico with their overall school achievement scores for 3rd grade SOL reading? not by race?

            Want to see those "bad" schools on a map of Henrico and Richmond? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/368a3c51b3fe83a8ced389c2c2b0afb54e46747af7deed152af7c0d4d8ce0b45.png

      2. Chip Gibson Avatar
        Chip Gibson

        Nailed it, Sir.

    2. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      In 2022, about 96.2 percent of Black, non-Hispanic females had attained at least a high school diploma in the United States compared to 94.3 percent of Black, non-Hispanic males.

      In other words, the vast majority of Black Americans stay in school long enough to graduate from high school.

      In 1980, the amount spent per year per student for public school elementary and secondary education was $2,722. In 2020, that number was $14,420

      $2,722 in 1980 dollars was worth $7,851 in 2020.

      https://www.statista.com/statistics/185135/average-expenditures-per-pupil-in-public-schools/

      Per student spending per year from 1980 through 2020 increased by about double, after inflation.

      Despite per capita spending rising at twice the rate of inflation, we are still falling behind.

      Yet every year, the answer from the teachers' unions (and many on the left) is always the same – spend more money.

      Absent spending more money … what solutions are available?

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Can you provide a cit for your 2022 data?

        the "mo" money is nationwide – both union and non-union schools, right?

        And I agree with your last point, but we all know you can spend money and not be effective but that does not mean you can spend less or no money and be effected. It's about being effect with the money you do spend. And we're not!

  6. Not Today Avatar
    Not Today

    Just enough truth to be palatable. Not enough lived experience to make sense. Always, always paternalistic.

  7. Chip Gibson Avatar
    Chip Gibson

    Very well stated, Sir. Long, long overdue to remove race from the prevalent narratives. All God's children, all individual Americans.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      not black, low education and low income… end up with living in poor neighborhoods with not so good neighborhood schools where half the kids or more don't achieve basic proficiency.

Leave a Reply