Courtesy californiahumandevelopment.org

by James C. Sherlock

The Richmond Times-Dispatch, on cue, wrote in an editorial the other day that more state money was needed to fund local housing.

Maybe.

But that is not the first place to look.

The governor wants to condition development aid to local communities on their reforming land-use policies to permit more construction.

I have a few ideas along that line.

Proffers, also known as conditional zoning, are a recognition that real estate developments have impacts on other properties and on services provided by the local jurisdiction. Fair enough.

The money for roads, sewers and schools has to come from somewhere. Proffers make the developers and their customers pay for a share of capital improvements deemed necessary by city/county planners.

Wielded unpredictably, and sometimes unethically, they are also part of the problem. See the excellent article Politics and Proffers by Matt Ahern for the games played with proffers and their cost to the housing economy.

Then there is low-cost housing.

The Commonwealth by law permits but does not require localities to waive fees for low-cost housing. That law, originally and curiously restricted to only non-profit developers, was updated in 2019 to permit the same waivers to for-profit builders.

Send state housing funds only to jurisdictions that do so. Require in law a limit to the costs of proffers for low-cost housing.

Finally, tax Virginia’s astonishingly profitable non-profit hospitals to help them with their mission of caring for the disadvantaged — in this case in low-cost housing.

Proffers. The Governor and General Assembly should look at Virginia’s laws on proffers and tighten them up.

The goals will include fair opportunities to every builder, reasonable certainty of development costs and fair hearings before the city councils and county boards.

Those steps will increase private sector efforts to produce housing.

I don’t know about where you live, but Virginia Beach City Council elections have been about development for as long as Virginia Beach has been a city.

Our city council has never been able to plead ignorance of real estate matters. It has had a majority of members from the real estate and banking industries seemingly forever.

  • It has protected and catered to favored developers and put up roadblocks to those not on the “list.” Out-of-town developers are far less likely to have projects approved, and they know it.
  • The city’s proffer demands can make housing projects good or bad business investments subject only to the vote of the council.
  • The same city council has been regularly subject to reverse proffers from favored developers for projects large and small — noting what the city must do for the developer in return for future tax receipts.
  • Proffer “flexibility” has been further corrupted by the advantages of projects funded by favored lenders.

Virginia’s General Assembly should move to assess its current laws to maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of proffers with new development and re-development proposals, and coordinate proffered improvements with other funding sources.

More than anything, proffers should not be a black box that subject the developer and development to the whims — favor or disfavor — of city councils and county boards.

Virginia laws concerning proffers are in the Code of Virginia as “conditional zoning” under Title 15.2 of the Code of Virginia, Sections 15.2-2296 through 15.2-2303.4.

See just § 15.2-2242. Optional provisions of a subdivision ordinance. To get a feel for some of the ad hoc nonsense that builders are alternately burdened or advantaged by in trying to build projects, see # 7, “Provisions, in any town with a population between 14,500 and 15,000,”  carve out.

So when the Governor talks about localities removing roadblocks, proffers are part of the issue. As Mr. Ahern wrote: “Perhaps it is time to look at a different method altogether for addressing land use.”

State law as written enables city councils and county boards to make developments endlessly political — subject to campaign contributions and old boy networks — rather than decisions constrained by common and specific standards tightly drawn for the good of the citizens.

Some readers will complain that I am not for local control of zoning.  I am. But it has been clear to anyone drawing breath in Virginia Beach for at least six decades that we need stronger and clearer definitions of the limits of proffers in state law.  

Local redevelopment agencies. Virginia’s local redevelopment and housing authorities are ripe for efficiency and effectiveness improvements. I have written about some of them. My perspective is that some are overstaffed and underproductive, spending too high a percentage of public housing funds on staffs to manage them.

The local management of policy and handling of funds for such programs as § 15.2-735. Local housing fund and voluntary coordinated housing preservation and development districts require skill and dedication.

But I strongly recommend the state determine whether all of those staffs with very long waiting lists for low-income housing and little housing to offer meet a test of rendering value for cost.

Property taxes on non-profit hospitals. I have written for many years about the profits of Virginia’s non-profit general hospitals that last year and for many before that were on average four times the national averages. They simply do not provide sufficient community support to justify their tax exemptions.

Housing improves health.

Tax non-profit hospitals to help build it. Exempt the rural Critical Access Hospitals. Levy property and sales taxes at regular rates and spend half of the revenue for low-cost housing. Leave the rest with local governments who have been providing uncompensated services to those same hospitals forever.

Bottom line. So I offer four potential action items at the state level that do not require the spending of additional state money.

  • Eliminate from state law “optional” proffer provisions for local jurisdictions, tighten the definitions of the permanent ones and examine other ways to make land use decisions;  
  • Audit local housing and redevelopment agencies and provide continuing oversight to optimize their efficiency and effectiveness in spending federal, state and local funds;
  • Link state housing funds to the waiver by jurisdictions of fees for low cost housing and limit the costs of proffers for low cost housing; and
  • Levy property and sales taxes on Virginia’s extraordinarily profitable non-profit hospitals. Dedicate a portion of the receipts to low cost housing in the communities where the hospitals are located. It would do them a favor by helping them achieve their missions that they have been unable to achieve on their own.

Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

33 responses to “Suggestions to Ease Virginia’s Housing Crisis without Additional State Money”

  1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “Tax non-profit hospitals to help build it”

    First do churches…

    Regarding proffers, as I understand, they only apply to re-zoning and then only to the houses that are in addition to those allowed by-right. Would be interested in seeing what the net per unit cost of proffers are before we start tying them to laws supposedly designed to create more affordable housing.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Start by taxing the RF bands — a signal tax — and gouge the televangelists first.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        this is yet another version of “tax the man behind the tree” but set the rules so that the localities have to do it instead of the state.

        there is no free lunch on affordable housing just like there is not on other programs to “help” those who are “in need”.

        Conservatives don’t like the game. They want out….. another version of “let them eat cake”?

        DANG, I should have ADDED this to my existing comment… that Sherlock spreadsheet counter is …. counting!

  2. Lefty665 Avatar

    Proffers are problematic, and need reform. I support your efforts there. However, you do your argument no favors by fundamentally misrepresenting not for profits, hospitals or otherwise.

    Not for profits by definition do not have profits. That is why we call them “not for profit”. They have income and expenses. If they have income in excess of expenses that is an increase. If expenses exceed income they have a decrease. Those either increase fund balances or decrease them. You object to, and intentionally pejoratively misidentify, not for profit increases.

    Further, not for profits are required by law to apply increases to advancing their charitable purpose. It is profoundly unlikely the charitable purpose for a hospital is housing construction instead of health care. You have presented no evidence that any of Virginia’s not for profit hospitals have misappropriated any of their fund balances for things other than their charitable purpose.

    Your proposal to tax not for profits is flatly contrary to the reason organizations with charitable purposes are granted tax exemption. It is a terrible idea. You can do better.

    There may be merit in your criticisms of not for profit hospitals, proffers and the politics of construction. By conflating them you discredit your arguments. You can do better.

    1. vicnicholls Avatar
      vicnicholls

      How do explain the clout Sentara has – especially after it dumped MILLIONS of dollars onto the taxpayers from the EVMS ODU venture?

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Developers? New developments are almost by definition beyond the price of “affordable” housing. Tack on additional costs and then the almost is assuredly removed.

  4. LarrytheG Avatar

    Geeze, calls for MORE govt and MORE regulation!

    😉

    Proffers only cover capital costs.

    It’s the operational costs that go on year after year that are much “more” an issue IMO.

    Like water/sewer – got the hook-up costs and then the operational costs, Even the hook-up costs are really predicated
    on paying back the bonds on an annual basis.

    Schools. Yep the school might cost 50-100 million up front but the payroll for the teachers, custodians, bus drivers, maintenance go on year after year.

    Highways are different because they are mostly paid for by state level taxes which as far as I know, Youngkin is not proposing to reduce for low income folks.

    Spotsylvania requires from each zoning proposal a fiscal analysis that compares how much tax the project will generate versus how much services like public safety, schools, etc will cost and they often will not approve a proposal that has a “loss”. Even for projects that are claimed to be “affordable”.

    The rationale is simple, If a project will not pay for itself, then other taxpayers must make it up.

    That’s the essential nut of this problem IMO.

    You say it’s not money, but then you propose regulations and laws that actually end up making it about money and about the locality having to “eat” it.

    That’s simply not going to fly, That’s WHY the counties and cities want to have discussions WITH Youngkin rather than be on the other end of top-down edicts.

    1. how_it_works Avatar
      how_it_works

      “The rationale is simple, If a project will not pay for itself, then other taxpayers must make it up.”

      The other taxpayers being the commercial/industrial taxpayers which Spotsy, being a bedroom community, has very little of.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        There are something like 54,000 housing units in Spotsy believe it or not.

        So… real estate taxes, sales taxes, meals taxes and vehicle taxes and they do ding pretty good on late model vehicles.

        1. how_it_works Avatar
          how_it_works

          If new development is tax negative, so is old development.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            less than before…. I think…

            every rezone has to provide a fiscal impact analysis and the county has their own model also.

            they’re actually quite detailed… and if a proposal is negative , it can be turned down depending on what the other positives are.

            The harder problem is regional traffic. Stafford has road impact fees but even them cannot assess for impacts to regional traffic. That’s VDOT’s thing and it basically reacts after the fact and takes years, decades to “mitigate” but by that time there’s way more to mitigate than when planning reacted.

            The county gets it’s pound of flesh on residential also. They keep up with changing assessments and they go to the limit on values… I know.. they nail me every year on an raw land lot without access to water/sewer… It’s assessed more than 5 times what I paid for it years ago and I’m pretty sure I cannot sell it for what it’s assessed at.

  5. dave schutz Avatar
    dave schutz

    Khruschyovkas! https://www.aljazeera.com/gallery/2019/2/25/life-inside-a-kiev-khrushchyovka-soviet-architecture-in-ukraine Virgnia’s should be better built and less crowded, but there are big cost savings available with factory built housing, and revising state building codes to enable needs to be part of a solution.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      Yeah. I’ve notice that also. Old soviet style “housing” , even lower cost than manufactured housing or trailer parks or even campgrounds with permanent campers.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          It’s the cost of the land where you put it…. though….

          Then the locality has to figure out how much it will cost to provide services to them versus how much they pay in property taxes.

          The battle-cry is “let the free market “work” ” but then we blame the locality for trying to make sure each housing unit pays for it’s services without being subsidized by other taxpayers.

          Yes localities do enact regulations that basically require each housing unit pay for its consumed services so having the state or GOv “mandate” that they not do that – seems not a real solution, i.e. “state govt blaming local govt”.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      I understand Russia is in the process of replacing those.

      1. dave schutz Avatar
        dave schutz

        When the Khrushchyovkas were built in the 50s they had an expected life of 25 years, so it’s time… But it’s the idea of bringing panels and kitchen modules from a nearby factory to assemble on site which I think Virginia ought to be including in Youngkin’s wish list.

  6. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    The United States and the individual states need to take a very hard look at nonprofits generally. There is a big difference between those that work and spend most of their “income” to aid people directly and those that amass hundreds of millions of dollars and/or spend money to influence public policy and opinion. Ditto for private foundations. Many pay executives more than $1 million in annual compensation. Not quite soup kitchens.

    Exempting builders of low-income housing from impact fees or, in Virginia, proffers, is a subject worth debating. But there first needs to be disclosure of the facts about the costs of infrastructure and what happens to infrastructure and local taxes if low-income housing (must be defined) is exempt from proffers or impact fees.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Thanks for the contribution. The last CEO of Sentara was making north of $7 million a year.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        And UVa’s football coach?

  7. Ken Reid Avatar

    Where do I begin? Have any of you been in my boots and had to negotiate proffers? I did as a Loudoun elected official for 10 years and what it comes down to is “zoning for dollars.” Developers buy votes with proffers — and a wink to help the supervisor or councilemmber in their next campaign. I would much prefer the general assembly scrap them in favor of developer agreements whereby the developer agrees to pay for certain infrastructure and even operating through service district taxes on the new development and then allot units for rentals for lower income people (it’s called affordable dwelling units — afdus). Or, develop impact fees whereby there’s a schedule of costs decided by a true impartial ecomomic analysis, not political whim and need. I cannot begin to tell you the number of poorly proffered developments in Loudoun since the developer had the votes and no need to negotiate further. But heres the bottom line: the lack of affordable housing seems to be in areas with a lot of income gap; i.e. very wealthy educated types at the top of the service economy heap, and a ton of people at the bottom who are teh landscapers, maids, nannies, etc. making little income. Then, you have high growth areas like Loudoun and Prince william where people fight against new housing!
    What’s a poor politician to do}? But in places like Hampton Roads where theres a lot of good high wage blue collar jobs, you never hear about affordable housing because there’s a mix of housing that a number of people can afford.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      re: ” But heres the bottom line: the lack of affordable housing seems to be in areas with a lot of income gap; i.e. very wealthy educated types at the top of the service economy heap, and a ton of people at the bottom who are teh landscapers, maids, nannies, etc. making little income.”

      I agree. You need service workers but where can they afford to live?

      And these are folks down a notch from teachers and deputies and fire fighters.

      You can create service districts for commercial development like roads and similar, I’m not sure I’ve seen one for residential, perhaps, but it’s the regional traffic generated from a lot of residential development that impacts and proffers cannot be used except for direct development impacts.

      The big The Big Kahuna is public school annual operating costs. Few taxpayers pay anywhere near the actual costs and it really boils down to a lot of folks without kids paying their “share” to keep it “affordable”. Basically singles , married without kids and retired pay the freight for schools. There aint no way around that.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        “I agree. You need service workers but where can they afford to live?”

        How does West Palm Beach do it?

      2. Super Brain Avatar
        Super Brain

        The retired can get real estate tax exemptions and larger state tax deductions.

    2. Or, develop impact fees whereby there’s a schedule of costs decided by a true impartial economic analysis, not political whim and need.

      I would give this ‘upvotes’ if I could. If impact fees for schools, police, emergency services, etc. were approached the same way as water and sewer connection fees (aka capital charges) , then we’d be a whole lot closer to development paying the cost of development than we are now.

      And, a system of of discounted impact fees could be developed to encourage construction of affordable housing. A system in which discounts are computed using a standard formula based on the amount of affordable housing being constructed would help prevent corruption or favoritism to certain developers..

    3. Or, develop impact fees whereby there’s a schedule of costs decided by a true impartial economic analysis, not political whim and need.

      I would give this ‘upvotes’ if I could. If impact fees for schools, police, emergency services, etc. were approached the same way as water and sewer connection fees (aka capital charges) , then we’d be a whole lot closer to development paying the cost of development than we are now.

      And, a system of of discounted impact fees could be developed to encourage construction of affordable housing. A system in which discounts are computed using a standard formula based on the amount of affordable housing being constructed would help prevent corruption or favoritism to certain developers..

  8. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    I dunno, maybe such already exists, but why not STOP selling dilapidated, tax delinquent property seized from one slum lord to another slum lord. How about a rehab partnership instead? Yeah, it’ll require law changes and oversight, but you wind up with subsidized affordable housing instead of creeping sprawl.

    1. how_it_works Avatar
      how_it_works

      One man’s slum lord is another man’s affordable housing provider.

  9. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Your discussion of proffers seems to be based primarily on the 2009 article by Matt Ohem. That article is badly dated. There were major revisions of the proffer sections of the Code of Virginia in 2016 and 2019.

    https://ggwash.org/view/71307/virginia-general-assembly-fixes-the-reform-on-residential-proffers

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      The proffer system has been pretty much gutted where I live. Right now, the rules seem to be no proffers for schools unless the school is over capacity in the district where the development is proposed. And even that changes if the districts are re-allocated.

      A elementary school might cost 50 million – but if it has 50 teachers earning 50K that’s 2.5 million and it does not count cafeteria, custodial, maintenance or bus drivers which will be added to the debt service on the school cost. Add the two together and it becomes a question of 400 kids needing 5K each of local funding – and think in terms of how much real estate tax the parents are paying on their home. The home has to be 500-600k to provide about 5k in tax revenue and that’s not counting money needed for public safety and other county services.

      The only way it works is for others without kids to pay taxes – that “old” income transfer thing.

  10. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Another I-read-an-OpEd-and-am-now-well-qualified OpEd…

  11. Super Brain Avatar
    Super Brain

    Housing Authorities have annual audits since 1984. Before that the requirement was for biannual audits.
    The Auditor of Public Accounts has never paid much attention to RRHA’s.

Leave a Reply