The Amazing Shrinking Times-Dispatch


by Jon Baliles

You might recall a story from last summer in Style Weekly entitled The Incredibly Shrinking Times-Dispatch about the decline of our local newspaper and the print news business in general. It has been a precipitous and rapid descent.

Now, according to Axios, it seems that shrinking is not only ongoing but might be accelerating: Lee Enterprises is telling some employees that they will need to take a two-week, unpaid furlough or accept a salary reduction, according to an internal memo obtained by Axios.

The larger drama is that Lee was looked at for a takeover by Alden Global Capital last year and Lee laid off numerous employees company-wide and has continued to struggle (along with most legacy print media). The details of the saga can be read about here and are basically portrayed as two sides of the same bad coin. But, as it relates to Richmond, the story notes that:

In an email sent Monday, staffers at Lee-owned Richmond Times-Dispatch were told that all of their mandatory furlough time [two weeks] must be scheduled by the end of February.

Employees will continue to receive their benefits throughout the furlough period, and deductions for those benefits will continue to be taken out of their paychecks, the email read.

‘In order for Lee to comply with federal wage and hour laws, you are not allowed to do ANY work while out on furlough,’ read the email. ‘Please do not read or respond to emails or voicemails, do not return calls and do not come into the office. Do not attend any function as an official representative of the paper.’

Lee, one of the last remaining independent newspaper companies, has been rolling out furloughs across its newsrooms. Staffers at The Roanoke Times, the Globe Gazette and the Lincoln Journal Star were told earlier this month.

Yikes. That’s the kind of memo usually followed by polishing up your resumé. The story has tales of impending doom from papers in other cities about staff reductions, layoffs, stagnant wages, and lack of serving readers and the communities in which they publish.

Some of that has already occurred here per the article in Style, and it’s possible we might see some of those tales appear in our area code soon, which would be nothing short of devastating for the gathering and reporting of local news and covering of local issues. Even if a print publication goes all digital, let’s hope that in whatever form we see it, it is news that continues to serve our community — news we can actually use that provides accountability for those who make the decisions.

Republished with permission from RVA 5×5.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

36 responses to “The Amazing Shrinking Times-Dispatch”

  1. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    The horse you are beating is already dead.

  2. William O'Keefe Avatar
    William O’Keefe

    Vince Lombardi is reputed to answer the question of his secret to winning by saying, “do a few things but do them extremely well.”
    The RTD has been doing the opposite and as it quality and writing has deteriorated, its readership and subscription base have fallen. Raising prices and reducing quality is a sure fire way to go out of business.

    1. Raising prices and reducing quality is a sure fire way to go out of business.

      Unless you’re Dominion…

      1. William O'Keefe Avatar
        William O’Keefe

        You can generalize, unless you are a monopoly which the RTD isn’t

    2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      It is sort of a chicken and egg question. Which came first, the deterioration in writing and coverage or the rising prices?

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        The thing to also recognize is that small papers, many in conservative rural counties and towns have also succumbed to the disease. Did Conservatives also leave the rural publications for the same reason ?

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          Yes, the proliferation of other outlets has eliminated their monopoly on news reporting and their ad revenue, too. The Interweb strikes again….

  3. DJRippert Avatar

    The problem is the whole concept of a newspaper, bundling and subscription based pricing.

    There are about 2 articles a week that I am interested in reading from the RTD. There is no way I am subscribing to the newspaper to read two articles per week. However, I would pay 25 cents per article. That’s $26 per year. Not what they get for a full subscription but better than nothing.

  4. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    The news media, especially newspapers, brought on its own demise. All successful businesses have a customer focus, but not newspapers. Instead of writing for the mass market, where people’s views on issues vary widely, newspaper reporters, aided by news editors, write for themselves and other like-minded reporters and editors. Then, add in the fact that there are many other sources of information on the Internet, and, surprise, circulation falls. And falling circulation drives down advertising. And the circle to the drain continues.

    There is no reason why newspapers lost so much advertising to Facebook and Google. But even before the rise of these companies, newspaper publishers allowed their employees to write for themselves, pushing away readers. Cutting back on local news followed, driving away more readers.

    From the time I could master the language, I read the morning and evening papers. My dad and mother and grandparents did too. Even when we still took the Post, my kids rarely read it. Why did newspapers fail to capture newer generations and alienate half their readers by writing one-sided articles?

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      Relying on social media, Facebook, Google for facts and truth is way more problematical that most MSM papers. They are biased, no question, but they do not typically fabricate total untruths or promote conspiracy theories like we are seeing on social media and some blogs and even TV networks.

      We have a significant number of people who believed the Dominion Voting system’s wacked out lies and conspiracy theories even now. Some elected to office on those lies.

      Can’t blame that on MSM unless one wants to claim that they thought MSM was biased and then went from frying pan into the fire,

      1. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
        f/k/a_tmtfairfax

        Larry, how come the Post did umpteen articles on George Allen’s stupid “macaca” statement but ??? on Biden’s stupid “Governor Moore is a boy” statement? How come the Post sent a gaggle of reporters to cover the Roy Moore – Doug Jones special senate election but missed the Ralph Northam blackface story not in one statewide election but in two consecutive statewide elections? How come the editorial board was allowed to violate Post policy to push a reporter not to write anything negative about then Governor Tim Kaine. (According to the Post, there is a wall be between the news and editorial operations that shouldn’t be crossed.)

        None of the professional journalists who frequent BR have attempted to justify this.

        My point remains, if you want to get more readers than less, you keep your reporters’ bias out of the news, be it a decision to cover an event or an issue or what is written about what is covered. My dad always said, when you find yourself in a hole, the first thing you do is to stop digging. The MSM continues to commit suicide.

        1. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
          f/k/a_tmtfairfax

          Larry, it’s not the editorial content. It’s the “news” itself. Given the fact that the Post has a DMV section and a number of reporters covering those events, including Virginia politics, why did it miss the Northam blackface incident, even as it sent multiple reporters to cover an Alabama senate special election?

          I rarely quote the Post. I read two or three Post articles a month, generally when someone sends me a link to one. At times, when a story is covered by multiple news outlets, I may cite the Post or some other left-focused source because you often claim bias if I link to a right-focused source.

          If newspapers had strived to provide bias-free news coverage and take on both Rs & Ds when appropriate, they would not be in as deep of a hole financially as they are today. They would have more readers and more advertisers. Would things be the same? No, but they would be better than they are today.

          1. Randy Huffman Avatar
            Randy Huffman

            I have seen it here in Charlottesville and agree with what you have outlined

        2. LarrytheG Avatar

          none of this is telling outright lies nor promoting conspiracy theories and it’s one paper which you have a vendetta against. On a wider scale , did ALL MSM media to what WapO did?

          WaPo is biased and not perfect by a long shot but the truth is that even folks like you will QUOTE them on articles that you like or agree with. Many conservatives do. They slam WapO then turn around and quote them on another article.

          The demise of local papers has NOTHING to do with what you are claiming. Most all local papers have been affected , good, bad, and ugly ones – the loss of Ad had nothing to do with their editorial content. All across Va from the Roanoke TImes, to RTD have suffered the same problems with Ad
          revenue no matter their editorial content.

        3. Randy Huffman Avatar
          Randy Huffman

          Totally disagree. I know many people who have walked away from our Charlottesville Daily Progress, owned by Lee, because there News Section has done exactly what was outlined above.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            Conservatives, who were never fans of most print news to start with perhaps but a substantial number who are not Conservative did not walk away over the content.

            Small town papers all over the country, including many in rural counties and towns have experienced the same problem and Conservatives STILL walked away from those papers also.

            We need to get to the truth not Conservatives myths.

          2. Randy Huffman Avatar
            Randy Huffman

            Don’t know why you say conservatives were never fans of print media?
            They don’t like ink on their fingers, or content? I’ve been reading papers since I was a teenager, and still get the WSJ delivered to my house (Editorial section conservatives, but paper itself balanced).

            Cant speak to other towns, but Charlottesville is pretty liberal and yet readership is way down on the Charlottesville paper. That seems to point that it is in fact the liberals who generally are not fans of print media since that paper is catering to them, whereas the more conservative folks walked away over content.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar

            point is, small town papers in many conservative rural areas are also closing down. It’s pretty
            much all papers whether they serve conservative or liberal sentiments. Even the WSJ is having challenges. Oh I see your theory – liberals don’t like print and conservatives don’t like content?
            So are there print papers that thrive because they reflect conservative content? Not just one or two like WSJ. Surely in cities and town and counties there are conservative papers, no?

          4. Randy Huffman Avatar
            Randy Huffman

            Ha, you got me a little on this one, but remember you started off saying conservatives were never fans of print media. I think we can agree print media is less read by alot of readers on both sides, though I will say I do like to read a paper, and have picked one, the WSJ. Despite my differences with the Daily Progress, I still subscribe online and look at it a few days a week. I don’t think many of the younger generation read a paper, period.

            Roanoke has a conservative leaning paper but its online only, the Roanoke Star. Not sure when it started. SW Va has the Cardinal News which is a nonprofit, but I don’t believe it identifies itself as anything but local news.

          5. LarrytheG Avatar

            well if I said ” started off saying conservatives were never fans of print media.” I was mistaken and wrong to say that.

            I see letters to the Editor in various papers including the RTD from Conservatives who say the paper has gone to heckfire in a handbasket because it has gotten “liberal”.

            And Conservatives here in BR are talking all the time about some book they read that supports their thinking….

            Many small town/county papers are not liberal at all.. yet they are dying too…

    2. Profit-motivated news is already inherently biased to what sells instead of what the people should know, and beholden to whichever entities own it which just further limit whatever service it can provide

      The result is sensationalism alongside cowardly slop that won’t interest younger generations, and older generations have been fed 40 years of propaganda that the newspapers are extensions of Marx himself, so there’s no avenue for a centrist product in the increasingly divisive political atmosphere of the past few decades.

      1. how_it_works Avatar
        how_it_works

        I think many Washington Post (and other “dead tree media” )subscribers are in my dad’s generation. After he passed away I had to cancel the subscription. It sure did a nice job of filling up the recycling bin.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          As pointed out before, we’re talking about small town papers all over the state and country, many of them in conservative rural areas.

          so the ‘dead tree’ thing is not the same as people rejecting papers because they don’t reflect the “values” of the readers?

          1. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            I think the problem is that younger people (my dad was 81 when he passed) don’t read physical newspapers AND don’t want to subscribe to online newspapers. On the rare occasion that Washington Post has something I want to read and I’ve already used my 2 free articles per month, well, that’s what “incognito mode” is for.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar

            Do young people not read books any more either?

          3. LarrytheG Avatar

            you know, the kind you get from a library or Thrift Books, etc… do young folks not read books with covers any more?

          4. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            They probably do until they get a kindle or a laptop or a tablet.

          5. LarrytheG Avatar

            I know people that once they read the book, won’t get rid of it. I ask why and they say they might read it again but they have stacks and stacks of books they’ve read and keep.

  5. LarrytheG Avatar

    The reality is that without Lee, the situation would be even worse, complete shutdowns and disappearance of print media.

    The business model for print media has been “disrupted” as they say and to this point, they have not totally figured out how to transition to online Ads even though social media, Google and FB have had great success at it , as well as broadcast media.

    We watch TV and it’s never been more apparent the role that ads play in occupying the time that viewers are forced to endure. They even compete with the Super Bowl for “eyeballs”!

    I already subscribe to 4 papers and will do no more and I resent paywalls for papers that Lee owns even though I already subscribe to two of them.

    I’m willing to pay for articles like DJ does and at some point I wonder if Lee Enterprises might offer a bundle subscription of some kind.

    And I’ll tell you where some people are going for Virginia news these days. It’s VPAP. There is some
    sort of agreement apparently but even then there are some articles they list that remain paywalled.

    It’s not like some people don’t want to know local news or even regional or state, they do, but they are not going to pay hundred of dollars of subscriptions for dozens of papers.

    Lee Enterprises and/or someone like them need to move to a different business model that provides a product that people will buy.

    I say Lee Enterprises because it’s clear to me that local papers either have no clue what to do or have little or no interest even if the local paper goes belly up. They stand by twisting in the wind and LE buys them for peanuts.

    They hate Lee Enterprises but in my view, Lee is the only one trying to preserve the Virginia local print media. I see no others in the wings,

    I’m not sure what the LE “haters” want instead of Lee.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      I’ve long thought that I would pay for VPAP (I donate already) if it meant the paywalls went away. They could find some revenue sharing formula I would think. Taking RTD and WSJ on line, that’s it these days. Don’t actually miss the huge pile of recycling.

      1. So, no pet bird for you?

      2. LarrytheG Avatar

        Some people “like” holding the printed page. They still like hard and soft cover books!

        1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
          Dick Hall-Sizemore

          I like having a physical newspaper, but I quit subscribing to the print RTD when the price went above $70 per month. My daughter still gets the print WaPo, and I enjoy the print copy when I visit her. I find that I read more articles in the print version than I do in the digital version.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            I’ve gotten away from “print” except for hardcover books that I read but I don’t read that manner. I do consume gobs of electronic info. In the Volunteer Tax world, more and more, and most of the reference docs are now electronic and knowing how to quickly search them for what you need
            is an important skill. YouTube has become an important tool for “how to” everything from fixing toilets to changing mower blades, etfc.

  6. VaPragamtist Avatar
    VaPragamtist

    I stopped reading the RTD several years ago when reporting took a sharp turn to the left.

    Journalism isn’t just about reporting and assuming that if you have enough sources your article is unbiased. Like all professions, journalists must actively work to mitigate their biases. I think they’ve at best become lazy in this regard or, at worst, use the legitimacy of journalism as a profession to advocate for their personal beliefs.

    Media companies have also abandoned journalism in favor “fake news”. Defined broadly, fake news includes more than manufactured information. It includes word choice, unbalance, bias seeping in, placement, giving articles undue prominence–anything that is done to covertly sway the consumer to one side or another under the guise of journalism.

    RTD as journalism died years ago.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      So here’s what I do not understand. I DO understand if someone is reading a paper and decides it’s gone “too far left” and they leave it.

      But what I do not understand is why they don’t say, “I left it because it was too “left” and NOW, I get my news from…… [this sources that provides “better” news”.

      So people leave and stop reading all together?

Leave a Reply