Teaching in the Time of COVID

by Matt HurtSince March 13 when Virginia schools were initially closed due to COVID-19, I have  participated in discussions with hundreds (maybe thousands) of public school teachers and administrators from across Virginia. Most conversations centered on the educational difficulties imposed by the pandemic. A common thread through those conversation was the frustration that schools were not meeting the needs of at-risk students. Educators felt like they were between a rock and a hard place.Most of these educators work in school divisions that offer some degree of in-person instruction to every student, and have done so through most of this school year. These folks are concerned that educational outcomes, even for students who opted for in-person instruction, will not be consistent with the progress expected prior to the pandemic. Few divisions offered in-person instruction for students five days a week. Some offered four days per week, and many offered two days per week (one group coming two days a week, and another group coming another two days a week to accommodate spacing needs for social distancing). In almost all divisions, the school day was slightly shortened. In most instances teachers had significantly less time with their students than in previous years.  Teachers believe that in-person students on average achieved more this year than most virtual classmates. In every division that offers in-person instruction, students have the option for virtual instruction, and approximately 30%-40% took advantage of it. Unfortunately, a large percentage of the students opting for virtual instruction are at-risk. In past years many had issues with truancy. Now they see virtual classes as an easy way to ditch school.Educators feel that virtual instruction has not been successful for at-risk students, mostly because the students won’t participate. Prior to COVID, teachers could develop positive relationships with students who were not motivated by grades and convince them to do their work. When that didn’t work, principals could intervene to help persuade students. Now, on the rare occasion when these students do log into a Zoom session, their camera is off, and they do not interact with their teacher. Rarely do they turn in any work; some haven’t submitted a single assignment all year.In an effort to mitigate the problem of non-participation, many teachers and administrators have logged countless hours calling, emailing, and drafting letters to the parents of these students. The purpose is to inform parents of the student’s lack of progress/participation, and to determine if there are any unmet needs that the school can address. Many times, the school’s and the teacher’s phone numbers are blocked. Their emails go unanswered. Their certified letters get returned to the school. Many of our educators counter these setbacks by conducting home visits to engage with parents, which does help a little, but does not provide the level of student participation necessary for students to be successful. During these conversations, educators inform parents of COVID precautions taken at school, and tell them the door is open should they wish to send their child to school. Some take them up on the offer, but not nearly enough.When we ask educators what measurable effect COVID has had on the skill attainment of our students, they dejectedly reply that they don’t know in the aggregate. When asked the question, one administrator commented, “Well, I can’t tell you how well the students are doing, but many of our parents’ skills are progressing nicely.” We haven’t received enough work from many of our at-risk students to gauge their progress this year. No one is sure if it is the student’s work, the parent’s work, or if the student sought the help of Google to complete the assignment.

Some students who consistently earned C’s in the past now have straight A’s, likely due to various forms of cheating.

The only verifiably valid aggregate data that has been collected so far is from our in-person students. When we administer SOL tests this year, we will get a reliable accounting of the skills of the students who will take the test, but many students likely will not come into school to take their tests. SOL tests are not allowed to be administered virtually due to test security protocols. Because of these issues, we won’t be able to fully assess the impact COVID has had on the education of our students until we resume in-person instruction for all.

The pandemic has also taken a tremendous toll on our educators. These folks were trained to teach students in face to face classrooms, and that training and experience doesn’t translate easily into the online format. This spring and summer, teachers spent countless hours learning an overwhelming array of new skills to try to meet the needs of their students in an online format. They had to recreate the wheel and convert all of their traditional materials into digital format. Please keep in mind that there has been an ongoing teacher shortage, and the effects of the pandemic will surely worsen that problem.

The stress and worry about how to change from in-person to virtual-instruction overnight, and how to do so in a way to ensure positive outcomes for students, was overwhelming. Add to that the stress of changing the plan many times from 100% virtual, to in-person instruction, back to virtual when they didn’t have enough teachers who weren’t in quarantine to have school, back to in-person instruction, back to virtual so everyone could get vaccinated, and etc.  

Most teachers in divisions that offer in-person instruction not only have to provide for the students in their classrooms but to virtual students as well. The problem gets even worse for teachers in those divisions that operate on an A/B hybrid schedule in which they have three groups of students to teach — group A kids, group B kids, and  virtual students. This scenario is a record keeping/ organizational nightmare to manage. All teachers report spending significantly more time planning, creating new materials, and grading work that is not turned in on time than they spent prior to the pandemic.

Teachers don’t get into this field to get rich, they do it to do good things for kids.  They worry they are not sufficiently providing for the educational needs of their students. Because many virtual students are not turning in much work, they’re receiving failing grades. Worse, they are not progressing enough to achieve success in the next grade. 

We will likely experience the educational effects of COVID for years. Prior to the pandemic, most students moved on to the next grade having mastered enough of the prerequisite skills to be successful, but some moved on without sufficient prerequisites in place. Working with students on various skill levels created a difficult problem for teachers. This problem certainly will be exacerbated by the pandemic. Despite the fact that educators are developing and implementing plans to mitigate this to the greatest extent possible, it is unrealistic to expect that summer school, after-school tutoring, or extended school years can effectively make this problem go away by August.

It is also unrealistic to expect that we retain students who have not progressed sufficiently to ensure success during the next grade. Many of our at-risk students simply bide their time in school until they turn eighteen and then drop out. If we do not develop a plan to ensure they can meet their graduation criteria prior to their eighteenth birthday, they will likely not earn a diploma. Retaining students a whole year will make sure that these students will turn eighteen prior to meeting the criteria to earn their diploma.

Throughout all of these conversations across the state, educational professionals expressed the belief that, over time, we can overcome the educational outcomes posed by the pandemic. However, this will take time, and there’s certainly no silver bullet that will make it easy.

Matt Hurt is director of the Comprehensive Instructional Program, a coalition of non-metropolitan public school systems in Virginia.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

19 responses to “Teaching in the Time of COVID”

  1. LarrytheG Avatar

    Thanks Matt! Much appreciate your thoughtful commentary!

    Please note: ” Matt Hurt is director of the Comprehensive Instructional Program, a coalition of non-metropolitan public school systems in Virginia.”

    He appears to be speaking at least partially with respect to “non-metro” public schools which have had similar COVID problems and impacts with “in-person” and hybrid, etc. …. AND he has not deemed it necessary to blame “unions” nor impugn teachers as a group.

  2. ksmith8953 Avatar
    ksmith8953

    Matt, as always, this was an awesome read! Love the southwest. Great educators.

  3. LarrytheG Avatar

    Thanks Matt! Much appreciate your thoughtful commentary!

    Please note: ” Matt Hurt is director of the Comprehensive Instructional Program, a coalition of non-metropolitan public school systems in Virginia.”

    He appears to be speaking at least partially with respect to “non-metro” public schools which have had similar COVID problems and impacts with “in-person” and hybrid, etc. …. AND he has not deemed it necessary to blame “unions” nor impugn teachers as a group.

  4. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead V

    Good one Mr. Hurt! You have distilled the essence of a huge crisis in just a few short paragraphs.

    “it is unrealistic to expect that summer school, after-school tutoring, or extended school years can effectively make this problem go away by August.”

    This maybe true. But I think school teachers can put a big dent into this by August 2022. Sad to say that most current high school kids grades 9-12 will never fully recover from this. But the middle school and elementary kids can be remediated to the correct level of achievement.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      So here is a question. What would happen to these “problem” kids if they got sent off to a 24/7 school like Fork Union?

      Would some get changed and succeed or would others rebel and leave or what?

      What if the state offered poor parents this option for their kids?

      1. Matt Hurt Avatar

        They tried something like that about a hundred years ago- Indian Residential Schools. Not sure that worked very well.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          Sorta worked for the forefathers and generations of rich folks over generations though.

          Some kids need structure 24/7 and public schools can’t do that.

          That’s part of what the Charter School folks are saying – i.e. you have to wear uniforms, your parents have to participate, etc. The problem is the lack of structure when they are not at school.

          Used to be – you could join the military but now they don’t want you without at least a legitimate high-school level education sufficient to be able to read and write.

        2. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead V

          Mr. Hurt are you referring to the schools such as the Carlisle Boarding School in Pennsylvania from the days of the Dawes Act?

          1. Matt Hurt Avatar

            Yes sir.

      2. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead V

        You know Mr. Larry I think the folks at Fork Union are on to something. It is called the One Subject Plan. 5 grading periods. Each is grading period is 7 weeks long. One Subject only. One teacher. Small classes. Achievement appears to have soared thru the roof. I remember when I had to retake Geometry in summer school that 6 weeks of 7 hours a day emersion in Geometry with a great teacher took me out of the fog and into mastery of the subject. Take a look at this short video and tell me what you think.
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTVEBhbKPR4&feature=emb_logo

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          Yes, James. My suggestion about boarding schools was not flip. I know folks who went to boarding schools and they do have a place for some kids. I know some teachers who think that’s the only way some kids will succeed given their home situations.

          Clearly, what we are doing now in places like Richmond does not work for some kids.

          Used to be – some kids just sorta bumped along until they joined the military, got some structure, discipline, training and found their way to a better life , sometimes better than their parents.

          But now, kids in not-good socio-economic situations are more or less doomed unless they are the few that are lucky.

          We’re just breeding an under class with our policies.

  5. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead V

    Good one Mr. Hurt! You have distilled the essence of a huge crisis in just a few short paragraphs.

    “it is unrealistic to expect that summer school, after-school tutoring, or extended school years can effectively make this problem go away by August.”

    This maybe true. But I think school teachers can put a big dent into this by August 2022. Sad to say that most current high school kids grades 9-12 will never fully recover from this. But the middle school and elementary kids can be remediated to the correct level of achievement.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      So here is a question. What would happen to these “problem” kids if they got sent off to a 24/7 school like Fork Union?

      Would some get changed and succeed or would others rebel and leave or what?

      What if the state offered poor parents this option for their kids?

      1. Matt Hurt Avatar

        They tried something like that about a hundred years ago- Indian Residential Schools. Not sure that worked very well.

  6. ksmith8953 Avatar
    ksmith8953

    Matt, as always, this was an awesome read! Love the southwest. Great educators.

  7. Larry,

    I don’t want to be snarky in this case, though I will cop to that charge re: some of your posts.

    I agree with most of what you said. We will need new solutions. There are many of us who have been saying this for many years. Would you now agree that the money should follow the child? The public school teachers won’t return to school. Public schools are losing the funding per child not taught. When parents take their kids out of public schools because the teachers won’t go back into the schools, shouldn’t the money follow the kid to his next school.

    As to your last statement, “We’re just breeding an under class with our policies.”: You are exactly right, except I would argue your recognition of this fact comes about 40 years too late. Patrick Moynihan made this observation many years ago. But better late than never.

    I’m willing to bet you would agree that only Democrat politicians can accomplish this. Republicans will always be opposed in this effort, just like Republicans were opposed when they tried to pass 900 billion in stimulus money. Similarly, only Nixon could have made an approach to China because the opposite party supported it while his own party did not.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      re:

      ” I don’t want to be snarky in this case, though I will cop to that charge re: some of your posts.”

      snark is good.. way better than some of the other I see here. 😉

      ” Would you now agree that the money should follow the child? ”

      Yes but ONLY if the same level of transparency and accountability is present for academic performance. We’re not going to use public money on a false premise that some provider other than public schools can do better. They must provide their results and they give the money back if they fail!

      “The public school teachers won’t return to school. Public schools are losing the funding per child not taught. When parents take their kids out of public schools because the teachers won’t go back into the schools, shouldn’t the money follow the kid to his next school.”

      Public school teachers WILL return to school but I think also you may miss all the other things that public schools do besides pure academics that many are now crying about when public schools are not fully open.

      “As to your last statement, “We’re just breeding an under class with our policies.”: You are exactly right, except I would argue your recognition of this fact comes about 40 years too late. Patrick Moynihan made this observation many years ago. But better late than never.”

      No – that’s a false premise. The vast majority of public schools are GOOD – they do fine with kids of educated/decent income parents. They don’t do as good with low education/low income parents.

      Keep in mind also that all the rest of the developed countries schools that rank the best in the world ARE largely PUBLIC education.

      “I’m willing to bet you would agree that only Democrat politicians can accomplish this. Republicans will always be opposed in this effort, just like Republicans were opposed when they tried to pass 900 billion in stimulus money. Similarly, only Nixon could have made an approach to China because the opposite party supported it while his own party did not.”

      I’m willing to bet that Conservatives that talk about private/choice/charter schools being the solution are dead wrong if they think those alternative schools should not be held to the very same academic performance that we hold public schools to. I’m all for the competition but totally opposed to the bogus idea that charter/choice should be exempt from reporting academic performance and held accountable for it also.

  8. Larry,

    I don’t want to be snarky in this case, though I will cop to that charge re: some of your posts.

    I agree with most of what you said. We will need new solutions. There are many of us who have been saying this for many years. Would you now agree that the money should follow the child? The public school teachers won’t return to school. Public schools are losing the funding per child not taught. When parents take their kids out of public schools because the teachers won’t go back into the schools, shouldn’t the money follow the kid to his next school.

    As to your last statement, “We’re just breeding an under class with our policies.”: You are exactly right, except I would argue your recognition of this fact comes about 40 years too late. Patrick Moynihan made this observation many years ago. But better late than never.

    I’m willing to bet you would agree that only Democrat politicians can accomplish this. Republicans will always be opposed in this effort, just like Republicans were opposed when they tried to pass 900 billion in stimulus money. Similarly, only Nixon could have made an approach to China because the opposite party supported it while his own party did not.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      re:

      ” I don’t want to be snarky in this case, though I will cop to that charge re: some of your posts.”

      snark is good.. way better than some of the other I see here. 😉

      ” Would you now agree that the money should follow the child? ”

      Yes but ONLY if the same level of transparency and accountability is present for academic performance. We’re not going to use public money on a false premise that some provider other than public schools can do better. They must provide their results and they give the money back if they fail!

      “The public school teachers won’t return to school. Public schools are losing the funding per child not taught. When parents take their kids out of public schools because the teachers won’t go back into the schools, shouldn’t the money follow the kid to his next school.”

      Public school teachers WILL return to school but I think also you may miss all the other things that public schools do besides pure academics that many are now crying about when public schools are not fully open.

      “As to your last statement, “We’re just breeding an under class with our policies.”: You are exactly right, except I would argue your recognition of this fact comes about 40 years too late. Patrick Moynihan made this observation many years ago. But better late than never.”

      No – that’s a false premise. The vast majority of public schools are GOOD – they do fine with kids of educated/decent income parents. They don’t do as good with low education/low income parents.

      Keep in mind also that all the rest of the developed countries schools that rank the best in the world ARE largely PUBLIC education.

      “I’m willing to bet you would agree that only Democrat politicians can accomplish this. Republicans will always be opposed in this effort, just like Republicans were opposed when they tried to pass 900 billion in stimulus money. Similarly, only Nixon could have made an approach to China because the opposite party supported it while his own party did not.”

      I’m willing to bet that Conservatives that talk about private/choice/charter schools being the solution are dead wrong if they think those alternative schools should not be held to the very same academic performance that we hold public schools to. I’m all for the competition but totally opposed to the bogus idea that charter/choice should be exempt from reporting academic performance and held accountable for it also.

Leave a Reply