Teaching Like Socrates

Low tuition, classical education – what’s not to like?By James A. Bacon

One day about two years ago Ann McLean, a devout Christian and mother of four, felt that she was “spoken to” by God and given a mission in life – to start a new school. She never looked back. If all goes well, she will enroll her first six classes of students for Hunter Country Day School this fall.

While the decision to launch a private school based on a classical education and Christian values came on suddenly, dissatisfaction with the conventional alternatives in the Richmond area had been percolating for quite a while. Educational standards in public schools, she felt, had collapsed. The curriculum in public and private schools alike had invaded by a dominant culture coarsened by sex and violence. And the college preparatory school where her children were enrolled heaped “crushing tuitions” on parents to pay for trophy buildings and athletic programs.

McLean’s intent is to focus on fundamentals, creating an environment where children can hone their minds and build character at the lowest tuition possible. Hunter Country Day will adopt a curriculum inspired by the classical education movement — the ultimate back-to-the-basics program — and charge only $6,000 in yearly tuition. That compares to $10,500 per pupil spent by public schools nationally this year and $10,900 in Virginia.

A slim, blonde banker’s wife with a Ph.D. in art history, McLean epitomizes the entrepreneurship sweeping K-12 education today. It’s a time of great ferment as Americans across the country seek to reinvent an educational system they see as badly broken. Indeed, that entrepreneurial, mission-driven spirit may be America’s best chance to break free from the rigid, suffocating stasis of the public school system. While private schools do offer an alternative, prep-school tuitions approaching $20,000 a year are unaffordable to the vast majority of Americans.

With the backing and support of two other Richmonders, McLean has leased classroom space from the Dover Baptist Church in Goochland County and scoured the region for second-hand equipment and desks. The school will have few frills. “We don’t need a huge football team. Sorry,” she says unapologetically. Technology has its uses but she doesn’t need high-tech school buildings either. “Socrates never had a classroom. Jesus Christ never had a classroom.”

Tuitions will go to hiring great teachers , keeping the teacher-student ratio down to an intimate 12 to one and implementing a classical education curriculum.  By “classical,” she doesn’t mean traditional, like teaching phonics (although she is a big believer in phonics). McLean is developing a curriculum based on the “trivium” developed in the Middle Ages: grammar, logic and rhetoric. Elementary school pupils are grounded in a foundation of facts, such as grammar. Middle school pupils learn how the facts relate in a logical framework. And high school students master rhetoric, or critical thinking. The curriculum is based on language and concepts, not photos, video and other images so prevalent in education today.

A core goal of classical education is to build students’ character. The founding fathers, says McLean, understood that humans were by nature selfish and fallen, the only antidote for which was the cultivation of personal virtue. “The American experiment depends upon an educated populace founded on Christian values,” says McLean, who makes no secret of her political and cultural conservatism. “The most important job of any culture is training the next generation” – a job at which the nation is failing. She wants to reverse the nation’s cultural decline. “I’m the little girl sticking my finger in the dike.”

McLean’s philosophy of education is not for everybody. But that’s the beauty of free markets. Real competition would offer a broad spectrum of alternatives to the secular uniformity of public schools and the soaring cost of elite prep schools. More importantly, Hunter Country Day will succeed only if McLean provides the kind of education – at an affordable price – that parents want for their children.

Virginia’s General Assembly is debating a number of proposals this session to increase private school choice by means of tax credits. None of the proposals are bold enough.  Based on Governor Bob McDonnell’s proposed 2012-2014 budget, the commonwealth will distribute $5.1 billion, or roughly $4,000 per student, in Direct Aid to Public Education. If that $4,000 followed the students, rather than the schools, the vast majority of Virginians could afford a private education of their choice…. Or, if parents couldn’t find a school that suited, like Ann McLean they could start their own.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

18 responses to “Teaching Like Socrates”

  1. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    “The curriculum in public and private schools alike had invaded by a dominant culture coarsened by sex and violence.”

    Huh? Evidence?

  2. I wonder if those who want these “better” schools would also agree to the same rigorous academic standards that public school have to meet or even better – these private schools have to meet NAEP proficiency standards?

    I’d like to see that happen. That would put exquisite pressure on the public school system.

    here’s what is going on.

    some kids are not being cared for by their parents. I do not know the percentage now compared to before but it’s clearly a big problem.

    The public school OTOH have been co-opted by the parents who care to provide the amenities that their kids wants – from sports to social clubs to baccalaureate programs even if it means that elementary programs for at risk kids get sacrificed.

    to a certain extent – having these parents move their kids to private school is a gift horse that we should not look hard at.

    and if they want to have their kids come back to the public schools for amenties – charge them.

    make pubic schools on the taxpayer dollar about academics only and everything else is ala carte.

    that way the ONLY curricula that is available to the kids we currently abandon IS academics and parents who want private schools can have at it.

  3. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    I have read your post more closely and am even more alarmed.

    If this woman wants to create a fundamentalist “Christian” school, there are plenty out there established by people who object to what they believe are incorrect values. This is hardly news.

    My issue is more with the way you have framed this. Did you get this from your conservative blogger session with Robert F. McDonnell?

    This “slim, blonde banker’s wife” is some kind of “entrepreneur” who wants to frame the next generation of Americans in what she claims are “Christian values.” What values? Baptist? Methodist? Catholic? Episcopalian? Jehovah’s Witnesses? (assuming I am getting my Christianity correctly). Didn’t Jews have anything to do with it? Or other religions?

    You claim she is teaching “classical” values from the “Middles Ages.” But if this PhD in Art History is so knowledgeable, doesn’t she know that “classical values” are based on Greek and Rome long before “Christianity” (or whatever she believes it to be) were in existence?

    As a graduate of the elite Episcopalian St. Albans school in DC, you ought to know the difference.

    I don’t know this woman, but from the way you have set her up, I wouldn’t want my two children (if they weren’t already in college) anywhere near her. And I sure as hell don’t want her to get part of my taxes.

    1. No, Peter, I did not get this from the Virginia Blogger Day. I’m all blogged out from that event.

      Peter, Peter, Peter…. You should know better than to question my knowledge of history. Do you *really* think that I’m so ignorant that I don’t know the “classical” era of history refers to ancient Greece and Rome? Come now. Really?

      Let me quote from “An Introduction to Classical Education: A Guide for Parents.”

      Classical education is the authoritative, traditional and enduring form of education, begun by the Greeks and Romans, developed through history and now being renewed and recovered in the 21st century.

      The Greeks and Romans educated with an emphasis on grammar, literature, logic and rhetoric.

      It was during the Middle Ages (c. 500 – 1460 A.D.) that the great variety of subjects and approaches present in the Greeks and Romans were analyzed and put into a systematic and more consistent form and curriculum. The curriculum of thetrivium, meaning “three ways”), featuring the subjects of grammar, logic and rhetoric was formally established during this time, as well as its counterpart the quadrivium (“the four ways”) containing the subjects of astronomy, arithmetic, music and geometry. The words trivium and quadrivium were coined in the Middle Ages.

      The “classical education” movement has updated its curriculum since the Middle Ages, needless to say, but core organizational principles can be traced to the Middle Ages, with the ultimate inspiration coming from the classical era.

  4. the situation is pretty simple. there are a crapload of people who are not happy with the public school system (but not for the same reasons).

    they no longer accept the middle-ground compromises.

    some want more religion (of their kind) and others want their kids protected from ruffians and bullies. Others want their kids to excel and the public schools are (in their view) seriously dumbed down.

    they are willing to leave the public school system – more than willing if they get their taxes back … except they really love the amenities that public schools offer that private schools cannot afford to.

    The problem is they are no longer willing to go along with the current system and I do not think that is going to change,

    there is a ton of people out there that are now homeschooling their kids and then sending them to non-public schools and with the advent of Virtual Learning – it’s probably going to accelerate.

    I have to admit – it’s pretty bad when a 21 school system has to have hundreds of cameras.. throughout the schools…

  5. DJRippert Avatar

    She charges less than 60% of what the public schools spend per pupil per year and has a student – to – teacher ratio of 12 -1?

    The student to teacher ratio across Fairfax County schools is just under 20 – 1 with an annual per student cost of $13,400.

    http://school-district.findthebest.com/q/3450/82/What-is-the-Student-Teacher-Ratio-in-the-Fairfax-Co-Pblc-Schs-public-school-district

    http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/government/budget/fcps-budget-facts.pdf

    It seems to me that this woman’s plan ought to be considered.

  6. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Another point,
    When was the last time James A. Bacon Jr., was actually inside a public K-12 classroom? It was the same problem I had with “Boomergeddon” and so stated in my review. Lots of wonkery about health care but it doesn’t seem he’s set foot in an emergency room and seen what really happens.

    It’s fine if children go to private school — mine did part of the time. But they went to a public high school and I found little of the outrageous incompetence and shameless emphasis on sex and violence he refers to. My wife is a professional teacher with a master’s degree. She complains more about attention deficit kids overdrugged by their parents or given extremely fattening diets by their parents than she does about the general collapse of civilization.
    When I read Bacon, it is if I am reading someone writing from another planet — someone who misses the real issues while buying into what the dogmatists claim.

  7. Peter, Peter, Peter, Peter… I’m not especially concerned about the coarsening of popular culture in schools. That’s Ann McLean’s concern, as should be abundantly clear from the context in which the phrase was used. While I don’t share that concern, I support her effort to create an educational environment that she feels is appropriate for her children and the children of those who think like her.

    You see, I believe in diversity. Diversity of thought. Diversity of practice. The diversity that comes from experimentation. If that means private schools that raise children according to orthodox Jewish values, or Muslim values, or Ayn Rand’s Objectivist values, or hippie-dippie communalist Woodstock values, I think Americans should be able to do so. I do not believe that the state should impose its bland, secular least-common-denominator values upon everyone.

  8. well.. it’s called “socialization” in a diverse world.

    do we really want to grow kids that end up with a narrow focus of other ideas and societies?

    this part of this is not good. Kids grow up to live in a big diverse secular world with lots of different religions and societies….

    public schools are a much truer representation of the world than private schools.

    1. LarryG asks an interesting question: “Do we really want to grow kids that end up with a narrow focus of other ideas and societies?”

      I think that’s a valid question, and it’s one of the best reasons I’ve heard — and I hear it frequently — for sending kids to public school. But I also believe it’s a personal decision for parents to make. And I recognize that other parents will not answer the question the same way that I might.

      As a libertarian by inclination, I do not believe in imposing my values on others any more than I will submit to others imposing their values on me.

      On a different point: I would not assume that a kid getting home schooled or a Christian/classical education will grow up any more ignorant of other cultures and viewpoints than a kid educated in a public school. One way in which you define your faith and values is to understand how they differ from other faiths and values. I attended an Episcopalian prep school and studied the history of Christianity from an Episcopalian perspective but was never taught that the Episcopalian way was “superior” or the only legitimate way. … That’s how I, as an altar boy in the Washington Cathedral, ended up an atheist.

      Indeed, I would argue that teaching students to think critically and analytically in a Christian classical tradition will lead them to be more independent and questioning in their thinking than students who never learn critical thinking skills in the first place.

  9. the basic problem, in various degrees, is that the world does not work the way that many (not all) religions say it should work and some religions say it’s blasphemy for the world to work in a way that “violates” their beliefs.

    that’s brewing big time trouble when you say: ” I do not believe in imposing my values on others any more than I will submit to others imposing their values on me.”

    Religions in general have an ethical dilemma if they want to instill the value of “tolerance” in their teaching.

    Can you see the Catholic Church counseling “tolerance” on things like birth control or Muslims preaching “tolerance” on core Christian beliefs?

    the worst troubles that we have in the world, in my view, come from Religion as much as anything else.

    Even people who send their kids to private school – want their kids to socialize with other, more diverse groups… including public school sports and other extracurricular activities.

    moving away a bit from that conundrum to the idea of what academic standards should we have (or not) and should those standards apply to every kid no matter where they get schooled and if they are not staying on grade level – what is to be done?

    I note in some European countries that clean our clock academically, they are just fine with private schooling – but the kid has to meet national academic standards and if they don’t there are consequences for the provider and especially so if the academic deficits are not isolated.

    so I’d be perfectly happy with everyone getting an education credit and spending it as they see fit as long as all kids have to meet the same academic standards.

    This would leave taxpayers still holding the extracurricular bag and a clear subsidy to some kids while a penalty to other private school kids.

    how would this be fixed?

  10. LarryG, I’m OK with the idea that private schools should be required to meet certain minimum eductional standards established by the state.

  11. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Bacon, Bacon, Bacon,
    What I still do not understand is why you are flaking for this woman and setting her up as some kind of educational pioneer. There are many, many, many religious or independent private schools out there. They do NOT have to adhere to the same rigors of standardized testing that public schools do. Some are good, some are excellent and some ought to be shut down. Check your facts.
    Also, check your headline writing. I fail to see what’s so “Socratic” about the way the “blonde banker’s wife” is running things.
    Maybe,. I’d feel differently if the post had not been written with such gushy enthusiasm and this “entrepreneurial” BS.
    Reminds me of a bumper sticker I saw in West Virginia this week:
    “Some Preachers Lie
    God Knows Who”

  12. Thad Hunter Avatar
    Thad Hunter

    I like the post. As someone who tried to hire IT talent I can attest that Virginia schools are not getting the job done. As a resident of Loudoun County I love the reference to trophy buildings although I’m not sure if you were referring to sports (which I also agree with) or the Hilton extravagance. Loudoun could build a school for Appalachia using the money it wastes. If you want good teachers and see good teachers paid well then let the market work. Good parents value education and if money is put back in to the hands of parents then we are making progress. Besides the state owes us all for creating a monopoly that has failed and lowered our global competiveness.

  13. ” As someone who tried to hire IT talent I can attest that Virginia schools are not getting the job done.”

    the narrative from the anti-public-schools folks is that our public schools are not getting the job done – because there are “bad” teachers’.

    the first part is true but it’s not because of bad teachers when school after school after school fails to compete with their European and Asian counterparts – which by the way are heavily govt run also.

    but in this country – we have decided that it’s bad teachers in govt run schools that is the problem and the solution is private schools with teachers that can be fired if they are “bad”.

    it’s a devastatingly simplistic view of the issue but typical for the right wing these days who address issues in sound-bite concepts.

    when an IT company tells us that they cannot find qualified US applicants in an economy that has significant unemployed and instead is hiring folks with Indian and other foreign extract (which I am NOT opposed to at all).. then we have a problem that extends far beyond “bad” teachers in public schools.

    we are frustrated and unhappy with the way our institutions work and basically on the blame path… rather than facing up to the realities that really involve us and our own lack of commitment to get better.

    Notice how many folks are OPPOSED to academic standards and standardized curricula – both significant aspects of every other industrialized country’s education policy.

    instead, we say in this country that testing “dumbs down” our students and we are forced to teach to the test.

    DUH! Has anyone considered what the SAT or Armed Forces tests are?

    as a society we have a fibrillation problem. We have a LOT of voices all going at the same time who are NOT saying the same things. They have all manner of complaints but they cannot agree on how to go forward.

    how they want to go forward is to throw away our current institutions.

    it’s pretty destructive. More and more folks basically support a tear-down mentality and cannot themselves agree on how to go forward.

    Firing “bad” teachers is not going to fix the problems we have. WE have much more serious issues than “bad” teachers but it is the current sound bite de-jure.

  14. LarryG, I don’t know of anyone who blames all the problems with education today on bad teachers. But the research does show that *among the factors affecting educational outcomes that schools can influence* the quality of teachers is No. 1 on the list, and the quality of principles is No. 2. Both liberals and conservatives agree on that, I do believe.

    The debate is how do you improve the quality of teachers. Liberals generally promote the idea of spending more on teacher development. Conservatives emphasize the idea of weeding out the bad teachers. A reasonable person might conclude that we should do both. But that is how the debate should be framed.

  15. re: how to improve the quality … BZZZZZTTTTT!!!!!!

    by putting teachers on one year contracts subject to evaluations that are not defined and left to the discretion of principles and administrations ….

    a “reasonable” person would say – let’s establish level-playing field evaluation system for teachers, principles AND administrators that cannot be perverted by unscrupulous people.

    That’s what the teachers want. They do not fear – fair evaluations but what you have here is a rush to an action that is going to end up with the foxes writing the rules for the henhouse.

    do I blame the Conservatives? YES! BECAUSE it’s CLEAR what their REAL INTENT IS and that is to punish teachers and not really have a fair and equitable evaluation system – they totally bailed out of that.

    bad motives. bad policy. bad results.

  16. last I heard this legislation failed and it’s final form was 3 years, not 1 and existing teachers grandfathered.

    that’s an acceptable compromise in my view and gives the state time to devise a standard evaluation methodology for teachers, principles and administrators.

    but the basic sound-bite mentality that our conservatives friends have – that the reason our schools are falling short, especially in comparison to our foreign competitors, is “bad” teachers – demonstrates an ignorance that is breathtaking in width and breadth.

    When a whole school and whole school systems fail to graduate but 1/3 of the kids with an academic rating of “proficient” in reading, writing and math/science – it’s much more involved than “bad” teachers.

    and I would also assert that “bad” teachers are a lot like “bad” Congressman.

    Virtually everyone thinks there are “bad” Congressman – but not their Congressman!

Leave a Reply