Taxation Through Misrepresentation

by Arthur G. Purves

Around June 28 Fairfax County homeowners will get their real estate tax bill, which is due July 28. The typical homeowner’s real estate tax bill will increase by $484, or 6.8%, from $7,159 to $7,643.

Around Sept. 5, Fairfax County car owners will get their personal property tax bill, which is due Oct. 5. The typical household’s personal property tax will increase by $151, or 36%, from $420 to $571.

Combining real estate and personal property tax increases, the typical household will have a $634, or 8.4% tax increase. This is the largest increase since Gerry Connolly’s 9.7% increase in 2006, at the end of the housing bubble. (When he was county chairman, Congressman Connolly increased taxes 15% in 2003, which makes him the record holder for the largest tax increase since 1982.)

However, if you read county chairman Jeff McKay’s April 26, 2022, newsletter about next year’s budget, you’d think your taxes are going down.

First, McKay says that the supervisors lowered the tax rate 3 cents, from $1.14 to $1.11. In fact, the supervisors increased the tax rate —  $1.11 is 7 cents higher than the $1.04 rate which would have prevented a tax increase due to higher assessments.

Virginia Code Section 58.1-3321 requires supervisors to compare the new rate of $1.11 not to the current $1.14 rate but to a lower rate that would offset the increase in assessments. For homeowners, that “lowered” rate is $1.04. Chairman McKay ignores the Virginia Code.

Also, Chairman McKay left out the storm water tax, which is also based on assessments. The storm water rate is 3 ¼ cents, so the total real estate tax rate is $1.14 ¼ cents, and not $1.11.

Second, Chairman McKay says, “The Board also agreed to a 15% reduction in the assessment of personal property (car) tax.…” However, used car values have increased so much that even with this 15% “reduction,” the typical household’s car tax bill will increase 36%.

Third, Chairman McKay cites “expanded tax relief for seniors,” which will increase the number of seniors eligible for tax relief by 2,000. There are about 160,000 seniors in the county, so the expanded tax relief benefits only about 1% of seniors.

Under compensation, Chairman McKay says all county employees are getting 4% raises. However, the supervisors’ budget package states that there will be “… average pay increases of 7.86 percent for uniformed public safety employees and 6.16 percent for non-uniformed employee.…”

All told, county revenue increases next year total $246 million. The total cost of raises and rate hikes for benefits for the county and schools (school employees are also getting 6% raises) is $252 million. So, the quarter-of-a-billion-dollar tax hike is all for raises and benefits.

Chairman McKay’s newsletter does not mention this. Instead, he says, “In total, this budget provides $199.4 million in tax relief.”

This is taxation by misrepresentation.

What McKay means is that the supervisors were thinking of raising taxes and other revenues by $445 million, but instead they  raised taxes and revenues only $246 million.

Suppose Chairman McKay had said that the supervisors effectively raised the real estate tax rate 7 cents rather than decreasing it 3 cents; that the rate is actually $1.14, not $1.11; that the car tax is going up 36%, not down 15%, that county employees are getting raises of 6% and 7%, not 4%, and that county revenues are increasing $246 million to pay for the raises and not going down by $199 million.

Would that jeopardize Chairman McKay’s reelection next year?

Arthur G. Purves is president of the Fairfax County Taxpayers Alliance. This column is republished with permission from the FCTA’s Bulletin.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

15 responses to “Taxation Through Misrepresentation”

  1. I am shocked — SHOCKED! — that a local politician would seek to describe an effectively-substantial property tax increase in a manner that is technically accurate yet minimizes its impact.

    But you’ve got something there with the VA Code section on the baseline for comparison. Was this requirement observed even nominally by the Fairfax Board itself in anything made public, as opposed to what’s in Chairman McKay’s press release?

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      “Newsletter” versus public notice. I suspect the required public notice has been or will be done and it will contain the equalized rate and other……….

      yes… “shocked” that a politician would dare to misrepresent an issue… scandalous!

  2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
    James C. Sherlock

    Thanks, Arthur. Excellent analysis.

  3. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    Taxes, especially property based, not declining!?!? Heresy. More folks paying greater taxes on the increasing value of property should mean a decrease. PTL there are those explaining (??!!!) the contradictions. Or, complaining. Pants on fire at the Government Center.

    1. WayneS Avatar

      Taxes are a necessary evil, yes, but did you miss the part where Fairfax real estate taxes have been increasing +/-3 times faster than household income?

      If they continue at this rate, then where will the money come from after they’ve bankrupted more than half the homeowners in the county and seized their property for failure to pay taxes? Or is that the plan? Drive out all but the richest people, more of whom can then flock to Fairfax to pick up vacant properties at bargain prices so they can tear down perfectly good middle-class-sized homes to construct super-McMansions and drive up property values even further, thereby allowing the county to collect even more taxes?

      Are you saying you support a county which raises its taxes at triple the rate of increases in household income? Be careful, or people might get the idea that “selfish” conservatives like me care more about “regular folks” than do our left-leaning friends.

      1. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        At least in Vienna that is currently already the practice. There isn’t any new land to develop, so developer purchase existing lots, tear down and rebuild which prices starting over $1,000,000.

        When we moved from Loudoun County (South Riding) they had recently built homes along Braddock road that started at $900,000. All this did was drive up the median house prices and push the middle class out.

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Local taxes? Whatever could they do with those? I can’t imagine. Oooh, oooh! Let’s not pay them and see what services we don’t get.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Fewer bike lanes which contain no bikes usually and bus routes which have no passengers. No more DEI bureaucracies, which are building at the local level. Fewer deputy assistant county managers, and assistant deputy superintendents. Eliminate slush funds which councilmembers or supervisors can give away to buy votes. The waste and silliness is just as common as at the federal level. If they had to meet the standards of the business world (lax enough) you’d see some amazing changes.

      Ask the folks in Uvalde if they feel good about the police budgets now….getting what they paid for?

      But what Purves is complaining about is behavior I’ve watched for 40 years. It is usually rewarded with re-election.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Never really feel like we get what we pay for with police budgets… I guess that is why they need to supplement with traffic tickets…

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          anti-taxxers in their heart of hearts really just resent the concept of taxation itself! The idea of the govt taking your money and spending it on things you don’t like – well.. it’s just not right!

          Uvalde , a not-untypical small-town force with poor training and incompetent leadership – that might be getting what was actually what you get with low taxes.

          But the real irony is perhaps those same anti-tax, pro-gun types advocating for more “hardened” schools – of course without increasing taxes……

      2. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        penny-wise, pound-foolish?

  5. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “Virginia Code Section 58.1-3321 requires supervisors to compare the new rate of $1.11 not to the current $1.14 rate but to a lower rate that would offset the increase in assessments. For homeowners, that “lowered” rate is $1.04. Chairman McKay ignores the Virginia Code.”

    I assume you found the flat tax rate (I also assume it is accurate – benefit of the doubt and all) from a County budget document… 🤷‍♂️

  6. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Lying about taxes, spending and deficits (at the federal level) has permeated all levels of government. This article does a good job of calling out Fairfax County. Other articles published on this blog have done a good job of describing he Northam Administration’s habit of hiding taxes within electric rates. Finally, this article debunk’s Biden’s lie about cutting he federal deficit:

    https://reason.com/2022/06/13/why-bidens-claim-of-cutting-the-deficit-is-false-in-a-single-chart/

    So long as the press in the United Staes continues to operate on life support politicians will continue to lie through their teeth about the actual fiscal impact of their actions and policies.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Biden did do it. Congress did. Right?

  7. VaNavVet Avatar
    VaNavVet

    Meanwhile the Fairfax County Public School district is paying thousands in legal fees associated with a lawsuit over the admission policy to its magnet high school. This over a matter that both sides should have been able to reach an easy compromise on. It is time for the school district to re-examine its policy on this magnet high school with an eye towards maximizing the benefit to all of the high school population.

Leave a Reply