A Tear in the Fabric of the Cosmos: Bacon Lauds a WaPo Editorial

Sooner or later it was bound to happen: The Washington Post has run an editorial that I agree with. Rest assured, I haven’t gone soft and mushy — it’s the Post that has seen the light.

Buried in the latest White House budget, writes the Post, is a proposal to grant $100 million to as-yet-unspecified cities to experiment with value pricing as a strategy for combatting traffic congestion. The Post, which has plugged tirelessly for more construction and higher taxes in Virginia, sees merit in a strategy that would modulate the demand side of the equation:

Traffic jams cost millions of Americans real money, an expense that is disguised in the form of lost time and wasted gas, not to mention the daily frustration that’s harder to price or otherwise quantify. The White House estimates that in 2003 American motorists in the 85 most-clogged metropolitan areas wasted 3.7 billion hours and 2.3 billion gallons of gasoline — about $63 billion worth — stuck in traffic. Every year, drivers in the 10 most-congested cities pay between $850 and $1,600 and use the equivalent of about eight work days on jammed highways and streets. These calculations do not even consider the massive social cost of additional air pollution. The Washington area is one of the worst-off: The Census Bureau announced last year that, on average, commuters in and around the District have the second-longest trips in the country.

Urban congestion has become so bad that, in addition to investing in public transportation and traffic-calming strategies, many cities are considering ways of making these disguised costs explicit — by, for example, charging a toll when drivers enter certain parts of towns or use particularly popular highways during peak hours — thereby discouraging unnecessary trips when congestion is at its worst.

It’s scary when I find myself agreeing with a Post editorial. There must be some significance to this harmonic convergence of such divergent philosophies. Perhaps it’s a sign that the time for congestion pricing has truly come. Now… if only we could persuade the lawmakers trapped inside the bubble of the General Assembly to halt their bickering over which taxes to raise and start thinking about how to institute congestion pricing.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

One response to “A Tear in the Fabric of the Cosmos: Bacon Lauds a WaPo Editorial”

  1. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    “Every year, drivers in the 10 most-congested cities pay between $850 and $1,600 and use the equivalent of about eight work days on jammed highways and streets.”

    A person that drives 15K a year in a car that gets 20mpg pays in Virginia about $270 for gas taxes (includes both Fed and State).

    Do you think that they would prefer instead to pay about $800 in Tolls for a less congested commute than to spend that $800 in lost time and gasoline?

    On one hand, we talk about how time time and money we lose due to congestion then on the other hand we argue that TOLLs are like another tax… completely ignoring the fact that Variable Price TOLLS will yield something of tangible value to those who pay.

    It is such an obvious no-brainer that even WaPa can’t figure out a rational argument in opposition.

    The primary risk is doing this is if VDOT gets their hands on it and uses it to replenish their mega project slush fund.. rather than NoVa and TW/HR being able to use it to tamp down congestion even more by eliminating bottlenecks, and other network optimization strategies.

    AND .. ALL of this without taking one penny from anyone else in RoVA.

    AND .. ALL of this without having one penny of NoVa money being diverted to RoVa (presumming it’s kept out of VDOT’s hands).

Leave a Reply