SW Va Schools Seize Initiative Again, Create Regional Online Academy

by James A. Bacon

While Virginia’s public school bureaucracy fixates on racial justice issues and dithers over how to respond to the COVID-19 epidemic, ten school districts in Southwest Virginia are taking matters into their own hands by creating a regional virtual academy.

Under a Memorandum of Understanding signed by the ten districts, the regional academy will hire its own teachers and create its own curriculum. The group is discussing whether to contract with a private company, Herndon-based Stride Inc., or another entity expected to submit an offer this week.

Online classes would be offered at no charge to families with state funds allocated to school districts on a per-person basis, reports the Bristol Herald-Courier. The level of state funding is determined by a formula that calculates a locality’s ability to pay. The City of Bristol receives about $7,000 annually per student/ The virtual academy is expected to cost $3,500 per pupil. School districts would keep the balance.

The academy is expected to cost $1.78 million annually, based on an enrollment of 500 students. In addition to the City of Bristol, Participating school districts include the counties of Bland, Giles, Pulaski, Radford, Smyth, Tazewell, Washington and Wythe. Four others are considering the program, and four have rejected the idea.

“We’ve kind of been in a hurry to get this in place for when school starts next year,” Keith Perrigan, Bristol school superintendent, told the virtual academy’s new board last month. “Virtual learning may not look like it does now, next fall. But now that Pandora’s Box has been opened, we’re not going to shove virtual learning back into it. I don’t know what the right plan is, but to not have any plan is the worst possible direction we can take.”

Bacon’s bottom line: Hopefully, most students will return to in-person learning in public schools next year, but an online learning environment is preferable for some students. One would think that the Virginia Department of Education would have taken the initiative. For whatever reason, the Southwest Virginia localities decided to take matters into their own hands. They’ve done it before, bypassing Richmond to create the Comprehensive Instructional Program, which has contributed to significant gains in SOL scores in participating school systems. Perhaps SW Va schools have learned they can move more quickly by avoiding the politics, the bureaucracy, and the ideological peccadillos of the educrats in Richmond.

One other thing stands out: $3,500 cost per student! Are you serious? Average spending per student in Virginia was more than $12,300 in the 2017-18 school year, and it’s higher now. Obviously, the online experience doesn’t include everything the in-person experience does. But, then, with may schools shut down by the COVID-19 epidemic most students haven’t been getting the in-person experience. What an indictment of the state’s educational leadership.

I’m beginning to wonder if the best thing Virginia could do is shut down the entire Virginia Department of Education apparatus, send state funds directly to local school districts with no strings attached, and save taxpayers tens of millions of dollars in the process.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

29 responses to “SW Va Schools Seize Initiative Again, Create Regional Online Academy”

  1. LarrytheG Avatar

    Wait a minute. Aren’t you same guy who has been railing about the “failure” on online learning for K-12″ ?

    what gives?

    and then this:

    ” I’m beginning to wonder if the best thing Virginia could do is shut down the entire Virginia Department of Education apparatus, send state funds directly to local school districts with no strings attached, and save taxpayers tens of millions of dollars in the process.”

    So if you’re gonna shut down VDOE – why do you still want to collect taxes, send them to Richmond and re-allocate?

    Why not just stop the whole thing and let the localities figure it out all together?

    ‘Isn’t that what you are really advocating? Just let each locality do what they think is right for education?

    Let me see.. Kirk Cox is going to run on that, right? Oh no.. Amanda Chase… that’ll fix those tax and spend elites in Richmond right?

    I bet even DJ likes this!

    Youse guys – “conservatives’ are all over the map these days.. it’s hard to keep up! g 😉

    1. What is it about this sentence that you don’t understand?

      “Hopefully, most students will return to in-person learning in public schools next year, but an online learning environment is preferable for some students.”

      If you need amplification of that thought, students who can benefit from online learning are mostly older — as in high school level — meaning they have more self discipline and require less supervision than 1st graders, and/or they are handicapped.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        It’s a very different sentiment than what you have been saying PRIOR to this and if not mistaken – across the board for all k-12 , “virtual is inferior”.

        agree?

        Have you changed your mind if the public schools do what you say is better with a regional academy? What’s the difference?

        And finally – are you advocating that the state stop allocating money for education and leave it up to the localities?

        Why have the state collect taxes from the localities then send it back to them to spend ? Why not – let them not send it to Richmond to start with?

        1. Larry: It’s a very different sentiment than what you have been saying PRIOR to this and if not mistaken – across the board for all k-12 , “virtual is inferior”.

          agree?

          No, I don’t agree.

          The evidence is that a large segment of the public school population is doing just fine with online learning — mainly students who are motivated, have supportive families, and have access to technology. Returning to in-person learning is desirable for these students, especially younger students, but not mission-critical. The pressing need to return to in-person learning is for the benefit of the other students, perhaps 20%, who are not personally motivated, do not have supportive family environments, and/or do not have consistent access to broadband.

          I don’t care to argue endlessly with you, so that’s the last I’ll have to say on the subject.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar

    Wait a minute. Aren’t you same guy who has been railing about the “failure” on online learning for K-12″ ?

    what gives?

    and then this:

    ” I’m beginning to wonder if the best thing Virginia could do is shut down the entire Virginia Department of Education apparatus, send state funds directly to local school districts with no strings attached, and save taxpayers tens of millions of dollars in the process.”

    So if you’re gonna shut down VDOE – why do you still want to collect taxes, send them to Richmond and re-allocate?

    Why not just stop the whole thing and let the localities figure it out all together?

    ‘Isn’t that what you are really advocating? Just let each locality do what they think is right for education?

    Let me see.. Kirk Cox is going to run on that, right? Oh no.. Amanda Chase… that’ll fix those tax and spend elites in Richmond right?

    I bet even DJ likes this!

    Youse guys – “conservatives’ are all over the map these days.. it’s hard to keep up! g 😉

    1. What is it about this sentence that you don’t understand?

      “Hopefully, most students will return to in-person learning in public schools next year, but an online learning environment is preferable for some students.”

      If you need amplification of that thought, students who can benefit from online learning are mostly older — as in high school level — meaning they have more self discipline and require less supervision than 1st graders, and/or they are handicapped.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        It’s a very different sentiment than what you have been saying PRIOR to this and if not mistaken – across the board for all k-12 , “virtual is inferior”.

        agree?

        Have you changed your mind if the public schools do what you say is better with a regional academy? What’s the difference?

        And finally – are you advocating that the state stop allocating money for education and leave it up to the localities?

        Why have the state collect taxes from the localities then send it back to them to spend ? Why not – let them not send it to Richmond to start with?

  3. SuburbanWoman Avatar
    SuburbanWoman

    Smart move. As long as the state is in a “state of emergency” divisions must offer an online option. Hopefully this provides an online option that is focused and high quality. Teachers are struggling under current hybrid models.
    It seems SWVA is doing things right. SWVA has realized education has changed and will never return to only in person models.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      I agree but ask what’s the difference between a given school district virtual and a regional academy virtual unless it allows one regional teacher to teach virtual instead of one from each school in every district.

      and what is the difference between regional virtual academies and
      Virginia Virtual Academy | Online Schools in Virginia?

      All along – if you’re gonna do virtual – why not do it at a higher level that local schools – anyhow?

      Beyond that – “virtual” needs to be MORE than a teacher on a computer screen “teaching” like they would in a classroom.

      There needs to be software specifically developed for online/virtual learning and if it done right – you won’t even need an internet connection or can do it with a minimal cellular one.

      Online/virtual is not going to go away after the pandemic. It’s going to get better and better and become a significant resource to home-bound kids as well as kids living in rural areas where course selection is limited.

  4. SuburbanWoman Avatar
    SuburbanWoman

    Smart move. As long as the state is in a “state of emergency” divisions must offer an online option. Hopefully this provides an online option that is focused and high quality. Teachers are struggling under current hybrid models.
    It seems SWVA is doing things right. SWVA has realized education has changed and will never return to only in person models.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      I agree but ask what’s the difference between a given school district virtual and a regional academy virtual unless it allows one regional teacher to teach virtual instead of one from each school in every district.

      and what is the difference between regional virtual academies and
      Virginia Virtual Academy | Online Schools in Virginia?

      All along – if you’re gonna do virtual – why not do it at a higher level that local schools – anyhow?

      Beyond that – “virtual” needs to be MORE than a teacher on a computer screen “teaching” like they would in a classroom.

      There needs to be software specifically developed for online/virtual learning and if it done right – you won’t even need an internet connection or can do it with a minimal cellular one.

      Online/virtual is not going to go away after the pandemic. It’s going to get better and better and become a significant resource to home-bound kids as well as kids living in rural areas where course selection is limited.

  5. SuburbanWoman Avatar
    SuburbanWoman

    I would love to see the actual “plans” the candidates for Governor have in regard to opening schools. It is easy to travel around talking about “open schools now” but what is the actual plan? Has anyone seen actual plans? What will be different?

  6. SuburbanWoman Avatar
    SuburbanWoman

    I would love to see the actual “plans” the candidates for Governor have in regard to opening schools. It is easy to travel around talking about “open schools now” but what is the actual plan? Has anyone seen actual plans? What will be different?

  7. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead V

    The SW Virginia Virtual Academy looks very similar to Liberty University On Line Academy, minus Jesus. LUOA’s enrollment has soared from about 5,000 to 8,000 out a cost of $3,500 for 36 weeks of instruction. SWVA Academy could be a big success. There is a market for this kind of learning and it will only grow. I will be paying attention to their progress as they set sail on a maiden voyage.

  8. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead V

    The SW Virginia Virtual Academy looks very similar to Liberty University On Line Academy, minus Jesus. LUOA’s enrollment has soared from about 5,000 to 8,000 out a cost of $3,500 for 36 weeks of instruction. SWVA Academy could be a big success. There is a market for this kind of learning and it will only grow. I will be paying attention to their progress as they set sail on a maiden voyage.

  9. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
    Baconator with extra cheese

    This model should be the mechanism for the Equity the VDOE and RVA pretends to seek.
    For example.. this allows all public school students to be educated by outstanding Phd-level Black teachers. And each child can be taught at the gifted or Governor’s School curriculum. Fire the white teachers and adminstrators who supposedly have perpetrated the systemic racism that has plagued Black excellence. Save money by not building new schools and save the salaries of thousands of teachers and administrators. Use that money to build affordable housing on vacant school land, provide free high speed access, and free healthy food.
    I want all the excuses removed…. this may allow that. Be bold Dr Governor…. Equity awaits!

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      Yep. I think Virtual Virgiia has been around for some time.

      And I actually agree, this is a way for kids who do have potential but are locked into a low performing neighborhood school to escape.

      I still think you do not need high speed internet if the software is designed to work without internet – that’s a key issue for a lot of kids and it’s not going to get fixed anytime soon for all of them. In the meantime – a chromebook that can “teach” without internet can do the job.

      When you get down do it – what actually has to “move” in terms of data is small compared to the software itself. Trying to load software on a slow connection like cellular is a no go.

      Take the chromebook to school or have a newly loaded one with lessons delivered then have it “refreshed’ when ready for the next.

      All that is really needed is a neighborhood internet depot where you take the chromebook to reload then take back home.

  10. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
    Baconator with extra cheese

    This model should be the mechanism for the Equity the VDOE and RVA pretends to seek.
    For example.. this allows all public school students to be educated by outstanding Phd-level Black teachers. And each child can be taught at the gifted or Governor’s School curriculum. Fire the white teachers and adminstrators who supposedly have perpetrated the systemic racism that has plagued Black excellence. Save money by not building new schools and save the salaries of thousands of teachers and administrators. Use that money to build affordable housing on vacant school land, provide free high speed access, and free healthy food.
    I want all the excuses removed…. this may allow that. Be bold Dr Governor…. Equity awaits!

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      Yep. I think Virtual Virgiia has been around for some time.

      And I actually agree, this is a way for kids who do have potential but are locked into a low performing neighborhood school to escape.

      I still think you do not need high speed internet if the software is designed to work without internet – that’s a key issue for a lot of kids and it’s not going to get fixed anytime soon for all of them. In the meantime – a chromebook that can “teach” without internet can do the job.

      When you get down do it – what actually has to “move” in terms of data is small compared to the software itself. Trying to load software on a slow connection like cellular is a no go.

      Take the chromebook to school or have a newly loaded one with lessons delivered then have it “refreshed’ when ready for the next.

      All that is really needed is a neighborhood internet depot where you take the chromebook to reload then take back home.

  11. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
    Baconator with extra cheese

    Besides the Teachers Unions are proclaiming their safety is more important than in-person instruction… Give them what they demand… all the safety of their own homes.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      We may agree more than you think!

      While, I don’t think a lot of teachers are anything but professional and not easily replaced by others with less training – but over the longer term – if virtual gets better and better, then more and more kids who are not well served will have an alternative path to get a decent education and that MIGHT lead to lesser need for teachers – but not short term. More like DOD working to reduce manpower needs.

      And, as usual, the parent will play a role in terms of keeping the kid on task – whether they be going to a bricks and mortar school or a virtual one.

      I have optimism based on hope for the future – as opposed to assigning blame for current failures. Blame might be temporarily satisfying but it
      don’t get you to solutions and it actually become an obstacle to that.

      Blame is easy and totally a failure in its own right.

      We have a long way to go for really-really-good virtual but we’re on a path and that’s a good thing.

      I don’t expect most public school districts to be innovators but followers and some pretty bad.

      I have more faith in the private sector to do “good” software and if Virginia and/or the regions go “virtual” then the issue will be who does the software and what are their qualifications for producing “good” software – way more than ordinary teachers.. but can’t do without teachers who understand the content.

      1. “Blame might be temporarily satisfying but it don’t get you to solutions and it actually become an obstacle to that.”

        I agree with that – except when those who are to blame for the problem are not only not gotten rid of, but are the ones tasked with [and paid large salaries for] “solving” said problem.

  12. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
    Baconator with extra cheese

    Besides the Teachers Unions are proclaiming their safety is more important than in-person instruction… Give them what they demand… all the safety of their own homes.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      We may agree more than you think!

      While, I don’t think a lot of teachers are anything but professional and not easily replaced by others with less training – but over the longer term – if virtual gets better and better, then more and more kids who are not well served will have an alternative path to get a decent education and that MIGHT lead to lesser need for teachers – but not short term. More like DOD working to reduce manpower needs.

      And, as usual, the parent will play a role in terms of keeping the kid on task – whether they be going to a bricks and mortar school or a virtual one.

      I have optimism based on hope for the future – as opposed to assigning blame for current failures. Blame might be temporarily satisfying but it
      don’t get you to solutions and it actually become an obstacle to that.

      Blame is easy and totally a failure in its own right.

      We have a long way to go for really-really-good virtual but we’re on a path and that’s a good thing.

      I don’t expect most public school districts to be innovators but followers and some pretty bad.

      I have more faith in the private sector to do “good” software and if Virginia and/or the regions go “virtual” then the issue will be who does the software and what are their qualifications for producing “good” software – way more than ordinary teachers.. but can’t do without teachers who understand the content.

      1. “Blame might be temporarily satisfying but it don’t get you to solutions and it actually become an obstacle to that.”

        I agree with that – except when those who are to blame for the problem are not only not gotten rid of, but are the ones tasked with [and paid large salaries for] “solving” said problem.

  13. ksmith8953 Avatar

    As the director of school improvement at the department of education for many years, the southwest never once let me down. Top notch! They get the work done. No belly aching, just a common sense approach and altruistic intent to help each other!

  14. ksmith8953 Avatar

    As the director of school improvement at the department of education for many years, the southwest never once let me down. Top notch! They get the work done. No belly aching, just a common sense approach and altruistic intent to help each other!

  15. Seems kind of silly to spend money on a regional bureaucracy when there is already VAVA

  16. Seems kind of silly to spend money on a regional bureaucracy when there is already VAVA

Leave a Reply