Talking Out of Both Sides of Their Mouths

Route of proposed Coalfields Expressway

by Dick Hall-Sizemore

While perusing today’s edition of the Roanoke Times, I ran across an article that astounded me.  It concerned a meeting recently in Southwest Virginia about the Coalfields Expressway.  I remembered hearing about this proposed highway many, many years ago and thought that it had been dismissed as a pipe dream.  It turns out that the idea (and hope) is still alive.

The Coalfields Expressway would be a 115-mile federal four-lane, divided highway running from the intersection of I-64 and I-77 near Beckley, West Virginia to U.S. Rt. 23 in Pound, in Wise County.  West Virginia has opened 15 miles of its 66-mile portion of the proposed highway and another 21 miles are in various stages of construction or planning.  Virginia has begun constructing 7 miles of its 50-mile portion.  That stretch overlaps with Rt. 460, linking Grundy to Kentucky.  The cost of the Virginia portion is estimated at over $3 billion.

As reported by the Roanoke Times, Secretary of Transportation Sheppard Miller III earlier this week conducted a “listening session” in Southwest Virginia to discuss the Expressway.  Area leaders reminded Miller that the “Coalfields Expressway has been in the works for 28 years and is a long way from completion.”  Will Morefield, the Republican representing the area in the House of Delegates, remembered hearing it discussed when he was in elementary school (he was born in 1984).

All the area leaders stressed the importance of the highway to the area’s development.  “Many of our localities in the coalfields have lost half, if not more, of their population,” Morefield said. “The Coalfields Expressway is extremely important to economic development in the area…I’m confident we can finish this if we have an administration — and I’m confident Gov. Youngkin and his administration and you and your team are willing to do whatever it takes to continue this process and expedite the construction of this expressway. It is absolutely imperative.”

Virginia’s six-year transportation plan includes only $171.3 million for the Expressway, which would fund a little over two miles of road construction.  When he was asked where the remainder of the needed funding could come from, Miller replied, “We have more money than we’ve had in a while.  Virginia has been starved for transportation money, but I think there are better years ahead. We’ll do our best to take care of everybody. It’s a big state with a lot of needs. There are a lot of needs here.”

That comment was in sharp contrast to what he and his boss, Governor Youngkin, have been saying recently at the other end of the state.  Speaking in favor of Youngkin’s bill to suspend the gas tax for three months and then phase it back in over two months, as well as cap future increases, Miller told the House Finance Committee on April 19, “We have an exceptional amount of revenue that we did not expect a couple years ago in the transportation plan.  Over six years it’s in the billions of dollars. And obviously the governor has made a pledge to try to get some of the revenue back to the citizens who have contributed it to the commonwealth.”  It is estimated that the proposed bill (HB 6001) would result in a loss of $628 million in transportation revenue over seven years.  Most of that loss, $343.5 million, would occur in the upcoming fiscal year.  On May 10, Governor Youngkin continued to push for the legislation, contending, “We have more money in the system than we thought. Over a billion dollars more in the commonwealth transportation budget. It’s Virginians’ money and it’s time for us to let them have it.”  Apparently, the Governor feels having more money than you thought you would have means you don’t need it.  The folks in Southwest Virginia told his Secretary of Transportation something different and he seemed to agree.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

8 responses to “Talking Out of Both Sides of Their Mouths”

  1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
    James C. Sherlock

    Dick, Virginia law § 33.2-214.1. Statewide prioritization process for project selection was put in place in 2014 and modified over the next three years specifically to keep an outsized portion of state highway funds from going to thinly populated regions of the state. I specifically remember the legislative process that resulted in that law.

    “1. The prioritization process shall be based on an objective and quantifiable analysis that considers, at a minimum, the following factors relative to the cost of the project or strategy: congestion mitigation, economic development, accessibility, safety, and environmental quality.”

    The State Transportation Board is unlikely to find a formulaic way under that law to prioritize the Coalfields Expressway. It hasn’t been able to survive a cost-benefit analysis compared to other projects in the state.

    When talking about transportation funding differently in Northern Virginia than in Southwest Virginia, state transportation officials are talking about the constraints of that law. The amount of funding available does not change the priority calculations wrt the Coalfields Expressway.

    Now the General Assembly could pass a law specifically funding that highway, but with Southwestern Virginia’s shrinking representation in the General Assembly, it will be difficult.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      I know that. You know that. I am pretty sure that Sheppard Miller knows it, too. But, instead of telling those people in Southwest Virginia that, he seemed to give them hope. After all, they made it a point to remind him that the area had voted heavily for Youngkin in the last election.

      1. vicnicholls Avatar
        vicnicholls

        With politics you never know. Frankly I never, ever suspected that RvW would even be up for discussion.

  2. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    How can the Southwest increase economic opportunities and population without infrastructure? Stupid law in my opinion.

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Will it connect to a bridge in Alaska?

  4. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    In order to get federal funding, the states must show sources of funding, or the project will not be included in the (fiscally) constrained long-range plan. And then to actually receive federal money, the states must show they have the money, or the project will not be in the transportation improvement plan.

  5. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    The Biden/bipartisan federal infrastructure dollars are to some extent targeted towards disadvantaged communities …but perhaps rural coalfields is not in their scope.

  6. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    The law is known as SmartScale and it actually does allow a region to select it’s priority. NoVa and Hampton have picked congestion mitigation but Fredericksburg and many SW Va places have selected economic development as their priority.

    However, highways like the Coalfield Expressway no longer “work” the way they used to and it’s doubtful that it will do much for that region in the 21st century economy.

    Highways in rural areas are easier because land is cheap and easy to get. Land in urban areas is not and can easily cost a billion dollars for a few miles and an interchange or two and even then it usually does squat for congestion relief other than smooth the way to the next bottleneck.

    And TMT is correct. Each region, by Federal law, cannot have any more projects in it’s plan that it can demonstrate it has funding for.

    so the Coalfields Expressway is more a “concept” than a real plan.

Leave a Reply